Genetic factors that predict response and failure of biologic therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)represents a significant disease burden marked by chronic inflammation and complications that adversely affect patients’quality of life.Effective diagnostic strategies involve clinical assessments,endoscopic evaluations,imaging studies,and biomarker testing,where early diagnosis is essential for effective management and prevention of long-term complications,highlighting the need for continual advancements in diagnostic methods.The intricate interplay between genetic factors and the outcomes of biological therapy is of critical importance.Unraveling the genetic determinants that influence responses and failures to biological therapy holds significant promise for optimizing treatment strategies for patients with IBD on biologics.Through an indepth examination of current literature,this review article synthesizes critical genetic markers associated with therapeutic efficacy and resistance in IBD.Understanding these genetic actors paves the way for personalized approaches,informing clinicians on predicting,tailoring,and enhancing the effectiveness of biological therapies for improved outcomes in patients with IBD.

Role of conventional therapies in the era of biological treatment in Crohn’s disease

Outstanding progress regarding the pathophysiology of Crohn's disease (CD) has led to the development of innovative therapeutic concepts. Numerous controlled trials have been performed in CD. This review concentrates on the results of randomized,placebo-controlled trials,and meta-analyses when available,that provide the highest degree of evidence. Current guidelines on the management of CD recommend a step-up approach to treatment involving the addition of more powerful therapies as the severity of disease and refractoriness to therapy increase. The advent of biological drugs has opened new therapeutic horizons for treating CD,modifying the treatment goals. However,the large majority of patients with CD will be managed through conventional therapy,even if they are a prelude to biological therapy.

Editorial Biologic therapies in type 1 diabetes： how far are they from us？

Type 1 diabetes （T1D） is a chronic, multifactorial autoimmune disorder that is characterized by theprogressive immune destruction to pancreatic [3 cells, which begins years before clinical onset. The latest survey showed that there are nearly 100 million patients with diabetes in China.1 At present, the therapy of this disease can not be carried out effectively aiming at etiology. Patients with T1D rely on insulin replacement treatment and bear huge risks of long-term complications and severe hypoglycemia. Biologic therapies are relatively innovative treatments. Unlike conventional medicines that modify the immune system as a whole, biologics affect specific immune component. Theoretically, this targeted approach is not only more specific in its effects but also less likely to result in adverse events. Therefore, biologic therapies have become a new research hotspot of T 1D treatment. They have been increasingly used in the treatment of autoimmune diseases （e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease） and could offer new hope for autoimmune diabetic patients. Herein we concentrate on the recent clinical trials of biologic therapies in T1D （Table 1）.

Rare extraintestinal manifestations of ulcerative colitis treated with dual biologic therapy:A case report

BACKGROUND Ulcerative colitis(UC)is an idiopathic,chronic inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)most often located in the rectum,but may involve the entire colon.Extra intestinal manifestations(EIMs)occur with varying frequency depending on the affected organ.The most common ones are musculoskeletal EIMs,affecting up to 33%-40%of IBD patients.These include,among others,inflammatory back pain,tendinitis,plantar fasciitis and arthritis.Only a few case reports in literature discuss Achilles tendinitis.CASE SUMMARY This report describes a patient with UC and Achilles tendinitis in whom after many unsuccessful attempts of treatment with sulfasalazine,mesalazine,glucocorticosteroids,infliximab and tofacitinib,a complete UC remission and resolution of Achilles tendinitis were achieved with the use of dual biologic therapy(DBT)-ustekinumab and adalimumab(ADA).CONCLUSION This case mentions rare EIMs of UC and suggests that DBT may be an alternative for patient with ulcerative colitis and EIMs.

