Synthetic Evaluation on Decision of Public Bidding for Construction Project

Public bidding is the international current practice to contract construction project. But the decision on the bidding often is made according to the qualitative evaluation based on the subjective opinion of specialists. Therefore, the fuzzy mathematics principle was applied and a synthetic evaluation model was established to provide an effective method for the development of quantitative bidding decision in this paper.

Detection Tool for Unbalanced Bids

Unbalanced bidding is a cash flow management strategy that is recognized as an illegal/disqualifying practice by public owners;and unethical practice by most private owners. This practice provides the awarded bidder with unjustified advantages at the expense of the owner. Unfortunately, limited tools and techniques are currently available to identify and detect unbalanced bids during the evaluation process. This paper presents an innovative detection tool to identify unbalanced bids in unit price contracts during the bid evaluation process. The proposed technique develops BMDI graphs to visualize total markup variation patterns during the project lifetime to detect unbalanced bids. The proposed method also uses Monte Carlo simulation to take in consideration the impact of cost uncertainties and risks. An illustrative example was presented to show the capabilities and features of the proposed method in determining the status of submitted bids during the evaluation process.

Applying Fuzzy Matter-Element Model Based on AHP to Evaluating Bids of Water Saving Irrigation Project

Owing to overcoming the characteristics that there are many economic and technical indexes which are fuzzy and incompatibility to each other in evaluating investment project,a new method is proposed.The method is based on the matter-element analysis and combined with the concepts of fuzzy mathematics,which is called the method of fuzzy matter-element analysis.It constructs the compound fuzzy matter element with the investment projects,evaluation factors and their fuzzy value.Through establishing the best subjection degree (fuzzy value),complex fuzzy matter element of relational coefficient and weight aggregation of fuzzy matter-element model,the writer achieves on optimum order of the investment projects according to the calculated relational degree and finds the best project.In this paper,the calculation of weight adopts the analytical hierarchy process method(AHP).Through the actual example,it shows that the model is simple and its calculation is reliable.It is very significant for the engineering evaluated bid and investment decision.

A Grey Decision Model Used in Bidding for Equipment Purchase

Bidding has long been used as a method for allocating and procuring goods and services. An acurrate and comprehensive evaluation of bidders is the key to make the bidding a successful one for tenderee. However, evaluation of bidders is a tough work and the result of evaluation is always affected by the evaluator's understanding of the standards set for evaluation, and the evaluator's expertise, experience and preferrence. We make an effort to find a method for selecting bidders as accurately as possible. A grey decision model is presented, and an example is illustrated to make the practioners know how to use the model.

Research and Application of FAHP in Bidding Quotation for Petroleum Geophysical Prospecting Project

This paper mainly talks about the main layer analytical method, and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, fuzzy hierarchical analysis (AHP) method of a deeper connotation, and further discusses its application in bidding quotation for petroleum geophysical prospecting project. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) integrates many merits of AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation organically. It determines the weight of each affecting factor using analytic hierarchy process at first, and then uses the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to determine each scheme index. FAHP can effectively enhance the decision-making efficiency.

Research and Application of Construction Project Cost Control in Engineering Bidding Stage

In order to strengthen cost control in construction project bidding stage, this paper takes the price control in bidding stage as the main line, dedicated to determine the key point in the stage of cost control, and establishes the more objective and reasonable evaluation in view of the comprehensive evaluation method, and combined with the practical application of engineering to demonstrate. This paper not only improved the tendering and bidding stage method of cost control in construction project in our country, and improves the method system of engineering cost control.

油气勘查出让区块价值评估方法研究

近年来,我国持续深化油气矿产资源管理改革,全面推行油气矿业权竞争性出让政策,矿业权出让市场竞价激烈,石油公司竞得矿业权面临挑战。面对新政策新形势,如何在较短期内高效、科学评估出让区块价值,为矿业权竞标决策赢得主动,是当前需要研究的重要课题。本文探索建立一种快速高效、科学合理的矿业权地质评价和价值评估方法流程,研究提出了基于勘查程度、成藏条件、资源规模和技术经济条件等4大要素,15项关键评价参数的定量与定性相结合的勘探潜力评价方法,建立了基于风险概率统计分析方法的区块地质风险评价标准;分析不同价值评估方法,优选适用于当前低勘探程度出让区块的预期货币价值法开展价值评估;并应用实例进行分析,为油气企业实现出让区块地质评价和价值评估,制定竞价方案提供参考依据。

