Objective: To explore the antibacterial activity of combined use of Shuanghuanglian and cefoperazone sulbactam sodium on resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Methods: The Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains which w...Objective: To explore the antibacterial activity of combined use of Shuanghuanglian and cefoperazone sulbactam sodium on resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Methods: The Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains which were sensitive and resistant to cefoperazone sulbactam sodium were selected to prepare different test bacterial solutions respectively;The experimental liquid of Shuanghuanglian and Cefoperazone Sulbactam Sodium were prepared separately and set as different test groups and control groups;The Drug Sensitivity Tests of Shuanghuanglian and cefoperazone sulbactam sodium at different concentration gradients which were used alone or used in combination were carried out for different strains with sensitivity and resistance, And use standard entry as a reference control. Result: The results of drug sensitivity test of Shuanghuanglian combined with Cefoperazone-Sulbactam sodium against the resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were compared with the results of drug sensitivity test of the two separately used, and the difference was statistically significant (P 〈 0.05) [The drug sensitivity test results of Shuanghuanglian and cefoperazone sulbactam sodium to Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant strains were statistically significant compared with the drug sensitivity test results of Shuanghuanglian and Cefoperazone Sulbactam Sodium used separately (P 〈 0.05)];There was a dependence between strains and concentration in the effect of the combination of the two drugs. Conclusion: The combination of Shuanghuanglian and cefoperazone sulbactam sodium has synergistic antibacterial or bactericidal effect on Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant strains. .展开更多
To develop near-infrared （NIR） reflectance spectroscopic methods for the quantitative analysis of cefoperazone sodium/ sulbactam sodium from different manufacturers for injection powder medicaments. Various powders ...To develop near-infrared （NIR） reflectance spectroscopic methods for the quantitative analysis of cefoperazone sodium/ sulbactam sodium from different manufacturers for injection powder medicaments. Various powders of cefoperazone sodium/ sulbactam sodium were directly analyzed by non-destructive NIR reflectance spectroscopy using the spectrometer EQUINOX55. Two quantitative methods via integrating sphere （IS） and fiberoptic probe （FOP） models were explored from 6 batches of commercial samples and 42 batches of laboratory samples at a content ranging from 30% to 70% for cefoperazone and 60% to 20% for sulbactam. The root mean square errors of cross validation （RMSECV） and the root mean square errors of prediction （RMSEP） of IS were 1.79% and 2.85%, respectively, for cefoperazone sodium, and were 1.86% and 3.08%, respectively, for sulbactam sodium; and those of FOP were 2.93% and 2.92%, respectively, for cefoperazone sodium, and were 2.23% and 3.01%, respectively, for sulbactam sodium. Based on the ICH guidelines and Ref. 12, the quantitative models were then evaluated in terms of specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, robustness and model transferability. The non-destructive quantitative NIR methods used in this study are applicable for rapid analysis of injectable powdered drugs from different manufacturers.展开更多
