BACKGROUND Liver cancer is a malignant tumor with high morbidity and mortality.Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE)is the main method for surgically unresectable liver cancer.In recent years,drug-loaded micr...BACKGROUND Liver cancer is a malignant tumor with high morbidity and mortality.Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE)is the main method for surgically unresectable liver cancer.In recent years,drug-loaded microspheres have been gradually applied in TACE technology.There are some controversies about the therapeutic effects of drug-loaded microspheres TACE(D-TACE)and traditional TACE.AIM To explore the short-term efficacy of D-TACE and traditional TACE in the treatment of advanced liver cancer.METHODS The clinical data of 73 patients with advanced liver cancer admitted to the First and Sixth Medical Centers of Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2017 to October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.Among them,15 patients were treated with D-TACE,and 58 patients were treated with traditional TACE.Clinical baseline characteristics,perioperative laboratory indices,postoperative adverse reactions and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.RESULTS There was no statistical difference between the two groups for the postoperative response:The highest postoperative body temperature of the drug-loaded microsphere group was 38.0±0.9℃and the postoperative highest body temperature of the traditional TACE group was 38.3±0.7℃(t=-1.414,P=0.162).For the 24 h postoperative nausea and vomiting after surgery in terms of scoring and postoperative pain scores,the traditional TACE group was higher than the drugloaded microsphere group(χ2=14.33,P=0.014;χ2=32.967,P=0.000)and the two groups had significant statistical differences.The disease control rate at 3 mo after treatment in the drugloaded microsphere group was 60%and the disease control rate at 3 mo after treatment in the traditional TACE group was 75.9%(χ2=4.091,P=0.252).There was no statistical difference between the two groups of data.During the follow-up period,the number of interventional treatments received was once in the drug-loaded microsphere group and the traditional TACE group received an average of 1.48 treatments(χ2=10.444 P=0.005).There was a statistical difference between the two groups.CONCLUSION Compared with traditional TACE,D-TACE may have some advantages in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with a large tumor load in the short term,but the long-term clinical efficacy needs additional follow-up studies.In addition,compared with the traditional group,the patients in the drug-loaded microsphere group had better subjective tolerance and could reduce the number of interventional treatments.Therefore,D-TACE is worthy of clinical promotion.展开更多
BACKGROUND Drug-eluting beads show good safety and promising efficacy when used as part of a transarterial chemoembolization regimen for primary liver cancer.However,data on the clinical efficacy and safety of pirarub...BACKGROUND Drug-eluting beads show good safety and promising efficacy when used as part of a transarterial chemoembolization regimen for primary liver cancer.However,data on the clinical efficacy and safety of pirarubicin-loaded beads combined with lobaplatin are lacking in China.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using pirarubicin-loaded beads combined with lobaplatin for primary liver cancer.METHODS Between January 2019 and March 2020,60 patients with primary liver cancer were selected at Hebei North University Affiliated First Hospital.According to different treatment methods,the participants were categorized into two groups with 30 patients treated with pirarubicin-loaded microspheres combined with lobaplatin included in an observation group and 30 patients treated with pirarubicin emulsion with lipiodol combined with lobaplatin were included in a control group.The progression-free survival,overall survival,clinical response rate,disease control rate,liver and kidney function and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.RESULTS The progression-free survival was 14 mo in the observation group,which was significantly higher than 9 mo of the control group(P<0.05).The 6-mo,12-mo and 18-mo survival rates were 93.33%(28/30),66.67%(20/30)and 23.33%(7/30),respectively in the observation group,which were significantly higher than 83.33%(25/30),50.00%(15/30)and 13.33%(4/30),respectively,of the control group(all P<0.05).The clinical efficacy rate and disease control rate were 73.33%and 93.33%,respectively,in the observation group,which were significantly higher than those of the control group(53.55%and 80.00%,respectively,all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in alpha-fetoprotein between the two groups before the treatment(P>0.05).After the treatment,alpha-fetoprotein was 289.06±76.21 ng/m L in the observation group and 365.01±73.11 ng/m L in the control group,which were low in both groups compared with those before the treatment(all P<0.05).The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference for the adverse reactions of pain and fever between the two groups(P<0.05).CONCLUSION The combination of pirarubicin-loaded beads and lobaplatin can improve treatment efficacy resulting in mild liver function damage and postoperative complications in patients with primary liver cancer.It can be used in clinical practice.展开更多
基金National key research and development project of Ministry of Science and Technology,No.2016YFC0103908.