Drug Survival of Biological Therapy in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Background: Biological therapy prevents structural damage, improves functional capacity, and has provided an important advance in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In a real-life scenario, drug survival is an indirect measure of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a drug. The objective of the study was to analyze the drug survival rate of biological therapy in a national health system (SUS). Methods: A retrospective cohort study of the medication process of RA was carried out in public pharmacies of a Brazilian state from January 2010 to April 2017. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was applied. The survival rate was defined as the incidence of drug discontinuation. The retention rate was defined as the mean of months using the drug. Results: Of the total of 902 individuals, 83.6% were female with a mean age of 56 years. Anti-TNF, mostly adalimumab (ADA), was the main biological agent prescribed. Mean drug retention of the first biological was 59.6 months (95% CI: 56.7 - 62.5), followed by 53.7 (95% CI: 48 - 59.4) and 28.2 (95% CI: 23.1 - 23.3) months for the second and third biologicals, respectively. Among the anti-TNF group, ADA, ETN, IFX had the better retention rate. There was no statistical difference in the general survival analyses (p = 0.18) among the groups. However, along the first 2 years, ADA, ETN, and RTX had the three better drug survival. The drug retention seems to increase with age (p = 0.036), with the subgroups > 70 years of age having the highest means (70 - 80 years: 67.29;>80: 67.53). Among all, 27.1% of patients switched to a second biologic. Conclusion: The anti-TNF group, mostly adalimumab (ADA), is the most prescribed medication as first and second-line therapy, reflecting its accessibility in the SUS and efficiency of the follow-up protocols. Among the anti-TNF group, ADA, ETN, and IFX had the better retention rate. Additionally, ADA and ETN had the better drug survival for the first treatment in the first 2 years. RTX was the non-anti-TNF with the best survival. A quarter of patients who start a biological therapy fail and switch to another drug (27%).

Risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with autoimmune diseases undergoing non-tumor necrosis factor-targeted biologics

Hepatitis B virus reactivation(HBVr)can occur in patients treated with immunosuppressive medications.Risk stratification for HBVr based on hepatitis B virus(HBV)serology and viral load is an important strategy to determine appropriate HBV monitoring and antiviral prophylaxis use.Recent advances in the understanding of pathophysiology of autoimmune diseases have led the development of cytokine-targeted therapies.Tumor necrosis factor(TNF)-αinhibitors have been widely used for patients with inflammatory bowel disease,psoriasis,and rheumatic diseases.Further,the clinical benefits of interleukin(IL)-12/23,IL-17,or Janus kinases inhibitors have been demonstrated in these patients.It is well known that TNF-αinhibitor use can lead to HBVr,however,the risk of HBVr in patients undergoing non-TNF-targeted biologics have not been fully understood.In this review,we discuss the risk of HBVr in patients treated with non-TNF-targeted biologics,and immunological mechanisms of these medications causing HBVr.

Biological therapy for ulcerative colitis:An update

Of the diverse biological agents used for patients with ulcerative colitis, the anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents infliximab and adalimumab have been used in large-scale clinical trials and are currently widely used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease patients. Recent studies have indicated that golimumab, oral tofacitinib and vedolizumab reportedly achieved good clinical response and remission rates in ulcerative colitis patients. Thus, we believe that the detailed investigation of various studies on clinical trials may provide important information for the selection of appropriate biological agents, and therefore, we have extensively reviewed such trials in the present study.

Role of the combination of biologics and/or small molecules in the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)is a group of chronic diseases that includes ulcerative colitis,Crohn’s disease,and indeterminate colitis.Patients with IBD require prolonged treatment and high utilization of healthcare resources for proper management.The treatment of patients with IBD is focused on achieving therapeutic goals including clinical,biochemical,and endoscopic variables that result in improvement of the quality of life and prevention of disability.Advanced IBD treatment includes tumor necrosis factor inhibitors,integrin antagonist,antagonist of the p40 subunit of interleukin 12/23,and small molecule drugs.However,despite the multiple treatments available,about 40%of patients are refractory to therapy and present with persistent symptoms that have a great impact on their quality of life,with hospitalization and surgery being necessary in many cases.Dual therapy,a strategy sometimes applicable to refractory IBD patients,includes the combination of two biologics or a biologic in combination with a small molecule drug.There are two distinct scenarios in IBD patients in which this approach can be used:(1)Refractory active luminal disease without extraintestinal manifestations;and(2)patients with IBD in remission,but with active extraintestinal manifestations or immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.This review provides a summary of the results(clinical response and remission)of different combinations of advanced drugs in patients with IBD,both in adults and in the pediatric population.In addition,the safety profile of different combinations of dual therapy is analyzed.The use of newer combinations,including recently approved treatments,the application of new biomarkers and artificial intelligence,and clinical trials to establish effectiveness during long-term followup,are needed to establish new strategies for the use of advanced treatments in patients with refractory IBD.