BACKGROUND Respiratory tract infections in the elderly are difficult to cure and can easily recur,thereby posing a great threat to patient prognosis and quality of life.AIM To investigate the therapeutic effects of di...BACKGROUND Respiratory tract infections in the elderly are difficult to cure and can easily recur,thereby posing a great threat to patient prognosis and quality of life.AIM To investigate the therapeutic effects of different antibiotics in elderly patients with respiratory tract infection.METHODS Seventy-four elderly patients with respiratory tract infection were randomly allocated to a study(n=37;treated with cefoperazone sodium/sulbactam sodium)or control(n=37;treated with piperacillin sodium/tazobactam sodium on the basis of routine symptomatic support)group.Both groups were treated for 7 d.Time to symptom relief(leukocyte recovery;body temperature recovery;cough and sputum disappearance;and rale disappearance time),treatment effect,and laboratory indexes[procalcitonin(PCT),C-reactive protein(CRP),white blood cell count(WBC),and neutrophil percentage(NE)]before and 7 d after treatment and the incidence of adverse reactions were assessed.RESULTS In the study group,the time to WBC normalization(6.79±2.09 d),time to body temperature normalization(4.15±1.08 d),time to disappearance of cough and sputum(6.19±1.56 d),and time to disappearance of rales(6.68±1.43 d)were shorter than those of the control group(8.89±2.32 d,5.81±1.33 d,8.77±2.11 d,and 8.69±2.12 d,respectively;P=0.000).Total effective rate was higher in the study group(94.59%vs 75.68%,P=0.022).Serum PCT(12.89±3.96μg/L),CRP(19.62±6.44 mg/L),WBC(20.61±6.38×10^(9)/L),and NE(86.14±7.21%)levels of the study group before treatment were similar to those of the control group(14.05±4.11μg/L,18.79±5.96 mg/L,21.21±5.59×10^(9)/L,and 84.39±6.95%,respectively)with no significant differences(P=0.220,0.567,0.668,and 0.291,respectively).After 7 d of treatment,serum PCT,CRP,WBC,and NE levels in the two groups were lower than those before treatment.Serum PCT(2.01±0.56μg/L),CRP(3.11±1.02 mg/L),WBC(5.10±1.83×10^(9)/L),and NE(56.35±7.17%)levels were lower in the study group than in the control group(3.29±0.64μg/L,5.67±1.23 mg/L,8.13±3.01×10^(9)/L,and 64.22±8.08%,respectively;P=0.000).There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the groups(7.50%vs 12.50%,P=0.708).CONCLUSION Piperacillin sodium/tazobactam sodium is superior to cefoperazone sodium/sulbactam sodium in the treatment of elderly patients with respiratory tract infection with a similar safety profile.展开更多
Summary： To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous moxifloxacin with those of a commonly used empirical antibiotic regimen, cefoperazone and azithromycin in the treatment of community acquired ...Summary： To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous moxifloxacin with those of a commonly used empirical antibiotic regimen, cefoperazone and azithromycin in the treatment of community acquired pneumonia （CAP） in adult patients requiring initial parenteral therapy, 40 patients with CAP were divided into two groups, a moxifloxacin group （n=20） and a control group （n=20）, which were treated for 7 to 14 days. The patients in the moxifloxacin group were intravenously given 400 mg of moxifloxacin （AveloxR） once a day. Patients in the control group were administered 2.0 g of cefoperazone twice a day and azithromycin 0.5 g once a day. Clinical, bacteriological, and laboratory examinations were performed before the treatment, and at the end of the treatment. Our results showed that there was no significant difference in the clinical efficacy rate between two treatment groups at end of therapy （90 % for moxifloxacin, 95 % for cefoperazone plus azithromycin） （P〉0.05）. The bacteriologic eradication rate at the end of treatment was 90 % in the moxifloxacin group and 80 % in the cefoperazone-plus-azithromycin group, whereas there was no significant difference between the two groups （P〉0.05）. In addition, both drugs were well-tolerated in this trial, with the number of drug-related adverse events being comparable. It is concluded that moxifloxacin is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for CAP and was equivalent to the com- monly used empirical treatment of cefoperazone plus azithromycin. Moxifloxacin is likely to offer clinicians an alternative for reliable empirical CAP treatment in the face of increasing antibiotic resistance.展开更多
