Propofol sedation in routine endoscopy:A case series comparing target controlled infusion vs manually controlled bolus concept

BACKGROUND Many studies have addressed safety and effectiveness of non-anaesthesiologist propofol sedation(NAPS)for gastrointestinal(GI)endoscopy Target controlled infusion(TCI)is claimed to provide an optimal sedation regimen by avoiding under-or oversedation.AIM To assess safety and performance of propofol TCI sedation in comparison with nurse-administered bolus-sedation.METHODS Fouty-five patients undergoing endoscopy under TCI propofol sedation were prospectively included from November 2016 to May 2017 and compared to 87 patients retrospectively included that underwent endoscopy with NAPS.Patients were matched for age and endoscopic procedure.We recorded time of sedation and endoscopy,dosage of medication and adverse events.RESULTS There was a significant reduction in dose per time of propofol administered in the TCI group,compared to the NAPS group(8.2±2.7 mg/min vs 9.3±3.4 mg/min;P=0.046).The time needed to provide adequate sedation levels was slightly but significantly lower in the control group(5.3±2.7 min vs 7.7±3.3 min;P<0.001),nonetheless the total endoscopy time was similar in both groups.No differences between TCI and bolus-sedation was observed for mean total-dosage of propofol rate as well as adverse events.CONCLUSION This study indicates that sedation using TCI for GI endoscopy reduces the dose of propofol necessary per minute of endoscopy.This may translate into less adverse events.However,further and randomized trials need to confirm this trend.

Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion Modeling in Rabbits:Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analysis

This study aimed to establish a new propofol target-controlled infusion（TCI） model in animals so as to study the general anesthetic mechanism at multi-levels in vivo. Twenty Japanese white rabbits were enrolled and propofol（10 mg/kg） was administrated intravenously. Artery blood samples were collected at various time points after injection, and plasma concentrations of propofol were measured. Pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using Win Nonlin software. Propofol TCI within the acquired parameters integrated was conducted to achieve different anesthetic depths in rabbits, monitored by narcotrend. The pharmacodynamics was analyzed using a sigmoidal inhibitory maximal effect model for narcotrend index（NI） versus effect-site concentration. The results showed the pharmacokinetics of propofol in Japanese white rabbits was best described by a two-compartment model. The target plasma concentrations of propofol required at light anesthetic depth was 9.77±0.23 μg/m L, while 12.52±0.69 μg/m L at deep anesthetic depth. NI was 76.17±4.25 at light anesthetic depth, while 27.41±5.77 at deep anesthetic depth. The effect-site elimination rate constant（ke0） was 0.263/min, and the propofol dose required to achieve a 50% decrease in the NI value from baseline was 11.19 μg/m L（95% CI, 10.25–13.67）. Our results established a new propofol TCI animal model and proved the model controlled the anesthetic depth accurately and stably in rabbits. The study provides a powerful method for exploring general anesthetic mechanisms at different anesthetic depths in vivo.

老年髋关节置换术中实施丙泊酚闭环靶控输注麻醉的效果及对患者术后谵妄风险的影响

目的研究老年髋关节置换术中实施丙泊酚闭环靶控输注麻醉的效果及对术后谵妄风险的影响。方法回顾性选取2020年1月至2023年1月入安庆市第一人民医院接受治疗的90例髋关节骨折老年患者,择期行髋关节置换术。参考麻醉方式不同分为A组、B组和C组,每组各30例。A组给予丙泊酚闭环靶控持续输注麻醉,B组给予丙泊酚开环靶控持续输注麻醉,C组给予丙泊酚人工持续输注麻醉。比较3组患者的术中相关指标(麻醉时间、手术时间以及拔管时间)、麻醉相关指标(术中丙泊酚总计用量、术中维持泵调节次数)、血流动力学变化[麻醉诱导开始(T_(0))、插管(T_(1))、手术开始(T_(2))、手术结束(T_(3))、拔管(T_(4))的平均动脉压、心率以及脑电双频指数(BIS)值]情况、术后恢复情况及术后谵妄发生情况。结果(1)术中指标:3组患者麻醉时间、手术时间以及拔管时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(2)麻醉相关指标:A组患者术中丙泊酚总计用量、术中维持泵调节次数均明显低于B、C组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);B组患者单位麻醉时间内丙泊酚用量、单位手术时间内丙泊酚用量均明显高于A、C组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(3)血流动力学:A组T_(2)、T_(3)时平均动脉压均高于B组、C组,A组T_(4)时的平均动脉压更加接近于T_(0);3组患者不同时刻心率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组T_(2)、T_(3)时BIS值均低于B组、C组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(4)术后恢复情况:A组患者PACU停滞时间、自主呼吸恢复时间、指令反应恢复时间均明显低于B、C组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(5)术后谵妄:A组患者术后谵妄发生率为16.67%,显著低于B、C组(40.00%、46.67%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论老年髋关节置换术中采用丙泊酚靶控输注麻醉可减少丙泊酚用量,术中生命体征更加平稳,可降低人工操作次数,术后麻醉苏醒更快,且术后谵妄发生率也更低,是老年患者首选的麻醉方案。