新业态下建设工程评标典型问题与对策研究

本文通过梳理近两年政府采购投诉处理案例,探讨了建设工程评标中“允许实质性响应细微偏差澄清”“对否决投标条款外的异常内容未作审查”“不平衡报价直接作废标处理”以及“更改不合理的评分办法”四类突出典型问题,通过分析其表现形式,援引相关法律法规,提出规范的评标处理建议。

安徽省公共资源交易开评标现场管理标准化研究与应用

开标、评标环节是公共资源交易活动的核心,也是体现公共资源交易效率和公平性的重要内容,一直备受社会关注。本文在深入分析安徽省公共资源交易标准化服务现状的基础上,探讨了公共资源交易开评标现场管理过程中,运用标准化的形式对实践工作的先进经验进行提炼固化的问题。提出对开评标现场管理的规范化、标准化建设的基本要求,明确现场管理内容,促进公共资源交易现场管理的标准化水平提升,为公共资源交易服务提质增效起到重要支撑作用。

超效率DEA+FCA模型在工程项目评标中的应用

评标办法是否科学合理关系着招投标交易的结果和后续的工程建设,而目前现行的评标办法指标权重的确定包含着大量的人为经验因素,缺乏严谨的数学模型。将超效率DEA方法引入到工程项目评标中,结合模糊综合评价方法对定性指标进行量化,不仅能够克服现行评标办法中的人为因素缺陷,而且可以对各投标单位投入产出效率值进行直接排序,更科学地向建设单位推荐出中标者。经过实证,超效率DEA+FCA评标模型科学合理、方便快捷、公平有效。

“最低评标价法”之探析

“最低评标价法”是一种国际通行的评标方式,旨在通过合理的价格竞争选择最优投标方案。然而,在我国的实践中,该方法经历多次修改,逐渐偏离初衷,导致最低投标报价与最低价中标二者概念混淆,非价格因素与评标逻辑冲突,从而影响了政府采购的公正与效率。本文明确区分“评标价”与“投标报价”,建立科学的评标体系,设计合理的评标标准,确保价格因素与非价格因素之间的平衡,以规范最低评标价法在政府采购中的应用。

建设项目评标质量改进研究

为了全面改善建设单位招标质效,保证建设项目的顺利推进,结合当前建筑市场招投标领域的现状,详细分析投标文件质量、评标时间、评委素质等对评标科学性的影响。依据招投标相关法规,结合工作实际有针对性提出相应改进措施,使投标文件的条理性、易读性得到有效改善,评标时间的确定更加科学,抽选的专家更具有专业性,专家素质实现动态提升。本研究期望有效提升评标效率和质量,保证评标的规范性和科学性。

Determining winner in multi-attribute procurement auction:a method based on technical and business experts' evaluation information

A method for solving the winner determination problem （WDP） in multi-attribute procurement auctions is proposed, based on technical and business experts＇ evaluation information. Firstly, on the background of procurements in China, a multi-attribute pro- curement auction mechanism is presented, where technical and business experts participate in the bid evaluation. Then, the concept of TOPSIS is used to determine the positive and negative ideal points of the WDP according to bid prices, the technical and business experts＇ evaluation information. Further, the closeness coefficient of each bidder （candidate supplier） is obtained by calculating the distances to the positive and negative ideal points. Thus, the winning supplier can be determined according to the closeness coefficients. Finally, a numerical example is used to illustrate the use of the proposed method.

