Aims and objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of a patient education tool (the ENAT) on self efficacy, patient knowledge, health outcomes and its usability in practice. Background: The effectiveness and value of ...Aims and objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of a patient education tool (the ENAT) on self efficacy, patient knowledge, health outcomes and its usability in practice. Background: The effectiveness and value of patient education in rheumatoid arthritis have been questioned. The ENAT was developed to help the nurses to provide more focused, individualized and relevant education. The psychometric properties of the ENAT have been assessed. Design: This study is a single blind randomized controlled trial using both quantitative and qualitative methodology. The primary outcome is patient self efficacy. Secondary outcomes are physical function, psychological status, pain levels, social interaction and patient knowledge of disease. Methods: 130 RA patients will be randomized into an experimental (EG) or control group (CG). The EG patients will complete the ENAT prior to seeing a Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) at weeks 0, 16 and 32. The CNS will use the ENAT as a template to meet patients perceived educational needs in addition to the usual care. The CG will receive their usual care from the CNS without the aid of the ENAT. To determine the ENAT’s usability, semi-structured quailtative interviews will take place with the practitioners and a sample of patients once they have completed the quantitative arm of the study. Results: The study commenced in April 2011 and the results are expected to be available after April 2013. Conclusions: It is hypothesized that nurses’ use of the ENAT will lead to increased patient self efficacy, and improved patient knowledge and health outcomes among the patients who used it. Furthermore, it is hypothesized that the ENAT will be easy for staff and patients to use. Relevance to clinical practice: The ENAT was developed to assess the perceived educational needs of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and thus help the nurses to provide more focused, individualised and relevant education.展开更多
Background: A means of assessing the social support needs of spouses of patients with cancer is not available in Japan, yet such individuals are at increased risk of developing psychological difficulties. Objectives: ...Background: A means of assessing the social support needs of spouses of patients with cancer is not available in Japan, yet such individuals are at increased risk of developing psychological difficulties. Objectives: The present study aimed (1) to describe the social support needs of spouses of patients with cancer, and (2) to explore factors associated with social support needs of spouses of patients with cancer. Design: Spouses (n = 559) of patients with cancer were recruited by registered agents of an online survey company and completed a self-reporting, online questionnaire. Measurements: The questionnaires included demographic information and a tool to assess social support needs. Results: Factor analysis of social support needs of the spouses of patients with cancer indicated that (1) “social support needs regarding disease and treatment of patient” (54 items) comprised 3 factors (“medical condition and cure”, “daily life and social support”, “intimacy and employment”), and (2) “social support needs of spouse (19 items)” comprised 2 factors (“family psychological issues and social support” and “intimacy, employment and society”). The ANOVA and T tests showed that “younger age”, “under treatment”, and “cancer not cured: treatment stopped”, “PS1” and “PS 2-4”, the presence of “lung cancer”, and “recurrence/metastasis” were significant factors (all展开更多
