Objective: To observe the clinical effect and safety of circumcision stapler in children with phimosis and redundant prepuce. Methods: From July 2013 to July 2017, 40 children were prospectively randomized and assigne...Objective: To observe the clinical effect and safety of circumcision stapler in children with phimosis and redundant prepuce. Methods: From July 2013 to July 2017, 40 children were prospectively randomized and assigned to experiment group (circumcision stapler n = 20) or control group (conventional circumcision, n = 20). Outcomes were operation time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications. Results: There was significant difference between the two groups for operation time (5.35 min vs 30.30 min, P < 0.05) and intraoperative blood loss (2.56 ml vs 10.40 ml, P < 0.05) respectively. Conclusion: Circumcision staplers are superior to conventional circumcision for the advantages of shorter operation time and fewer blood losses.展开更多
This paper was aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of adult male circumcision using the Shang RingTM （SR） with the no-flip technique compared with Dorsal Slit （DS） surgical method, A single-cent...This paper was aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of adult male circumcision using the Shang RingTM （SR） with the no-flip technique compared with Dorsal Slit （DS） surgical method, A single-centered, prospective study was conducted at the West China Hospital, where patients were circumcised using the no-flip SR （n = 408） or the DS （n = 94） procedure. The adverse events （AEs） and satisfaction were recorded for both groups, and ring-removal time and percentage of delayed removals were recorded for the SR group. Finally, complete follow-up data were collected for 76.1% of patients （SR： n = 306; DS： n = 76）. The average ring-removal time for the SR group was 17.62 ± 6.30 days. The operation time （P 〈 0.001）, pain scores during the procedure （P 〈 0.001） and at 24 h postoperatively （P 〈 0.001）, bleeding （P = 0.001）, infection （P = 0.034）, and satisfaction with penile appearance （P 〈 0.001） in the SR group were superior to those in the DS group. After two postoperative weeks, the percentage of patients with edema in the SR group （P = 0.029） was higher but no differences were found at 4 weeks （P = 0, 185） between the two groups. In conclusions, the no-flip SR method was found to be superior to the DS method for its short operation time （〈5 min）, involving less pain, bleeding, infection, and resulting in a satisfactory appearance. However, the time for recovery from edema took longer, and patients may wear device for 2-3 weeks after the procedure.展开更多
文摘Objective: To observe the clinical effect and safety of circumcision stapler in children with phimosis and redundant prepuce. Methods: From July 2013 to July 2017, 40 children were prospectively randomized and assigned to experiment group (circumcision stapler n = 20) or control group (conventional circumcision, n = 20). Outcomes were operation time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications. Results: There was significant difference between the two groups for operation time (5.35 min vs 30.30 min, P < 0.05) and intraoperative blood loss (2.56 ml vs 10.40 ml, P < 0.05) respectively. Conclusion: Circumcision staplers are superior to conventional circumcision for the advantages of shorter operation time and fewer blood losses.
文摘This paper was aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of adult male circumcision using the Shang RingTM （SR） with the no-flip technique compared with Dorsal Slit （DS） surgical method, A single-centered, prospective study was conducted at the West China Hospital, where patients were circumcised using the no-flip SR （n = 408） or the DS （n = 94） procedure. The adverse events （AEs） and satisfaction were recorded for both groups, and ring-removal time and percentage of delayed removals were recorded for the SR group. Finally, complete follow-up data were collected for 76.1% of patients （SR： n = 306; DS： n = 76）. The average ring-removal time for the SR group was 17.62 ± 6.30 days. The operation time （P 〈 0.001）, pain scores during the procedure （P 〈 0.001） and at 24 h postoperatively （P 〈 0.001）, bleeding （P = 0.001）, infection （P = 0.034）, and satisfaction with penile appearance （P 〈 0.001） in the SR group were superior to those in the DS group. After two postoperative weeks, the percentage of patients with edema in the SR group （P = 0.029） was higher but no differences were found at 4 weeks （P = 0, 185） between the two groups. In conclusions, the no-flip SR method was found to be superior to the DS method for its short operation time （〈5 min）, involving less pain, bleeding, infection, and resulting in a satisfactory appearance. However, the time for recovery from edema took longer, and patients may wear device for 2-3 weeks after the procedure.
