Aim: To assess the psychometric properties of the Chinese Index of Premature Ejaculation (CIPE). Methods: The sexual function of 167 patients with and 114 normai controls without premature ejaculation (PE) were evalua...Aim: To assess the psychometric properties of the Chinese Index of Premature Ejaculation (CIPE). Methods: The sexual function of 167 patients with and 114 normai controls without premature ejaculation (PE) were evaluated with CIPE. All subjects were married and had regular sexual activity. The CIPE has 10 questions, focusing on libido, erectile function, ejaculatory latency, sexual satisfaction and difficulty in delaying ejaculation, self-confi dence and depression. Each question was responded to on a 5 point Likert-type scale. The individual question score and the total scale score were analyzed between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences between the age, duration of marriage and educational level (P > 0.05) of patients with and vvithout PE and normai controls. The mean latency of patients with PE and normai controls were 1.6±1.2 and 10.2±9.5 minutes, respectively. Significant differences between patients with (26.7±4.6) PE and normai controls (41.9±4.0) were observed on the total score of CIPE (P < 0.01). Using binary logistic regression analysis, PE was significantly related to five questions of the original measure. They are the so-called the CIPE-5 and include: ejaculatory latency, sexual satisfaction of patients and sexual partner, difficulty in delaying ejaculation, anxiety and depression. Receiver Operat ing Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of CIPE-5 questionnaire indicated that the sensitivity and specificity of CIPE were 97.60 % and 94.74 %, respectively. Employing the total score of CIPE-5, patients with PE could be divided into three groups: mild (>15 point) 19.8 %, moderate (10-14 point) 62.8 % and severe (< 9 point) 16.7 %. Conclusion: The CIPE-5 is a useful method for the evaluation of sexual function of patients with PE and can be used as a clinical endpoint for clinical trials studying the efficacy of pharmacologica] intervention.展开更多
The premature ejaculation diagnostic tool （PEDT） is a brief diagnostic measure to assess premature ejaculation （PE）. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding its validity in the new evidence-based-defined...The premature ejaculation diagnostic tool （PEDT） is a brief diagnostic measure to assess premature ejaculation （PE）. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding its validity in the new evidence-based-defined PE. This study was performed to evaluate the validity of PEDT and its association with IIEF-15 in different types of evidence-based-defined PE. From June 2015 to January 2016, a total of 260 men complaining of PE and defined as lifelong PE （LPE）/acquired PE （APE） according to the evidence-based definition from Andrology Clinic of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, along with 104 male healthy controls without PE from a medical examination center, were enrolled in this study. All individuals completed questionnaires including demographics, medical and sexual history, as well as PEDT and IIEF-15. After statistical analysis, it was found that men with PE reported higher PEDT scores （14.28 ± 3.05） and lower IIEF-15 （41.26 ± 8.20） than men without PE （PEDT： 5.32 ± 3.42, IIEF-15：52.66 ± 6.86, P 〈 0.001 for both）. It was suggested that a score of 〉9 indicated PE in both LPE and APE by sensitivity and specificity analyses （sensitivity： 0.875, 0.913; specificity： 0.865, 0.865, respectively）. In addition, IIEF-15 were higher in men with LPE （42.64 ± 8.11） than APE （39.43 ± 7.84, P 〈 0.001）. After adjusting for age, IIEF-15 was negatively related to PEDT in men with LPE （adjust r = -0.225, P 〈 0.001） and APE （adjust r = -0.378, P 〈 0.001）. In this study, we concluded that PEDT was valid in the diagnosis of evidenced-based-defined PE. Furthermore, IIEF-15 was negatively related to PEDT in men with different types of PE.展开更多
