目的：评价和确定Braden-Q儿童压疮评估量表用于诊断住院患儿压疮高风险的最佳临界值。方法：对2014年1至6月在我院住院且Braden-Q量表≤24分的372例患者进行住院期间压疮发生情况追踪分析,采用灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值...目的：评价和确定Braden-Q儿童压疮评估量表用于诊断住院患儿压疮高风险的最佳临界值。方法：对2014年1至6月在我院住院且Braden-Q量表≤24分的372例患者进行住院期间压疮发生情况追踪分析,采用灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、约登指数和受试者工作特征曲线（receiver operating characteristic,ROC）确定和评价Braden-Q量表诊断压疮高度危险的临界值。结果：372例研究对象中有37.73%的患者Braden-Q评分≤16分（最低11分）,72.27%的患者Braden-Q评分17～24分;共发生院内压疮21例,其分值主要集中在13～16分。当Braden-Q量表诊断压疮高危的临界值为16分时,其预测压疮危险的灵敏度为0.826,特异度为0.759,阳性预测值为0.185,阴性预测值为0.985,约登指数（0.585）较其他临界值更大,Braden-Q量表ROC曲线下面积（area under curve,AUC）为0.923。结论：Braden-Q量表16分是诊断儿童压疮高度危险的最佳临界值,能够很好地预测儿童发生压疮的风险,具有较高的诊断价值。展开更多
目的:探讨基于儿童压疮危险评估(Braden-Q)量表行经皮氧分压(TcPO2)监测评估新生儿头枕部压疮发生的价值,为新生儿救护中心(NICU)早期预警压疮提供依据。方法:选择2018年10月-2019年4月笔者所在医院新生儿救护中心(NICU)收治的60例新生...目的:探讨基于儿童压疮危险评估(Braden-Q)量表行经皮氧分压(TcPO2)监测评估新生儿头枕部压疮发生的价值,为新生儿救护中心(NICU)早期预警压疮提供依据。方法:选择2018年10月-2019年4月笔者所在医院新生儿救护中心(NICU)收治的60例新生儿为研究对象,在入院时均应用Braden-Q量表评估压疮危险评分,同时经皮氧分压(TcPO2)监测患儿头枕部皮肤组织的氧合状况。根据在NICU期间是否发生压疮将其分为压疮组(22例)和非压疮组(38例)。比较两组Braden-Q量表评分、TcPO2,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,评价TcPO2监测对新生儿头枕部压疮的早期预测效果。结果:压疮组Braden-Q量表评分为(16.25±2.22)分,低于非压疮组的(22.88±4.92)分,差异有统计学意义(t=6.751,P=0.013)。压疮组低、中、高危构成比例分别为13.64%、45.45%、40.91%,非压疮组分别为50.00%、42.11%、7.89%,两组低危、高危构成比例比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。压疮组与非压疮组新生儿入住NICU第3、5、7天TcPO2均低于第1天,且呈逐渐下降趋势,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);压疮组第1、3、5、7天TcPO2低于非压疮组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。新生儿TcPO2的最佳截断值为87.03 mm Hg,ROC曲线下面积(AUC值)为0.728,敏感性为90.91%,特异性为60.53%,95%CI(0.768,0.927)。结论:基于Braden-Q量表行经皮氧分压监测评估新生儿头枕部压疮发生的价值显著,可更好地为压疮的发生提供预警。展开更多
目的比较Braden-QD量表和Braden-Q量表在评估小儿重症监护室(pediatric intensive care unit,PICU)患儿压力性损伤发生风险中的应用效果。方法采用方便抽样方法,选取2021年12月至2022年9月连云港市第一人民医院PICU收治的205例患儿作为...目的比较Braden-QD量表和Braden-Q量表在评估小儿重症监护室(pediatric intensive care unit,PICU)患儿压力性损伤发生风险中的应用效果。方法采用方便抽样方法,选取2021年12月至2022年9月连云港市第一人民医院PICU收治的205例患儿作为研究对象,采用Braden-QD量表和Braden-Q量表评估压力性损伤的风险。使用SPSS 25.0和Python 2.7进行数据统计分析。量表的评定者间信度采用组内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficient,ICC)评价,内部一致性采用Cronbach'sα评价,预测能力比较采用受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operator characteristic curve,ROC)、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、灵敏度、特异度和ROC曲线下面积(area under the ROC curve,AUC)。结果(1)205例患儿中有24例(11.7%)发生压力性损伤,以1期为主(20例,83.3%)。(2)Braden-QD量表和Braden-Q量表的ICC分别为0.890、0.862,Cronbach'sα分别为0.891、0.710。(3)Braden-QD量表的AUC为0.936,最佳诊断截断值为9.5分,此时约登指数、灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为0.765、0.875、0.890、0.512、0.982;Braden-Q量表的AUC为0.881,最佳诊断截断值为18.5分,约登指数、灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为0.626、0.792、0.834、0.388、0.968。结论Braden-QD量表更适用于PICU患儿压力性损伤发生风险的评估。展开更多