论解决政府采购评委成员意见分歧的思考

政府采购过程是一个很长的链条,政府采购的最终结果,往往取决于评审结果,而评审结果又依赖于评标委员会成员意见。在实际评审中,评委成员难免出现意见不一情形,现行处理分歧的法规没有明确或相互冲突,为推进评审进程,实践中有些公共资源交易中心简单地采取多数决规则解决评委成员间关于共同认定事项的意见分歧,但是多数决规则有着诸多局限,并非所有意见分歧都能通过多数决方式解决,有必要重新界定多数决规则在评审中适用边界和适用规则。

招标项目后评价的研究与应用

质量是企业生命之本,其工程、物资和服务采购选商,是招标管理首先面临的工作。选商质量优劣对项目建设期投资控制、安全监管和工程总体质量把控具有重要意义。为保证企业招标选商合法合规,持续提升招标管理水平和工程建设质量,在招投标过程结束合同履约期内或履约期满后,通过有序组织领导,抽取一定数量招标项目,设置后评价指标,确定后评价方法,建立后评价体系,应用电子招标交易平台生成的大量招投标过程数据和合同履约期有关资料,对抽取的招标项目逐一进行招投标、合同签订及履约全过程复盘评价,查找问题所在,总结成果经验,建立各方有效反馈机制,就招标项目后评价实操过程有关内容提出建设性意见,为企业开展招标项目后评价提供有力参考,促进企业招投标质量持续提升。

PSCC校食材采购项目案例分析

以PSCC校食材采购项目为研究案例,通过对案例项目招标采购创新点及相关问题进行经验分享和综合分析,提出扎实充分的采购需求调研、公开招标的采购方式、可操作性和系统性的评标机制以及动态调整的定价机制等措施,确保招标采购工作质量的同时降低潜在风险,以期为高校类似项目招标采购工作提供参考和借鉴。

关于远程异地评标的实践与探讨

近年来,随着招标投标交易活动全流程电子化推行,在相关政策文件的要求下,各地采用跨省、跨地市、跨县市区的远程异地评标如雨后春笋,有效地弱化了因地域“朋友圈”或人际“小团体”等关系对招标投标交易活动,特别是重大投资项目引发的“围”“串”“堵”的不良影响,大大提高了招投标交易活动的质量与效率,营造了更加公开、公平、公正的公共资源交易营商环境。但在实施过程中也发现了部分问题亟待解决,制约远程异地评标健康发展。

机械设备采购评标方法与融入全寿命周期因素研究

在目前提倡绿色低碳环保的环境下,全寿命周期成本估量已被纳入到成本计算中。在工程、装备的招标的评标体系中的评标方法以及权重的分配等可以考虑不同因素对投标人情况进行打分和评价进而获得最优的选择。文中通过研究目前主流评标体系和趋势,分析不同评标体系所考虑的因素、相应的权重分配以及得分计算方法并总结出相应的公式;进而从应标方的角度分析各种评标体系、评价因素以及权重的影响并提出了基于预估的中标报价范围计算公式供参考;最终分析了融入全寿命周期考量的评标体系及招标人的自我完善措施。

高校招标代理服务的质量评估及优化管理研究

高校采购工作是高校财经管理的关键环节,招标代理机构的服务质量直接影响采购结果和质量。为推进高校采购工作的提质增效和高质量发展,通过分析招标代理的性质及评估意义,提取服务质量的评估指标,使用层次分析法分层构建指标体系,建立招标代理服务的质量评估体系。结果表明,服务质量与招标代理机构的内部控制制度、采购文件编制、经理执业水平紧密相关。最后根据评估体系提出招标代理优化管理建议,有助于高校加强采购内控建设,优化招标代理的遴选与监管,防范廉政风险,促进采购工作的规范化、科学化、现代化。

预期货币价值法在国内页岩气区块竞标中的应用与探讨

矿权竞标结果受多种因素影响,具有较强的不确定性。特别是在低勘探程度区,如何准确开展区块经济评价是目前亟待解决的一个重点问题。以预期货币价值法(EMV)为基础,考虑“风险—价值”双因素模型量化地质风险,运用概率分布模型量化资源量的不确定性,明确关键参数的选取依据,梳理出针对低勘探程度区页岩气区块的经济评价方案,并应用于南方滇黔桂盆地桂中坳陷页岩气某区块。该方法综合考虑了资源潜力、工程技术条件、开发方案、预期经济价值及油气补贴政策等不同方案组合下的多个场景,形成的多套经济评价方案可为决策者提供多样化的区块经济评价参数数据,能有效指导区块竞标方案决策。