Objective To explore the clinical value of ultrasound shear wave elastography(SWE)and contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)in transrectal prostate biopsy.Methods A total of 54 patients(average age:67.79±12.01 years)...Objective To explore the clinical value of ultrasound shear wave elastography(SWE)and contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)in transrectal prostate biopsy.Methods A total of 54 patients(average age:67.79±12.01 years)in the experimental group underwent transrectal prostate biopsy under the guidance of SWE,while 46 patients(average age:69.22±11.54 years)in the control group underwent transrectal prostate biopsy guided by CEUS.Results There were a total of 451 needles,with an average of 8.35±1.67 needles per patient in the experimental group,and a total of 462 needles,with an average of 10.04±1.33 needles per patient in the control group.The difference in puncture times between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the positive detection rate,sensitivity or specificity between the two groups(P>0.05),but there was a significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy between the two groups(P<0.05).The E_(mean)and E_(max)of prostate cancer were significantly higher in the experimental group than in benign prostatic hyperplasia(P<0.05).The receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC)analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve(AUC)of E_(mean)was 0.752(S.E.=0.072,95%CI=0.611-0.894,P=0.007),and the best cutoff value was 47.005 kPa.Conclusion In summary,both SWE-and CEUS-guided transrectal prostate biopsy can help find the focus and guide the puncture,and improve the positive detection rate.展开更多
基金The study was funded by Inner Mongolia Natural Science Foundation(2020MS08047).
文摘Objective To explore the clinical value of ultrasound shear wave elastography(SWE)and contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)in transrectal prostate biopsy.Methods A total of 54 patients(average age:67.79±12.01 years)in the experimental group underwent transrectal prostate biopsy under the guidance of SWE,while 46 patients(average age:69.22±11.54 years)in the control group underwent transrectal prostate biopsy guided by CEUS.Results There were a total of 451 needles,with an average of 8.35±1.67 needles per patient in the experimental group,and a total of 462 needles,with an average of 10.04±1.33 needles per patient in the control group.The difference in puncture times between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the positive detection rate,sensitivity or specificity between the two groups(P>0.05),but there was a significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy between the two groups(P<0.05).The E_(mean)and E_(max)of prostate cancer were significantly higher in the experimental group than in benign prostatic hyperplasia(P<0.05).The receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC)analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve(AUC)of E_(mean)was 0.752(S.E.=0.072,95%CI=0.611-0.894,P=0.007),and the best cutoff value was 47.005 kPa.Conclusion In summary,both SWE-and CEUS-guided transrectal prostate biopsy can help find the focus and guide the puncture,and improve the positive detection rate.
