Background: Heart failure is a major public health challenge in sub-Saharan Africa. In patients with chronic Heart Failure and cardiac desynchrony, studies have suggested that cardiac resynchronization, can improve ca...Background: Heart failure is a major public health challenge in sub-Saharan Africa. In patients with chronic Heart Failure and cardiac desynchrony, studies have suggested that cardiac resynchronization, can improve cardiac function and the quality of life of patients. However, in Sub-Saharan Africa, very few studies have been done on cardiac resynchronization which is in its infancy. The aim of this study is to report the local data from our hospital. Method: It was a transversal, descriptive and analytical study conducted from November 2019 to September 2022 at the Cardiology Department of the Principal Hospital of Dakar. Results: Twelve patients were implanted for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT). The sex ratio was 8 males/4 females. The average age was 67 ± 11 years. Ten patients had non-ischemic heart disease and the two others had ischemic one. All of them had NYHA III or IV scores before CRT. The Quality of Life (QOL) was judged as poor by all of the patients. The average duration of QRS was 156 ± 9 ms. 27.9% ± 5% was the mean Left Ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Complications occur in 3/12 patients (25%). It was one CS vein dissection, one micro LV lead dislodgement and one phrenic nerve stimulation. Nine patients, who were considered as responders, had an improvement of QOL and NYHA, the LVEF increased and the end-diastolic dimension, and the duration of the QRS interval all decreased. Two patients do not respond and one (1) who had permanent atrial fibrillation, was a secondary responder after an atrioventricular junction ablation. Conclusion: Cardiac resynchronization is a therapy that improves the QOL of patients, the LVEF and reduces the duration of the QRS interval. However, this procedure is not without risk of complications. In sub-Saharan Africa, the major challenge is to improve the financial accessibility of this therapy for the population.展开更多
BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT) can be used as an escalated therapy to improve heart function in patients with cardiac dysfunction due to long-term right ventricular pacing. However, guidelines are o...BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT) can be used as an escalated therapy to improve heart function in patients with cardiac dysfunction due to long-term right ventricular pacing. However, guidelines are only targeted at adults. CRT is rarely used in children.CASE SUMMARY This case aimed to implement biventricular pacing in one child with heart failure who had a left ventricular ejection fraction < 35% at 4 years after implantation of an atrioventricular sequential pacemaker due to atrioventricular block.Postoperatively, echocardiography showed atrial sensing ventricular pacing and QRS wave duration of 120-130 ms, and cardiac function significantly improved after upgrading pacemaker.CONCLUSION Patients whose cardiac function is deteriorated to a level to upgrade to CRT should be upgraded to reverse myocardial remodeling as soon as possible.展开更多
BACKGROUND Left bundle branch pacing(LBBP)is a physiological pacing method that has emerged in recent years.It is an ideal choice for patients with complete left bundle branch block who are in need of cardiac resynchr...BACKGROUND Left bundle branch pacing(LBBP)is a physiological pacing method that has emerged in recent years.It is an ideal choice for patients with complete left bundle branch block who are in need of cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT).Moreover,LBBP is superior in maintaining physiological ventricular activation and can effectively improve heart function and quality of life in patients with pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy.However,LBBP in pacing-dependent patients who already have cardiac dysfunction has not been well assessed.CASE SUMMARY A 69-year-old male patient presented with symptoms of chest tightness,palpitation and systolic heart failure with New York Heart Association class III for 1 mo.The 12-lead electrocardiogram showed atrial fibrillation with third-degree atrioventricular block and ventricular premature beat.Holter revealed a right bundle branch block,atrial fibrillation with third-degree atrioventricular block,frequent multifocal ventricular premature beats,Ron-T and ventricular tachycardia.The echocardiogram documented an enlarged left atrium and left ventricle and a low left ventricular ejection fraction.Coronary angiography indicated a stenosis of 30%in the middle left anterior descending