Objective:Urethral stricture disease after endo-urological treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)is a sparsely described complication.We describe management of five categories of these strictures in this retro...Objective:Urethral stricture disease after endo-urological treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)is a sparsely described complication.We describe management of five categories of these strictures in this retrospective observational case series.Methods:One hundred and twenty-one patients presenting with symptoms of bladder outflow obstruction after endo-urological intervention for BPH from February 2016 to March 2019 were evaluated.Among them,76 were eligible for this study and underwent reconstructive surgery.Preoperative and postoperative assessments were done with symptom scores,uroflowmetry,ultrasound for post-void residue,and urethrogram.Any intervention during follow-up was classed as a failure.The recurrence and 95%confidence interval for recurrence percentage were calculated.Results:The following five categories of patients were identified:Bulbo-membranous(33[43.4%]),navicular fossa(21[27.6%]),penile/peno-bulbar(8[10.5%]),bladder neck stenosis(6[7.9%]),and multiple locations(8[10.5%]).The average age was 69 years(range:60-84 years).Overall average symptom score,flow rate,and post-void residue changed from 21 to 7,6 mL/s to 19 mL/s,and 210 mL to 20 mL,respectively.The average follow-up was 34 months(range:12-58 months).Overall recurrence and complication rates were 10.5%and 9.2%,respectively.The recurrence in each category was seen in 3,1,2,1,and 1 patient,respectively.Overall 95% confidence interval for recurrence percentage was 4.66-19.69.Conclusion:Urethral stricture disease is a major long-term complication of endo-urological treatment of BPH.The bulbo-membranous strictures need continence preserving approach.Navicular fossa strictures require minimally invasive and cosmetic consideration.Peno-bulbar strictures require judicious use of grafts and flaps.Bladder neck stenosis in this cohort could be treated with endoscopic measures.Multiple locations need treatment based on their sites in single-stage as far as possible.展开更多
<strong>Introduction:</strong> Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one among the foremost common diseases affecting the aging man with, almost 80% of the ...<strong>Introduction:</strong> Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one among the foremost common diseases affecting the aging man with, almost 80% of the lads greater than 70 affected. BPH is caused by unregulated proliferation within the prostate, which may cause physical obstruction of the prostatic urethra and result in anatomic bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the historical gold standard up till now to which all endoscopic procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are compared with a mean hospital stay of three days. This surgery although efficacious has been related with increased morbidity and increased day case failure rates as compared to newer techniques. These shortcomings have prompted the utilization of newer methods like Transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate (TUERP), Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP). This review will discuss the enucleation techniques, advantages and therefore the predictive factors for a successful day case prostate surgery. <strong>Materials and Methods:</strong> During this review, we discuss the newer techniques utilized in day case BPH surgery as well as the predictive factors for a successful BPH surgery, both enucleation, benefits and morcellation are covered also. <strong>Results:</strong> TUERP, ThuLEP and HoLEP have literature supporting the advantages of these techniques, which demonstrates its ability in day case BPH surgeries in specially selected cases with favorable factors and a 61% overall success rate. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> TUERP, ThuLEP and HoLEP Have proven to show favorable outcomes in day case BPH surgery with urologist’s experience, prostate size, duration of operation, age, use of anticoagulants, morning theatre list and ASA score being the key factors for a successful day case surgery.展开更多