艾司氯胺酮和丙泊酚在宫腔镜手术中的药效学相互作用

目的采用响应曲面法分析艾司氯胺酮和丙泊酚在宫腔镜手术中的药效学相互作用。方法选择择期行宫腔镜手术患者45例,年龄18~64岁,BMI 18.5~28.0 kg/m^(2),ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级。选择不同血浆药物浓度的艾司氯胺酮(0、0.1、0.2、0.3、0.4、0.5、0.6、0.7、0.8μg/ml)复合丙泊酚靶控输注,术中维持艾司氯胺酮的血浆药物浓度不变,阶梯式增加丙泊酚的血浆药物浓度。评估扩张宫颈引起的体动反应。采用响应曲面模型分析艾司氯胺酮与丙泊酚的药效学相互作用。结果艾司氯胺酮(0~0.8μg/ml)与丙泊酚(1.0~7.0μg/ml)相互作用的三维响应曲面显示,两者抑制扩张宫颈引起的体动反应方面具有相加作用。抑制扩张宫颈引起的体动反应的艾司氯胺酮半数有效浓度(EC_(50))为0.61μg/ml(95%CI 0.41~0.81μg/ml),丙泊酚EC_(50)为4.69μg/ml(95%CI 3.17~6.21μg/ml)。结论响应曲面法可以定性和定量地分析艾司氯胺酮和丙泊酚的药效学相互作用规律,在抑制扩张宫颈引起的体动反应上,艾司氯胺酮和丙泊酚具有相加作用。

右美托咪定与利多卡因靶控输注在无痛胃肠镜麻醉中的相互作用和配伍方案优化

目的:探究右美托咪定与利多卡因靶控输注在无痛胃肠镜麻醉中的相互作用和配伍方案优化。方法:选择进行无痛胃肠镜检查的患者92例为研究对象,随机分为A、B、C、D四组,每组23例。比较四组麻醉时(T_(1))、无痛胃肠镜置入时(T_(2))、无痛胃肠镜检查第5 min时(T_(3))疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、拉姆赛(Ramsay)镇静评分、心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、脉搏氧饱和度(SpO_(2))、麻醉满意度以及不良反应方式情况。采用等辐射法分析右美托咪定与利多卡因在脑电双频谱指数(BIS)为50时的相互作用。结果:A组患者T_(2)和T_(3)时Ramsay镇静评分高于其他三组(均P<0.05);T_(3)时HR、MAP低于其他三组,SpO_(2)高于其他三组(均P<0.05)。A组麻醉诱导时间长于其他三组,麻醉满意度低于其他三组(均P<0.05)。D组苏醒时间和离院时间长于其他三组,恶心呕吐和嗜睡发生率高于其他三组(均P<0.05)。等辐射法分析结果显示,右美托咪定和利多卡因在无痛胃肠镜麻醉中有协同作用。结论:右美托咪定和利多卡因在麻醉作用上有协同作用。0.50μg/kg右美托咪定+0.80 mg/kg利多卡因与0.60μg/kg右美托咪定+0.60 mg/kg利多卡因靶控输注在无痛胃肠镜麻醉中麻醉效果和血流动力学指标稳定性更好,不良反应发生率更低,麻醉满意度更高。

Clinical evaluation of target controlled infusion system for sufentanil administration