artery.Apparently,a CRT-D pacemaker was the best choice for this patient according to previous findings.However,the patient was worried about the financial burden.A single-chamber pacemaker with LBBP was selected,with the plan to take amiodarone and upgrade with dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or CRT-D at an appropriate time.During the follow-up at 3 mo after LBBP,the patient showed an improvement in cardiac function with slight improvement in echocardiography parameters,and the New York Heart Association functional class was maintained at I.Moreover,the patient no longer suffered from chest tightness and palpitation.Holter showed decreased ventricular arrhythmia of less than 5%.CONCLUSION LBBP might be used in patients with heart failure and a high-degree atrioventricular block as an alternative to conventional CRT.展开更多
Symptomatic bradycardia is effectively treated with the implantation of a cardiac pacemaker. Although a highly successful therapy, during recent years there has been a focus on the negative effects associated with lon...Symptomatic bradycardia is effectively treated with the implantation of a cardiac pacemaker. Although a highly successful therapy, during recent years there has been a focus on the negative effects associated with longterm pacing of the apex of the right ventricle(RV). It has been shown in both experimental and clinical studies that RV pacing leads to ventricular dyssynchrony, similar to that of left bundle branch block, with subsequent detrimental effects on cardiac structure and function, and in some cases adverse clinical outcomes such as atrial fibrillation, heart failure and death. There is substantial evidence that patients with reduced left ventricular function(LVEF) are at particular high risk of suffering the detrimental clinical effects of long-term RV pacing. The evidence is, however, incomplete, coming largely from subanalyses of pacemaker and implantable cardiac defibrillator studies. In this group of patients with reduced LVEF and an expected high amount of RV pacing, biventricular pacing(cardiac resynchronization therapy) devices can prevent the negative effects of RV pacing and reduce ventricular dyssynchrony. Therefore, cardiac resynchronization therapy has emerged as an attractive option with promising results and more clinical studies are underway. Furthermore, specific pacemaker algorithms, which minimize RV pacing, can also reduce the negative effects of RV stimulation on cardiac function and may prevent clinical deterioration.展开更多
Cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT) effected via biventricular pacing has been established as prime therapy for heart failure patients of New York Heart Association functional class Ⅱ, Ⅲ and ambulatory Ⅳ, reduce...Cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT) effected via biventricular pacing has been established as prime therapy for heart failure patients of New York Heart Association functional class Ⅱ, Ⅲ and ambulatory Ⅳ, reduced left ventricular(LV) function, and a widened QRS complex. CRT has been shown to improve symptoms, LV function, hospitalization rates, and survival. In order to maximize the benefit from CRT and reduce the number of non-responders, consideration should be given to target the optimal site for LV lead implantation away from myocardial scar and close to the latest LV site activation; and also to appropriately program the device paying particular attention to optimal atrioventricular and interventricular intervals. We herein review current data related to both optimal LV lead placement and device programming and their effects on CRT clinical outcomes.展开更多
We are reporting a case of 71-year old lady with a dual chamber demand pacemaker,who developed acute pulmonary edema due to an acute left ventricular(LV)dysfunction and worsening in mitral valve regurgitation after at...We are reporting a case of 71-year old lady with a dual chamber demand pacemaker,who developed acute pulmonary edema due to an acute left ventricular(LV)dysfunction and worsening in mitral valve regurgitation after atrioventricular nodal ablation for uncontrolled atrial fibrillation.This was attributed to right ventricular apical pacing leading to LV dyssynchronization.Patient dramatically improved within 12-24 h after upgrading her single chamber pacemaker to biventricular pacing.Our case demonstrates that biventricular pacing can be an effective modality of treatment of acute congestive heart failure.In particular,it can be used when it is secondary to LV dysfunction and severe mitral regurgitation attributed to significant dyssynchrony created by right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular nodal ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation.展开更多