文摘BACKGROUND Liver cancer is a malignant tumor with high morbidity and mortality.Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE)is the main method for surgically unresectable liver cancer.In recent years,drug-loaded microspheres have been gradually applied in TACE technology.There are some controversies about the therapeutic effects of drug-loaded microspheres TACE(D-TACE)and traditional TACE.AIM To explore the short-term efficacy of D-TACE and traditional TACE in the treatment of advanced liver cancer.METHODS The clinical data of 73 patients with advanced liver cancer admitted to the First and Sixth Medical Centers of Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2017 to October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.Among them,15 patients were treated with D-TACE,and 58 patients were treated with traditional TACE.Clinical baseline characteristics,perioperative laboratory indices,postoperative adverse reactions and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.RESULTS There was no statistical difference between the two groups for the postoperative response:The highest postoperative body temperature of the drug-loaded microsphere group was 38.0±0.9℃and the postoperative highest body temperature of the traditional TACE group was 38.3±0.7℃(t=-1.414,P=0.162).For the 24 h postoperative nausea and vomiting after surgery in terms of scoring and postoperative pain scores,the traditional TACE group was higher than the drugloaded microsphere group(χ2=14.33,P=0.014;χ2=32.967,P=0.000)and the two groups had significant statistical differences.The disease control rate at 3 mo after treatment in the drugloaded microsphere group was 60%and the disease control rate at 3 mo after treatment in the traditional TACE group was 75.9%(χ2=4.091,P=0.252).There was no statistical difference between the two groups of data.During the follow-up period,the number of interventional treatments received was once in the drug-loaded microsphere group and the traditional TACE group received an average of 1.48 treatments(χ2=10.444 P=0.005).There was a statistical difference between the two groups.CONCLUSION Compared with traditional TACE,D-TACE may have some advantages in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with a large tumor load in the short term,but the long-term clinical efficacy needs additional follow-up studies.In addition,compared with the traditional group,the patients in the drug-loaded microsphere group had better subjective tolerance and could reduce the number of interventional treatments.Therefore,D-TACE is worthy of clinical promotion.
基金Supported by Zhangjiakou Science and Technology Research and Development Program,No.1821154HZhangjiakou Technology Innovation Guidance Program,No.2021194H。
文摘BACKGROUND Drug-eluting beads show good safety and promising efficacy when used as part of a transarterial chemoembolization regimen for primary liver cancer.However,data on the clinical efficacy and safety of pirarubicin-loaded beads combined with lobaplatin are lacking in China.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using pirarubicin-loaded beads combined with lobaplatin for primary liver cancer.METHODS Between January 2019 and March 2020,60 patients with primary liver cancer were selected at Hebei North University Affiliated First Hospital.According to different treatment methods,the participants were categorized into two groups with 30 patients treated with pirarubicin-loaded microspheres combined with lobaplatin included in an observation group and 30 patients treated with pirarubicin emulsion with lipiodol combined with lobaplatin were included in a control group.The progression-free survival,overall survival,clinical response rate,disease control rate,liver and kidney function and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.RESULTS The progression-free survival was 14 mo in the observation group,which was significantly higher than 9 mo of the control group(P<0.05).The 6-mo,12-mo and 18-mo survival rates were 93.33%(28/30),66.67%(20/30)and 23.33%(7/30),respectively in the observation group,which were significantly higher than 83.33%(25/30),50.00%(15/30)and 13.33%(4/30),respectively,of the control group(all P<0.05).The clinical efficacy rate and disease control rate were 73.33%and 93.33%,respectively,in the observation group,which were significantly higher than those of the control group(53.55%and 80.00%,respectively,all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in alpha-fetoprotein between the two groups before the treatment(P>0.05).After the treatment,alpha-fetoprotein was 289.06±76.21 ng/m L in the observation group and 365.01±73.11 ng/m L in the control group,which were low in both groups compared with those before the treatment(all P<0.05).The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference for the adverse reactions of pain and fever between the two groups(P<0.05).CONCLUSION The combination of pirarubicin-loaded beads and lobaplatin can improve treatment efficacy resulting in mild liver function damage and postoperative complications in patients with primary liver cancer.It can be used in clinical practice.
