基于Hofstede文化维度理论和世界价值观调查数据,测度了基于KSI、EDI、WVS的3种文化距离(cultural distance,CD),结合美国对52个东道国(地区)的直接投资及各项控制指标数据,使用面板校正标准误差(panel correction standard error,PCSE...基于Hofstede文化维度理论和世界价值观调查数据,测度了基于KSI、EDI、WVS的3种文化距离(cultural distance,CD),结合美国对52个东道国(地区)的直接投资及各项控制指标数据,使用面板校正标准误差(panel correction standard error,PCSE)模型进行分析,结果显示,CD与美国对外直接投资(outward foreign direct investment,OFDI)并非呈现简单的正负向关系,而可能存在门槛效应。通过Hansen门槛回归模型进一步考察了二者的内在作用机制,结果显示,CD通过了单门槛检验,即CD对美国OFDI存在门槛效应;当CD小于门槛值时,其作为正向因子积极促进美国OFDI,一旦CD超过门槛值,美国OFDI将显著减少。同时对“外来者劣势”和“外来者收益”二者关系的解释说明,CD与美国OFDI呈倒U型关系;CD较大时对美国OFDI的阻碍作用远大于CD较小时对其的促进作用,体现了美国OFDI对CD的敏感性。展开更多
Since China’s opening and reform began, China has attracted a large inflow of foreigndirect investment (FDI). This is largely due to the stable development of the economy,preferential policies, rich resources, cheap ...Since China’s opening and reform began, China has attracted a large inflow of foreigndirect investment (FDI). This is largely due to the stable development of the economy,preferential policies, rich resources, cheap labor, and bright market prospects. The amountof FDI actually used by China in 2004 reached US$60.63 billion, maintaining the growthmomentum that started in 2000, ranking China as second in the world. FDI’s positions inindustrial production, in industrial structure upgrade, and in import/export have beenstrengthened. The technical level has continued to rise and the number of R&D centers setup in China has been increasing. The increasing role of FDI in China’s economy hasaroused growing concern from all quarters. 2004 was a year that witnessed the mostextensive discussion among economists and other circles on the advantages anddisadvantages of FDI in China. Is the amount of FDI too much? Have foreign-fundedenterprises introduced advanced technologies? Have they produced an overflowing effect?Is there a monopoly on the domestic market by foreign capital? And does it affect economicstability and national security? (Guo Hong, 2004)展开更多
文摘基于Hofstede文化维度理论和世界价值观调查数据,测度了基于KSI、EDI、WVS的3种文化距离(cultural distance,CD),结合美国对52个东道国(地区)的直接投资及各项控制指标数据,使用面板校正标准误差(panel correction standard error,PCSE)模型进行分析,结果显示,CD与美国对外直接投资(outward foreign direct investment,OFDI)并非呈现简单的正负向关系,而可能存在门槛效应。通过Hansen门槛回归模型进一步考察了二者的内在作用机制,结果显示,CD通过了单门槛检验,即CD对美国OFDI存在门槛效应;当CD小于门槛值时,其作为正向因子积极促进美国OFDI,一旦CD超过门槛值,美国OFDI将显著减少。同时对“外来者劣势”和“外来者收益”二者关系的解释说明,CD与美国OFDI呈倒U型关系;CD较大时对美国OFDI的阻碍作用远大于CD较小时对其的促进作用,体现了美国OFDI对CD的敏感性。
文摘Since China’s opening and reform began, China has attracted a large inflow of foreigndirect investment (FDI). This is largely due to the stable development of the economy,preferential policies, rich resources, cheap labor, and bright market prospects. The amountof FDI actually used by China in 2004 reached US$60.63 billion, maintaining the growthmomentum that started in 2000, ranking China as second in the world. FDI’s positions inindustrial production, in industrial structure upgrade, and in import/export have beenstrengthened. The technical level has continued to rise and the number of R&D centers setup in China has been increasing. The increasing role of FDI in China’s economy hasaroused growing concern from all quarters. 2004 was a year that witnessed the mostextensive discussion among economists and other circles on the advantages anddisadvantages of FDI in China. Is the amount of FDI too much? Have foreign-fundedenterprises introduced advanced technologies? Have they produced an overflowing effect?Is there a monopoly on the domestic market by foreign capital? And does it affect economicstability and national security? (Guo Hong, 2004)