Background: The optimal site for left ventricular (LV) lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains uncertain. Intra-procedural measures for predicting response to CRT have shown mixed results. Hy...Background: The optimal site for left ventricular (LV) lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains uncertain. Intra-procedural measures for predicting response to CRT have shown mixed results. Hypothesis: This study analyzed intracardiac electrogram (IEGM) characteristics at implant and assessed patients’ response rates (RR) to CRT. Methods: Forty-one consecutive patients undergoing CRT were enrolled. Medically optimized patients in sinus rhythm, with ejection fraction (EF) 34 were included. Right ventricular (RV) leads were positioned mid-septum. LV leads were targeted to the latest mechanical activation on echocardiography. IEGMs were measured, assessing intrinsic RV-to-LV delay (int RV-LV), RV-paced delay (RVp-LV), and LV-paced delay (LVp-RV). The difference between LVp-RV and RVp-LV was recorded as delta-LV. Response was defined as improvement of EF > 10%, reduction in LVEDD > 15% and improvement of ≥1 NYHA class. Results: Overall RR was 79%. LV leads were placed in the target location in 91%. Int RV-LV was 101 ± 14 ms in responders;78 ± 11 ms in non-responders (p 100 had a RR of 87%;int RV-LV 40 ms had a RR of 56%;delta-LV < 40 ms had a RR of 85%. There was no significant correlation between lead position, DI, QRS duration or EF and IEGM measurements. Conclusions: IEGM measures at implant are easily obtained. Significant intrinsic electrical delay and shorter delta-LV both predict response, even when LV leads are implanted in the targeted mechanically-delayed segment. These assessments of electrical dyssynchrony may be used to determine optimal lead positions and response to CRT.展开更多
目的分析希氏束起搏对慢性心力衰竭患者心功能、心律失常、运动能力及生活质量的影响。方法选取2021年1月—2023年1月黔东南苗族侗族自治州人民医院收治的60例慢性心力衰竭患者。所有患者均接受希氏束起搏植入术。对患者随访6个月,观察...目的分析希氏束起搏对慢性心力衰竭患者心功能、心律失常、运动能力及生活质量的影响。方法选取2021年1月—2023年1月黔东南苗族侗族自治州人民医院收治的60例慢性心力衰竭患者。所有患者均接受希氏束起搏植入术。对患者随访6个月,观察其治疗效果,对患者的心功能、心律失常、运动能力及生活质量等进行评价。结果(1)患者手术前后左室舒张末期容积(left ventricular end diastolic volume,LVEDV)、左室舒张末期内径(left ventricular end-diastolic diameter,LVEDd)指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。除左室射血分数(left ventricular ejection fractions,LVEF)、左室内压最大变化速率指标(maximum rate of change of left chamber pressure,LVdp/dt)高于术前外,术后其余心功能指标均比术前低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(2)手术前后的室性早搏比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。其余指标均术后优于术前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(3)术后各项生活质量分值均比术前高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论希氏束起搏技术的应用能够有效改善慢性心力衰竭患者的预后,此种干预形式不仅促进患者心功能的提升,并且还可使心律失常状态得到缓解,有助于提高其运动能力、生活质量等。展开更多
文摘Background: Heart failure is a major public health challenge in sub-Saharan Africa. In patients with chronic Heart Failure and cardiac desynchrony, studies have suggested that cardiac resynchronization, can improve cardiac function and the quality of life of patients. However, in Sub-Saharan Africa, very few studies have been done on cardiac resynchronization which is in its infancy. The aim of this study is to report the local data from our hospital. Method: It was a transversal, descriptive and analytical study conducted from November 2019 to September 2022 at the Cardiology Department of the Principal Hospital of Dakar. Results: Twelve patients were implanted for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT). The sex ratio was 8 males/4 females. The average age was 67 ± 11 years. Ten patients had non-ischemic heart disease and the two others had ischemic one. All of them had NYHA III or IV scores before CRT. The Quality of Life (QOL) was judged as poor by all of the patients. The average duration of QRS was 156 ± 9 ms. 27.9% ± 5% was the mean Left Ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Complications occur in 3/12 patients (25%). It was one CS vein dissection, one micro LV lead dislodgement and one phrenic nerve stimulation. Nine patients, who were considered as responders, had an improvement of QOL and NYHA, the LVEF increased and the end-diastolic dimension, and the duration of the QRS interval all decreased. Two patients do not respond and one (1) who had permanent atrial fibrillation, was a secondary responder after an atrioventricular junction ablation. Conclusion: Cardiac resynchronization is a therapy that improves the QOL of patients, the LVEF and reduces the duration of the QRS interval. However, this procedure is not without risk of complications. In sub-Saharan Africa, the major challenge is to improve the financial accessibility of this therapy for the population.