Background Sufentanil target controlled infusion （TCI） provides stable analgesia, better hemodynamic control than a bolus injection of intravenous anesthetics, anticipated recovery and improved quality of anesthesia during perioperative period. This study evaluated the accuracy and feasibility of TCI system for sufentanil at high concentrations in Chinese surgical patients. Methods Twelve low risk adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were included in this study. Sufentanil was administered with a specific TCI system incorporating the population pharmacokinetic data of sufentanil previously reported, using a target effect-site concentration of sufentanil 4 or 6 ng/ml. Sufentanil TCI duration was 30 minutes. Frequent arterial blood samples were taken during and up to 24 hours after sufentanil TCI for determination of plasma sufentanil concentrations by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. The changes of circulatory system function during the procedure, recovery profile and adverse effects were recorded. Measured plasma sufentanil concentrations were compared with the values predicted by the TCI system. The bias （median performance error, MDPE）, precision （median absolute performance error, MDAPE） and wobble （variability of performance error） of the sufentanil TCI system were determined. Results All patients had stable cardiovascular variables during induction and maintenance of anesthesia. Time to eye opening and extubation were （5.6±1.7） minutes when TCI set to 4 ng/ml and （7.2±2.3） minutes when set to 6 ng/ml. There was no episode of agitation, muscle rigidity or intraoperative awareness. The bias （MDPE）, precision （MDAPE） and wobble of the sufentanil TCI system were -3.7%, 18.9% and 19.6% respectively during TCI, and the MDPE, MDAPE and wobble were -29.1%, 31.7% and 15.0% respectively after TCI （up to 8 hours）. Conclusions The TCI system programmed for sufentanil at 4 or 6 ng/ml was considered acceptable for clinical use in low risk Chinese surgical patients. But the relatively larger MDPE and MDAPE after TCI suggest improvements of the Dharmacokinetic model are needed.

Two-stage analysis of pharmacokinetics of sufentanil administered by target-controlled infusion in Chinese patients

Background Sufentanil is a suitable choice for target-controlled infusion （TCI） because of its shorter context-sensitive half-time. The current study was to estimate the pharmacokinetics of sufentanil TCI in Chinese patients using the two-stage analysis. Methods Twelve adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists （ASA） physical status I or II undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were included. Anesthesia was induced with propofol, rocuronium and sufentanil administered by TCI lasting for 30 minutes, with target effect-site concentration of sufentanil 4 or 6 ng/ml. Frequent arterial blood samples （1.5 ml） were taken during and up to 24 hours after sufentanil TCI. Before the end of surgery, another arterial blood sample （1.0 ml） was drawn for the blood-gas analysis. Plasma sufentanil concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry （limit of quantitation was 5 pg/ml）. The data were analyzed with the two-stage approach, linear regression and correlation analysis. Results The pharmacokinetics of sufentanil TCI were adequately described by a three-compartment model. The variables were derived as follows： the volume of central compartment （V1） was 5.4 L, volume of distribution at steady-state （Vdss） was 222.6 L, metabolic clearance （CI1） was 0.84 L/min and elimination half-life （t~/2y） was 389 minutes. Patients＇ age, gender and PaCO2 correlated significantly with the pharmacokinetic parameters. The Vdss, volume of slowly equilibrating compartment （V3） and t1/2 y increased, and rapid distribution clearance （012） decreased with increasing patient age. Male patients had larger values of Vdss, volume of rapidly equilibrating compartment （V2） and V3 than female patients. The Vdss and V3 increased with higher PaCO2 values. There were no significant correlations between the pharmacokinetic variables and body weight, height, lean body mass, plasma albumin, sufentanil dose, duration of surgery, pH or base excess of blood （BE-B）. Conclusions The pharmacokinetics of sufentanil TCI in Chinese patients can be optimally described by a three-compartment model. The pharmacokinetic analysis technique may affect the pharmacokinetic parameters and correlations.

Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil administered by target-controlled infusion in Chinese surgical patients

Background Target-controlled infusion （TCI） has been recently developed and successfully implemented in clinical practice. This study was conducted to determine the pharmacokinetics of TCI administered sufentanil in Chinese surgical patients. Methods The pharmacokinetics of sufentanil was investigated in 12 adult patients, aged 23-76 years, scheduled for prolonged surgery under general anesthesia. Anesthetic induction was carried out with propofol, rocuronium and TCI administered sufentanil aiming for target effect-site concentration of sufentanil 4 or 6 ng/ml. Sufentanil TCI lasted for 30 minutes. Frequent arterial blood samples （1.5 ml） were drawn during and up to 24 hours after sufentanil TCI. Plasma sufentanil concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; limit of sensitivity of mass spectrometry was 5 pg/ml. The data were analyzed with the nonlinear mixed-effect model program. Results The pharmacokinetics of TCI administered sufentanil were optimally described by a three-compartment model with the following parameters： the central volume of distribution （V1） = 5.4 L, the volume of distribution at steady-state （Vdss） = 195.4 L, systemic clearance （CI1） = 1.10 L/min, and elimination half-life （t1/2 Y） = 271.8 minutes. Both age and gender affected the pharmacokinetic parameters. The rapid distribution clearance （012） was negatively correlated with patient age, and the volume of slowly equilibrating compartment （V3） was positively correlated with age. The Cl2 and the volume of rapidly equilibrating compartment （V2） were influenced by gender with male patients showing higher values of Cl2 and V2 than female patients. There was no relationship of body weight, lean body mass, plasma albumin, or target effect-site concentration of sufentanil with any of the pharmacokinetic parameters studied. Conclusions The pharmacokinetics of TCI administered sufentanil in Chinese patients can be adequately described by a three-compartment model. Pharmacokinetics adjusted to the individual patient should improve the accuracy of TCI systems.