Objective: The purpose of this study was to: ( 1 ) observe the value of the score of Braden Q scale in predicting pressure ulcers in pediatric Intensive Care Unit ( ICU) patients in China, ( 2) determine the critical ...Objective: The purpose of this study was to: ( 1 ) observe the value of the score of Braden Q scale in predicting pressure ulcers in pediatric Intensive Care Unit ( ICU) patients in China, ( 2) determine the critical cutoff point for classifying patient risk, and ( 3) describe the pressure ulcer incidence. Methods: A prospective cohort descriptive study with a convenience sample of 198 patients bed-ridden for at least 24 hours without pre-existing pressure ulcers enrolled from a pediatric intensive care unit ( PICU) . The Braden Q score and skin assessment were independently rated, and data collectors were blinded to the other measures. Patients were observed for up to 3 times per week for 2 weeks and once a week thereafter until PICU discharge. Results: Fourteen patients ( 7. 1%) developed pressure ulcers; 12 ( 85. 7%) were Stage I pres-sure ulcers, 2 ( 14. 3%) were Stage II, and there were no Stage III or IV pressure ulcers. Most pressure ulcers ( 64. 3%) were present at the first observation. The Braden Q Scale has an overall cumulative variance contribution rate of 69. 599%. Using Stage I+ pressure ulcer data obtained during the first observation, a Receiver Operator Characteristic ( ROC) curve for each possible score of the Braden Q Scale was constructed. The area under the curve ( AUC) was 0. 57, and the 95% confidence interval was 0. 50-0. 62. At a cutoff score of 19, the sensitivity was 0. 71, and the specificity was 0. 53. The AUC of each item of the Braden Q Scale was 0. 543-0. 612. Conclusions: PICU patients are susceptible to pressure ulcers. The value of the Braden Q Scale in the studied pediatric population was relatively poor, and it should be optimized before it is used in Chinese pediatric patients.展开更多
文摘目的：评价和确定Braden-Q儿童压疮评估量表用于诊断住院患儿压疮高风险的最佳临界值。方法：对2014年1至6月在我院住院且Braden-Q量表≤24分的372例患者进行住院期间压疮发生情况追踪分析,采用灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、约登指数和受试者工作特征曲线（receiver operating characteristic,ROC）确定和评价Braden-Q量表诊断压疮高度危险的临界值。结果：372例研究对象中有37.73%的患者Braden-Q评分≤16分（最低11分）,72.27%的患者Braden-Q评分17～24分;共发生院内压疮21例,其分值主要集中在13～16分。当Braden-Q量表诊断压疮高危的临界值为16分时,其预测压疮危险的灵敏度为0.826,特异度为0.759,阳性预测值为0.185,阴性预测值为0.985,约登指数（0.585）较其他临界值更大,Braden-Q量表ROC曲线下面积（area under curve,AUC）为0.923。结论：Braden-Q量表16分是诊断儿童压疮高度危险的最佳临界值,能够很好地预测儿童发生压疮的风险,具有较高的诊断价值。
文摘目的:探讨基于儿童压疮危险评估(Braden-Q)量表行经皮氧分压(TcPO2)监测评估新生儿头枕部压疮发生的价值,为新生儿救护中心(NICU)早期预警压疮提供依据。方法:选择2018年10月-2019年4月笔者所在医院新生儿救护中心(NICU)收治的60例新生儿为研究对象,在入院时均应用Braden-Q量表评估压疮危险评分,同时经皮氧分压(TcPO2)监测患儿头枕部皮肤组织的氧合状况。根据在NICU期间是否发生压疮将其分为压疮组(22例)和非压疮组(38例)。比较两组Braden-Q量表评分、TcPO2,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,评价TcPO2监测对新生儿头枕部压疮的早期预测效果。结果:压疮组Braden-Q量表评分为(16.25±2.22)分,低于非压疮组的(22.88±4.92)分,差异有统计学意义(t=6.751,P=0.013)。压疮组低、中、高危构成比例分别为13.64%、45.45%、40.91%,非压疮组分别为50.00%、42.11%、7.89%,两组低危、高危构成比例比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。压疮组与非压疮组新生儿入住NICU第3、5、7天TcPO2均低于第1天,且呈逐渐下降趋势,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);压疮组第1、3、5、7天TcPO2低于非压疮组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。新生儿TcPO2的最佳截断值为87.03 mm Hg,ROC曲线下面积(AUC值)为0.728,敏感性为90.91%,特异性为60.53%,95%CI(0.768,0.927)。结论:基于Braden-Q量表行经皮氧分压监测评估新生儿头枕部压疮发生的价值显著,可更好地为压疮的发生提供预警。