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate （PKEP） for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH） compared with 160-W lithium triboride laser photoselectiv...To evaluate the safety and efficacy of plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate （PKEP） for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH） compared with 160-W lithium triboride laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate （PVP）. From February 2011 to July 2012, a prospective nonrandomized study was performed. One-hundred one patients underwent PKEP, and 110 underwent PVP. No severe intraoperative complications were recorded, and none of the patients in either group required a blood transfusion. Shorter catheterization time （38.14 ± 23.64 h vs 72.54 ± 28.38 h, P 〈 0.001） and hospitalization （2.32 ± 1.25 days vs 4.07±1.23 days, P 〈 0.001） were recorded in the PVP group. At 12-month postoperatively, the PKEP group had a maintained and statistically improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score （IPSS） （4.07 ±2.07 vs 5.00 ±2.10; P〈 0.001）, quality of life （QoL） （1.08 ± 0.72 vs 1.35 ± 0.72; P= 0.007）, maximal urinary flow rate （Qmax） （24.75±5.87 ml s^-1 vs 22.03 ±5.04 ml s^-1; P 〈 0.001）, postvoid residual urine volume （PVR） （14,29 ± 6,97 ml vs 17.00±6.11 ml; P = 0,001）, and prostate-specific antigen （PSA） value （0.78 ±0.57 ng ml^-1 vs 1.27 ±1.07 ng ml^-1; P 〈 0.001）. Both PKEP and PVP relieve low urinary tract symptoms （LUTS） due to BPH with low complication rates. PKEP can completely remove prostatic adenoma while the total amount of tissue removed by PVP is less than that can be removed by PKER Based on our study of the follow-up, PKEP provides better postoperative outcomes than PVP.展开更多
经尿道前列腺电切术(transurethral resection of the prostate,TURP)为针对临床上药物治疗失败的良性前列腺增生(benign prostatic hyperplasia,BPH)患者的首选术式,其术后常见并发症之一为膀胱颈挛缩(bladder neck contracture,BNC)...经尿道前列腺电切术(transurethral resection of the prostate,TURP)为针对临床上药物治疗失败的良性前列腺增生(benign prostatic hyperplasia,BPH)患者的首选术式,其术后常见并发症之一为膀胱颈挛缩(bladder neck contracture,BNC)。术中对膀胱颈的过分切削、尿路感染、液体冲刷、机械应力等均为促进BNC的发病因素。TURP术后BNC的诊断需要依靠临床症状及必要的辅助检查,如膀胱镜检查等共同确定,术前合并慢性前列腺炎、小体积BPH、尿路感染、术中电切和电凝强度、术中操作、术后留置尿管等可作为BNC发生的重要预测因素。在药物治疗BNC总体效果不佳的情况下,应合理选择包括膀胱颈切开及膀胱颈重建在内的手术治疗。而术前对感染的控制及抗雄激素药物的合理应用、术中的精细操作、术后的通畅引流及糖皮质激素应用均可作为预防BNC的有效措施。展开更多
目的探讨经尿道膀胱电切术(transurethral resection of bladder,TURBt)同期进行尿道前列腺切除术(transurethral resection of prostate,TURP)治疗的浅表性膀胱癌合并良性前列腺增生(benign prostate hyperplasia,BPH)的临床效果。方...目的探讨经尿道膀胱电切术(transurethral resection of bladder,TURBt)同期进行尿道前列腺切除术(transurethral resection of prostate,TURP)治疗的浅表性膀胱癌合并良性前列腺增生(benign prostate hyperplasia,BPH)的临床效果。方法回顾性分析本院手术治疗的109例浅表性膀胱癌合并BPH患者的资料情况,其中采取TURBt同期行TURP治疗的患者57例(联合组)、仅采取TURBt资料52例(对照组),对比两组患者的手术效果就围手术期指标。结果联合组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后留置导尿管时间、术后住院时间均显著的长于对照组患者,且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后联合组的国际前列腺症状(international prostate symptom score,IPSS)评分、生存质量(quality of life score,QOL)评分、残余尿量(residual urine volume,PVR)测定值均显著的低于对照组患者(P<0.05),联合组的Qmax测定值显著地高于对照组患者(P<0.05);术后24个月,联合组和对照组的肿瘤复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),联合组的尿道狭窄发生率(3.51%)显著低于对照组患者(17.31%),且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 TURBt同期TURP治疗的浅表性膀胱癌合并BPH虽然手术时间、出血量较多及术后恢复时间长较单纯TURBt,但是具有显著的改善患者术后排尿情况、生存质量及降低尿道狭窄发生率的作用。展开更多
文摘Objective:Urethral stricture disease after endo-urological treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)is a sparsely described complication.We describe management of five categories of these strictures in this retrospective observational case series.Methods:One hundred and twenty-one patients presenting with symptoms of bladder outflow obstruction after endo-urological intervention for BPH from February 2016 to March 2019 were evaluated.Among them,76 were eligible for this study and underwent reconstructive surgery.Preoperative and postoperative assessments were done with symptom scores,uroflowmetry,ultrasound for post-void residue,and urethrogram.Any intervention during follow-up was classed as a failure.The recurrence and 95%confidence interval for recurrence percentage were calculated.Results:The following five categories of patients were identified:Bulbo-membranous(33[43.4%]),navicular fossa(21[27.6%]),penile/peno-bulbar(8[10.5%]),bladder neck stenosis(6[7.9%]),and multiple locations(8[10.5%]).The average age was 69 years(range:60-84 years).Overall average symptom score,flow rate,and post-void residue changed from 21 to 7,6 mL/s to 19 mL/s,and 210 mL to 20 mL,respectively.The average follow-up was 34 months(range:12-58 months).Overall recurrence and complication rates were 10.5%and 9.2%,respectively.The recurrence in each category was seen in 3,1,2,1,and 1 patient,respectively.Overall 95% confidence interval for recurrence percentage was 4.66-19.69.Conclusion:Urethral stricture disease is a major long-term complication of endo-urological treatment of BPH.The bulbo-membranous strictures need continence preserving approach.Navicular fossa strictures require minimally invasive and cosmetic consideration.Peno-bulbar strictures require judicious use of grafts and flaps.Bladder neck stenosis in this cohort could be treated with endoscopic measures.Multiple locations need treatment based on their sites in single-stage as far as possible.