背景国内外用于评估癌症患者支持性照护需求的量表较多,但有关此类量表质量的标准化评价研究及不同量表间的横向比较研究较为缺乏,也少有研究者对此类量表的测量特性进行系统的整合与评价。目的评价中文版癌症患者支持性照护需求量表的...背景国内外用于评估癌症患者支持性照护需求的量表较多,但有关此类量表质量的标准化评价研究及不同量表间的横向比较研究较为缺乏,也少有研究者对此类量表的测量特性进行系统的整合与评价。目的评价中文版癌症患者支持性照护需求量表的测量学性能及研究的方法学质量。方法2021年4月检索中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普中文科技期刊全文数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、EmBase、Web of Science、CINAHL Complete数据库,获取有关中文版癌症患者支持性照护需求量表测量学性能评价的研究,检索时限均为建库至2021年3月30日。由两位研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料后,采用健康测量工具遴选标准(COSMIN)系统综述指南,在对量表的测量特性及研究的方法学质量进行评价的基础上,综合评定中文版癌症患者支持性照护需求评估量表各测量特性的证据等级,并形成对于量表的最终推荐意见。采用描述分析法对评价结果进行汇总、分析。结果共纳入15项研究,涉及8个中文版癌症患者支持性照护需求评估量表〔癌症患者支持性照护需求简明问卷中文版(SCNS-SF34)、中文版支持性照护需求筛查工具(SCNS-ST9-C)、癌症患者综合需求评估量表(CNAT)、癌症需求简明问卷(CNQ-SF)、中文版癌症患者未满足需求量表(CaSUN-C)、癌症患者未满足需求简明量表(SF-SUNS)、晚期癌症患者需求评估问卷(ACNQ-41)、晚期癌症患者需求评估表简表(ACNQ-29)〕。就量表的测量特性质量而言,除ACNQ-29的内容效度为“未提及”外,其余7个量表的内容效度均为“不确定”;除CaSUN-C、SF-SUNS的结构效度为“充分”外,其余6个量表的结构效度均为“不确定”;SCNS-SF34、CNQ-SF、CaSUN-C、SF-SUNS的内部一致性为“充分”,ACNQ-41的内部一致性为“不充分”,其余3个量表的内部一致性为“不确定”;CNAT、CNQ-SF、ACNQ-29的假设检验为“未提及”,CaSUN-C、SF-SUNS、ACNQ-41的假设检验为“不确定”,SCNS-SF34、SCNS-ST9-C的假设检验为“充分”;除ACNQ-41的稳定性为“不充分”,SCNS-ST9-C、ACNQ-29的稳定性为“未提及”外,其余5个量表的稳定性均为“充分”;仅SCNS-SF34的跨文化效度为“充分”,其余7个量表的跨文化效度均为“未提及”。8个量表的推荐等级均为B级。结论SCNS-SF34的测量特性得到了最为全面的评价,其具有较好的信效度,且临床应用可行性高,可暂时被推荐使用,但上述结论仍有待更多高质量证据加以支撑。展开更多
目的了解老年癌症患者综合需求情况,为进一步的护理干预提供参考。方法采用癌症患者综合需求评估量表(Comprehensive Needs Assessment Tool in cancer for patients,CNAT)对397例老年癌症患者进行问卷调查。结果老年癌症患者综合需求总...目的了解老年癌症患者综合需求情况,为进一步的护理干预提供参考。方法采用癌症患者综合需求评估量表(Comprehensive Needs Assessment Tool in cancer for patients,CNAT)对397例老年癌症患者进行问卷调查。结果老年癌症患者综合需求总分42.37(32.77,53.11)分,身体症状需求35.90(12.82,51.28)分,心理情感需求33.33(9.01,57.58)分,知识信息需求50.00(33.33,66.67)分,实际支持需求33.33(19.05,47.62)分,社会精神支持需求33.33(22.22,55.56)分,护理需求58.33(33.33,66.67)分,医院设施需求66.67(41.67,66.67)分,医疗需求58.33(33.33,75.00)分;老年癌症患者综合需求受到目前职业、照顾者类型、治疗方式、癌症类型、癌症患病时间、癌症分期、受教育程度、家庭月总收入及目前居住地影响(均P<0.01)。结论老年癌症患者就医体验需求较高,与患者的病情及获得资源的情况有关。需要加强对低学历、居住于农村,患有乳腺癌、子宫及其附件癌症、癌症分期较差及放疗患者的针对性干预,满足其需求。展开更多
文摘Aims and objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of a patient education tool (the ENAT) on self efficacy, patient knowledge, health outcomes and its usability in practice. Background: The effectiveness and value of patient education in rheumatoid arthritis have been questioned. The ENAT was developed to help the nurses to provide more focused, individualized and relevant education. The psychometric properties of the ENAT have been assessed. Design: This study is a single blind randomized controlled trial using both quantitative and qualitative methodology. The primary outcome is patient self efficacy. Secondary outcomes are physical function, psychological status, pain levels, social interaction and patient knowledge of disease. Methods: 130 RA patients will be randomized into an experimental (EG) or control group (CG). The EG patients will complete the ENAT prior to seeing a Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) at weeks 0, 16 and 32. The CNS will use the ENAT as a template to meet patients perceived educational needs in addition to the usual care. The CG will receive their usual care from the CNS without the aid of the ENAT. To determine the ENAT’s usability, semi-structured quailtative interviews will take place with the practitioners and a sample of patients once they have completed the quantitative arm of the study. Results: The study commenced in April 2011 and the results are expected to be available after April 2013. Conclusions: It is hypothesized that nurses’ use of the ENAT will lead to increased patient self efficacy, and improved patient knowledge and health outcomes among the patients who used it. Furthermore, it is hypothesized that the ENAT will be easy for staff and patients to use. Relevance to clinical practice: The ENAT was developed to assess the perceived educational needs of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and thus help the nurses to provide more focused, individualised and relevant education.
