Human rights have always been the focus of disputes between China and the West. To make a better China story about human rights and enhance China’s international discourse power in the field of human rights, we propo...Human rights have always been the focus of disputes between China and the West. To make a better China story about human rights and enhance China’s international discourse power in the field of human rights, we propose the text construction, translation and communication path of the construction of the human rights discourse system with Chinese characteristics from the cross-disciplinary perspective. Based on the examples of prevention and control of the CoVID-19 pandemic under the concept of putting people first, mainstream diplomatic linguistic data relevant to the fight against the novel coronavirus was collected through the internet. The human rights discourse with Chinese characteristics is constructed through a variety of texts focusing on putting the people first, the right to life, the right to health, the right to information, the right to privacy, the right to work and a sense of a community with a shared future for human beings. The core concepts of human rights have experienced the deepening process of decontextualization, abstraction and theorization to gradually conform to the expression habits of international audiences. The international communication effect is mainly positive in civil society. It shows that the construction of China’s human rights discourse system and the governance of international human rights discourse have achieved preliminary results. To enhance China’s discourse power on human rights, we need to add an interdisciplinary approach.展开更多
学术话语权作为实现“文化强国”的重要组成部分,是衡量其综合国力和文化软实力强弱的重要尺度,受到世界各国的高度重视。欧美发达国家相继提出的“话语权力理论”“文化领导权理论”,以及西方文化霸权理论一直主导着世界话语权的发展...学术话语权作为实现“文化强国”的重要组成部分,是衡量其综合国力和文化软实力强弱的重要尺度,受到世界各国的高度重视。欧美发达国家相继提出的“话语权力理论”“文化领导权理论”,以及西方文化霸权理论一直主导着世界话语权的发展。近年来,国内对“学术话语权缺失”“学术话语体系构建”“学术话语权提升策略”等主题进行了广泛的探讨。学术话语权是学术话语体系建设的关键要素所在,学术话语权作为软实力对社会发展及学术繁荣的实际影响和作用异常深远;探寻国际学术话语权的研究现状及启示,可为我国构建学术话语权的科学评价理论、方法和应用体系提供有益参考和借鉴。为此,本文选取Web of Science核心合集数据库中的相关研究成果,通过Citespace软件对国际学术话语权的国别进行统计和分析,再用Vosviewer软件对国际学术话语权文献进行热点主题分析,再采用文献计量分析方法对相关研究文献的研究进展进行全面分析和总结。结果表明,国际学术话语权研究的热点主题主要集中在学术话语与语言学的相关理论研究、跨文化跨语言跨学科学术话语研究、学术话语在政治话语权、身份认定及社会化中的作用、学术话语评价与计量研究等4个方面,通过研究进展综合分析国际学术话语权对中国学术话语权的影响及未来发展思考;并提出提升中国学术话语权的实现路径。实践中,借鉴国内外经验和理论,可以创新学术话语权的推进机制。具体包括:自上而下国家战略和社会各界自下而上推动相结合;构建科学可行的学术话语权分类评价指标、对不同领域的学术话语权采取差异化政策支持;提升学术话语内容创新、平台建设和传播力度。另外,在大数据、人工智能时代,要利用自身力量创建一流的全媒体多语言的学术传播平台,让中国学术前沿和学术话语传播至更远更广的国际舞台。最后,可通过科学管理培养学术大师,并激励学术大师参与国际学术议题设置等。展开更多
基金the major project of National Social Science Foundation of China,“Discourse Construction, Translation and Communication of Major-Country Diplomacy with Chinese Characteristics”(Project No. 17ZDA318)
文摘Human rights have always been the focus of disputes between China and the West. To make a better China story about human rights and enhance China’s international discourse power in the field of human rights, we propose the text construction, translation and communication path of the construction of the human rights discourse system with Chinese characteristics from the cross-disciplinary perspective. Based on the examples of prevention and control of the CoVID-19 pandemic under the concept of putting people first, mainstream diplomatic linguistic data relevant to the fight against the novel coronavirus was collected through the internet. The human rights discourse with Chinese characteristics is constructed through a variety of texts focusing on putting the people first, the right to life, the right to health, the right to information, the right to privacy, the right to work and a sense of a community with a shared future for human beings. The core concepts of human rights have experienced the deepening process of decontextualization, abstraction and theorization to gradually conform to the expression habits of international audiences. The international communication effect is mainly positive in civil society. It shows that the construction of China’s human rights discourse system and the governance of international human rights discourse have achieved preliminary results. To enhance China’s discourse power on human rights, we need to add an interdisciplinary approach.
文摘学术话语权作为实现“文化强国”的重要组成部分,是衡量其综合国力和文化软实力强弱的重要尺度,受到世界各国的高度重视。欧美发达国家相继提出的“话语权力理论”“文化领导权理论”,以及西方文化霸权理论一直主导着世界话语权的发展。近年来,国内对“学术话语权缺失”“学术话语体系构建”“学术话语权提升策略”等主题进行了广泛的探讨。学术话语权是学术话语体系建设的关键要素所在,学术话语权作为软实力对社会发展及学术繁荣的实际影响和作用异常深远;探寻国际学术话语权的研究现状及启示,可为我国构建学术话语权的科学评价理论、方法和应用体系提供有益参考和借鉴。为此,本文选取Web of Science核心合集数据库中的相关研究成果,通过Citespace软件对国际学术话语权的国别进行统计和分析,再用Vosviewer软件对国际学术话语权文献进行热点主题分析,再采用文献计量分析方法对相关研究文献的研究进展进行全面分析和总结。结果表明,国际学术话语权研究的热点主题主要集中在学术话语与语言学的相关理论研究、跨文化跨语言跨学科学术话语研究、学术话语在政治话语权、身份认定及社会化中的作用、学术话语评价与计量研究等4个方面,通过研究进展综合分析国际学术话语权对中国学术话语权的影响及未来发展思考;并提出提升中国学术话语权的实现路径。实践中,借鉴国内外经验和理论,可以创新学术话语权的推进机制。具体包括:自上而下国家战略和社会各界自下而上推动相结合;构建科学可行的学术话语权分类评价指标、对不同领域的学术话语权采取差异化政策支持;提升学术话语内容创新、平台建设和传播力度。另外,在大数据、人工智能时代,要利用自身力量创建一流的全媒体多语言的学术传播平台,让中国学术前沿和学术话语传播至更远更广的国际舞台。最后,可通过科学管理培养学术大师,并激励学术大师参与国际学术议题设置等。