基金Supported by The Clinical Research Center Project of Department of Science and Technology of Guizhou Province,No.(2016)410 and No.(2017)5405
文摘BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT) can be used as an escalated therapy to improve heart function in patients with cardiac dysfunction due to long-term right ventricular pacing. However, guidelines are only targeted at adults. CRT is rarely used in children.CASE SUMMARY This case aimed to implement biventricular pacing in one child with heart failure who had a left ventricular ejection fraction < 35% at 4 years after implantation of an atrioventricular sequential pacemaker due to atrioventricular block.Postoperatively, echocardiography showed atrial sensing ventricular pacing and QRS wave duration of 120-130 ms, and cardiac function significantly improved after upgrading pacemaker.CONCLUSION Patients whose cardiac function is deteriorated to a level to upgrade to CRT should be upgraded to reverse myocardial remodeling as soon as possible.
文摘BACKGROUND Left bundle branch pacing(LBBP)is a physiological pacing method that has emerged in recent years.It is an ideal choice for patients with complete left bundle branch block who are in need of cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT).Moreover,LBBP is superior in maintaining physiological ventricular activation and can effectively improve heart function and quality of life in patients with pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy.However,LBBP in pacing-dependent patients who already have cardiac dysfunction has not been well assessed.CASE SUMMARY A 69-year-old male patient presented with symptoms of chest tightness,palpitation and systolic heart failure with New York Heart Association class III for 1 mo.The 12-lead electrocardiogram showed atrial fibrillation with third-degree atrioventricular block and ventricular premature beat.Holter revealed a right bundle branch block,atrial fibrillation with third-degree atrioventricular block,frequent multifocal ventricular premature beats,Ron-T and ventricular tachycardia.The echocardiogram documented an enlarged left atrium and left ventricle and a low left ventricular ejection fraction.Coronary angiography indicated a stenosis of 30%in the middle left anterior descending artery.Apparently,a CRT-D pacemaker was the best choice for this patient according to previous findings.However,the patient was worried about the financial burden.A single-chamber pacemaker with LBBP was selected,with the plan to take amiodarone and upgrade with dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or CRT-D at an appropriate time.During the follow-up at 3 mo after LBBP,the patient showed an improvement in cardiac function with slight improvement in echocardiography parameters,and the New York Heart Association functional class was maintained at I.Moreover,the patient no longer suffered from chest tightness and palpitation.Holter showed decreased ventricular arrhythmia of less than 5%.CONCLUSION LBBP might be used in patients with heart failure and a high-degree atrioventricular block as an alternative to conventional CRT.
文摘Symptomatic bradycardia is effectively treated with the implantation of a cardiac pacemaker. Although a highly successful therapy, during recent years there has been a focus on the negative effects associated with longterm pacing of the apex of the right ventricle(RV). It has been shown in both experimental and clinical studies that RV pacing leads to ventricular dyssynchrony, similar to that of left bundle branch block, with subsequent detrimental effects on cardiac structure and function, and in some cases adverse clinical outcomes such as atrial fibrillation, heart failure and death. There is substantial evidence that patients with reduced left ventricular function(LVEF) are at particular high risk of suffering the detrimental clinical effects of long-term RV pacing. The evidence is, however, incomplete, coming largely from subanalyses of pacemaker and implantable cardiac defibrillator studies. In this group of patients with reduced LVEF and an expected high amount of RV pacing, biventricular pacing(cardiac resynchronization therapy) devices can prevent the negative effects of RV pacing and reduce ventricular dyssynchrony. Therefore, cardiac resynchronization therapy has emerged as an attractive option with promising results and more clinical studies are underway. Furthermore, specific pacemaker algorithms, which minimize RV pacing, can also reduce the negative effects of RV stimulation on cardiac function and may prevent clinical deterioration.