We disagree with Boyle’s recent article questioning our systematic review in Journal of Sexual Medicine in 2013 (Volume 10, pages 2644-2657). In particular, he disputed the quality ranking we assigned to 7 of the 36 ...We disagree with Boyle’s recent article questioning our systematic review in Journal of Sexual Medicine in 2013 (Volume 10, pages 2644-2657). In particular, he disputed the quality ranking we assigned to 7 of the 36 articles that met our inclusion criteria. These had been ranked for quality by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) grading system. We found that, “the highest-quality studies suggest that medical male circumcision has no adverse effect on sexual function, sensitivity, sexual sensation or satisfaction.” This conclusion was supported by two randomized controlled trials, regarded as high-quality (1++) evidence and the majority of surveys and studies involving physiological measurements comparing uncircumcised and circumcised men. Here we explain why the 2 randomized controlled trials merit a 1++ ranking and why 4 reports that Boyle believes merit a higher ranking only meet the criteria set down for low quality (2?) evidence according to the SIGN system. We therefore stand by our conclusions. These are supported by a meta-analysis of sexual dysfunctions and by a recent detailed systematic review of the histological correlates of male sexual sensation.展开更多
目的研究原发性早泄患者(primary premature ejaculation,PPE)中国早泄患者性功能评价表(CIPE)的分值与SW-振动值之间的相关性,以及PE患者与婚检者SW-振动值之间的相关性,进而为原发性早泄的临床诊疗提供客观依据。方法选取2017年9月至2...目的研究原发性早泄患者(primary premature ejaculation,PPE)中国早泄患者性功能评价表(CIPE)的分值与SW-振动值之间的相关性,以及PE患者与婚检者SW-振动值之间的相关性,进而为原发性早泄的临床诊疗提供客观依据。方法选取2017年9月至2018年4月佳木斯大学附属第一医院男科门诊诊治的121例符合国际性医学学会(international society for sexual medicine, ISSM)诊断标准的原发性早泄患者作为研究对象(实验组)。填写CIPE评价表,根据分值将实验组分为轻、中、重三组,再将49例正常婚检者作为对照组,SW-震动检测仪分别检测各组阴茎干左、右及龟头6点、12点振动值大小,进行数据分析,得出结论。结果实验组与对照组阴茎干左、右及龟头6点、12点振动值相对于对照组差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01),早泄组轻、中、重三组组间比较差异无统计学意义。结论原发性早泄患者阴茎干及龟头振动值较对照组降低,敏感性增高,但是依据早泄患者CIPE分值分组后,三组间振动值结果无明显统计学差异。因此,临床上可将SW-振动值检测做为原发性早泄诊断筛查的一种客观依据。展开更多
文摘Aim: To assess the psychometric properties of the Chinese Index of Premature Ejaculation (CIPE). Methods: The sexual function of 167 patients with and 114 normai controls without premature ejaculation (PE) were evaluated with CIPE. All subjects were married and had regular sexual activity. The CIPE has 10 questions, focusing on libido, erectile function, ejaculatory latency, sexual satisfaction and difficulty in delaying ejaculation, self-confi dence and depression. Each question was responded to on a 5 point Likert-type scale. The individual question score and the total scale score were analyzed between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences between the age, duration of marriage and educational level (P > 0.05) of patients with and vvithout PE and normai controls. The mean latency of patients with PE and normai controls were 1.6±1.2 and 10.2±9.5 minutes, respectively. Significant differences between patients with (26.7±4.6) PE and normai controls (41.9±4.0) were observed on the total score of CIPE (P < 0.01). Using binary logistic regression analysis, PE was significantly related to five questions of the original measure. They are the so-called the CIPE-5 and include: ejaculatory latency, sexual satisfaction of patients and sexual partner, difficulty in delaying ejaculation, anxiety and depression. Receiver Operat ing Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of CIPE-5 questionnaire indicated that the sensitivity and specificity of CIPE were 97.60 % and 94.74 %, respectively. Employing the total score of CIPE-5, patients with PE could be divided into three groups: mild (>15 point) 19.8 %, moderate (10-14 point) 62.8 % and severe (< 9 point) 16.7 %. Conclusion: The CIPE-5 is a useful method for the evaluation of sexual function of patients with PE and can be used as a clinical endpoint for clinical trials studying the efficacy of pharmacologica] intervention.
