OBJECTIVE:To determine the clinical effect,treatment times,and rheoencephalogram changes in vertebral artery type cervical spondylosis patients treated with innovative Tuina manipulations.METHODS:One hundred and twent...OBJECTIVE:To determine the clinical effect,treatment times,and rheoencephalogram changes in vertebral artery type cervical spondylosis patients treated with innovative Tuina manipulations.METHODS:One hundred and twenty six cervical spondylosis patients(vertebral artery type) were randomly divided into test and control groups.Patients in the test group were treated with innovative Tuina manipulations,while those in the control group were treated with the routine Tuina manipulations according to the textbook of Chinese Massage for Acupuncture and Moxibustion majors.The clinical effects,treatment times,clinical symptoms,and cerebral blood flow were measured.RESULTS:The response to the treatment was 100% in the test group and 88.71% in the control group.Patients in the test group required(7 ± 4) treatments before recovery,while those in the control group required(15 ± 7) treatments before recovery(P<0.05).The clinical symptoms exhibited greater improvement in the test group compared to the control group(P<0.05).There were no differences in cerebral blood flow between the two groups.CONCLUSION:Both innovative Tuina manipulations and routine Tuina manipulations produced satisfactory therapeutic results in vertebral artery type cervical spondylosis patients.However,the innovative manipulation was more effective in improving the functional symptoms,although there were no changes in the cerebral blood flow.展开更多
目的观察浮针联合Mulligan手法治疗瘀血阻络型椎动脉型颈椎病的临床疗效及对血清血栓素B2(B2 of thromboxane,TXB2)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(tumor necrosis factor-α,TNF-α)、神经元特异性烯醇酶(neuron specific enolase,NSE)水平及血流...目的观察浮针联合Mulligan手法治疗瘀血阻络型椎动脉型颈椎病的临床疗效及对血清血栓素B2(B2 of thromboxane,TXB2)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(tumor necrosis factor-α,TNF-α)、神经元特异性烯醇酶(neuron specific enolase,NSE)水平及血流动力学的影响。方法将124例瘀血阻络型椎动脉型颈椎病患者随机分为观察组和对照组,每组62例。对照组患者采用Mulligan手法治疗,观察组采用浮针联合Mulligan手法治疗。观察两组治疗前后血清TXB2、TNF-α、前列腺素E2(prostaglandin E2,PGE2)、NSE、一氧化氮(nitric oxide,NO)和白介素-6(interleukin-6,IL-6)水平,观察两组治疗前后椎动脉阻力指数(resistance index,RI)、椎动脉和椎基底动脉平均峰流速、椎动脉型颈椎病功能评定量表(vertebral artery type cervical spondylosis functional assessment scale,FS-CSA)、改良颈性眩晕症状与功能评估量表(modified evaluation scale for cervical vertigo,ESCV)评分、中医证候积分、颈椎椎体水平位移、椎体角度位移和椎体屈伸活动范围情况,并比较两组临床疗效。结果两组治疗后血清TNF-α、TXB2和PGE2水平降低(P<0.05),且观察组低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组治疗后血清NSE和IL-6水平降低,NO水平升高(P<0.05);且观察组血清NSE、IL-6低于对照组(P<0.05),NO高于对照组(P<0.05)。两组治疗后椎动脉和椎基底动脉平均峰流速提高(P<0.05),椎动脉RI降低(P<0.05);且观察组椎动脉和椎基底动脉平均峰流速高于对照组(P<0.05),椎动脉RI低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组治疗后ESCV评分、FS-CSA和中医证候积分降低(P<0.05);且观察组低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组治疗后椎体角度位移和椎体水平位移降低(P<0.05),椎体屈伸活动范围增大(P<0.05);观察组椎体角度位移、椎体水平位移低于对照组(P<0.05),椎体屈伸活动范围大于对照组(P<0.05)。对照组总有效率为85.5%,观察组为96.8%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论浮针联合Mulligan手法治疗瘀血阻络型椎动脉型颈椎病,可减轻炎症反应,调节血管内皮功能,改善颈部血流,有助于改善颈椎功能,提高临床疗效。展开更多
基金Supported by the Fund of Capital Medical Development and Research(No.Ⅲ-11)the Subject Growth Fund of Guang'anmen Hospital,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences(No.81392)
文摘OBJECTIVE:To determine the clinical effect,treatment times,and rheoencephalogram changes in vertebral artery type cervical spondylosis patients treated with innovative Tuina manipulations.METHODS:One hundred and twenty six cervical spondylosis patients(vertebral artery type) were randomly divided into test and control groups.Patients in the test group were treated with innovative Tuina manipulations,while those in the control group were treated with the routine Tuina manipulations according to the textbook of Chinese Massage for Acupuncture and Moxibustion majors.The clinical effects,treatment times,clinical symptoms,and cerebral blood flow were measured.RESULTS:The response to the treatment was 100% in the test group and 88.71% in the control group.Patients in the test group required(7 ± 4) treatments before recovery,while those in the control group required(15 ± 7) treatments before recovery(P<0.05).The clinical symptoms exhibited greater improvement in the test group compared to the control group(P<0.05).There were no differences in cerebral blood flow between the two groups.CONCLUSION:Both innovative Tuina manipulations and routine Tuina manipulations produced satisfactory therapeutic results in vertebral artery type cervical spondylosis patients.However,the innovative manipulation was more effective in improving the functional symptoms,although there were no changes in the cerebral blood flow.