Objective:To compare the Bishop score and cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound concerned with prediction over the success of labor induction.Methods:This cross-sectional observational analytical study w...Objective:To compare the Bishop score and cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound concerned with prediction over the success of labor induction.Methods:This cross-sectional observational analytical study was conducted from May 2017 to October 2017 at several teaching hospitals of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine Hasanuddin University of Makassar, India. There were 110 samples of pregnant women undergoing labor induction process including 79 samples of successful induction and 31 samples of induction failure. The data analysis used Pearson Chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression to see the effect of Bishop score and measurement of cervical length with successful induction of labor.Results: Number of samples with successful labor induction with Bishop score <3 was 25 (31.6%) and Bishop score≥3 was 54 (68.4%), with rate ratio=3.714 andP=0.000. With measurement of cervical length (cut-off point 2.98 cm), number of samples with successful labor induction with cervical length≤2.98 cm was 12 (15.2%) and cervical length >2.98 cm was 67 (84.8%), with rate ratio=3.124 andP=0.000. Multivahate analysis of logistic regression was found to be more influential in the predicted success of labor induction (P=0.014 with Bishop score <3, odds ratio=1.000 and Bishop score≥3, odds ratio=3.779. Conclusions: Bishop score is better in predicting the success of labor induction compared to the measurement of cervical length through transvaginal ultrasound.展开更多
【目的】探讨产前超声联用宫颈Bishop评分在瘢痕足月妊娠阴道试产评价中的价值。【方法】选取2019年1月至2021年1月在我院分娩的瘢痕子宫足月孕妇94例,均在我院行阴道试产,分析阴道试产成功和失败产妇的临床资料、Bishop评分等差异。【...【目的】探讨产前超声联用宫颈Bishop评分在瘢痕足月妊娠阴道试产评价中的价值。【方法】选取2019年1月至2021年1月在我院分娩的瘢痕子宫足月孕妇94例,均在我院行阴道试产,分析阴道试产成功和失败产妇的临床资料、Bishop评分等差异。【结果】94例孕妇中,阴道试产成功41例(43.62%);阴道试产成功产妇年龄、宫颈长度、宫颈宽度和胎儿体重明显低于阴道试产失败产妇(P<0.05),Bishop评分、子宫颈后角和出生后5 min Agar评分明显高于阴道试产失败产妇(P<0.05);Logistic回归分析结果显示:年龄、宫颈长度、宫颈宽度、Bishop评分是阴道试产成功的影响因素(P<0.05);Logistic回归模型预测阴道试产成功的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.805,灵敏性和特异性分别为80.50%和85.00%;Bishop评分与新生儿出生后5 min Apgar评分呈正相关(P<0.05)。【结论】产前超声联用宫颈Bishop评分在瘢痕足月妊娠阴道试产评价中具有较好的应用价值,同时Bishop评分与新生儿出生后5 min Apgar评分有关。展开更多
目的对Foley's尿管联合催产素用于足月妊娠低宫颈评分引产的疗效和安全性进行探讨。方法从我院2012年10月-2013年10月收治需要引产的产妇中随机选取100例作为研究对象,根据使用药物的不同分成对照组和观察组,每组各50例。其中对照组单...目的对Foley's尿管联合催产素用于足月妊娠低宫颈评分引产的疗效和安全性进行探讨。方法从我院2012年10月-2013年10月收治需要引产的产妇中随机选取100例作为研究对象,根据使用药物的不同分成对照组和观察组,每组各50例。其中对照组单纯使用催产术滴入的方法,观察组使用给子宫颈管内放置Foley's尿管后,注入80 m L的生理盐水的方法,对两组患者引产的疗效和安全性进行比较。结果观察组的有效率为94.0%,显著高于对照组的有效率(54.0%);同时,观察组宫颈Bishop评分提高(5.86±0.10)分,对照组提高(3.80±1.00)分,差异均具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。无论是在宫颈成熟方面,还是在胎盘娩出时间和产后出血量方面,两组患者存在较大差异,观察组明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论 Foley's尿管联合催产素用于足月妊娠低宫颈Bishop评分引产具有安全有效、简单方便和价格低廉的优点,值得进行临床以推广。展开更多
文摘Objective:To compare the Bishop score and cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound concerned with prediction over the success of labor induction.Methods:This cross-sectional observational analytical study was conducted from May 2017 to October 2017 at several teaching hospitals of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine Hasanuddin University of Makassar, India. There were 110 samples of pregnant women undergoing labor induction process including 79 samples of successful induction and 31 samples of induction failure. The data analysis used Pearson Chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression to see the effect of Bishop score and measurement of cervical length with successful induction of labor.Results: Number of samples with successful labor induction with Bishop score <3 was 25 (31.6%) and Bishop score≥3 was 54 (68.4%), with rate ratio=3.714 andP=0.000. With measurement of cervical length (cut-off point 2.98 cm), number of samples with successful labor induction with cervical length≤2.98 cm was 12 (15.2%) and cervical length >2.98 cm was 67 (84.8%), with rate ratio=3.124 andP=0.000. Multivahate analysis of logistic regression was found to be more influential in the predicted success of labor induction (P=0.014 with Bishop score <3, odds ratio=1.000 and Bishop score≥3, odds ratio=3.779. Conclusions: Bishop score is better in predicting the success of labor induction compared to the measurement of cervical length through transvaginal ultrasound.
文摘【目的】探讨产前超声联用宫颈Bishop评分在瘢痕足月妊娠阴道试产评价中的价值。【方法】选取2019年1月至2021年1月在我院分娩的瘢痕子宫足月孕妇94例,均在我院行阴道试产,分析阴道试产成功和失败产妇的临床资料、Bishop评分等差异。【结果】94例孕妇中,阴道试产成功41例(43.62%);阴道试产成功产妇年龄、宫颈长度、宫颈宽度和胎儿体重明显低于阴道试产失败产妇(P<0.05),Bishop评分、子宫颈后角和出生后5 min Agar评分明显高于阴道试产失败产妇(P<0.05);Logistic回归分析结果显示:年龄、宫颈长度、宫颈宽度、Bishop评分是阴道试产成功的影响因素(P<0.05);Logistic回归模型预测阴道试产成功的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.805,灵敏性和特异性分别为80.50%和85.00%;Bishop评分与新生儿出生后5 min Apgar评分呈正相关(P<0.05)。【结论】产前超声联用宫颈Bishop评分在瘢痕足月妊娠阴道试产评价中具有较好的应用价值,同时Bishop评分与新生儿出生后5 min Apgar评分有关。
文摘目的对Foley's尿管联合催产素用于足月妊娠低宫颈评分引产的疗效和安全性进行探讨。方法从我院2012年10月-2013年10月收治需要引产的产妇中随机选取100例作为研究对象,根据使用药物的不同分成对照组和观察组,每组各50例。其中对照组单纯使用催产术滴入的方法,观察组使用给子宫颈管内放置Foley's尿管后,注入80 m L的生理盐水的方法,对两组患者引产的疗效和安全性进行比较。结果观察组的有效率为94.0%,显著高于对照组的有效率(54.0%);同时,观察组宫颈Bishop评分提高(5.86±0.10)分,对照组提高(3.80±1.00)分,差异均具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。无论是在宫颈成熟方面,还是在胎盘娩出时间和产后出血量方面,两组患者存在较大差异,观察组明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论 Foley's尿管联合催产素用于足月妊娠低宫颈Bishop评分引产具有安全有效、简单方便和价格低廉的优点,值得进行临床以推广。