Relationship between depth of anesthesia and effect-site concentration of propofol during induction with the target-controlled infusion technique in elderly patients

Background There are few studies to assess whether the effect-site concentration of propofol can predict anesthetic depth during the target-controlled infusion （TCI） induction in elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between effect-site concentration of propofol and depth of anesthesia during the TCI induction in elderly patients. Methods Ninety patients （60-80 years） with an American Society of Anesthesiologists （ASA） physical status of 1-3, undergoing scheduled abdominal and thoracic surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into one of three groups, Group S1, S2 and S3 （30 patients in each group）. The patients in Group S1 received propofol with a target plasma concentration of 4.0 pg/ml; patients in Group S2 received propofol with an initial target plasma concentrations of 2.0 IJg/ml that was raised to 4.0 pg/ml 3 minutes later; patients in Group S3 received an infused scheme of 3 steps; starting from a target plasma concentration of 2.0 pg/ml that was increased stepwised by 1 pg/ml until a target plasma concentration of 4.0 pg/ml was achieved, the interval between the two steps was 3 minutes. When an Observer＇s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation （OANS） score of 1 was achieved, remifentanil （effect-site concentration （Ce） of 4.0 ng/ml） and rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg were administered. Tracheal intubation was started 2 minutes after rocuronium injection. Changes of propofol Ce, blood pressure （BP）, heart rate （HR）, and bispectral index （BIS） were recorded. Results When an OAA/S score of 1 was achieved, Ce of propofol were （1.7±0.4） pg/ml, （1.9±0.3） pg/ml, （1.9±0.4） pg/ml and the BIS values were 64±5, 65±8, and 62±8 in Groups S1, S2 and S3. Before intubation, Ce of propofol was （2.8±0.2） pg/ml, （2.8±0.3） pg/ml, （2.7±0.3） pg/ml, and the BIS values were 48±7, 51±7, and 47±5 in Groups S1, S2 and S3. By linear regression analysis, a significant correlation between Ce of propofol and BIS values was found （r=-0.580, P 〈0.01）. Systolic blood pressure （SBP） before intubation was significantly lower in Group S1 than in Groups S2 and S3. SBP and HR after intubation in the three groups were significantly increased when compared with pre-intubation values, but they did not exceed baseline values Conclusions During the TCI induction, Ce of propofol with （1.9±0.3） pg/ml may make the elderly patients unconscious. When remifentanil with a Ce of 4.0 ng/ml is added a Ce of propofol with （2.8±0.3） pg/ml is suitable for intubation. The Ce of propofol has a close correlation with the BIS values. Also, a two-step TCI technique seems to be a more suitable method of anesthesia induction in elderly patients compared with the no-stepwise TCI technique and three-step TCI technique.

Comparison of C50 for Propofol-remifentanil Target-controlled Infusion and Bispectral Index at Loss of Consciousness and Response to Painful Stimulus in Elderly and Young Patients

Background：In this prospective randomized study,we compared the predicted blood and effect-site C50 for propofol and remifentanil target-controlled infusion （TCI） and the bispectral index （BIS） values at loss of consciousness （LOC） and response to a standard noxious painful stimulus （LOS） in elderly and young patients,respectively.We hypothesized that the elderly patients will require lower target concentration of both propofol and remifentanil at above two clinical end-points.Methods：There were 80 American Society of Anesthesiologists （ASA） physical status Ⅰ Ⅱ unpremedicated patients enrolled in this study,they were divided into elderly group （age ≥65 years,n =40） and young group （aged 18-54 years,n =40）.Propofol was initially given to a predicted blood concentration of 1.2 μg/ml and thereafter increased by 0.3 μg/ml every 30 s until Observer＇s Assessment of Alertness and Sedation score was 1.The propofol level was kept constant,and remifentanil was given to provide a predict blood concentration of 2.0 ng/ml,and then increased by 0.3 ng/ml every 30 s until loss of response to a tetanic stimulus.BIS （version 3.22,BIS Quattro sensor） was also recorded.Results：In elderly group,the propofol effect-site C50 at LOC of was 1.5 （1.4-1.6） μg/ml,was significantly lower than that of young group,which was 2.2 （2.1-2.3） μg/ml,the remifentanil effect-site C50 at LOS was 3.5 （3.3-3.7） ng/ml in elderly patients,was similar with 3.7 （3.6-3.8） ng/ml in young patients.Fifty percent of patients lost consciousness at a BIS value of 57.3 （56.4-58.1）,was similar with that of young group,which was 55.2 （54.0-56.3）.Conclusion：In elderly patients,the predicted blood and effect-site concentrations of propofol at LOC were lower than that of young patients.At same sedation status,predicted blood and effect-site concentrations of remifentanil required at LOS were similar in elderly and young patients.BIS were not affected by age.Low-propofol/high-opioid may be optional TCI strategy for elderly patients.

