Objective: To compare the effects and safety of conventional transarterial chemoembolization(c TACE) and yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization [TARE(90 Y)] for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)Methods: Nine high-qual...Objective: To compare the effects and safety of conventional transarterial chemoembolization(c TACE) and yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization [TARE(90 Y)] for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)Methods: Nine high-quality observational studies, one low bias-risk randomized controlled trial(RCT), and one moderate biasrisk RCT included 1,652 patients [c TACE, 1,124; TARE(90 Y), 528], from whom data were extracted for this systematic review and meta-analysis.Results: The extracted study outcomes included 1-year and 2-year overall survival(OS) rates, objective responses(ORs), and serious adverse events(AEs). 1-year OS rates: OR = 0.939, 95 % CI: 0.705-1.251, P = 0.66. 2-year OS rates: overall pooled OR =0.641, 95% CI: 0.382-1.075, P = 0.092; observational study subgroup OR = 0.575, 95% CI: 0.336-0.984, P = 0.043; RCT subgroup OR* = 0.641, 95% CI: 0.382-1.075, P = 0.346. OR: overall pooled OR = 0.781, 95% CI: 0.454-1.343, P = 0.371; m RECIST subgroup OR = 0.584, 95 % CI: 0.349-0.976, P = 0.040; WHO subgroup OR = 1.065; 95% CI: 0.500-2.268, P = 0.870. Serious AEs: overall pooled RR = 1.477, 95% CI: 0.864-2.526, P = 0.154; RCT subgroup RR = 0.680, 95% CI: 0.325-1.423, P = 0.306; observational study subgroup RR = 1.925; 95 % CI: 0.978-3.788, P = 0.058.Conclusions: TARE(90 Y) increased 2-year OS rates in the observational subgroup and resulted in better OR rates, according to m RECIST criteria, in comparison with c TACE. Furthermore, a lower risk of AEs was observed for TARE(90 Y) than for c TACE.展开更多
文摘Objective: To compare the effects and safety of conventional transarterial chemoembolization(c TACE) and yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization [TARE(90 Y)] for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)Methods: Nine high-quality observational studies, one low bias-risk randomized controlled trial(RCT), and one moderate biasrisk RCT included 1,652 patients [c TACE, 1,124; TARE(90 Y), 528], from whom data were extracted for this systematic review and meta-analysis.Results: The extracted study outcomes included 1-year and 2-year overall survival(OS) rates, objective responses(ORs), and serious adverse events(AEs). 1-year OS rates: OR = 0.939, 95 % CI: 0.705-1.251, P = 0.66. 2-year OS rates: overall pooled OR =0.641, 95% CI: 0.382-1.075, P = 0.092; observational study subgroup OR = 0.575, 95% CI: 0.336-0.984, P = 0.043; RCT subgroup OR* = 0.641, 95% CI: 0.382-1.075, P = 0.346. OR: overall pooled OR = 0.781, 95% CI: 0.454-1.343, P = 0.371; m RECIST subgroup OR = 0.584, 95 % CI: 0.349-0.976, P = 0.040; WHO subgroup OR = 1.065; 95% CI: 0.500-2.268, P = 0.870. Serious AEs: overall pooled RR = 1.477, 95% CI: 0.864-2.526, P = 0.154; RCT subgroup RR = 0.680, 95% CI: 0.325-1.423, P = 0.306; observational study subgroup RR = 1.925; 95 % CI: 0.978-3.788, P = 0.058.Conclusions: TARE(90 Y) increased 2-year OS rates in the observational subgroup and resulted in better OR rates, according to m RECIST criteria, in comparison with c TACE. Furthermore, a lower risk of AEs was observed for TARE(90 Y) than for c TACE.