文摘<strong>Introduction:</strong> Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one among the foremost common diseases affecting the aging man with, almost 80% of the lads greater than 70 affected. BPH is caused by unregulated proliferation within the prostate, which may cause physical obstruction of the prostatic urethra and result in anatomic bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the historical gold standard up till now to which all endoscopic procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are compared with a mean hospital stay of three days. This surgery although efficacious has been related with increased morbidity and increased day case failure rates as compared to newer techniques. These shortcomings have prompted the utilization of newer methods like Transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate (TUERP), Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP). This review will discuss the enucleation techniques, advantages and therefore the predictive factors for a successful day case prostate surgery. <strong>Materials and Methods:</strong> During this review, we discuss the newer techniques utilized in day case BPH surgery as well as the predictive factors for a successful BPH surgery, both enucleation, benefits and morcellation are covered also. <strong>Results:</strong> TUERP, ThuLEP and HoLEP have literature supporting the advantages of these techniques, which demonstrates its ability in day case BPH surgeries in specially selected cases with favorable factors and a 61% overall success rate. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> TUERP, ThuLEP and HoLEP Have proven to show favorable outcomes in day case BPH surgery with urologist’s experience, prostate size, duration of operation, age, use of anticoagulants, morning theatre list and ASA score being the key factors for a successful day case surgery.
文摘To evaluate the safety and efficacy of plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate （PKEP） for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH） compared with 160-W lithium triboride laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate （PVP）. From February 2011 to July 2012, a prospective nonrandomized study was performed. One-hundred one patients underwent PKEP, and 110 underwent PVP. No severe intraoperative complications were recorded, and none of the patients in either group required a blood transfusion. Shorter catheterization time （38.14 ± 23.64 h vs 72.54 ± 28.38 h, P 〈 0.001） and hospitalization （2.32 ± 1.25 days vs 4.07±1.23 days, P 〈 0.001） were recorded in the PVP group. At 12-month postoperatively, the PKEP group had a maintained and statistically improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score （IPSS） （4.07 ±2.07 vs 5.00 ±2.10; P〈 0.001）, quality of life （QoL） （1.08 ± 0.72 vs 1.35 ± 0.72; P= 0.007）, maximal urinary flow rate （Qmax） （24.75±5.87 ml s^-1 vs 22.03 ±5.04 ml s^-1; P 〈 0.001）, postvoid residual urine volume （PVR） （14,29 ± 6,97 ml vs 17.00±6.11 ml; P = 0,001）, and prostate-specific antigen （PSA） value （0.78 ±0.57 ng ml^-1 vs 1.27 ±1.07 ng ml^-1; P 〈 0.001）. Both PKEP and PVP relieve low urinary tract symptoms （LUTS） due to BPH with low complication rates. PKEP can completely remove prostatic adenoma while the total amount of tissue removed by PVP is less than that can be removed by PKER Based on our study of the follow-up, PKEP provides better postoperative outcomes than PVP.
文摘经尿道前列腺电切术(transurethral resection of the prostate,TURP)为针对临床上药物治疗失败的良性前列腺增生(benign prostatic hyperplasia,BPH)患者的首选术式,其术后常见并发症之一为膀胱颈挛缩(bladder neck contracture,BNC)。术中对膀胱颈的过分切削、尿路感染、液体冲刷、机械应力等均为促进BNC的发病因素。TURP术后BNC的诊断需要依靠临床症状及必要的辅助检查,如膀胱镜检查等共同确定,术前合并慢性前列腺炎、小体积BPH、尿路感染、术中电切和电凝强度、术中操作、术后留置尿管等可作为BNC发生的重要预测因素。在药物治疗BNC总体效果不佳的情况下,应合理选择包括膀胱颈切开及膀胱颈重建在内的手术治疗。而术前对感染的控制及抗雄激素药物的合理应用、术中的精细操作、术后的通畅引流及糖皮质激素应用均可作为预防BNC的有效措施。
文摘目的探讨经尿道膀胱电切术(transurethral resection of bladder,TURBt)同期进行尿道前列腺切除术(transurethral resection of prostate,TURP)治疗的浅表性膀胱癌合并良性前列腺增生(benign prostate hyperplasia,BPH)的临床效果。方法回顾性分析本院手术治疗的109例浅表性膀胱癌合并BPH患者的资料情况,其中采取TURBt同期行TURP治疗的患者57例(联合组)、仅采取TURBt资料52例(对照组),对比两组患者的手术效果就围手术期指标。结果联合组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后留置导尿管时间、术后住院时间均显著的长于对照组患者,且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后联合组的国际前列腺症状(international prostate symptom score,IPSS)评分、生存质量(quality of life score,QOL)评分、残余尿量(residual urine volume,PVR)测定值均显著的低于对照组患者(P<0.05),联合组的Qmax测定值显著地高于对照组患者(P<0.05);术后24个月,联合组和对照组的肿瘤复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),联合组的尿道狭窄发生率(3.51%)显著低于对照组患者(17.31%),且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 TURBt同期TURP治疗的浅表性膀胱癌合并BPH虽然手术时间、出血量较多及术后恢复时间长较单纯TURBt,但是具有显著的改善患者术后排尿情况、生存质量及降低尿道狭窄发生率的作用。