Concentrations of propofol in cerebral spinal fluid: target-controlled infusion

Background Although the performance of target-controlled infusion (TCI) have been studied extensively, the accuracy and safety of a TCI system that targets the effect site remains to be demonstrated. This study was to investigate the relations of TCI of propofol to its concentrations in cerebral spinal fluid (CSF), the effect-site concentrations and bispectral index (BIS).Methods Twelve mongrel dogs were used for investigations. The target effect-site concentration was set at 3μg/ml and the infusion was lasted for 15 minutes. CSF and blood samples were then collected and propofol concentrations were determined by using high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. BIS and hemodynamic data were monitored continuously.Results The predicted plasma concentrations were generally overestimated. Median performance error (MDPE) and absolute median performance error (MDAPE) were -10.0% and 29.9% respectively. Propofol CSF concentrations were much lower than its effect-site concentrations. Changes in BIS were consistent with propofol concentrations in CSF, both of which changed direction at 5 minutes while the effect-site concentrations relatively lagged behind. Better correlation ( r2 = 0. 9195) was found between BIS and CSF concentrations, when compared with that between BIS and effect-site concentrations (r2=0. 554).Conclusion With 1% enflurane inhaled, the inconsistency of drug effect to the effect-site concentrations may result from inaccuracy of pharmacokinetic parameters. CSF may show effect-site concentrations more accurately than plasma when using target effect-site concentration infusion.

BIS指导下丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼靶控输注对老年髋关节置换患者术中丙泊酚用量和术后谵妄发生率的影响

目的:探讨脑电双频指数(BIS)指导下丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼靶控输注(TCI)对老年髋关节置换患者术中丙泊酚用量和术后谵妄发生率的影响。方法:回顾性分析老年髋部骨折患者的病例资料,依据患者接受的麻醉方式不同分为两组,即接受BIS指导下丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼TCI麻醉的髋关节置换患者纳入观察组,接受BIS指导下丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼持续静脉泵入的同类患者纳入对照组,建立二元Logistics回归分析,构建倾向性评分匹配模型分析得出观察组获取56例病例资料,对照组获取49例病例资料,组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察两组不同时间点[入室后(T_(0))、麻醉后(T_(1))、骨水泥后(T_(2))、术毕(T_(3))、出室后(T_(4))、术后3h(T_(5))及术后5h(T_(6))时刻]的平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、手术一般情况、丙泊酚用量、BIS值维持情况,对比两组不同时间点(术前及术后1h、6h、1d、3d、7d时刻)谵妄评分[谵妄量表分析系统(CAM-CR)],记录两组术后谵妄发生率,比较两组不同时间点(术前及术后1d)的血糖(Glu)及血浆肾上腺素(E)、皮质醇(Cor)水平变化。结果:观察组在T_(1)时刻MAP值相比T_(0)时刻有显著性降低(P<0.05),两组均在T_(2)时刻MAP值相比T_(0)时刻有显著性降低(P<0.05),其中对照组在T_(5)、T_(6)及T_(7)时刻HR值相比T_(4)时刻出现显著性降低(P<0.05);两组手术时间、麻醉时间及术中出血量对比均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组丙泊酚用量显著少于对照组(P<0.05),观察组BIS值目标范围维持时间比显著高于对照组(P<0.05),观察组苏醒时间、气管拔管时间及定向力恢复时间显著短于对照组(P<0.05);术后1h、6h、1d、3d、7d,两组CAM-CR评分可见先升高后降低,均显著高于术前(P<0.05),观察组术后1h、6h、1d、3d的CAM-CR评分均显著低于对照组(P<0.05),两组术后7d的上述评分较术前和组间同时间点对比均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组的术后谵妄发生率为5.36%,显著低于对照组的18.37%(P<0.05);术后1d,两组Glu及血浆E、Cor水平相比术前出现显著性升高(P<0.05),但观察组显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:BIS指导下丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼TCI应用于老年髋关节置换患者术中能稳定血流动力学,改善围手术期指标,并减少丙泊酚用量,改善BIS值维持情况,并促进患者麻醉恢复,减少术后谵妄发生风险,同时能减轻机体应激反应。