Are we giving biologics too late? The case for early versus late use

Corticosteroids and immunomodulators have been the mainstay therapies for Crohn’s disease. Corticosteroids are highly effective to control symptoms in the short- term, but they are not effective in maintaining remission, they heal the mucosa in a reduced proportion of cases, and long-time exposure is associated with an increased risk of infections and mortality. Immunomodulators, azathioprine and methotrexate, heal the mucosa in a higher proportion of patients that corticosteroids but their onset of action is slow and they benefit less than half of patients with Crohn’s disease. In the last decade, medical therapy for Crohn’s disease has experienced a remarkable change due to the introduction of biologic therapy, and particularly the use of anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha agents. Infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab pegol have demonstrated efficacy for induction and maintenance of remission in active Crohn’s disease. These agents have raised the bar for what is a suitable symptomatic response in Crohn’s disease and modification of the natural history of the disease has become a major goal in the treatment of Crohn’s disease. There are several data in the literature that suggest that early use of biologic therapy and achievement of mucosal healing contribute to disease course modification. However, many questions on early biological therapy for Crohn’s disease remain still unanswered.

Emerging role of dual biologic therapy for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Biologic agents have now been used in the management of inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)for many years where experience,expertise and confidence in their use has developed over time.In the United Kingdom,there are well established guidelines and recommendations for both single agent biologic treatments,and with combination therapy of a biologic agent with a small molecule agent in maintenance therapy.In recent times,there has been increasing interest and experience using dual biologic therapy(DBT)in IBD,primarily in difficult to treat and refractory cases with high disease burden.However,published data on use,experience and safety profiles is limited and large-scale studies remain low in number in this developing area.We therefore aim to present a summary and review of the available published data in this area to help us better understand the emerging role of DBT in IBD.

Frequency and prognostic role of mucosal healing in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis after one-year of biological therapy

AIM: To assess the endoscopic activity before and after a one-year period of biological therapy and to evaluate the frequency of relapses and need for retreatment after stopping the biologicals in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).

Improving cancer therapy by combining cell biological, physical, and molecular targeting strategies

Successful cancer therapy depends on selective killing of tumor cells while sparing normal cells. Selectivity can be achieved through treatment strategies that target tumor cells. A recent report from the Li laboratory （1） describes an elegant strategy to selectively kill tumor cells by combining several targeting strategies based on cell biological, physical, and molecular （genetic） properties of tumor and normal cells that enhances tumor cell killing in vitro and in an in vivo tumor xenograft model. The idea of using a multiplex targeting approach is reminiscent of strategies in which several antibiotics are used to treat bacterial infections while minimizing the chance that rare antibiotic-resistant mutants will arise within a population.

Access to biologicals in Crohn's disease in ten European countries

AIM To analyze access(availability, affordability and acceptability) to biologicals for Crohn's disease(CD) in ten European countries and to explore the associations between these dimensions, the uptake of biologicals and economic development.METHODS A questionnaire-based survey combined with desk research was carried out in May 2016. Gastroenterologists from the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain and Sweden were invited to participate and provide data on the availability of biologicals/biosimilars, reimbursement criteria, clinical practice and prices, and use of biologicals. An availability score was developed to evaluate the restrictiveness of eligibility and administrative criteria applied in the countries. Affordability was defined as the annual cost of treatment as a share of gross domestic product(GDP) per capita. Correlations with the uptake of biologicals, dimensions of access and GDP per capita were calculated.RESULTS At the time of the survey, infliximab and adalimumab were reimbursed in all ten countries, and vedolizumab was reimbursed in five countries(France, Germany, Latvia, Slovakia, Sweden). Reimbursement criteria were the least strict in Sweden and Germany, and the strictest in Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. Between countries, the annual cost of different biological treatments differed 1.6-3.3-fold. Treatments were the most affordable in Sweden(13%-37% of the GDP per capita) and the least affordable in the Central and Eastern European countries, especially in Hungary(87%-124%) and Romania(141%-277%). Biosimilars made treatments more affordable by driving down the annual costs. The number of patients with CD on biologicals per 100000 population was strongly correlated with GDP per capita(0.91), although substantial differences were found in the uptake among countries with similar economic development. Correlation between the number of patients with CD on biologicals per 100000 population and the availability and affordability was also strong(-0.75,-0.69 respectively). CONCLUSION Substantial inequalities in access to biologicals were largely associated with GDP. To explain differences in access among countries with similar development needs further research on acceptance.