文摘Background: A means of assessing the social support needs of spouses of patients with cancer is not available in Japan, yet such individuals are at increased risk of developing psychological difficulties. Objectives: The present study aimed (1) to describe the social support needs of spouses of patients with cancer, and (2) to explore factors associated with social support needs of spouses of patients with cancer. Design: Spouses (n = 559) of patients with cancer were recruited by registered agents of an online survey company and completed a self-reporting, online questionnaire. Measurements: The questionnaires included demographic information and a tool to assess social support needs. Results: Factor analysis of social support needs of the spouses of patients with cancer indicated that (1) “social support needs regarding disease and treatment of patient” (54 items) comprised 3 factors (“medical condition and cure”, “daily life and social support”, “intimacy and employment”), and (2) “social support needs of spouse (19 items)” comprised 2 factors (“family psychological issues and social support” and “intimacy, employment and society”). The ANOVA and T tests showed that “younger age”, “under treatment”, and “cancer not cured: treatment stopped”, “PS1” and “PS 2-4”, the presence of “lung cancer”, and “recurrence/metastasis” were significant factors (all
文摘背景国内外用于评估癌症患者支持性照护需求的量表较多,但有关此类量表质量的标准化评价研究及不同量表间的横向比较研究较为缺乏,也少有研究者对此类量表的测量特性进行系统的整合与评价。目的评价中文版癌症患者支持性照护需求量表的测量学性能及研究的方法学质量。方法2021年4月检索中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普中文科技期刊全文数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、EmBase、Web of Science、CINAHL Complete数据库,获取有关中文版癌症患者支持性照护需求量表测量学性能评价的研究,检索时限均为建库至2021年3月30日。由两位研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料后,采用健康测量工具遴选标准(COSMIN)系统综述指南,在对量表的测量特性及研究的方法学质量进行评价的基础上,综合评定中文版癌症患者支持性照护需求评估量表各测量特性的证据等级,并形成对于量表的最终推荐意见。采用描述分析法对评价结果进行汇总、分析。结果共纳入15项研究,涉及8个中文版癌症患者支持性照护需求评估量表〔癌症患者支持性照护需求简明问卷中文版(SCNS-SF34)、中文版支持性照护需求筛查工具(SCNS-ST9-C)、癌症患者综合需求评估量表(CNAT)、癌症需求简明问卷(CNQ-SF)、中文版癌症患者未满足需求量表(CaSUN-C)、癌症患者未满足需求简明量表(SF-SUNS)、晚期癌症患者需求评估问卷(ACNQ-41)、晚期癌症患者需求评估表简表(ACNQ-29)〕。就量表的测量特性质量而言,除ACNQ-29的内容效度为“未提及”外,其余7个量表的内容效度均为“不确定”;除CaSUN-C、SF-SUNS的结构效度为“充分”外,其余6个量表的结构效度均为“不确定”;SCNS-SF34、CNQ-SF、CaSUN-C、SF-SUNS的内部一致性为“充分”,ACNQ-41的内部一致性为“不充分”,其余3个量表的内部一致性为“不确定”;CNAT、CNQ-SF、ACNQ-29的假设检验为“未提及”,CaSUN-C、SF-SUNS、ACNQ-41的假设检验为“不确定”,SCNS-SF34、SCNS-ST9-C的假设检验为“充分”;除ACNQ-41的稳定性为“不充分”,SCNS-ST9-C、ACNQ-29的稳定性为“未提及”外,其余5个量表的稳定性均为“充分”;仅SCNS-SF34的跨文化效度为“充分”,其余7个量表的跨文化效度均为“未提及”。8个量表的推荐等级均为B级。结论SCNS-SF34的测量特性得到了最为全面的评价,其具有较好的信效度,且临床应用可行性高,可暂时被推荐使用,但上述结论仍有待更多高质量证据加以支撑。
文摘目的了解老年癌症患者综合需求情况,为进一步的护理干预提供参考。方法采用癌症患者综合需求评估量表(Comprehensive Needs Assessment Tool in cancer for patients,CNAT)对397例老年癌症患者进行问卷调查。结果老年癌症患者综合需求总分42.37(32.77,53.11)分,身体症状需求35.90(12.82,51.28)分,心理情感需求33.33(9.01,57.58)分,知识信息需求50.00(33.33,66.67)分,实际支持需求33.33(19.05,47.62)分,社会精神支持需求33.33(22.22,55.56)分,护理需求58.33(33.33,66.67)分,医院设施需求66.67(41.67,66.67)分,医疗需求58.33(33.33,75.00)分;老年癌症患者综合需求受到目前职业、照顾者类型、治疗方式、癌症类型、癌症患病时间、癌症分期、受教育程度、家庭月总收入及目前居住地影响(均P<0.01)。结论老年癌症患者就医体验需求较高,与患者的病情及获得资源的情况有关。需要加强对低学历、居住于农村,患有乳腺癌、子宫及其附件癌症、癌症分期较差及放疗患者的针对性干预,满足其需求。
