Relations between Environmental Right for Citizens and the Right to Use Environmental Resources owned by Company and Enterprise

From angles of administrative law and private law, the article analyzes relations between environmental right for citizens and the right to use environmental resources owned by company and enterprise and points out three principles to balancing two relations: A principle of equal protection, a principle that general interest is superior to special interest as well as taking an account for special interest, in specific circumstances, for example, in the circumstance that clashes between environmental and economic interests can not be avoided, policy makers can put an emphasis on more important social interest according after considering weight of each interest. Finally, the article reaches a conclusion that China should establish system of environmental right for citizens from legislative and administrative levels so that a harmonious society can be constructed with guarantee.

Pay Attention to Vulnerable Groups & Safeguard Citizens' Marriage, Family Rights——On New Marriage Law

Marriage and family remain a universal and eternal subject of study. It covers law, ethics, sociology, psychology and even economics. Law and ethics play the most outstanding role in it. Family ethics and moral standards constitute an important part of social ethical system while marriage and family constitute part of the legal system nearest to the life of the common people. Since the founding of New China, the Party and the State have paid full attention to the marriage and family system. Compared with other laws, the law about marriage and family was the first to be legislated. On May 1, 1950, New China’s first law, the 1950 version of Marriage Law, was promulgated. Commenting on the legal document, Chairman Mao Zedong had this to say: Marriage law concerns

Book on Citizens' Legal Rights Published

A book on the legal rights of citizens has been published by the China Procuratorate Publishing House.

Important Guarantee for The Basic Rights of Citizens——China's State compensation system

A common folk can sue an official? This was hardly possible in the past in China where the old feudalistic tradition dies hard. But this is really possible today when the common people cannot only sue officials and also get compensation if they are wronged. State compensation system It would be inevitable for government functionaries to cause damages to some citizens, legal persons or other organizations in the course of their management of the society. That is why China has established a State compensation system to compensate for the damages to citizens, legal persons and other organizations caused by government functionaries in exercising their power.

On China's Protection of Citizens' Right to Be Informed and Construction of Government Information Publicity System

I. The Unfolding Situation of the Philosophy of Right to Be Informed in China and Early Construction of Government Information Publicity System The origin of the thought,known as China＇s protection of right to be informed and the construction of government information publicity system

Chinese Citizens' Right To Work and Social Security Effectively Protected——An interview with Zheng Silin, minister of labor and social security

Following is an interview by staff reporters of the Human Rights magazine with Zheng Silin, Chinese minister of labor and social security. The interview was meant in part to celebrate the tenth anniversary of the implementation of the Labor Law of the People's Republic of China that falls on January 1,2005. We are publishing this transcript with a view to providing our readers with information about how China has worked persistently to protect citizens' right to work and social security and the achievements it has made in this regard. We need to remind our readers of the fact that back in March 2004, the National People's Congress, China's highest legislature, approved a recommendation for revision of China's Constitution. In accordance with the recommendation, the Constitution had one more clause added: The state shall establish and improve a social security system commensurate to the level of the economic and social development.

Progress in Reform of China's Education and Pro tection of Citizens' Right to Educatio n ——An Interview with Zhou Ji, Minister of Education

Following is a transcript of an interview by our staff reporter with Zhou Ji, Minister of Education, on a range of questions concerning China's education. These include how China is reforming its education system, what the Chinese Government has done to protect the right of citizens to education, as well as the investment made by the state in education.

