Introduction: This study aimed to develop valid and reliable scale with the intention of measure Coping Self-efficacy (CSES) of Iranian type 2 diabetic patients. Patients and Methods: Validity and reliability of Irani...Introduction: This study aimed to develop valid and reliable scale with the intention of measure Coping Self-efficacy (CSES) of Iranian type 2 diabetic patients. Patients and Methods: Validity and reliability of Iranian version of Coping Self-efficacy Scale (CSES) were measured by a cross-sectional study. Content validity, reliability and cultural equivalency were appraised through qualitative and quantitative study on 260 participants who have type 2 diabetes. Results: Reliability and validity of the scale and its four subscales, such as “stop unpleasant emotions and thoughts” (a = 0.92) “used problem-focused coping” (a = 0.71), Self-efficacy on diabetes problem solving (a = 0.74) and “get support from friends and family” (a = 0.67) were approved explicitly by a psychometric analysis;these show that the scale was slightly valid and reliable on the study setting. An intraclass correlation coefficient was satisfactory (p < 0.001). Criterion validity between total scale and metabolic control Index (HbA1c) of type 2 diabetic patients was significant (p < 0.001) and showed indirect correlation with the domains of the scale. Conclusion: Study findings supported the reliability and validity of the Iranian version of new Coping Self-efficacy-24 for measuring Coping Selfefficacy among Iranian type 2 diabetic patients. Based on our finding, we would like to recommend appropriate interventions in the future.展开更多
目的对心理健康促进量表(Mental Health Promotion Scale,MHPS)进行汉化,并在护理人员中检验其信效度。方法依照Brislin翻译模式对英文版量表进行翻译、回译、文化调适和预调查,形成中文版MHPS。2022年12月至2023年4月,选取959名临床护...目的对心理健康促进量表(Mental Health Promotion Scale,MHPS)进行汉化,并在护理人员中检验其信效度。方法依照Brislin翻译模式对英文版量表进行翻译、回译、文化调适和预调查,形成中文版MHPS。2022年12月至2023年4月,选取959名临床护士展开问卷调查,评价量表的信效度。结果中文版MHPS探索性因子分析提取12个公因子,累计方差贡献率为74.634%;其条目水平内容效度指数(I-CVI)0.900~1.000,量表水平内容效度指数(S-CVI/Ave)为0.996。验证性因子分析显示,模型各项指标均达标准,模型拟合度良好。量表总的Cronbach′sα系数为0.961,重测信度为0.888,Spearman-Brown折半信度系数为0.889。结论中文版MHPS量表的信效度良好,可作为我国护理人员心理健康促进能力的测评工具。展开更多
文摘Introduction: This study aimed to develop valid and reliable scale with the intention of measure Coping Self-efficacy (CSES) of Iranian type 2 diabetic patients. Patients and Methods: Validity and reliability of Iranian version of Coping Self-efficacy Scale (CSES) were measured by a cross-sectional study. Content validity, reliability and cultural equivalency were appraised through qualitative and quantitative study on 260 participants who have type 2 diabetes. Results: Reliability and validity of the scale and its four subscales, such as “stop unpleasant emotions and thoughts” (a = 0.92) “used problem-focused coping” (a = 0.71), Self-efficacy on diabetes problem solving (a = 0.74) and “get support from friends and family” (a = 0.67) were approved explicitly by a psychometric analysis;these show that the scale was slightly valid and reliable on the study setting. An intraclass correlation coefficient was satisfactory (p < 0.001). Criterion validity between total scale and metabolic control Index (HbA1c) of type 2 diabetic patients was significant (p < 0.001) and showed indirect correlation with the domains of the scale. Conclusion: Study findings supported the reliability and validity of the Iranian version of new Coping Self-efficacy-24 for measuring Coping Selfefficacy among Iranian type 2 diabetic patients. Based on our finding, we would like to recommend appropriate interventions in the future.
文摘目的对心理健康促进量表(Mental Health Promotion Scale,MHPS)进行汉化,并在护理人员中检验其信效度。方法依照Brislin翻译模式对英文版量表进行翻译、回译、文化调适和预调查,形成中文版MHPS。2022年12月至2023年4月,选取959名临床护士展开问卷调查,评价量表的信效度。结果中文版MHPS探索性因子分析提取12个公因子,累计方差贡献率为74.634%;其条目水平内容效度指数(I-CVI)0.900~1.000,量表水平内容效度指数(S-CVI/Ave)为0.996。验证性因子分析显示,模型各项指标均达标准,模型拟合度良好。量表总的Cronbach′sα系数为0.961,重测信度为0.888,Spearman-Brown折半信度系数为0.889。结论中文版MHPS量表的信效度良好,可作为我国护理人员心理健康促进能力的测评工具。
