In this paper, we consider a class of bounded Reinhardt domains Dα（m, n1,…,nm）. The Bergman kernel function K（z,z^）, the Bergman metric matrix T（z,z^）, the Cauchy-Szegoe kernel function S（z,ζ^） are obtained...In this paper, we consider a class of bounded Reinhardt domains Dα（m, n1,…,nm）. The Bergman kernel function K（z,z^）, the Bergman metric matrix T（z,z^）, the Cauchy-Szegoe kernel function S（z,ζ^） are obtained. Then we prove that the formal Poisson kernel function is not a Poisson kernel function. At last, we prove that Dα is a quasiconvex domain and Dα is a stronger quasiconvex domain if and only if Dα is a hypersphere.展开更多
The purpose of this paper is to complement the results by Lanzani and Stein （2017） by showing thedense definability of the Cauchy-Leray transform for the domains that give the counter-examples of Lanzani andStein （...The purpose of this paper is to complement the results by Lanzani and Stein （2017） by showing thedense definability of the Cauchy-Leray transform for the domains that give the counter-examples of Lanzani andStein （2017）, where LP-boundedness is shown to fail when either the ＂near＂ C2 boundary regularity, or the strongC-linear convexity assumption is dropped.展开更多
The purpose of this paper is to complement the results by Lanzani and Stein(2017) by showing the dense definability of the Cauchy-Leray transform for the domains that give the counter-examples of Lanzani and Stein(201...The purpose of this paper is to complement the results by Lanzani and Stein(2017) by showing the dense definability of the Cauchy-Leray transform for the domains that give the counter-examples of Lanzani and Stein(2017), where L^p-boundedness is shown to fail when either the "near" C^2 boundary regularity, or the strong C-linear convexity assumption is dropped.展开更多
基金Supported by the NSF of Henan University(04YBRW043)
文摘In this paper, we consider a class of bounded Reinhardt domains Dα（m, n1,…,nm）. The Bergman kernel function K（z,z^）, the Bergman metric matrix T（z,z^）, the Cauchy-Szegoe kernel function S（z,ζ^） are obtained. Then we prove that the formal Poisson kernel function is not a Poisson kernel function. At last, we prove that Dα is a quasiconvex domain and Dα is a stronger quasiconvex domain if and only if Dα is a hypersphere.
基金supported by the National Science Foundation of USA (Grant Nos. DMS1503612 (Lanzani) and DMS-1265524 (Stein))
文摘The purpose of this paper is to complement the results by Lanzani and Stein （2017） by showing thedense definability of the Cauchy-Leray transform for the domains that give the counter-examples of Lanzani andStein （2017）, where LP-boundedness is shown to fail when either the ＂near＂ C2 boundary regularity, or the strongC-linear convexity assumption is dropped.
基金supported by the National Science Foundation of USA (Grant Nos. DMS1503612 (Lanzani) and DMS-1265524 (Stein))
文摘The purpose of this paper is to complement the results by Lanzani and Stein(2017) by showing the dense definability of the Cauchy-Leray transform for the domains that give the counter-examples of Lanzani and Stein(2017), where L^p-boundedness is shown to fail when either the "near" C^2 boundary regularity, or the strong C-linear convexity assumption is dropped.