Dual biologic therapy with ocrelizumab for multiple sclerosis and vedolizumab for Crohn's disease:A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND Little is known about the safety and efficacy of using two or more biologics for the treatment of immune-mediated diseases,including Crohn’s disease(CD).CASE SUMMARY This case report and narrative review demonstrate the potential safety of dual biologic therapy(DBT)in a 45-year-old female with two separate immunemediated diseases.She had a history of multiple sclerosis for which she was receiving treatment with ocrelizumab,and she had been recently diagnosed with CD after presenting with diarrhoea.The CD diagnosis was confirmed radiologically,endoscopically,histologically,and biochemically.The patient received treatment with vedolizumab,a gut-specific inhibitor of theα4β7 integrin on leukocytes.No adverse reactions were observed for the duration of treatment.The safety of ocrelizumab and vedolizumab for the treatment of different immune-mediated diseases was demonstrated.CONCLUSION DBT may be a safe and effective option for the treatment of refractory disease or multiple immunemediated diseases.Newer biologics,which have improved safety profiles and gut specificity,may provide promising avenues for treatment.However,caution must be exercised in the appropriate selection of biologics given their inherent immunosuppressive properties,side effects,and efficacy profiles.Current evidence suggests that biologic therapy is not associated with a worse prognosis in patients with coronavirus disease 2019,but treatment decisions should be made in a multidisciplinary setting.Further research from controlled trials is needed to better understand the safety profile of DBT in CD.The immunopathological mechanisms underlying DBT also remain to be clarified.

Biologic therapy for Crohn’s disease over the last 3 decades

BACKGROUND Despite the overload of publications on Crohn’s disease(CD),no comprehensive analysis of biologic therapy for CD has been reported.AIM To determine knowledge gaps and identify areas of interest of biologic therapy for CD.METHODS The top 100 highest-cited original articles were identified from January 1991 to December 2020 in the Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core Collection database.We conducted a bibliometric analysis of biologic therapy for CD based on total citations,summarized the bibliographic information of the articles related to CD biologic therapy,and explored the research hotspots.RESULTS The top 100 highest-cited original articles were identified with total citations ranging from 307 to 2978.The 2000s(Period II,n=66)yielded the most influential original articles and saw the most dramatic growth.Among the top 10 countries,including 8 European countries and 2 North American countries,the United States(n=37)and Belgium(n=20)contributed the most publications.Among the top 10 institutions,the University Hospital Gasthuisberg in Belgium(n=23),the University of Chicago in the United States(n=20),and the Mayo Clinic in the United States(n=17)published the most papers.Regarding authors,Rutgeerts P in Belgium(n=32),Sandborn WJ in the United States(n=23),and Feagan BG in Canada(n=18)published the highest number of studies.The cooperation relationships between the United States and Europe were most frequent.Gastroenterology(impact factor=22.682)published the most articles on biologic therapy for CD(n=32)with 17654 total citations.Anti-tumor necrosis factor biologics and monoclonal antibodies were the most studied topics.CONCLUSION The bibliometric analysis emphasized the key contributions to the development of the specialized field.These data would provide useful research insights into biologic therapy for CD for clinicians and researchers.

Navigating new horizons in inflammatory bowel disease:Integrative approaches and innovations

This editorial offers an updated synthesis of the major advancements in the management and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease(IBD),as documented in the World Journal of Gastroenterology between 2023 and early 2024.This editorial explores substantial developments across key research areas,such as intestinal microecology,computational drug discovery,dual biologic therapy,telemedicine,and the integration of lifestyle changes into patient care.Furthermore,the discussion of emerging topics,including bowel preparation in colonoscopy,the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic,and the intersection between IBD and mental health,reflects a shift toward a more holistic approach to IBD research.By integrating these diverse areas of research,this editorial seeks to promote a holistic and multidisciplinary approach to IBD treatment,combining emerging technologies,personalized medicine,and conventional therapies to improve patient outcomes.

Recombination Mutant Human Tumor Necrosis Factor Combined with Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Advanced Cancer