艾司氯胺酮泵注对依托咪酯靶控输注所致苏醒期躁动的影响

目的探讨艾司氯胺酮恒速泵注对依托咪酯靶控输注患者苏醒期躁动的影响。方法选择拟在依托咪酯靶控输注全麻下行中耳鼓室成形手术的患者120例,男61例,女59例,年龄18~64岁,BMI 18~30 kg/m^(2),ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级。将患者随机分为两组:艾司氯胺酮组(E组)和对照组(C组),每组60例。麻醉诱导开始至手术结束前30 min,E组泵注艾司氯胺酮0.2 ml·kg^(-1)·h^(-1),C组泵注生理盐水0.2 ml·kg^(-1)·h^(-1)。记录手术时间、麻醉时间、苏醒时间、拔管时间、PACU停留时间。记录苏醒期躁动例数、出PACU时和术后1 d VAS疼痛评分、术后1 d恶心呕吐例数以及术后1 d恶心呕吐VAS评分。评估术前、术后1、2 d的焦虑和抑郁评分。结果E组苏醒期躁动发生率、出PACU时和术后1 d VAS疼痛评分明显低于C组(P<0.05)。两组手术时间、麻醉时间、苏醒时间、拔管时间、PACU停留时间、术后1 d恶心呕吐发生率、术后1 d恶心呕吐VAS评分以及不同时点焦虑、抑郁评分差异无统计学意义。结论艾司氯胺酮泵注辅助依托咪酯靶控输注可以减少苏醒期躁动,促进患者术后恢复。

右美托咪定对丙泊酚靶控输注复合舒芬太尼麻醉期间麻醉深度的影响

目的探讨丙泊酚靶控输注与舒芬太尼复合麻醉期间患者采用右美托咪定(DEX)对麻醉深度的影响。方法选取2021年8月至2022年7月在郑州市第三人民医院接受甲状腺次全切除术患者共计90例,均行丙泊酚靶控输注与舒芬太尼复合麻醉,根据随机数字表法分为研究组(n=45)与对照组(n=45),研究组静脉泵注DEX稀释药物+生理盐水,对照组静脉泵注生理盐水(同等剂量),对两组熵指数(EI)变化情况(诱导后、操作时、手术结束后)进行观察,对两组平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、警觉/镇静评分(OAA/S)进行记录[给药前(T_(0))、给药5 min(T_(1))、给药10 min(T_(2))、给药20 min(T_(3))],统计两组麻醉恢复时间。结果两组诱导后、操作时、手术结束后的反应熵(RE)和状态熵(SE)降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且研究组与对照组相比更低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组T_(1)、T_(2)时MAP升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),T_(1)、T_(2)、T_(3)时HR下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),T_(1)、T_(2)、T_(3)时OAA/S评分降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),研究组T_(1)、T_(2)时MAP较对照组更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),研究组T_(2)、T_(3)时HR更低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),研究组T_(2)、T_(3)时OAA/S评分更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组呼吸睁眼时间、拔管时间较对照组更短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论DEX应用于丙泊酚靶控输注与舒芬太尼复合麻醉患者可提高麻醉质量,稳定血流动力学,镇静效果显著,缩短麻醉恢复时间。

模拟丙泊酚Marsh模式靶控输注瑞马唑仑在全麻诱导和维持的可行性研究

目的:评价模拟丙泊酚Marsh模式靶控输注瑞马唑仑对腹腔镜胆囊手术患者麻醉诱导和维持的可行性临床应用研究。方法:择期行腹腔镜胆囊手术患者80例,随机分为丙泊酚组(P组)和瑞马唑仑组(R组),每组各40例,麻醉诱导和维持分别靶控输注丙泊酚和瑞马唑仑(Marsh模式,血浆靶浓度)。记录意识消失时间,诱导插管前(T0)、插管后即刻(T1)、插管后3 min(T2)、气腹即刻(T3)、术中30 min(T4)、术毕(T5)的心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、脑电双频指数(BIS);记录注射痛、术毕气管拔管时间和术后不良反应。结果:与P组比较,R组意识消失时间短(P<0.05),注射痛、术中低血压和心动过缓的发生率低(P<0.05),但术后拔管时间延长(P<0.05)。结论:模拟丙泊酚Marsh模式靶控输注瑞马唑仑用于全麻诱导和维持,安全有效可行,不良反应少,且生命体征平稳。

