BACKGROUND Coronary stent implantation is usually used to treat unstable angina to alleviate stenosis or occlusion,promoting blood flow restoration and alleviating symptoms such as myocardial ischemia.And postoperativ...BACKGROUND Coronary stent implantation is usually used to treat unstable angina to alleviate stenosis or occlusion,promoting blood flow restoration and alleviating symptoms such as myocardial ischemia.And postoperative cardiac rehabilitation is essential for enhancing recovery and prognosis.Nevertheless,conventional rehabilitation lacks specificity,particularly for elderly patients with multiple comorbidities and poor compliance,rendering it less effective.AIM To investigate the effects of systematic cardiac rehabilitation training in elderly patients with unstable angina following coronary stenting intervention.METHODS A retrospective enrollment was conducted comprising fifty-four elderly patients with unstable angina pectoris who underwent systematic cardiac rehabilitation training after receiving coronary intervention as the rehabilitation group,while fifty-three elderly patients who received basic nursing and rehabilitation guidance measures after coronary intervention were assigned to the control group.Differences in Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores,survival quality(SF-36)scores,cardiopulmonary exercise function assessment index,echocardiographic cardiac function index,and adverse cardiovascular events were compared between the two groups.RESULTS After intervention,the rehabilitation group observed greater VO2 Max,maximum metabolic equivalent,eft ventricular ejection fraction,left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and smaller left ventricular end-systolic diameter.And the rehabilitation group observed greater scores of physical activity limitation,stable angina pectoris,treatment satisfaction,and SF-36 score.The incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in the two groups,showed no significant difference.CONCLUSION Systematic cardiac rehabilitation following coronary stenting in elderly patients with unstable angina pectoris can enhance cardiac function recovery,consequently enhancing both quality of life and cardiopulmonary exercise tolerance.展开更多
widely used development incidence of factors and Coronary stent implantation was considered as a way of coronary revascularization. It has been in the treatment of coronary heart disease, but restenosis has become the...widely used development incidence of factors and Coronary stent implantation was considered as a way of coronary revascularization. It has been in the treatment of coronary heart disease, but restenosis has become the main bottleneck to the of stent technique. Despite drug-eluting stents used widely, restenosis rate is still about 10%. The restenosis was associated with intervention injury, patient factors, genetic types, nerve endocrine so on Overview above aspects is expected to provide some ideas for restenosis prevention and treatment.展开更多
Background Though drug-eluting stent （DES） almost solved a problem of restenosis, safety issues related to stent thrombosis are still the major concern of DES. We hypothesized that hybrid stent implantation may decr...Background Though drug-eluting stent （DES） almost solved a problem of restenosis, safety issues related to stent thrombosis are still the major concern of DES. We hypothesized that hybrid stent implantation may decrease the use of DES, probably improving the long-term safety but not affecting efficacy adversely when treating multilesion coronary artery disease in the DES era. Methods From April 2004 to October 2006, 848 patients with multilesion disease underwent hybrid stent implantation. During the same period 5647 patients with multilesion coronary heart disease were treated by exclusive DES implantation in Fu Wai Hospital. According to propensity score matching, we chose 823 pairs of patients with multileison coronary artery disease for inclusion into our study. We obtained the 24-month clinical outcome including death, myocardial infarction （MI）, thrombosis, target lesion revascularization （TLR）, target vessel revascularization （TVR）, and major adverse cardiac events （MACE, the composite of death, MI, and TVR）. We used Cox＇s proportional-hazard models to assess relative risks of all the outcome measures after propensity match. Results At 24 months, patients in the hybrid stent implantation group showed a significantly higher risk of TLR （8.39% vs. 3.28%, HR2.38, 95% Cl. 1.50-3.70）, TVR （11.07% vs. 6.32%,/-/R 1.61, 95% Cl. 1.15-2.27） and MACE （13.75% vs. 8.75%, FIR 1.37, 95% Cl. 1.02-1.85）. No significant difference was apparent in terms of mortality （1.22% vs. 1.70%, HR 0.55, 95% Cl. 0.24-1.25）, MI （1.95% vs. 2.31%, HR0.73, 95% Cl. 0.37-1.42）, or thrombosis （definite＋probable） （0.73% vs. 1.58%, HR0.40, 95% Cl. 0.15-1.05）. Conclusions In patients with multilesion coronary artery disease, the exclusive DES implantation was associated with significantly lower risks of TLR, TVR and MACE, and the hybrid stent implantation did not result in any significant improvements regarding safety issues. Prospective studies are needed to confirm our results.