Objective: Past studies showed that tumor necrosis factor (TNF) assisted anti-tumor treatment and intensified the sensitivity of chemotherapy. However its clinical application has been curbed because of its low purity, high dosage, and strong toxicity. The objective of present study is to evaluate the therapeutic effects and adverse reactions of recombinant mutant human tumor necrosis factor (rmhTNF) combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced malignant tumor. Methods: 105 patients with advanced malignant tumor were randomly divided into trial group, 69 patients, and control group, 36 patients. rmhTNF was injected intramuscularly to the trial group at a dose of 4×106 U/m2, from the 1st to 7th days, the 11th to 17th days combined with chemotherapy course. The chemotherapy plan was as follows: CAP for patients with the NSCLC; FAM for patients with gastric cancer; FC for patients with colorectal cancer. One treatment cycle lasted for 21 days and two cycles were scheduled. The control group was given only the same chemotherapy as the trial group. Results: In the trial group there was 1 CR case and 12 PR cases, and the response rate was 13/69 (18.84%); in the control group 1 PR case, the response rate 1/36 (2.78%). The response rate in the trial group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P=0.022). The response rate for NSCLC in the trial group was 8/17 (47.06%), and 1/6 (16.67%) in the control group. The response rates for gastric cancer and colorectal cancer in the trial groups also were higher than those in the control groups. After the treatment the KPS was 89.00±9.92 in the trial group, and 84.17±8.84 in the control group, with a significant difference between the two groups (P=0.028). The adverse reactions of rmhTNF injection included: pain in the injection area, chill, hardening and swelling and redness in the injection area, fever, ostealgia and myosalgia, and cold-like symptoms. All these adverse reactions were mild and bearable. Conclusion: The administration of rmhTNF in combination with general chemotherapy is an effective and secure means in treating advanced malignant tumor.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease:The dawn of reactive monitoring

Inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)is a chronic condition that significantly affects the quality of life of its patients.Biologic drugs have been the mainstay treatment in the management of IBD patients but despite their significant contribution,there remains a proportion of patients that do not respond or lose response to treatment.Therapeutic drug monitoring(TDM)involves measuring levels of serum drug concentrations and anti-drug antibodies.TDM of biologic drugs initially emerged to understand treatment failure in other immune mediated inflammatory diseases.This was then introduced in IBD to rationalize primary non-response or secondary loss of response,given that low serum drug concentrations or the formation of anti-drug antibodies are variably associated with treatment failure.The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview regarding the current use of TDM in clinical practice and to present the evidence available regarding its use in both proactive and reactive clinical settings in preventing and managing treatment failure.This review also presents the existing evidence regarding the association of various clinical outcomes with specific thresholds of drug concentrations,in everyday practice.A narrative review of published articles and conference abstracts regarding the use of TDM in IBD management,through an electronic search using PubMed and ScienceDirect.TDM has proven to be superior and more cost effective in guiding management of patients with treatment failure compared to empiric dose escalation or change in treatment.Despite a trend towards an association between clinical outcomes and drug concentrations,proactive TDM based strategies have not been shown to achieve clear benefit in long-term outcomes.In the clinical setting,TDM has proven to be useful in managing IBD patients,and its use in the reactive setting,as an additional tool to help manage patients with treatment failure,is being promoted as newer guidelines and consensus groups implement TDM as part of the management plan.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease treatments

Recently,biological drugs have played a leading role in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease,and therapeutic drug monitoring(TDM)may be useful in maximizing their effectiveness.TDM involves the measurement of serum drug and anti-drug antibodies concentrations as the basis for dosage adjustments or drug conversions to achieve a higher response rate.We believe that concentration thresholds should be individualized based on patients’disease severity,extent and phenotype,and therapeutic purposes should also be considered,with higher cut-offs mainly needed for endoscopic and fistula healing than for symptomatic remission.Proactive and reactive TDM can help optimize treatment,especially in patients receiving anti-tumour necrosis factor,and guide dose adjustment or drug conversion with lower cost.TDM is a promising approach to achieve precision medicine and targeted medicine in the future.

Management of inflammatory bowel disease with Clostridium difficile infection

To address the management of Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) infection (CDI) in the setting of suspected inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-flare. METHODSA systematic search of the Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE databases by independent reviewers identified 70 articles including a total of 932141 IBD patients or IBD-related hospitalizations. RESULTSIn those with IBD, CDI is associated with increased morbidity, including subsequent escalation in IBD medical therapy, urgent colectomy and increased hospitalization, as well as excess mortality. Vancomycin-containing regimens are effective first-line therapies for CDI in IBD inpatients. No prospective data exists with regards to the safety or efficacy of initiating or maintaining corticosteroid, immunomodulator, or biologic therapy to treat IBD in the setting of CDI. Corticosteroid use is a risk factor for the development of CDI, while immunomodulators and biologics are not. CONCLUSIONStrong recommendations regarding when to initiate IBD specific therapy in those with CDI are precluded by a lack of evidence. However, based on expert opinion and observational data, initiation or resumption of immunosuppressive therapy after 48-72 h of targeted antibiotic treatment for CDI may be considered.