靶控输注舒芬太尼或瑞芬太尼对日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后镇痛和恢复的影响

目的 比较靶控输注舒芬太尼与传统瑞芬太尼用于改善日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后镇痛和恢复质量的有效性和安全性。方法 本研究为一项前瞻性随机对照研究,选取2019年10月至2022年10月在晋中市第一人民医院日间病房行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的100例患者作为观察对象。采用随机数字法将患者分为两组,50例患者术中靶控输注瑞芬太尼(常规组),50例患者术中靶控输注舒芬太尼(观察组)。观察两组患者术后疼痛、恶心呕吐、自主呼吸恢复时间、苏醒时间、拔管时间,恢复定向力所用时间,以及围手术期[麻醉诱导前(T0)、麻醉诱导后5 min(T_(1))、插管操作时(T_(2))、切皮(T_(3))、入腹观察时(T_(4))、拔管时(T_(5))时]的血压、心率等变化。结果 观察组术后3 h内视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)低于常规组(P <0.05)。但观察组自主呼吸恢复时间、苏醒时间、拔管时间及定向力恢复时间相较于常规组更长(P <0.05)。麻醉诱导后5 min(T_(1))常规组血压低于观察组,在拔管时(T_(5)),常规组血压、心率高于观察组(P <0.05)。两组患者围术期不良事件发生率无差异。结论 对日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者,靶控输注舒芬太尼,具有血流动力学更加平稳、镇痛效能发挥显著的优点,但由于延长患者术后恢复时间,所以需提前停药。

CONCERT-CL闭环靶控输注系统对腹腔镜胃肠手术患者术后胃肠功能及免疫功能的影响

目的 探讨CONCERT-CL闭环靶控输注系统在腹腔镜胃肠手术患者中的应用效果及对患者术后胃肠功能和免疫功能的影响。方法 选取2022年8月至2023年5月上海市徐汇区中心医院收治的80例腹腔镜胃肠手术患者作为研究对象,按随机数表法分为观察组和对照组各40例。两组患者均采用相同的麻醉方案,但观察组患者采用CONCERT-CL闭环靶控输注系统进行麻醉管理,而对照组患者则采用开放式麻醉维持。比较两组患者的围术期相关指标、胃肠功能和围术期白细胞分化抗原(CD) TT细胞数量和自然杀伤细胞(NK)细胞数量,同时比较两组患者术后不良反应发生情况。结果 观察组患者的手术时间、麻醉时间分别为(183.60±30.15) min、(206.69±10.54) min,对照组分别为(189.12±43.85) min、(211.65±16.83) min,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组患者术中丙泊酚用量和顺式阿曲库铵用量分别为(13.34±2.00) mg/kg、(0.26±0.09) mg/kg,明显低于对照组的(15.96±1.41) mg/kg、(0.35±0.11) mg/kg,拔管即刻警觉-镇静(OAA/S)评分和术中BIS时间为40~60的占比分别为(3.46±0.25)分、(82.60±4.22)%,明显高于对照组的(3.12±0.46)分、(64.02±3.65)%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组和对照组患者的肠鸣音恢复[(22.60±4.52) h vs (30.57±6.84) h]、腹痛缓解[(26.88±4.11) h vs (30.17±2.94) h]、术后首次排气时间[(32.69±4.25) h vs (44.35±1.68) h]比较,观察组明显短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后12 h,观察组和对照组患者的CD4+TT数量[(35.69±1.54)%vs (32.01±6.21)%]、NK细胞数量[(20.36±2.41)%vs (18.73±2.65)%]比较,观察组明显高于对照组,CD8+TT数量[(27.01±1.79)%vs (29.28±3.87)%]比较,观察组明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者的不良反应总发生率为5.00%,略低于对照组的10.00%,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 CONCERT-CL闭环靶控输注系统在腹腔镜胃肠手术患者中的应用能够降低术中麻醉维持药物用量,患者苏醒速度更快。同时还能够促进患者术后胃肠功能的恢复,并且对免疫功能起到一定改善作用。