文摘Cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT) effected via biventricular pacing has been established as prime therapy for heart failure patients of New York Heart Association functional class Ⅱ, Ⅲ and ambulatory Ⅳ, reduced left ventricular(LV) function, and a widened QRS complex. CRT has been shown to improve symptoms, LV function, hospitalization rates, and survival. In order to maximize the benefit from CRT and reduce the number of non-responders, consideration should be given to target the optimal site for LV lead implantation away from myocardial scar and close to the latest LV site activation; and also to appropriately program the device paying particular attention to optimal atrioventricular and interventricular intervals. We herein review current data related to both optimal LV lead placement and device programming and their effects on CRT clinical outcomes.
文摘We are reporting a case of 71-year old lady with a dual chamber demand pacemaker,who developed acute pulmonary edema due to an acute left ventricular(LV)dysfunction and worsening in mitral valve regurgitation after atrioventricular nodal ablation for uncontrolled atrial fibrillation.This was attributed to right ventricular apical pacing leading to LV dyssynchronization.Patient dramatically improved within 12-24 h after upgrading her single chamber pacemaker to biventricular pacing.Our case demonstrates that biventricular pacing can be an effective modality of treatment of acute congestive heart failure.In particular,it can be used when it is secondary to LV dysfunction and severe mitral regurgitation attributed to significant dyssynchrony created by right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular nodal ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation.
文摘Background: The optimal site for left ventricular (LV) lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains uncertain. Intra-procedural measures for predicting response to CRT have shown mixed results. Hypothesis: This study analyzed intracardiac electrogram (IEGM) characteristics at implant and assessed patients’ response rates (RR) to CRT. Methods: Forty-one consecutive patients undergoing CRT were enrolled. Medically optimized patients in sinus rhythm, with ejection fraction (EF) 34 were included. Right ventricular (RV) leads were positioned mid-septum. LV leads were targeted to the latest mechanical activation on echocardiography. IEGMs were measured, assessing intrinsic RV-to-LV delay (int RV-LV), RV-paced delay (RVp-LV), and LV-paced delay (LVp-RV). The difference between LVp-RV and RVp-LV was recorded as delta-LV. Response was defined as improvement of EF > 10%, reduction in LVEDD > 15% and improvement of ≥1 NYHA class. Results: Overall RR was 79%. LV leads were placed in the target location in 91%. Int RV-LV was 101 ± 14 ms in responders;78 ± 11 ms in non-responders (p 100 had a RR of 87%;int RV-LV 40 ms had a RR of 56%;delta-LV < 40 ms had a RR of 85%. There was no significant correlation between lead position, DI, QRS duration or EF and IEGM measurements. Conclusions: IEGM measures at implant are easily obtained. Significant intrinsic electrical delay and shorter delta-LV both predict response, even when LV leads are implanted in the targeted mechanically-delayed segment. These assessments of electrical dyssynchrony may be used to determine optimal lead positions and response to CRT.
文摘目的分析希氏束起搏对慢性心力衰竭患者心功能、心律失常、运动能力及生活质量的影响。方法选取2021年1月—2023年1月黔东南苗族侗族自治州人民医院收治的60例慢性心力衰竭患者。所有患者均接受希氏束起搏植入术。对患者随访6个月,观察其治疗效果,对患者的心功能、心律失常、运动能力及生活质量等进行评价。结果(1)患者手术前后左室舒张末期容积(left ventricular end diastolic volume,LVEDV)、左室舒张末期内径(left ventricular end-diastolic diameter,LVEDd)指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。除左室射血分数(left ventricular ejection fractions,LVEF)、左室内压最大变化速率指标(maximum rate of change of left chamber pressure,LVdp/dt)高于术前外,术后其余心功能指标均比术前低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(2)手术前后的室性早搏比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。其余指标均术后优于术前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(3)术后各项生活质量分值均比术前高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论希氏束起搏技术的应用能够有效改善慢性心力衰竭患者的预后,此种干预形式不仅促进患者心功能的提升,并且还可使心律失常状态得到缓解,有助于提高其运动能力、生活质量等。
