Objective:To explore the treatment of TOSSY type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation with clavicular hook plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament repair and its clinical effect.Methods:80 patients with TOSSY...Objective:To explore the treatment of TOSSY type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation with clavicular hook plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament repair and its clinical effect.Methods:80 patients with TOSSY type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation who were admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to January 2019 were selected.They were randomly divided into the control group(n=39,treated with clavicular hook plate)and the observation group(n=41,treated with clavicular hook plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament repair)by the random number table method.The clinical efficacy in 12 months after operation,related clinical indicators,12-month postoperative recovery and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results:The excellent and good rate was 92.68%(38/41)in 12 months after operation in the observation group,which was higher than that(76.92%,30/39)in the control group(p<.05).There were no significant differences in the duration of surgery,intraoperative blood loss and HLOS between the observation group and the control group(p>.05).In 12 months after operation,abduction activity and forward flexion activity of the observation group were higher than those of the control group,and visual analogue score(VAS)was lower than that of the control group(p<.05).The incidence of complications in the observation group was slightly lower than that in the control group,but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(p>.05).Conclusions:For TOSSY type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation,clavicular hook plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament repair has a good clinical efficacy.It can improve shoulder joint function,alleviate shoulder pain and have fewer complications.It can provide a reference for clinical treatment of this type of acromioclavicular joint dislocation.展开更多
Introduction: Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is a common shoulder injury, comprising 9% - 12% of shoulder girdle injuries. Optimal management remains challenging, with treatment decisions guided by the Rockw...Introduction: Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is a common shoulder injury, comprising 9% - 12% of shoulder girdle injuries. Optimal management remains challenging, with treatment decisions guided by the Rockwood classification system. Controversies surround grade III injuries, necessitating further classification. Non-operative treatment has shown favorable outcomes, while surgical interventions vary. Anatomical coracoclavicular reconstruction (ACCR) has demonstrated biomechanical advantages over traditional methods. Arthroscopic techniques offer advantages, minimizing deltoid detachment and allowing concurrent pathology identification. This study evaluates the outcomes of arthroscopic-assisted ACCR in chronic AC joint dislocation. Surgical Technique: Arthroscopic-assisted ACCR involves meticulous portal placement, tendon graft harvesting, diagnostic arthroscopy, and coracoid exposure. The clavicle tunnels were made to mimic the conoid and trapezoid ligament positions, using FibreTape#2 loop and Dog Bone Button for correct placement against the coracoid base, and passing the semitendinosus graft through to reconstruct the conoid ligament, reduction done and graft follow through for anatomical reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective cohort study at Hospital Kuala Lumpur analyzed 35 patients undergoing arthroscopic-assisted ACCR for Rockwood grade III - V AC joint dislocations. Inclusion criteria encompassed trauma ≥ 3 weeks prior, no prior shoulder injuries, and ≥12-month follow-up. Functional and radiological assessments utilized ASES scores and coracoclavicular distances, respectively. Statistical analysis employed descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Results: The mean age was 38.9 years (SD 11.26), and 34 of 35 patients were male. Grade IV injuries were predominant (37.1%). Waiting time for surgery averaged 234.9 days. Functional improvement was substantial postoperatively (ASES: 55.5 to 88.9). Radiological outcomes demonstrated reduced coracoclavicular distances and maintained reduction. No significant correlation was observed between injury grade and outcomes. Conclusion: Arthroscopic-assisted ACCR for chronic AC joint dislocation yields significant functional and radiological improvement, irrespective of injury grade. Waiting time for surgery exhibits minor impact on outcomes, emphasizing the procedure’s efficacy. Concomitant injuries do not impede success, highlighting the versatility of this approach in managing shoulder instability. The study contributes valuable insights into the nuanced management of chronic AC joint dislocations and supports the adoption of arthroscopic-assisted ACCR as a viable treatment option.展开更多
基金Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region(2019MS08045).
文摘Objective:To explore the treatment of TOSSY type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation with clavicular hook plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament repair and its clinical effect.Methods:80 patients with TOSSY type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation who were admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to January 2019 were selected.They were randomly divided into the control group(n=39,treated with clavicular hook plate)and the observation group(n=41,treated with clavicular hook plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament repair)by the random number table method.The clinical efficacy in 12 months after operation,related clinical indicators,12-month postoperative recovery and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results:The excellent and good rate was 92.68%(38/41)in 12 months after operation in the observation group,which was higher than that(76.92%,30/39)in the control group(p<.05).There were no significant differences in the duration of surgery,intraoperative blood loss and HLOS between the observation group and the control group(p>.05).In 12 months after operation,abduction activity and forward flexion activity of the observation group were higher than those of the control group,and visual analogue score(VAS)was lower than that of the control group(p<.05).The incidence of complications in the observation group was slightly lower than that in the control group,but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(p>.05).Conclusions:For TOSSY type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation,clavicular hook plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament repair has a good clinical efficacy.It can improve shoulder joint function,alleviate shoulder pain and have fewer complications.It can provide a reference for clinical treatment of this type of acromioclavicular joint dislocation.
文摘Introduction: Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is a common shoulder injury, comprising 9% - 12% of shoulder girdle injuries. Optimal management remains challenging, with treatment decisions guided by the Rockwood classification system. Controversies surround grade III injuries, necessitating further classification. Non-operative treatment has shown favorable outcomes, while surgical interventions vary. Anatomical coracoclavicular reconstruction (ACCR) has demonstrated biomechanical advantages over traditional methods. Arthroscopic techniques offer advantages, minimizing deltoid detachment and allowing concurrent pathology identification. This study evaluates the outcomes of arthroscopic-assisted ACCR in chronic AC joint dislocation. Surgical Technique: Arthroscopic-assisted ACCR involves meticulous portal placement, tendon graft harvesting, diagnostic arthroscopy, and coracoid exposure. The clavicle tunnels were made to mimic the conoid and trapezoid ligament positions, using FibreTape#2 loop and Dog Bone Button for correct placement against the coracoid base, and passing the semitendinosus graft through to reconstruct the conoid ligament, reduction done and graft follow through for anatomical reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective cohort study at Hospital Kuala Lumpur analyzed 35 patients undergoing arthroscopic-assisted ACCR for Rockwood grade III - V AC joint dislocations. Inclusion criteria encompassed trauma ≥ 3 weeks prior, no prior shoulder injuries, and ≥12-month follow-up. Functional and radiological assessments utilized ASES scores and coracoclavicular distances, respectively. Statistical analysis employed descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Results: The mean age was 38.9 years (SD 11.26), and 34 of 35 patients were male. Grade IV injuries were predominant (37.1%). Waiting time for surgery averaged 234.9 days. Functional improvement was substantial postoperatively (ASES: 55.5 to 88.9). Radiological outcomes demonstrated reduced coracoclavicular distances and maintained reduction. No significant correlation was observed between injury grade and outcomes. Conclusion: Arthroscopic-assisted ACCR for chronic AC joint dislocation yields significant functional and radiological improvement, irrespective of injury grade. Waiting time for surgery exhibits minor impact on outcomes, emphasizing the procedure’s efficacy. Concomitant injuries do not impede success, highlighting the versatility of this approach in managing shoulder instability. The study contributes valuable insights into the nuanced management of chronic AC joint dislocations and supports the adoption of arthroscopic-assisted ACCR as a viable treatment option.