<span style="font-family:Verdana;">Endometriosis is an estrogen dependent gynecological disorder, which can occur throughout the reproductive age of women, causing chronic pelvic pain, substantial morb...<span style="font-family:Verdana;">Endometriosis is an estrogen dependent gynecological disorder, which can occur throughout the reproductive age of women, causing chronic pelvic pain, substantial morbidity, and impaired fertility. It is clinically defined as the presence of ectopic endometrium resulting in sustained inflammatory reaction. In India</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> about 29,000,000 women suffer from endometriosis. Severe pelvic pain and recurrent endometriomas were observed even after surgery. We have conducted aspirations totally in 110 patients in which most of the patients were suffering from Stage III & Stage IV of endometriosis except for 7 patients for whom we have done as primary therapy for endometriomas. Among 110 </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">patients</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, 4 patients didn’t turn up for follow up after first aspiration. This pilot study conducted with 110 patients in Ponni Hospital and Fertility Research Centre, Madurai aimed to evaluate pregnancy outcome in 51 infertile patients, and to alleviate pelvic pain, to restore a healthy sexual life and to reduce the recurrence rate of Ovarian Endometriomas (OE) in 59 patients, who did not seek fertility, After using the newer sclerosing agent Leuprolide with Cefoperazone Sulbactam (LCS) under ultrasound guidance. This prospective pilot study resulted in a highly significant achievement in pregnancy where 41 patients conceived out of 51 patients (80.39%) only 6 are in ongoing treatment. Those who didn’t seek fertility were 59 of which 43 have </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">completed family 1</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> have one child</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and 3 unmarried girls</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. 96.61% were relieved of pain and recurrence and restored healthy sexual life, 2 are in ongoing treatment. We have not encountered any adverse effects during this</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> treatment.</span>展开更多
Objective: To investigate the antibacterial effect of baicalin combined with cefoperazone-sulbactam sodium on drug-resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Method: Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains that are sensitive...Objective: To investigate the antibacterial effect of baicalin combined with cefoperazone-sulbactam sodium on drug-resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Method: Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains that are sensitive and resistant to cefoperazone-sulbactam sodium were selected to prepare different test bacterial solutions respectively;The test solutions of baicalin and cefoperazone sulbactam sodium were prepared respectively, and different test groups and control groups were set up;The drug sensitivity tests of different concentration gradients of baicalin and cefoperazone sulbactam sodium used alone and in combination were carried out for different sensitive and drug-resistant strains, and the standard strains were used as parallel control. Result: The drug susceptibility test results of the combined use of baicalin and cefoperazone-sulbactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa drug-resistant strains were compared with the drug susceptibility results of the two used separately, and the difference was statistically significant (P Pseudomonas aeruginosa.展开更多
