Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration is the standard for evaluating thyroid nodules with a high safety profile and a relatively low number of non-diagnostic cytological findings.Nevertheless,this diagnostic method...Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration is the standard for evaluating thyroid nodules with a high safety profile and a relatively low number of non-diagnostic cytological findings.Nevertheless,this diagnostic method traditionally has its weak points.Several diagnostic categories such as BethesdaⅠ,ⅢandⅣare not reliable for thyroid carcinoma risk assessment.Recent advancements in a core needle biopsy made it possible to use this tool as a new method for thyroid nodules evaluation.The main feature of this method is the use of thin needles(18-21G)and guns with an automatic trigger mechanism.The histological material collected with the use of a core needle biopsy is usually superior to cytological.Therefore,the core needle biopsy can be used as a complementary technique to a standard fine needle aspiration in difficult and dubious cases of thyroid neoplasia with uncertain malignant potential.展开更多
Aims: The reproducibility of Ki-67 between core-needle biopsies and surgical materials has not been well documented in the literature, although the concordance affects the utility of the Ki-67 labeling index based on ...Aims: The reproducibility of Ki-67 between core-needle biopsies and surgical materials has not been well documented in the literature, although the concordance affects the utility of the Ki-67 labeling index based on the core-needle biopsy materials, which indicates the need for preoperative chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to reveal the reproducibility of Ki-67 between both materials and the cause of discrepancies. Methods and Results: We analyzed 137 cases of invasive carcinoma of the breast and the compared Ki-67-labeling index between core-needle biopsy and surgical materials. The Ki-67-labeling index of biopsy and surgical specimens ranged from 1% to 85% (median: 13%) and 1% to 80% (median: 12%), respectively. The discrepancy of Ki-67-labeling ranged from 0% to 55% (median: 4%) and could be calculated by the tumor size, hot spots of surgical materials, a high Ki-67-labeling index based on the core-needle biopsy materials, and the total length of core needles, respectively. Conclusions: The concordance rate of the Ki-67-labeling index between core-needle biopsies and surgical materials was favorable, so we can use each Ki-67-labeling index of core-needle biopsies as a marker for preoperative chemotherapy. Factors affecting the index discrepancy were hot spots, a high Ki-67-labeling index, and the total length of biopsy material. Judgements on the subtypes and clinical procedures of invasive breast carcinoma could be made comprehensively based on not only the Ki-67-labeling index but also the existence of hot spots and histological grade.展开更多
文摘Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration is the standard for evaluating thyroid nodules with a high safety profile and a relatively low number of non-diagnostic cytological findings.Nevertheless,this diagnostic method traditionally has its weak points.Several diagnostic categories such as BethesdaⅠ,ⅢandⅣare not reliable for thyroid carcinoma risk assessment.Recent advancements in a core needle biopsy made it possible to use this tool as a new method for thyroid nodules evaluation.The main feature of this method is the use of thin needles(18-21G)and guns with an automatic trigger mechanism.The histological material collected with the use of a core needle biopsy is usually superior to cytological.Therefore,the core needle biopsy can be used as a complementary technique to a standard fine needle aspiration in difficult and dubious cases of thyroid neoplasia with uncertain malignant potential.
文摘Aims: The reproducibility of Ki-67 between core-needle biopsies and surgical materials has not been well documented in the literature, although the concordance affects the utility of the Ki-67 labeling index based on the core-needle biopsy materials, which indicates the need for preoperative chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to reveal the reproducibility of Ki-67 between both materials and the cause of discrepancies. Methods and Results: We analyzed 137 cases of invasive carcinoma of the breast and the compared Ki-67-labeling index between core-needle biopsy and surgical materials. The Ki-67-labeling index of biopsy and surgical specimens ranged from 1% to 85% (median: 13%) and 1% to 80% (median: 12%), respectively. The discrepancy of Ki-67-labeling ranged from 0% to 55% (median: 4%) and could be calculated by the tumor size, hot spots of surgical materials, a high Ki-67-labeling index based on the core-needle biopsy materials, and the total length of core needles, respectively. Conclusions: The concordance rate of the Ki-67-labeling index between core-needle biopsies and surgical materials was favorable, so we can use each Ki-67-labeling index of core-needle biopsies as a marker for preoperative chemotherapy. Factors affecting the index discrepancy were hot spots, a high Ki-67-labeling index, and the total length of biopsy material. Judgements on the subtypes and clinical procedures of invasive breast carcinoma could be made comprehensively based on not only the Ki-67-labeling index but also the existence of hot spots and histological grade.
