Objective:To explore the impact of the application and implementation of risk-based cancer care planning in patients with cervical cancer radiotherapy on the complications and self-care ability of patients.Method:This...Objective:To explore the impact of the application and implementation of risk-based cancer care planning in patients with cervical cancer radiotherapy on the complications and self-care ability of patients.Method:This study recruited selected patients who came for cervical cancer radiotherapy in a tertiary hospital in Xianyang City,Shaanxi Province from November 2020 to November 2021.One hundred patients were recruited.Nursing management was carried out,and cancer care planning under the concept of conventional care and risk were applied.The effects of different nursing methods on patients were compared and analyzed.Results:The patients in the experimental group had higher scores of self-care ability and lower complication rate.All data were significantly different from those of the control group(P<0.05),and the nursing effect on the experimental group was better.Conclusion:The application and implementation of the risk-based cancer care planning in patients who received cervical cancer radiotherapy has significant clinical effects,which is beneficial to reduce the incidence of patients’adverse reactions and promote patient recovery.展开更多
The purpose of this research was to describe women’s narrative accounts of the impact of cervical cancer treatment on their sexual function and intimate relationships, and to evaluate what changes in care and educati...The purpose of this research was to describe women’s narrative accounts of the impact of cervical cancer treatment on their sexual function and intimate relationships, and to evaluate what changes in care and education are needed to enhance quality of life and intimacy after treatment. The research approach was a narrative design, using semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Narratives were examined within and across interviews, and thematic content analysis completed. The study was done in a gynecologic oncology clinic at a public hospital in the Midwest United States. The sample consisted of twelve women, ranging in age from 27 to 59, who had completed the cervical cancer treatment with chemo-radiation or radiation and surgery, and were now followed by their gynecologic oncologists. Across narratives, five major themes were identified, including unexpected physical complications, not “getting back to normal,” emotional pain and isolation, lack of available information, and inadequate health care provider response to treatment complications and sexual relationship problems. Women’s stories reveal that sex and intimacy issues for cervical cancer survivors remain within a culture of silence. In many situations, health professionals did not provide information that realistically prepared women and partners for probable consequences of treatment, did not assess sexual issues before or after treatment, did not recognize various symptoms as being complications of cancer treatment, did not make referrals, and/or recognized complications, but accepted them as “normal” and without solution. Ethical implications for health professionals and the need for education, communication, and the development of new lines of research are discussed.展开更多
目的:比较腔内联合组织间插植治疗与三管式腔内后装治疗在宫颈癌后装近距离中的剂量学差异。方法:回顾性分析我院2017年2月至2017年12月后装治疗宫颈癌患者40例,FIGO分期为Ⅰb-Ⅳa期。其中20例患者采用核通Fletch三通道施源器进行三管...目的:比较腔内联合组织间插植治疗与三管式腔内后装治疗在宫颈癌后装近距离中的剂量学差异。方法:回顾性分析我院2017年2月至2017年12月后装治疗宫颈癌患者40例,FIGO分期为Ⅰb-Ⅳa期。其中20例患者采用核通Fletch三通道施源器进行三管式后装腔内治疗(ICBT),20例患者采用核通Fletch宫腔管联合4针插植进行治疗(IC/ISBT)。在靶区D 90尽量接近600 cGy条件下,评估单次后装治疗靶区适形指数(COIN)、均匀指数(HI)、膀胱及直肠的剂量学差异。结果:IC/ISBT组患者的高危CTV靶区COIN明显高于ICBT组(P=0.000),而HI指数两组患者并无差异(P=0.917)。IC/ISBT组患者膀胱D 1 cm 3和D 2 cm 3剂量明显低于ICBT组( P =0.015, P =0.023)。IC/ISBT组患者直肠D 1 cm 3 剂量明显低于ICBT组( P =0.040),D 2 cm 3 剂量也较ICBT组低( P =0.070),但差异无统计学意义。两组患者总治疗时间差异无统计学意义( P =0.500)。 结论: 腔内联合4针插植治疗较三管式腔内放疗可以显著提高COIN而不改变靶区高剂量区范围和总治疗时间,并降低危及器官膀胱、直肠的受量。展开更多
文摘Objective:To explore the impact of the application and implementation of risk-based cancer care planning in patients with cervical cancer radiotherapy on the complications and self-care ability of patients.Method:This study recruited selected patients who came for cervical cancer radiotherapy in a tertiary hospital in Xianyang City,Shaanxi Province from November 2020 to November 2021.One hundred patients were recruited.Nursing management was carried out,and cancer care planning under the concept of conventional care and risk were applied.The effects of different nursing methods on patients were compared and analyzed.Results:The patients in the experimental group had higher scores of self-care ability and lower complication rate.All data were significantly different from those of the control group(P<0.05),and the nursing effect on the experimental group was better.Conclusion:The application and implementation of the risk-based cancer care planning in patients who received cervical cancer radiotherapy has significant clinical effects,which is beneficial to reduce the incidence of patients’adverse reactions and promote patient recovery.
文摘The purpose of this research was to describe women’s narrative accounts of the impact of cervical cancer treatment on their sexual function and intimate relationships, and to evaluate what changes in care and education are needed to enhance quality of life and intimacy after treatment. The research approach was a narrative design, using semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Narratives were examined within and across interviews, and thematic content analysis completed. The study was done in a gynecologic oncology clinic at a public hospital in the Midwest United States. The sample consisted of twelve women, ranging in age from 27 to 59, who had completed the cervical cancer treatment with chemo-radiation or radiation and surgery, and were now followed by their gynecologic oncologists. Across narratives, five major themes were identified, including unexpected physical complications, not “getting back to normal,” emotional pain and isolation, lack of available information, and inadequate health care provider response to treatment complications and sexual relationship problems. Women’s stories reveal that sex and intimacy issues for cervical cancer survivors remain within a culture of silence. In many situations, health professionals did not provide information that realistically prepared women and partners for probable consequences of treatment, did not assess sexual issues before or after treatment, did not recognize various symptoms as being complications of cancer treatment, did not make referrals, and/or recognized complications, but accepted them as “normal” and without solution. Ethical implications for health professionals and the need for education, communication, and the development of new lines of research are discussed.
文摘目的:比较腔内联合组织间插植治疗与三管式腔内后装治疗在宫颈癌后装近距离中的剂量学差异。方法:回顾性分析我院2017年2月至2017年12月后装治疗宫颈癌患者40例,FIGO分期为Ⅰb-Ⅳa期。其中20例患者采用核通Fletch三通道施源器进行三管式后装腔内治疗(ICBT),20例患者采用核通Fletch宫腔管联合4针插植进行治疗(IC/ISBT)。在靶区D 90尽量接近600 cGy条件下,评估单次后装治疗靶区适形指数(COIN)、均匀指数(HI)、膀胱及直肠的剂量学差异。结果:IC/ISBT组患者的高危CTV靶区COIN明显高于ICBT组(P=0.000),而HI指数两组患者并无差异(P=0.917)。IC/ISBT组患者膀胱D 1 cm 3和D 2 cm 3剂量明显低于ICBT组( P =0.015, P =0.023)。IC/ISBT组患者直肠D 1 cm 3 剂量明显低于ICBT组( P =0.040),D 2 cm 3 剂量也较ICBT组低( P =0.070),但差异无统计学意义。两组患者总治疗时间差异无统计学意义( P =0.500)。 结论: 腔内联合4针插植治疗较三管式腔内放疗可以显著提高COIN而不改变靶区高剂量区范围和总治疗时间,并降低危及器官膀胱、直肠的受量。