目的通过蒙特卡洛模拟评价头孢哌酮/舒巴坦(CSL,2:1)对不同肾功能患者革兰阴性菌血流感染给药方案的合理性。方法应用琼脂稀释法测定CSL对革兰阴性菌的最低抑制浓度(MIC),并通过蒙特卡洛模拟(MCS)计算不同肾功能患者CSL不同给药方案对...目的通过蒙特卡洛模拟评价头孢哌酮/舒巴坦(CSL,2:1)对不同肾功能患者革兰阴性菌血流感染给药方案的合理性。方法应用琼脂稀释法测定CSL对革兰阴性菌的最低抑制浓度(MIC),并通过蒙特卡洛模拟(MCS)计算不同肾功能患者CSL不同给药方案对不同敏感性细菌的达标概率(PTA)和累积反应分数(CFR),评估给药方案的合理性。结果CSL对血流感染来源肠杆菌、鲍曼不动杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌的MIC_(90)分别为32/16、128/64和64/32 mg/L。对MIC>16 mg/L的肠杆菌,对不同肾功能患者即使CSL以4.5 g q6 h 15 min输注,获得的PTA仍低于90%,CFR最高为77.82%,对产ESBL肠杆菌血流感染CFR仍低于80%。对ESBL阴性肠杆菌感染患者,CLCR>60 mL/min时,CSL 3.0 g q6 h(说明书最大剂量)、3.0 g q8 h、4.5 g q6 h和4.5 g q8 h 4种给药方案获得的CFR分别为90.2%、83.15%、91.4%和87.09%;CLCR≤60 mL/min时,所有给药方案均可使CFR大于80%。对鲍曼不动杆菌感染患者,当CLCR>60 mL/min,CSL各给药方案所获CFR均低于40%;CLCR为31~60 mL/min,CSL 4.5 g q6 h给药获得CFR为85.27%;CLCR为10~30 mL/min,3.0 g q6 h、4.5 g q6 h和4.5 g q8 h获得的CFR分别为88.05%、91.86%和82.61%;CLCR<10 mL/min时(非透析患者),各给药方案所获得CFR均大于80%。对铜绿假单胞菌感染患者,当患者CLCR在10~30或≤10 mL/min时,CSL以4.5 g q6h给药所获得的CFR分别为80.09%和81.68%。结论CSL治疗革兰阴性菌血流感染时,需要根据细菌敏感性和患者肾功能等情况制定个体化给药方案,目前推荐的给药方案可能存在剂量不足情况。针对鲍曼不动杆菌敏感性折点可能需要进一步调整。展开更多
文摘Objective: To explore the antibacterial activity of combined use of Shuanghuanglian and cefoperazone sulbactam sodium on resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Methods: The Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains which were sensitive and resistant to cefoperazone sulbactam sodium were selected to prepare different test bacterial solutions respectively;The experimental liquid of Shuanghuanglian and Cefoperazone Sulbactam Sodium were prepared separately and set as different test groups and control groups;The Drug Sensitivity Tests of Shuanghuanglian and cefoperazone sulbactam sodium at different concentration gradients which were used alone or used in combination were carried out for different strains with sensitivity and resistance, And use standard entry as a reference control. Result: The results of drug sensitivity test of Shuanghuanglian combined with Cefoperazone-Sulbactam sodium against the resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were compared with the results of drug sensitivity test of the two separately used, and the difference was statistically significant (P 〈 0.05) [The drug sensitivity test results of Shuanghuanglian and cefoperazone sulbactam sodium to Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant strains were statistically significant compared with the drug sensitivity test results of Shuanghuanglian and Cefoperazone Sulbactam Sodium used separately (P 〈 0.05)];There was a dependence between strains and concentration in the effect of the combination of the two drugs. Conclusion: The combination of Shuanghuanglian and cefoperazone sulbactam sodium has synergistic antibacterial or bactericidal effect on Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant strains. .
基金National Key Technologies R&D Program Foundation of China (Grant No. 2006BAK04A11)
文摘To develop near-infrared （NIR） reflectance spectroscopic methods for the quantitative analysis of cefoperazone sodium/ sulbactam sodium from different manufacturers for injection powder medicaments. Various powders of cefoperazone sodium/ sulbactam sodium were directly analyzed by non-destructive NIR reflectance spectroscopy using the spectrometer EQUINOX55. Two quantitative methods via integrating sphere （IS） and fiberoptic probe （FOP） models were explored from 6 batches of commercial samples and 42 batches of laboratory samples at a content ranging from 30% to 70% for cefoperazone and 60% to 20% for sulbactam. The root mean square errors of cross validation （RMSECV） and the root mean square errors of prediction （RMSEP） of IS were 1.79% and 2.85%, respectively, for cefoperazone sodium, and were 1.86% and 3.08%, respectively, for sulbactam sodium; and those of FOP were 2.93% and 2.92%, respectively, for cefoperazone sodium, and were 2.23% and 3.01%, respectively, for sulbactam sodium. Based on the ICH guidelines and Ref. 12, the quantitative models were then evaluated in terms of specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, robustness and model transferability. The non-destructive quantitative NIR methods used in this study are applicable for rapid analysis of injectable powdered drugs from different manufacturers.
