Objective:To investigate the differences of apparent diffusion coefficient and transverse relaxation rate(R_(2)^(*))in magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)between micro hepatocellular carcinoma and nodules of cirrhosis.Met...Objective:To investigate the differences of apparent diffusion coefficient and transverse relaxation rate(R_(2)^(*))in magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)between micro hepatocellular carcinoma and nodules of cirrhosis.Method:The clinical data of 68 patients with micro hepatocellular carcinoma(76 lesions)and 45 patients with nodular cirrhosis(48 lesions)were retrospectively analyzed.Diffusion weighted imaging and R_(2)^(*)imaging were performed on all patients.The differences of apparent diffusion coefficient and R_(2)^(*)values in patients with micro hepatocellular carcinoma and nodular cirrhosis were compared.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves were drawn to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of apparent diffusion coefficient values and R_(2)^(*)values for microhepatocellular carcinoma.Result:Compared with nodules of cirrhosis,the mean apparent diffusion coefficient and R_(2)^(*)value of micro-hepatocellular carcinoma were significantly decreased(P<0.05).The diagnosis threshold of apparent diffusion coefficient is at 1.35×10^(-3)mm^(2)/s,and the sensitivity for the diagnosis of micro-hepatocellular carcinoma was 80.88%,and the specificity was 91.11%,and the corresponding area under the ROC curve was 0.88;The diagnostic threshold for R_(2)^(*)value was at 53.96 Hz,and the sensitivity for the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma was 91.18%,and the specificity was 77.78%,and the corresponding area under the ROC curve was 0.84.Conclusion:MRI apparent diffusion coefficient value and R_(2)^(*)value can be used to differentiate and diagnose micro hepatocellular carcinoma and nodules of cirrhosis,in which the apparent diffusion coefficient of nodules of cirrhosis was less than 1.35×10^(-3)mm^(2)/s,R_(2)^(*)values were lower than 53.96 Hz may indicate the occurrence of nodular canceration.展开更多
文摘Objective:To investigate the differences of apparent diffusion coefficient and transverse relaxation rate(R_(2)^(*))in magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)between micro hepatocellular carcinoma and nodules of cirrhosis.Method:The clinical data of 68 patients with micro hepatocellular carcinoma(76 lesions)and 45 patients with nodular cirrhosis(48 lesions)were retrospectively analyzed.Diffusion weighted imaging and R_(2)^(*)imaging were performed on all patients.The differences of apparent diffusion coefficient and R_(2)^(*)values in patients with micro hepatocellular carcinoma and nodular cirrhosis were compared.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves were drawn to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of apparent diffusion coefficient values and R_(2)^(*)values for microhepatocellular carcinoma.Result:Compared with nodules of cirrhosis,the mean apparent diffusion coefficient and R_(2)^(*)value of micro-hepatocellular carcinoma were significantly decreased(P<0.05).The diagnosis threshold of apparent diffusion coefficient is at 1.35×10^(-3)mm^(2)/s,and the sensitivity for the diagnosis of micro-hepatocellular carcinoma was 80.88%,and the specificity was 91.11%,and the corresponding area under the ROC curve was 0.88;The diagnostic threshold for R_(2)^(*)value was at 53.96 Hz,and the sensitivity for the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma was 91.18%,and the specificity was 77.78%,and the corresponding area under the ROC curve was 0.84.Conclusion:MRI apparent diffusion coefficient value and R_(2)^(*)value can be used to differentiate and diagnose micro hepatocellular carcinoma and nodules of cirrhosis,in which the apparent diffusion coefficient of nodules of cirrhosis was less than 1.35×10^(-3)mm^(2)/s,R_(2)^(*)values were lower than 53.96 Hz may indicate the occurrence of nodular canceration.
