CNKI has published the ＂Annual Report for International Citation of Chinese Academic Journals＂ since 2012. In the past three years, it has provided comprehensive data on the international impact of Chinese academic ...CNKI has published the ＂Annual Report for International Citation of Chinese Academic Journals＂ since 2012. In the past three years, it has provided comprehensive data on the international impact of Chinese academic journals. Using the clout index （CI） to rank the Chinese academic journals, ＂the Highest International Impact Academic Journals of China＂ and ＂ the Excellent International Impact Academic Journals of China＂ are announced every year. By introducing the rating criteria of the ＂Annual Report for International Citation of Chinese Academic Journals＂, the characteristics of high impact journals are discussed. Especially, the status of the pharmaceutical journals is discussed. We found that there are increasing numbers of Chinese journals that are included in the SCI, and some of them are high impact journals. However, journals published in Chinese are still facing difficulties to be included in SCI, even though they show higher impact than journals published in other non-English languages. The Chinese Pharmaceutical journals need to enhance their international impact, but Journals on Chinese Medicine show high impact.展开更多
According to the recently released Journal Citation Report(JCR),Chinese Medical Journal’s impact factor(IF)increasedyear by year.The new IF in 2006 is 0.615,increased by 9.6% compared to 2005(0.561),meanwhile the tot...According to the recently released Journal Citation Report(JCR),Chinese Medical Journal’s impact factor(IF)increasedyear by year.The new IF in 2006 is 0.615,increased by 9.6% compared to 2005(0.561),meanwhile the total cite in 2006is 1948,increased by 12.2% compared with 2005(1736).The top cited papers published in our journal from 2004 to2006 are listed as follows.We would like to present our acknowledgements to all the authors and reviewers.展开更多
目的:评价中国科学引文数据库收录的针灸期刊发表的Meta分析文献方法学质量和报告质量,为相关研究提供借鉴与示范。方法:计算机检索《中国针灸》《针刺研究》,Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina Science,World Journal of Acupuncture-M...目的:评价中国科学引文数据库收录的针灸期刊发表的Meta分析文献方法学质量和报告质量,为相关研究提供借鉴与示范。方法:计算机检索《中国针灸》《针刺研究》,Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina Science,World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion杂志2017年12月前发表的Meta分析文献,使用AMSTAR量表进行方法学质量评价,使用PRISMA声明进行报告质量评价。结果:共纳入文献69篇,文献的合著率为100%,合作度为5.45。第一作者来自32个单位,共有29篇(42.0%)文献得到基金资助。文献被引率为98.6%,篇均被引16.3次。方法学质量评价均分为(7.78±1.14)分,高质量14篇(20.3%),中等质量50篇(72.5%),低质量5篇(7.2%)。报告质量评价均分为(20.33±2.36)分,相对完整24篇(34.8%),一定缺陷41篇(59.4%),严重缺陷4篇(5.8%)。结论:中国科学引文数据库针灸期刊发表的Meta分析报告具有较高的方法学质量和报告质量,可以为临床决策提供证据,但仍然需要进一步按照Meta分析报告的规范写作,使质量水平不断提高。同时,应该不断提高试验研究的整体水平,推动针灸循证研究的发展,促进高质量证据的形成。展开更多
基金Project for Enhancing International Impact of China STM Journals(2013–2015)the High Quality Scientific Journals Project(2014–2015Chinese Association for Science and Technology)
文摘CNKI has published the ＂Annual Report for International Citation of Chinese Academic Journals＂ since 2012. In the past three years, it has provided comprehensive data on the international impact of Chinese academic journals. Using the clout index （CI） to rank the Chinese academic journals, ＂the Highest International Impact Academic Journals of China＂ and ＂ the Excellent International Impact Academic Journals of China＂ are announced every year. By introducing the rating criteria of the ＂Annual Report for International Citation of Chinese Academic Journals＂, the characteristics of high impact journals are discussed. Especially, the status of the pharmaceutical journals is discussed. We found that there are increasing numbers of Chinese journals that are included in the SCI, and some of them are high impact journals. However, journals published in Chinese are still facing difficulties to be included in SCI, even though they show higher impact than journals published in other non-English languages. The Chinese Pharmaceutical journals need to enhance their international impact, but Journals on Chinese Medicine show high impact.
文摘According to the recently released Journal Citation Report(JCR),Chinese Medical Journal’s impact factor(IF)increasedyear by year.The new IF in 2006 is 0.615,increased by 9.6% compared to 2005(0.561),meanwhile the total cite in 2006is 1948,increased by 12.2% compared with 2005(1736).The top cited papers published in our journal from 2004 to2006 are listed as follows.We would like to present our acknowledgements to all the authors and reviewers.
文摘目的:评价中国科学引文数据库收录的针灸期刊发表的Meta分析文献方法学质量和报告质量,为相关研究提供借鉴与示范。方法:计算机检索《中国针灸》《针刺研究》,Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina Science,World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion杂志2017年12月前发表的Meta分析文献,使用AMSTAR量表进行方法学质量评价,使用PRISMA声明进行报告质量评价。结果:共纳入文献69篇,文献的合著率为100%,合作度为5.45。第一作者来自32个单位,共有29篇(42.0%)文献得到基金资助。文献被引率为98.6%,篇均被引16.3次。方法学质量评价均分为(7.78±1.14)分,高质量14篇(20.3%),中等质量50篇(72.5%),低质量5篇(7.2%)。报告质量评价均分为(20.33±2.36)分,相对完整24篇(34.8%),一定缺陷41篇(59.4%),严重缺陷4篇(5.8%)。结论:中国科学引文数据库针灸期刊发表的Meta分析报告具有较高的方法学质量和报告质量,可以为临床决策提供证据,但仍然需要进一步按照Meta分析报告的规范写作,使质量水平不断提高。同时,应该不断提高试验研究的整体水平,推动针灸循证研究的发展,促进高质量证据的形成。