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Coronary stent implantation is usually used to treat unstable angina to alleviate stenosis or occlusion,promoting blood flow restoration and alleviating symptoms such as myocardial ischemia.And postoperative cardiac rehabilitation is essential for enhancing recovery and prognosis.Nevertheless,conventional rehabilitation lacks specificity,particularly for elderly patients with multiple comorbidities and poor compliance,rendering it less effective.AIM To investigate the effects of systematic cardiac rehabilitation training in elderly patients with unstable angina following coronary stenting intervention.METHODS A retrospective enrollment was conducted comprising fifty-four elderly patients with unstable angina pectoris who underwent systematic cardiac rehabilitation training after receiving coronary intervention as the rehabilitation group,while fifty-three elderly patients who received basic nursing and rehabilitation guidance measures after coronary intervention were assigned to the control group.Differences in Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores,survival quality(SF-36)scores,cardiopulmonary exercise function assessment index,echocardiographic cardiac function index,and adverse cardiovascular events were compared between the two groups.RESULTS After intervention,the rehabilitation group observed greater VO2 Max,maximum metabolic equivalent,eft ventricular ejection fraction,left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and smaller left ventricular end-systolic diameter.And the rehabilitation group observed greater scores of physical activity limitation,stable angina pectoris,treatment satisfaction,and SF-36 score.The incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in the two groups,showed no significant difference.CONCLUSION Systematic cardiac rehabilitation following coronary stenting in elderly patients with unstable angina pectoris can enhance cardiac function recovery,consequently enhancing both quality of life and cardiopulmonary exercise tolerance.
文摘widely used development incidence of factors and Coronary stent implantation was considered as a way of coronary revascularization. It has been in the treatment of coronary heart disease, but restenosis has become the main bottleneck to the of stent technique. Despite drug-eluting stents used widely, restenosis rate is still about 10%. The restenosis was associated with intervention injury, patient factors, genetic types, nerve endocrine so on Overview above aspects is expected to provide some ideas for restenosis prevention and treatment.
文摘Background Though drug-eluting stent （DES） almost solved a problem of restenosis, safety issues related to stent thrombosis are still the major concern of DES. We hypothesized that hybrid stent implantation may decrease the use of DES, probably improving the long-term safety but not affecting efficacy adversely when treating multilesion coronary artery disease in the DES era. Methods From April 2004 to October 2006, 848 patients with multilesion disease underwent hybrid stent implantation. During the same period 5647 patients with multilesion coronary heart disease were treated by exclusive DES implantation in Fu Wai Hospital. According to propensity score matching, we chose 823 pairs of patients with multileison coronary artery disease for inclusion into our study. We obtained the 24-month clinical outcome including death, myocardial infarction （MI）, thrombosis, target lesion revascularization （TLR）, target vessel revascularization （TVR）, and major adverse cardiac events （MACE, the composite of death, MI, and TVR）. We used Cox＇s proportional-hazard models to assess relative risks of all the outcome measures after propensity match. Results At 24 months, patients in the hybrid stent implantation group showed a significantly higher risk of TLR （8.39% vs. 3.28%, HR2.38, 95% Cl. 1.50-3.70）, TVR （11.07% vs. 6.32%,/-/R 1.61, 95% Cl. 1.15-2.27） and MACE （13.75% vs. 8.75%, FIR 1.37, 95% Cl. 1.02-1.85）. No significant difference was apparent in terms of mortality （1.22% vs. 1.70%, HR 0.55, 95% Cl. 0.24-1.25）, MI （1.95% vs. 2.31%, HR0.73, 95% Cl. 0.37-1.42）, or thrombosis （definite＋probable） （0.73% vs. 1.58%, HR0.40, 95% Cl. 0.15-1.05）. Conclusions In patients with multilesion coronary artery disease, the exclusive DES implantation was associated with significantly lower risks of TLR, TVR and MACE, and the hybrid stent implantation did not result in any significant improvements regarding safety issues. Prospective studies are needed to confirm our results.