The Profound Revelation of Human Social Relations and the Profound Realization of Information Right of Citizens——The social significance of network technique advancement in the perspective of “Entity Cube”

The R＆D group of relationship searching in Microsoft Asia Research Institute explains ＂Entity Cube＂ launched in 2008 as follows：

Minors' Rights:Right to Privacy vs. Right to Know

I. An Overview of the Right of Privacy for Minors and Relevant Obligee＇s Right to Learn Their Privacy The right to privacy has been recognized as an important personal right by China＇s practitioners and theorists of law although it is not an independent part of the Civil Law. In general, the right of privacy refers to the ＂right of the natural person to enjoy tranquility of private life and his or her right not to allow other persons to invade, learn, use, reveal or publish the kind of information relevant to his private life.＂

The People’s Right To Know

Govt officials publicly declare their assets in the ongoing fight against corruption

能源法的法权构造及其体系展开

能源法的核心范畴界定较为模糊,亟待澄清。基于能源权利与能源权力的交互性、能源公益与能源私益的均衡性、能源监管与能源市场的协调性等需求考量,法权可作为能源法的核心范畴。能源法法权结构可从本体论、运行论和价值论三个层面予以构造,形成体系化安排。本体论上,应以公民能源权利与国家能源权力的交互为基础,强调公民能源权作为法权结构的逻辑起点、以落脚为能源普遍服务的能源权力作为法权结构的基本保障;运行论上,应以能源合同作为法权结构运行的具体承载;价值论上,应以能源正义作为法权结构价值的最终目的。由此,可仰仗能源法的法权结构构筑能源法学体系。

刑事审判阶段涉案财物处置中案外人的权利保障

刑事诉讼程序中公民的财产权利长期被忽视,涉案财物处置与案外人利益息息相关。从当前我国立法及司法实践来看,刑事审判阶段涉案财物处置中对案外人财产权保障不足,缺乏必要的救济程序,影响了对案外人利益的保护。具体表现为涉案财物与案外人概念不清,案外人的知情权、参与权保障不足等诸多问题。因此,以《刑诉法解释》第279条为中心,从涉案财物情况告知义务主体和送达方式、案外人参与权的法律基础、案外人参与刑事诉讼的流程等角度进行分析和探讨,加强案外人在刑事诉讼中的权利保障。

论营业性演出中假唱的认定及责任免除

认定假唱与否的关键,在于是否存在用事先录制好的歌曲代替现场演唱的行为。代替的程度不影响假唱在法律上的构成。我国的假唱法律制度含有“披露即可免除责任”的安排,对披露主体、披露方式、披露对象和披露内容等四个方面进行法律规定上的完善,不但可以使该制度安排得到更好的运行和适用,而且可以使营业性演出相关方充分利用现代科学技术丰富演唱的表演形式和内容,这有利于行政机关针对性地提高监管实效、保障消费者的知悉真情权和自主选择权、营造繁荣健康的演出市场。

侵犯个人信息行为的刑法全流程规制模式研究

在个人信息行为规制方面,我国前置法与刑法之间存在明显差异,前置法通过处理规则的设计实现了全流程规制,而刑法只能对部分不法处理行为进行惩治。此种规范格局导致法律难以衔接并形成刑法保护的盲区,不利于全面保护个人信息权益。对此,应提倡个人信息的刑法全流程规制模式,通过间接罪名适用法和法益量刑评价法对不同类型处理行为进行合理规制。通过理论维度和规范维度的证成,可以验证全流程规制模式具有可操作性。应当适用刑法合理规制非法收集行为和非法存储行为,保障前期阶段信息处理安全;适用刑法精准规制非法加工行为、非法使用行为和非法流转行为,保障中期阶段信息处理安全;运用刑法适度规制非法披露行为和非法删除行为,保障后期阶段信息处理安全。

台湾地区居民法律地位:三重面向、内容构造与优化路径

台湾地区居民法律地位问题,是防范与遏制“台独”分裂活动、推动两岸融合发展、推进国家完全统一进程中必须面对的重大现实问题。在法律实践中,台湾地区居民地位具有“待解放的中国人民”“特殊的中国公民”“同等待遇的中国居民”三重面向。相关立法坚持目标和问题导向,逐渐趋向具体化、同等化和常态化。当前,台湾地区居民法律地位的主要问题是如何推动落实同等待遇,这在一定程度上影响了其内容构造。其中,“居住地”标准是优化落实台湾地区居民法律地位的基础,权利义务是其规范内核,政策则对法律规定起着引领、实施和补充的重要作用。为切实提升台湾地区居民国家认同,建议接续推进身份管理模块化、推动同等待遇实质化、逐步实现权利义务体系化,形成优化台湾居民法律地位的系统方案。