文摘目的比较Braden-QD量表和Braden-Q量表在评估小儿重症监护室(pediatric intensive care unit,PICU)患儿压力性损伤发生风险中的应用效果。方法采用方便抽样方法,选取2021年12月至2022年9月连云港市第一人民医院PICU收治的205例患儿作为研究对象,采用Braden-QD量表和Braden-Q量表评估压力性损伤的风险。使用SPSS 25.0和Python 2.7进行数据统计分析。量表的评定者间信度采用组内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficient,ICC)评价,内部一致性采用Cronbach'sα评价,预测能力比较采用受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operator characteristic curve,ROC)、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、灵敏度、特异度和ROC曲线下面积(area under the ROC curve,AUC)。结果(1)205例患儿中有24例(11.7%)发生压力性损伤,以1期为主(20例,83.3%)。(2)Braden-QD量表和Braden-Q量表的ICC分别为0.890、0.862,Cronbach'sα分别为0.891、0.710。(3)Braden-QD量表的AUC为0.936,最佳诊断截断值为9.5分,此时约登指数、灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为0.765、0.875、0.890、0.512、0.982;Braden-Q量表的AUC为0.881,最佳诊断截断值为18.5分,约登指数、灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为0.626、0.792、0.834、0.388、0.968。结论Braden-QD量表更适用于PICU患儿压力性损伤发生风险的评估。
文摘Objective: The purpose of this study was to: ( 1 ) observe the value of the score of Braden Q scale in predicting pressure ulcers in pediatric Intensive Care Unit ( ICU) patients in China, ( 2) determine the critical cutoff point for classifying patient risk, and ( 3) describe the pressure ulcer incidence. Methods: A prospective cohort descriptive study with a convenience sample of 198 patients bed-ridden for at least 24 hours without pre-existing pressure ulcers enrolled from a pediatric intensive care unit ( PICU) . The Braden Q score and skin assessment were independently rated, and data collectors were blinded to the other measures. Patients were observed for up to 3 times per week for 2 weeks and once a week thereafter until PICU discharge. Results: Fourteen patients ( 7. 1%) developed pressure ulcers; 12 ( 85. 7%) were Stage I pres-sure ulcers, 2 ( 14. 3%) were Stage II, and there were no Stage III or IV pressure ulcers. Most pressure ulcers ( 64. 3%) were present at the first observation. The Braden Q Scale has an overall cumulative variance contribution rate of 69. 599%. Using Stage I+ pressure ulcer data obtained during the first observation, a Receiver Operator Characteristic ( ROC) curve for each possible score of the Braden Q Scale was constructed. The area under the curve ( AUC) was 0. 57, and the 95% confidence interval was 0. 50-0. 62. At a cutoff score of 19, the sensitivity was 0. 71, and the specificity was 0. 53. The AUC of each item of the Braden Q Scale was 0. 543-0. 612. Conclusions: PICU patients are susceptible to pressure ulcers. The value of the Braden Q Scale in the studied pediatric population was relatively poor, and it should be optimized before it is used in Chinese pediatric patients.