文摘BACKGROUND Respiratory tract infections in the elderly are difficult to cure and can easily recur,thereby posing a great threat to patient prognosis and quality of life.AIM To investigate the therapeutic effects of different antibiotics in elderly patients with respiratory tract infection.METHODS Seventy-four elderly patients with respiratory tract infection were randomly allocated to a study(n=37;treated with cefoperazone sodium/sulbactam sodium)or control(n=37;treated with piperacillin sodium/tazobactam sodium on the basis of routine symptomatic support)group.Both groups were treated for 7 d.Time to symptom relief(leukocyte recovery;body temperature recovery;cough and sputum disappearance;and rale disappearance time),treatment effect,and laboratory indexes[procalcitonin(PCT),C-reactive protein(CRP),white blood cell count(WBC),and neutrophil percentage(NE)]before and 7 d after treatment and the incidence of adverse reactions were assessed.RESULTS In the study group,the time to WBC normalization(6.79±2.09 d),time to body temperature normalization(4.15±1.08 d),time to disappearance of cough and sputum(6.19±1.56 d),and time to disappearance of rales(6.68±1.43 d)were shorter than those of the control group(8.89±2.32 d,5.81±1.33 d,8.77±2.11 d,and 8.69±2.12 d,respectively;P=0.000).Total effective rate was higher in the study group(94.59%vs 75.68%,P=0.022).Serum PCT(12.89±3.96μg/L),CRP(19.62±6.44 mg/L),WBC(20.61±6.38×10^(9)/L),and NE(86.14±7.21%)levels of the study group before treatment were similar to those of the control group(14.05±4.11μg/L,18.79±5.96 mg/L,21.21±5.59×10^(9)/L,and 84.39±6.95%,respectively)with no significant differences(P=0.220,0.567,0.668,and 0.291,respectively).After 7 d of treatment,serum PCT,CRP,WBC,and NE levels in the two groups were lower than those before treatment.Serum PCT(2.01±0.56μg/L),CRP(3.11±1.02 mg/L),WBC(5.10±1.83×10^(9)/L),and NE(56.35±7.17%)levels were lower in the study group than in the control group(3.29±0.64μg/L,5.67±1.23 mg/L,8.13±3.01×10^(9)/L,and 64.22±8.08%,respectively;P=0.000).There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the groups(7.50%vs 12.50%,P=0.708).CONCLUSION Piperacillin sodium/tazobactam sodium is superior to cefoperazone sodium/sulbactam sodium in the treatment of elderly patients with respiratory tract infection with a similar safety profile.
文摘Summary： To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous moxifloxacin with those of a commonly used empirical antibiotic regimen, cefoperazone and azithromycin in the treatment of community acquired pneumonia （CAP） in adult patients requiring initial parenteral therapy, 40 patients with CAP were divided into two groups, a moxifloxacin group （n=20） and a control group （n=20）, which were treated for 7 to 14 days. The patients in the moxifloxacin group were intravenously given 400 mg of moxifloxacin （AveloxR） once a day. Patients in the control group were administered 2.0 g of cefoperazone twice a day and azithromycin 0.5 g once a day. Clinical, bacteriological, and laboratory examinations were performed before the treatment, and at the end of the treatment. Our results showed that there was no significant difference in the clinical efficacy rate between two treatment groups at end of therapy （90 % for moxifloxacin, 95 % for cefoperazone plus azithromycin） （P〉0.05）. The bacteriologic eradication rate at the end of treatment was 90 % in the moxifloxacin group and 80 % in the cefoperazone-plus-azithromycin group, whereas there was no significant difference between the two groups （P〉0.05）. In addition, both drugs were well-tolerated in this trial, with the number of drug-related adverse events being comparable. It is concluded that moxifloxacin is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for CAP and was equivalent to the com- monly used empirical treatment of cefoperazone plus azithromycin. Moxifloxacin is likely to offer clinicians an alternative for reliable empirical CAP treatment in the face of increasing antibiotic resistance.
