Objective： To evaluate the comparative therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency ablation （RFA） and hepatic resection （HR） for breast cancer liver metastases （BCLMs）. Methods： Studies that had examined the outcom...Objective： To evaluate the comparative therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency ablation （RFA） and hepatic resection （HR） for breast cancer liver metastases （BCLMs）. Methods： Studies that had examined the outcomes for both RFA and HR for BCLM were identified by searching the electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Pooled analyzes of the overall survival （OS）, disease-free survival （DFS）, and short-term outcomes of BCLM were performed. Results： Patients with BCLM gained many more survival benefits from HR than from RFA with regard to the 3-year OS rate （combined odds ratio （OR） 0.41, 95% confidence interval （CI） 0.29-0.59, P〈0.001）, 5-year OS rate （combined OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.32-0.46, P〈0.001）, 3-year DFS （combined OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.27-0.49, P〈0.001）, and 5-year DFS （combined OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.40-0.66, P〈0.001）. RFA had fewer postoperative compli- cations （combined OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.20-0.44, P〈0.001） and shorter hospital stays （combined OR -9.01, 95% CI -13.49-4.54, P〈0.001） than HR. Conclusions： HR takes precedence over RFA in the treatment of patients with BCLM, considering the better survival rate. RFA gives rise to fewer complications and can be carried out with a shorter hos- pital stay, compared to HR. RFA should be reserved for patients who are not optimum candidates for resection.展开更多
It is widely accepted that the indications for hepatectomy in colorectal cancer liver metastases and liver metastases of neuro-endocrine tumors result in relatively better prognoses, whereas, the indications and progn...It is widely accepted that the indications for hepatectomy in colorectal cancer liver metastases and liver metastases of neuro-endocrine tumors result in relatively better prognoses, whereas, the indications and prognoses of hepatectomy for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases(NCNNLM) remain controversial owing to the limited number of cases and the heterogeneity of the primary diseases. There have been many publications on NCNNLM; however, its background heterogeneity makes it difficult to reach a specific conclusion. This heterogeneous disease group should be discussed in the order from its general to specific aspect. The present review paper describes the general prognosis and risk factors associated with NCNNLM while specifically focusing on the liver metastases of each primary disease. A multidisciplinary approach that takes into consideration appropriate timing for hepatectomy combined with chemotherapy may prolong survival and/or contribute to the improvement of the quality of life while giving respite from systemic chemotherapy.展开更多
文摘Objective： To evaluate the comparative therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency ablation （RFA） and hepatic resection （HR） for breast cancer liver metastases （BCLMs）. Methods： Studies that had examined the outcomes for both RFA and HR for BCLM were identified by searching the electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Pooled analyzes of the overall survival （OS）, disease-free survival （DFS）, and short-term outcomes of BCLM were performed. Results： Patients with BCLM gained many more survival benefits from HR than from RFA with regard to the 3-year OS rate （combined odds ratio （OR） 0.41, 95% confidence interval （CI） 0.29-0.59, P〈0.001）, 5-year OS rate （combined OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.32-0.46, P〈0.001）, 3-year DFS （combined OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.27-0.49, P〈0.001）, and 5-year DFS （combined OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.40-0.66, P〈0.001）. RFA had fewer postoperative compli- cations （combined OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.20-0.44, P〈0.001） and shorter hospital stays （combined OR -9.01, 95% CI -13.49-4.54, P〈0.001） than HR. Conclusions： HR takes precedence over RFA in the treatment of patients with BCLM, considering the better survival rate. RFA gives rise to fewer complications and can be carried out with a shorter hos- pital stay, compared to HR. RFA should be reserved for patients who are not optimum candidates for resection.
文摘It is widely accepted that the indications for hepatectomy in colorectal cancer liver metastases and liver metastases of neuro-endocrine tumors result in relatively better prognoses, whereas, the indications and prognoses of hepatectomy for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases(NCNNLM) remain controversial owing to the limited number of cases and the heterogeneity of the primary diseases. There have been many publications on NCNNLM; however, its background heterogeneity makes it difficult to reach a specific conclusion. This heterogeneous disease group should be discussed in the order from its general to specific aspect. The present review paper describes the general prognosis and risk factors associated with NCNNLM while specifically focusing on the liver metastases of each primary disease. A multidisciplinary approach that takes into consideration appropriate timing for hepatectomy combined with chemotherapy may prolong survival and/or contribute to the improvement of the quality of life while giving respite from systemic chemotherapy.