静脉注射利多卡因对丙泊酚抑制人工流产术扩张宫颈时体动半数有效浓度的影响

目的 探究静脉注射利多卡因对丙泊酚施耐德(Schnider)模型靶控输注(TCI)抑制人工流产术扩张宫颈时体动半数有效浓度(EC_(50))的影响。方法 选择自愿要求终止妊娠的初次人工流产患者46例,年龄18~35岁,妊娠6~9周,BMI 18~25 kg/m^(2),ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级。根据计算机生成的随机序列分为两组:利多卡因组(L组,n=25)和生理盐水组(C组,n=21)。L组静脉注射利多卡因1 mg/kg,C组静脉注射等容量的生理盐水。采用Schnider模型TCI丙泊酚,初始效应室靶浓度设为4.0μg/ml,依据Dixon序贯法,如在扩张宫颈时发生2级及以上体动反应,为阳性反应,则下一例升高一个浓度梯度,否则降低一个浓度梯度,相邻浓度梯度为0.5μg/ml。连续出现7个阳性反应拐点时终止研究。采用Probit回归分析计算两组丙泊酚抑制人工流产术扩张宫颈时体动的EC_(50)和95%有效浓度(EC_(95))及其95%可信区间(CI)。记录意识消失时间、苏醒时间、丙泊酚使用量和宫颈扩张效果,丙泊酚注射痛和术后15 min VAS疼痛评分,围术期低氧血症、低血压、术后恶心呕吐和头晕等不良反应的发生情况。结果 L组丙泊酚抑制人工流产术扩张宫颈时体动的EC_(50)为3.82μg/ml(95%CI 3.59~4.03μg/ml),EC_(95)为4.25μg/ml(95%CI 4.04~5.10μg/ml)。C组丙泊酚抑制人工流产术扩张宫颈时体动的EC_(50)为4.09μg/ml(95%CI 3.71~4.41μg/ml),EC_(95)为4.65μg/ml(95%CI 4.36~6.48μg/ml)。与C组比较,L组丙泊酚EC_(50)明显降低,丙泊酚使用量明显减少,宫颈扩张总有效率明显升高,丙泊酚注射痛和低氧血症发生率明显降低(P<0.05)。结论 静脉注射利多卡因1 mg/kg可降低Schnider模型TCI丙泊酚抑制人工流产术扩张宫颈时体动的EC_(50),减少丙泊酚使用量,降低静脉注射痛发生率,宫颈扩张效果好,不良反应少。

静脉输注右美托咪定联合靶控输注瑞芬太尼在老年患者ERCP麻醉中的临床应用

目的探讨静脉输注右美托咪定(Dex)联合靶控输注瑞芬太尼在老年患者经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)麻醉中的安全性及可行性。方法选择2021年1月至8月择期监测麻醉(MAC)下行ERCP的老年患者(年龄≥65岁)98例,随机分为丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼(TRP)组和Dex-瑞芬太尼(TRD)组。TRP组患者麻醉采用靶控输注丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼,TRD组患者麻醉采用静脉输注Dex联合靶控输注瑞芬太尼,2组均采用非气管插管的MAC麻醉。观察并记录患者在麻醉诱导前(T0)、麻醉诱导后即刻(T_(1))、进镜时(T_(2))、十二指肠乳头插管时(T_(3))、退镜时(T_(4))、留置鼻胆管结束时(T_(5))平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、脉博氧饱和度(SpO_(2))、呼吸频率(RR)、脑电双频指数(BIS)。于不同时点(术前、麻醉诱导后每隔15 min和苏醒即刻)采动脉血行血气分析,记录动脉血氧分压(PaO_(2))、动脉二氧化碳分压(PaCO_(2))、瑞芬太尼靶控输注浓度、手术时间、苏醒时间(停止输注瑞芬太尼至意识恢复时间)、麻醉恢复时间(意识恢复至离开手术室时间)、术中体动、离室Aldrete评分、术后60 min VAS评分、术后不良反应,以及麻醉医生、内镜医生和患者的满意度。结果2组患者的年龄、性别、BMI、ASA分级等一般资料均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。与TRP组比较,TRD组MAP在T_(1)和T_(3)时点增高(P<0.05),HR在T_(1)、T_(2)、T_(3)、T_(4)时点降低,SpO_(2)、RR在T_(1)、T_(2)、T_(3)、T_(4)时点增高,BIS在T_(2)、T_(3)、T_(4)、T_(5)时点增高,托下颌次数和低氧血症发生率降低,离室Aldrete评分增高,术后60 min VAS评分降低,麻醉医生、内镜医生及患者满意度增高,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。2组患者各时点PaO_(2)、PaCO_(2)、靶控输注瑞芬太尼浓度、手术时间、苏醒时间、麻醉恢复时间、术后不良反应发生率无统计学差异。结论与靶控输注丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼相比,静脉输注Dex联合靶控输注瑞芬太尼可降低老年患者在ERCP手术中低氧血症的发生率,麻醉方案能够满足ERCP手术的麻醉需求,安全可行。