Background: Care is a team effort that its continuity is not possible by a person alone. Nurses and physicians should have collaboration with other professions to solve care complex problems. Aim: We conducted a revie...Background: Care is a team effort that its continuity is not possible by a person alone. Nurses and physicians should have collaboration with other professions to solve care complex problems. Aim: We conducted a review of the literature to evaluate clinical nurses collaboration with other disciplines examined by qualitative approach. Method: We searched all articles that published from 1995 to 2014 in both English and Persian which had been performed interdisciplinary collaboration processes in the clinical nursing. These articles were done with qualitative approach for nurse’s collaboration with other disciplines. We searched using databases of Proquest, Scopus, pub Med, Science Direct, and Iranian databases of Sid, Magiran, Iran Medex. This review was performed using keywords matching with MESH terms such as interdisciplinary relations, nurse-physician relations, care team, collaboration, and their Persian equivalents at the first separately and then with AND/OR as combination. In most studies, the main structure was three components of collaboration process, context of collaboration and consequences that they were emphasized. Results & Conclusions: However context and processes were different but most studies reported outcomes similarity of interdisciplinary collaboration. Thus to achieve common goals between different disciplines working together is essential for effective care in clinical settings.展开更多
目的 考察中文版交流与分享信息量表（Communication and Sharing of Information Scale,CSI）用于医护合作关系的信效度.方法 根据自愿入组原则招募天津市10所医院600名医护人员作为研究对象,进行CSI评定,采用探索性因子分析与验证性...目的 考察中文版交流与分享信息量表（Communication and Sharing of Information Scale,CSI）用于医护合作关系的信效度.方法 根据自愿入组原则招募天津市10所医院600名医护人员作为研究对象,进行CSI评定,采用探索性因子分析与验证性因子分析相结合的方法考评结构效度;计算克朗巴赫-α系数评价量表内部一致性;计算两次测量相关系数考评重测信度.结果 探索性因子分析抽取了3个因子,按方差贡献率的大小依次命名为护理人员沟通、医生沟通、医疗信息共享.验证性因子分析显示x2/df为5.760,NNFI为0.900,GFI为0.945,AGFI为0.923,主要拟合指数近似误差均方根REMEA为0.06,各个指数均符合测量学标准,提示量表具有较好的结构效度.总量表Cronbach＇s α系数为0.870,三个因子的Cronbach＇s α系数分别为0.780,0.788,0.815,显示量表具有较好的内部一致性.随机抽取其中的100人于4周后重测,重测相关系数为0.870,提示量表具有良好的重测信度.结论 CSI量表中文译本用于调查医护合作关系状况时具有较好的结构效度和重测信度,量表内部一致性好,可推荐医院管理部门使用该量表评估医护合作的效率与质量问题.展开更多
文摘Background: Care is a team effort that its continuity is not possible by a person alone. Nurses and physicians should have collaboration with other professions to solve care complex problems. Aim: We conducted a review of the literature to evaluate clinical nurses collaboration with other disciplines examined by qualitative approach. Method: We searched all articles that published from 1995 to 2014 in both English and Persian which had been performed interdisciplinary collaboration processes in the clinical nursing. These articles were done with qualitative approach for nurse’s collaboration with other disciplines. We searched using databases of Proquest, Scopus, pub Med, Science Direct, and Iranian databases of Sid, Magiran, Iran Medex. This review was performed using keywords matching with MESH terms such as interdisciplinary relations, nurse-physician relations, care team, collaboration, and their Persian equivalents at the first separately and then with AND/OR as combination. In most studies, the main structure was three components of collaboration process, context of collaboration and consequences that they were emphasized. Results & Conclusions: However context and processes were different but most studies reported outcomes similarity of interdisciplinary collaboration. Thus to achieve common goals between different disciplines working together is essential for effective care in clinical settings.
文摘目的 考察中文版交流与分享信息量表（Communication and Sharing of Information Scale,CSI）用于医护合作关系的信效度.方法 根据自愿入组原则招募天津市10所医院600名医护人员作为研究对象,进行CSI评定,采用探索性因子分析与验证性因子分析相结合的方法考评结构效度;计算克朗巴赫-α系数评价量表内部一致性;计算两次测量相关系数考评重测信度.结果 探索性因子分析抽取了3个因子,按方差贡献率的大小依次命名为护理人员沟通、医生沟通、医疗信息共享.验证性因子分析显示x2/df为5.760,NNFI为0.900,GFI为0.945,AGFI为0.923,主要拟合指数近似误差均方根REMEA为0.06,各个指数均符合测量学标准,提示量表具有较好的结构效度.总量表Cronbach＇s α系数为0.870,三个因子的Cronbach＇s α系数分别为0.780,0.788,0.815,显示量表具有较好的内部一致性.随机抽取其中的100人于4周后重测,重测相关系数为0.870,提示量表具有良好的重测信度.结论 CSI量表中文译本用于调查医护合作关系状况时具有较好的结构效度和重测信度,量表内部一致性好,可推荐医院管理部门使用该量表评估医护合作的效率与质量问题.
