Two Crossed Dermal Flaps for Prevention of Bottoming out after Breast Reduction

Introduction: Breast reduction is one of the most prevalent plastic surgery procedures in Syria and the world, bottoming out on the other hand is one of the most happened disadvantages after breast reduction with inferior pedicle technique. Different techniques were used to prevent this deformity after inferior pedicle. In this study we tried to prevent bottoming out by using two crossed dermal flaps suspending the inferior pedicle to the periosteum of the 2nd rib. Methods and materials: 32 patients had breast reduction surgery using inferior pedicle technique at Almowassat University Hospital in Damascus. We divide them into 2 groups, 16 patients each. First group we used crossed dermal flaps with the inferior pedicle and the second group was without these flaps, the dermal flaps had a base on the side of the inferior pedicle base, crossed anterior to it in the middle point between the lower edge of the areola and the IMF and then sutured to the periosteum of the 2nd rib on each side. Results: Preoperatively, the average distance between the inframammary fold and areola was 14.5 cm (range, 11 - 18 cm) in the first group without dermal flaps and 14 cm in the second group with dermal flaps. The average amount of breast parenchymal resection was 790 g (range, 140 - 1600 g). The average distance between the inframammary fold and the lower border of the areola was 8.5 cm (range, 7.5 - 9 cm) on the postoperative first-year measurements in the group with flaps and 10.2 cm (8.6 - 11.4 cm) in the other group. Conclusion: Inferior pedicle suspension using crossed dermal flaps has a real role in preventing bottoming out, without using any allogenic or alloplastic materials, making it one of the considered ways in preventing bottoming after breast reduction.

Breast Reduction Complications

Background: Breast reduction surgery is increasing in popularity, with so many techniques all around the world, and the community’s knowledge of the details of this procedure increases thanks to the Internet and easy access to information, which increases breast reduction reviews for plastic surgery clinics. Reduction mammaplasty is an established and effective technique to treat symptomatic macromastia. Variable rates of complications have been reported, and there is a continued need for better outcome assessment studies. Aim: The purpose of this study was to identify the complications occurred during the first year of breast reduction surgery. Materials and Methods: A prospective study over a 1-year period from October 2018 to October 2019, that included 32 patients who underwent breast reduction surgery using the same technique (inferior pedicle and inverted T scar) in the Department of Plastic Surgery at Al-Mouassat University Hospital, Damascus, Syria. Patients were followed through a whole year after surgery and complications that occurred were recorded. Results: Complications that occurred in 14 patients (43%), and, and were more common in patients with larger breasts and worse symptoms before surgery. The most common complication was delayed wound healing, and it was associated with breast volume before surgery and with smoking. In general, the most relevant factor influencing the incidence of complications was the weight of the resected breast tissue, which is mainly related to the size of the breast before surgery. Conclusion: The weight of the resected breast tissue was the most important factor influencing the occurrence of complications after breast reduction surgery. The most prevalent complication was delayed wound healing and it was associated with the weight of the removed tissue.

Central/Inferior Pedicle Technique for Reduction Mammaplasty: A Systematic Review

Background: Intention of reduction mammoplasty is to minimize the breast volume and maintain supply of blood and innervations to NAC (nipple-areola-complex), to lift NAC to higher position in mound of breast using any reliable technique like central pedicle technique. Methods: This research selected and observed 15 patients who underwent central pedicle technique for mammaplasty of breast reduction. Age criterium included for this research is 18 years to 60 years for 5 years from Chinese patients. In addition to these, this study systematically reviewed about central pedicle technique for 25 years. Papers were selected from 1996 to 2021. Results: Using central pedicle technique, shape and projection of breast were reduced. Such changes of measurements showed that postoperative technique leads to long-term satisfactory impact. Conclusion: Central pedicle technique was found to be best, reliable and safe technique for reduction mammaplasty. Reduction mammaplasty is used for reducing the ptotic and large breasts. It provides more satisfactory and good aesthetic outcomes. Majority of patients do not have any complications postoperative. Complications rate is minimal when central pedicle technique is used for reduction mammaplasty. Patients with ptotic and large breasts would have huge advantage postoperative.

乳腺癌预后多因素研究的系统观

分析系统论在乳腺癌预后多因素研究中的指导和预见作用,阐明在临床科学研究中自觉、主动地运用系统论的科学方法,可以拓展研究思路,为乳腺癌的治疗提供新的方法;同时也提示还原法仅是系统论研究的基础方法之一,而非唯一方法。在基于系统论的研究中,应当将还原法、整体法有机结合。

A propensity score matched analysis of obesity as an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in reduction mammaplasty

Aim:Reduction mammaplasty is a commonly performed procedure for the treatment of symptomatic macromastia and is increasingly desired by the obese population.With the increasing prevalence obesity in the population,it is imperative to understand its effect on postoperative outcomes.The purpose of this study is to evaluate obesity as an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in breast reduction surgery using 1:1 patient matching through propensity scores between obese patients and non-obese controls.Methods:Between 2005 and 2013,the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset identified a total of 6,016 patients as having undergone primary reduction mammaplasty with 30-day postoperative follow-up.Patients were divided into obese[body mass index(BMI)of 30 or more]vs.not obese(BMI below 30).Patients were initially analyzed using standard multivariable analysis.Using propensity scores obtained from a logistic regression model,patients were subsequently matched 1:1 according to preoperative and operative variables to truly isolate the effect of obesity on surgical outcomes.Outcomes were compared between the matched cohorts using McNemar’s test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test.Results:In unmatched multivariable analysis,rates of overall complications(7.2%vs.5.3%,P=0.0024),wound complications(5.5%vs.3.6%,P=0.0004),superficial surgical site infection(4.1%vs.2.8%,P=0.0050),and wound dehiscence(0.3%vs.1.1%,P=0.0005)were found to be statistically different between obese vs.non-obese,respectively.However,when comparing 1:1 matched obese and non-obese patients,only wound complications(4.6%vs.3.1%,P=0.0334)were significantly increased in the obese cohort.Conclusion:Using the most robust statistical tools available,obesity was determined to affect wound complications after breast reduction without increased detriment on other major complications when compared to the non-obese.Obesity should be a considered with other preoperative comorbidities,rather than an independent contraindication to surgery.Breast reduction appears to be safe in the obese patient who is otherwise healthy.