分享权视域中的公民体育权

分享权与服务行政直接相关。包括体育权在内的精神文化类权利是现代社会公民实现“优良生活”所必不可少的重要内容。作为宪法社会权面向的体育权主要是行政法层面的分享权而非宪法层面的请求权,是宪法平等权在体育权领域的衍生性权利。公民体育分享权的实现进路是体育行政给付。具体而言,包括适当程度的体育公共服务、财政允许的体育资源直接给付以及以私法方式转化实现的体育行政给付。

大数据时代公民隐私权保护应对策略探讨

大数据时代的到来是人类社会进步的表现,大数据技术的发展给人们的生活和工作提供了极大的便利,但随着信息数据的高速增长,公民隐私权的保护变得愈加困难。现阶段,我国的公民隐私权保护体系还有待加强完善,探讨大数据时代公民隐私权保护应对策略便显得尤为重要。对此我们结合大数据时代背景,对大数据时代的公民隐私权进行界定,并结合我国的实际情况提出构建完善的公民隐私权法律保护体系、加强执法监督、增大社会普法力度等建议,以推动我国在大数据背景下对公民隐私权的进一步保护,进而实现整个经济社会的稳健发展。

刑事诉讼领域个人信息保护问题研究

刑事诉讼领域对公民个人信息保护依赖于现有刑事诉讼程序的执行,缺乏独立性。现行《刑事诉讼法》对公民个人信息采用的是被动保护的方式,完全依靠司法机关履行义务,公民无法积极主动保护个人信息,有悖于《公民个人信息保护法》中公民个人信息权的积极主动性质。刑事诉讼的私密性、公权性特征以及大数据技术使得刑事诉讼对公民个人信息的干涉程度加深;加强对司法人员的培训,促进司法人员树立保护公民个人信息的司法理念。结合《公民个人信息保护法》的规定,先行出台司法解释,时机成熟后再修法。

从“可望”走向“可及”:刑事在线诉讼完善的时空进路

网络技术产生了新的空间秩序与时间现象,在重构传统诉讼形态的同时,也引发了空间异化和时间错配的风险,使得信息会被“遮蔽”、画面会被“裁剪”,进而可能导致辩护边缘化、质证虚化、知情权弱化。在线诉讼也应当满足一种时空正义的要求,保障在线空间上的平等和时间上的同步以促进公平。在线认罪认罚应保障空间开放并充分释明,在线会见也要保障权利空间的专属性和私密性。对适用在线诉讼的时空环节进行甄别取舍,明确辩护人同意、在场且“在旁”、证据平台公平开放的空间规则,保障疑议证据的线下核实。增加确认环节以确保时间同步与信息对应,增设在线诉讼的知情权保障机制和必要性考量机制,赋予被告人设备更换权和程序变更权。

行政过程论视角下非现场执法中当事人权益保障研究

基于行政过程论全面、动态的考察视角,发现非现场执法在程序上存在以下问题:在设备设置阶段,设备正式投入运行的公告时间过短、公告途径单一、投入成本过高。在证据审核阶段,证据审核不及时、举证责任分配不当、同一超限运输行为的认定时间不一致。在告知和听取意见阶段,当事人的知情权、陈述和申辩权未得到充分保障。为此,提出相应的完善建议:在设备设置阶段,规定设备正式投入运行前公告期限不少于30日,采用多种途径发布公告,合理控制成本投入。在证据审核阶段,明确证据审核的期限,明确信息核实责任在行政机关,统一同一超限运输行为的认定时间标准。在告知和听取意见阶段,建立三阶段告知制度,规定合理的陈述和申辩期限。