BACKGROUND Neonatal distal humeral physeal fractures are rare and difficult to diagnose.Thus,missed diagnoses and delayed healing are possible.Few studies have reported surgical treatment,because a callus may develop ...BACKGROUND Neonatal distal humeral physeal fractures are rare and difficult to diagnose.Thus,missed diagnoses and delayed healing are possible.Few studies have reported surgical treatment,because a callus may develop at the fracture site 5 d after the fracture,resulting in difficult reduction,and reduction of the limb may cause further physeal injury.Other surgical challenges include the provision of adequate anesthesia and complexity of the operation.However,without appropriate reduction and fixation,a varus elbow deformity may develop.Manual reduction and percutaneous pin fixation are ideal treatment options.CASE SUMMARY A 4-day-old neonate with left elbow pain accompanied by limited movement for 4 d was admitted,and diagnosed with delayed physeal fracture of the distal humerus based on physical examination,ultrasonography,and magnetic resonance imaging.The patient was treated by manual reduction combined with percutaneous pin fixation under arthrography.Postoperatively,the reduction was successful.The upper limbs could have been lifted and the fingers could have been moved freely on the second day after the operation.CONCLUSION The techniques of manual reduction and percutaneous pin fixation,to treat neonatal distal humeral physeal fractures,are safe and reliable.展开更多
背景对于移位明显的儿童肱骨外髁骨折,传统治疗方法为切开复位后内固定治疗,但近年来采用闭合复位后克氏针固定治疗儿童肱骨外髁骨折的报道渐多,但究竟哪种手术方式的疗效与安全性更高,存在一定的争议。目的对闭合复位经皮穿针(CRPP)、...背景对于移位明显的儿童肱骨外髁骨折,传统治疗方法为切开复位后内固定治疗,但近年来采用闭合复位后克氏针固定治疗儿童肱骨外髁骨折的报道渐多,但究竟哪种手术方式的疗效与安全性更高,存在一定的争议。目的对闭合复位经皮穿针(CRPP)、切开复位克氏针内固定(ORKF)在小儿肱骨外髁骨折中的应用效果及安全性进行评价。方法计算机检索包括中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普网、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science在内的中文和英文数据库,检索时间为各数据库建立至2023-01-01。筛选两种手术方法治疗小儿肱骨外髁骨折的病例对照研究后,对其进行文献质量评价并提取数据。运用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析,对两种手术方式的相关疗效及安全性指标进行比较。结果共纳入16篇文献进行Meta分析,包括1165例患儿。Meta分析结果显示,CRPP组患儿手术时间短于ORKF组(MD=-11.81,95%CI=-15.04~-8.58,P<0.00001),术中出血量低于ORKF组(MD=-3.36,95%CI=-4.37~-2.36,P<0.00001),术后骨折愈合时间短于ORKF组(MD=-3.92,95%CI=-6.80~-1.03,P=0.008),克氏针存留时间短于ORKF组(MD=-3.35,95%CI=-6.33~-0.38,P=0.03),术后肘关节功能恢复不良率低于ORKF组(OR=0.44,95%CI=0.25~0.76,P=0.006),术后总体并发症的发生率低于ORKF组(OR=0.33,95%CI=0.19~0.56,P<0.0001),浅表感染的发生率低于ORKF组(OR=0.39,95%CI=0.21~0.73,P=0.003);而两组深部感染、不良愈合、肱骨外髁缺血坏死发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论CRPP治疗儿童肱骨外髁骨折,无论从效果还是从整体并发症上均优于ORKF,但在具体并发症方面尚需更多高质量文献进一步验证。展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Neonatal distal humeral physeal fractures are rare and difficult to diagnose.Thus,missed diagnoses and delayed healing are possible.Few studies have reported surgical treatment,because a callus may develop at the fracture site 5 d after the fracture,resulting in difficult reduction,and reduction of the limb may cause further physeal injury.Other surgical challenges include the provision of adequate anesthesia and complexity of the operation.However,without appropriate reduction and fixation,a varus elbow deformity may develop.Manual reduction and percutaneous pin fixation are ideal treatment options.CASE SUMMARY A 4-day-old neonate with left elbow pain accompanied by limited movement for 4 d was admitted,and diagnosed with delayed physeal fracture of the distal humerus based on physical examination,ultrasonography,and magnetic resonance imaging.The patient was treated by manual reduction combined with percutaneous pin fixation under arthrography.Postoperatively,the reduction was successful.The upper limbs could have been lifted and the fingers could have been moved freely on the second day after the operation.CONCLUSION The techniques of manual reduction and percutaneous pin fixation,to treat neonatal distal humeral physeal fractures,are safe and reliable.
文摘背景对于移位明显的儿童肱骨外髁骨折,传统治疗方法为切开复位后内固定治疗,但近年来采用闭合复位后克氏针固定治疗儿童肱骨外髁骨折的报道渐多,但究竟哪种手术方式的疗效与安全性更高,存在一定的争议。目的对闭合复位经皮穿针(CRPP)、切开复位克氏针内固定(ORKF)在小儿肱骨外髁骨折中的应用效果及安全性进行评价。方法计算机检索包括中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普网、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science在内的中文和英文数据库,检索时间为各数据库建立至2023-01-01。筛选两种手术方法治疗小儿肱骨外髁骨折的病例对照研究后,对其进行文献质量评价并提取数据。运用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析,对两种手术方式的相关疗效及安全性指标进行比较。结果共纳入16篇文献进行Meta分析,包括1165例患儿。Meta分析结果显示,CRPP组患儿手术时间短于ORKF组(MD=-11.81,95%CI=-15.04~-8.58,P<0.00001),术中出血量低于ORKF组(MD=-3.36,95%CI=-4.37~-2.36,P<0.00001),术后骨折愈合时间短于ORKF组(MD=-3.92,95%CI=-6.80~-1.03,P=0.008),克氏针存留时间短于ORKF组(MD=-3.35,95%CI=-6.33~-0.38,P=0.03),术后肘关节功能恢复不良率低于ORKF组(OR=0.44,95%CI=0.25~0.76,P=0.006),术后总体并发症的发生率低于ORKF组(OR=0.33,95%CI=0.19~0.56,P<0.0001),浅表感染的发生率低于ORKF组(OR=0.39,95%CI=0.21~0.73,P=0.003);而两组深部感染、不良愈合、肱骨外髁缺血坏死发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论CRPP治疗儿童肱骨外髁骨折,无论从效果还是从整体并发症上均优于ORKF,但在具体并发症方面尚需更多高质量文献进一步验证。