文摘<span style="font-family:Verdana;">Endometriosis is an estrogen dependent gynecological disorder, which can occur throughout the reproductive age of women, causing chronic pelvic pain, substantial morbidity, and impaired fertility. It is clinically defined as the presence of ectopic endometrium resulting in sustained inflammatory reaction. In India</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> about 29,000,000 women suffer from endometriosis. Severe pelvic pain and recurrent endometriomas were observed even after surgery. We have conducted aspirations totally in 110 patients in which most of the patients were suffering from Stage III & Stage IV of endometriosis except for 7 patients for whom we have done as primary therapy for endometriomas. Among 110 </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">patients</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, 4 patients didn’t turn up for follow up after first aspiration. This pilot study conducted with 110 patients in Ponni Hospital and Fertility Research Centre, Madurai aimed to evaluate pregnancy outcome in 51 infertile patients, and to alleviate pelvic pain, to restore a healthy sexual life and to reduce the recurrence rate of Ovarian Endometriomas (OE) in 59 patients, who did not seek fertility, After using the newer sclerosing agent Leuprolide with Cefoperazone Sulbactam (LCS) under ultrasound guidance. This prospective pilot study resulted in a highly significant achievement in pregnancy where 41 patients conceived out of 51 patients (80.39%) only 6 are in ongoing treatment. Those who didn’t seek fertility were 59 of which 43 have </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">completed family 1</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> have one child</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and 3 unmarried girls</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. 96.61% were relieved of pain and recurrence and restored healthy sexual life, 2 are in ongoing treatment. We have not encountered any adverse effects during this</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> treatment.</span>
文摘Objective: To investigate the antibacterial effect of baicalin combined with cefoperazone-sulbactam sodium on drug-resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Method: Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains that are sensitive and resistant to cefoperazone-sulbactam sodium were selected to prepare different test bacterial solutions respectively;The test solutions of baicalin and cefoperazone sulbactam sodium were prepared respectively, and different test groups and control groups were set up;The drug sensitivity tests of different concentration gradients of baicalin and cefoperazone sulbactam sodium used alone and in combination were carried out for different sensitive and drug-resistant strains, and the standard strains were used as parallel control. Result: The drug susceptibility test results of the combined use of baicalin and cefoperazone-sulbactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa drug-resistant strains were compared with the drug susceptibility results of the two used separately, and the difference was statistically significant (P Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
文摘目的通过蒙特卡洛模拟评价头孢哌酮/舒巴坦(CSL,2:1)对不同肾功能患者革兰阴性菌血流感染给药方案的合理性。方法应用琼脂稀释法测定CSL对革兰阴性菌的最低抑制浓度(MIC),并通过蒙特卡洛模拟(MCS)计算不同肾功能患者CSL不同给药方案对不同敏感性细菌的达标概率(PTA)和累积反应分数(CFR),评估给药方案的合理性。结果CSL对血流感染来源肠杆菌、鲍曼不动杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌的MIC_(90)分别为32/16、128/64和64/32 mg/L。对MIC>16 mg/L的肠杆菌,对不同肾功能患者即使CSL以4.5 g q6 h 15 min输注,获得的PTA仍低于90%,CFR最高为77.82%,对产ESBL肠杆菌血流感染CFR仍低于80%。对ESBL阴性肠杆菌感染患者,CLCR>60 mL/min时,CSL 3.0 g q6 h(说明书最大剂量)、3.0 g q8 h、4.5 g q6 h和4.5 g q8 h 4种给药方案获得的CFR分别为90.2%、83.15%、91.4%和87.09%;CLCR≤60 mL/min时,所有给药方案均可使CFR大于80%。对鲍曼不动杆菌感染患者,当CLCR>60 mL/min,CSL各给药方案所获CFR均低于40%;CLCR为31~60 mL/min,CSL 4.5 g q6 h给药获得CFR为85.27%;CLCR为10~30 mL/min,3.0 g q6 h、4.5 g q6 h和4.5 g q8 h获得的CFR分别为88.05%、91.86%和82.61%;CLCR<10 mL/min时(非透析患者),各给药方案所获得CFR均大于80%。对铜绿假单胞菌感染患者,当患者CLCR在10~30或≤10 mL/min时,CSL以4.5 g q6h给药所获得的CFR分别为80.09%和81.68%。结论CSL治疗革兰阴性菌血流感染时,需要根据细菌敏感性和患者肾功能等情况制定个体化给药方案,目前推荐的给药方案可能存在剂量不足情况。针对鲍曼不动杆菌敏感性折点可能需要进一步调整。