文摘The premature ejaculation diagnostic tool （PEDT） is a brief diagnostic measure to assess premature ejaculation （PE）. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding its validity in the new evidence-based-defined PE. This study was performed to evaluate the validity of PEDT and its association with IIEF-15 in different types of evidence-based-defined PE. From June 2015 to January 2016, a total of 260 men complaining of PE and defined as lifelong PE （LPE）/acquired PE （APE） according to the evidence-based definition from Andrology Clinic of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, along with 104 male healthy controls without PE from a medical examination center, were enrolled in this study. All individuals completed questionnaires including demographics, medical and sexual history, as well as PEDT and IIEF-15. After statistical analysis, it was found that men with PE reported higher PEDT scores （14.28 ± 3.05） and lower IIEF-15 （41.26 ± 8.20） than men without PE （PEDT： 5.32 ± 3.42, IIEF-15：52.66 ± 6.86, P 〈 0.001 for both）. It was suggested that a score of 〉9 indicated PE in both LPE and APE by sensitivity and specificity analyses （sensitivity： 0.875, 0.913; specificity： 0.865, 0.865, respectively）. In addition, IIEF-15 were higher in men with LPE （42.64 ± 8.11） than APE （39.43 ± 7.84, P 〈 0.001）. After adjusting for age, IIEF-15 was negatively related to PEDT in men with LPE （adjust r = -0.225, P 〈 0.001） and APE （adjust r = -0.378, P 〈 0.001）. In this study, we concluded that PEDT was valid in the diagnosis of evidenced-based-defined PE. Furthermore, IIEF-15 was negatively related to PEDT in men with different types of PE.
文摘We disagree with Boyle’s recent article questioning our systematic review in Journal of Sexual Medicine in 2013 (Volume 10, pages 2644-2657). In particular, he disputed the quality ranking we assigned to 7 of the 36 articles that met our inclusion criteria. These had been ranked for quality by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) grading system. We found that, “the highest-quality studies suggest that medical male circumcision has no adverse effect on sexual function, sensitivity, sexual sensation or satisfaction.” This conclusion was supported by two randomized controlled trials, regarded as high-quality (1++) evidence and the majority of surveys and studies involving physiological measurements comparing uncircumcised and circumcised men. Here we explain why the 2 randomized controlled trials merit a 1++ ranking and why 4 reports that Boyle believes merit a higher ranking only meet the criteria set down for low quality (2?) evidence according to the SIGN system. We therefore stand by our conclusions. These are supported by a meta-analysis of sexual dysfunctions and by a recent detailed systematic review of the histological correlates of male sexual sensation.
文摘目的研究原发性早泄患者(primary premature ejaculation,PPE)中国早泄患者性功能评价表(CIPE)的分值与SW-振动值之间的相关性,以及PE患者与婚检者SW-振动值之间的相关性,进而为原发性早泄的临床诊疗提供客观依据。方法选取2017年9月至2018年4月佳木斯大学附属第一医院男科门诊诊治的121例符合国际性医学学会(international society for sexual medicine, ISSM)诊断标准的原发性早泄患者作为研究对象(实验组)。填写CIPE评价表,根据分值将实验组分为轻、中、重三组,再将49例正常婚检者作为对照组,SW-震动检测仪分别检测各组阴茎干左、右及龟头6点、12点振动值大小,进行数据分析,得出结论。结果实验组与对照组阴茎干左、右及龟头6点、12点振动值相对于对照组差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01),早泄组轻、中、重三组组间比较差异无统计学意义。结论原发性早泄患者阴茎干及龟头振动值较对照组降低,敏感性增高,但是依据早泄患者CIPE分值分组后,三组间振动值结果无明显统计学差异。因此,临床上可将SW-振动值检测做为原发性早泄诊断筛查的一种客观依据。
