Heart failure is a dynamic condition with high morbidity and mortality and its prognosis should be reassessed frequently, particularly in patients for whom critical treatment decisions may depend on the results of pro...Heart failure is a dynamic condition with high morbidity and mortality and its prognosis should be reassessed frequently, particularly in patients for whom critical treatment decisions may depend on the results of prognostication. In patients with heart failure, nuclear cardiology techniques are useful to establish the etiol-ogy and the severity of the disease, while fewer studies have explored the potential capability of nuclear cardi-ology to guide cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and to select patients for implantable cardioverter defbrillators (ICD). Left ventricular synchrony may be assessed by radionuclide angiography or gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. These modalities have shown promise as predictors of CRT outcome using phase analysis. Combined assessment of myocardial viability and left ventricular dyssynchrony is feasible using posi-tron emission tomography and could improve conven-tional response prediction criteria for CRT. Preliminary data also exists on integrated positron emission tomog-raphy/computed tomography approach for assessing myocardial viability, identifying the location of biven-tricular pacemaker leads, and obtaining left ventricular functional data, including contractile phase analysis. Fi-nally, cardiac imaging with autonomic radiotracers may be useful in predicting CRT response and for identifying patients at risk for sudden cardiac death, therefore po-tentially offering a way to select patients for both CRT and ICD therapy. Prospective trials where imaging is combined with image-test driven therapy are needed to better defne the role of nuclear cardiology for guiding device therapy in patients with heart failure.展开更多
Symptomatic bradycardia is effectively treated with the implantation of a cardiac pacemaker. Although a highly successful therapy, during recent years there has been a focus on the negative effects associated with lon...Symptomatic bradycardia is effectively treated with the implantation of a cardiac pacemaker. Although a highly successful therapy, during recent years there has been a focus on the negative effects associated with longterm pacing of the apex of the right ventricle(RV). It has been shown in both experimental and clinical studies that RV pacing leads to ventricular dyssynchrony, similar to that of left bundle branch block, with subsequent detrimental effects on cardiac structure and function, and in some cases adverse clinical outcomes such as atrial fibrillation, heart failure and death. There is substantial evidence that patients with reduced left ventricular function(LVEF) are at particular high risk of suffering the detrimental clinical effects of long-term RV pacing. The evidence is, however, incomplete, coming largely from subanalyses of pacemaker and implantable cardiac defibrillator studies. In this group of patients with reduced LVEF and an expected high amount of RV pacing, biventricular pacing(cardiac resynchronization therapy) devices can prevent the negative effects of RV pacing and reduce ventricular dyssynchrony. Therefore, cardiac resynchronization therapy has emerged as an attractive option with promising results and more clinical studies are underway. Furthermore, specific pacemaker algorithms, which minimize RV pacing, can also reduce the negative effects of RV stimulation on cardiac function and may prevent clinical deterioration.展开更多
Heart failure has gained increasing notice due to its high prevalence and mortality rate. The management for heart failure has been emphasized on the role of device therapy. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator(ICD)...Heart failure has gained increasing notice due to its high prevalence and mortality rate. The management for heart failure has been emphasized on the role of device therapy. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator(ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT) were given strong recommendation for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction(HFrEF), considering their effectiveness on preventing sudden cardiac death(SCD), improving cardiac function and benefiting survival. In this review, we explained the underlying mechanisms of disease initiation and progression in HFrEF, in order to build the connection between the pathological basis of HFrEF and the rationality of ICD and CRT on terminating ventricular arrhythmia, improving cardiac function, decreasing the rate of adverse clinical outcomes and benefiting survival. In addition, we discussed the high-quality researches with significant values on the discovery of device therapy clinical benefits, and compared the class I recommendations for device therapy in HFr EF, suggested by American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology.展开更多
文摘Heart failure is a dynamic condition with high morbidity and mortality and its prognosis should be reassessed frequently, particularly in patients for whom critical treatment decisions may depend on the results of prognostication. In patients with heart failure, nuclear cardiology techniques are useful to establish the etiol-ogy and the severity of the disease, while fewer studies have explored the potential capability of nuclear cardi-ology to guide cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and to select patients for implantable cardioverter defbrillators (ICD). Left ventricular synchrony may be assessed by radionuclide angiography or gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. These modalities have shown promise as predictors of CRT outcome using phase analysis. Combined assessment of myocardial viability and left ventricular dyssynchrony is feasible using posi-tron emission tomography and could improve conven-tional response prediction criteria for CRT. Preliminary data also exists on integrated positron emission tomog-raphy/computed tomography approach for assessing myocardial viability, identifying the location of biven-tricular pacemaker leads, and obtaining left ventricular functional data, including contractile phase analysis. Fi-nally, cardiac imaging with autonomic radiotracers may be useful in predicting CRT response and for identifying patients at risk for sudden cardiac death, therefore po-tentially offering a way to select patients for both CRT and ICD therapy. Prospective trials where imaging is combined with image-test driven therapy are needed to better defne the role of nuclear cardiology for guiding device therapy in patients with heart failure.
文摘Symptomatic bradycardia is effectively treated with the implantation of a cardiac pacemaker. Although a highly successful therapy, during recent years there has been a focus on the negative effects associated with longterm pacing of the apex of the right ventricle(RV). It has been shown in both experimental and clinical studies that RV pacing leads to ventricular dyssynchrony, similar to that of left bundle branch block, with subsequent detrimental effects on cardiac structure and function, and in some cases adverse clinical outcomes such as atrial fibrillation, heart failure and death. There is substantial evidence that patients with reduced left ventricular function(LVEF) are at particular high risk of suffering the detrimental clinical effects of long-term RV pacing. The evidence is, however, incomplete, coming largely from subanalyses of pacemaker and implantable cardiac defibrillator studies. In this group of patients with reduced LVEF and an expected high amount of RV pacing, biventricular pacing(cardiac resynchronization therapy) devices can prevent the negative effects of RV pacing and reduce ventricular dyssynchrony. Therefore, cardiac resynchronization therapy has emerged as an attractive option with promising results and more clinical studies are underway. Furthermore, specific pacemaker algorithms, which minimize RV pacing, can also reduce the negative effects of RV stimulation on cardiac function and may prevent clinical deterioration.
基金supported by grants from Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention (No. Y0120220151)Science and Technology Projects of Guangzhou (No. 201903010097)+1 种基金National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82002014)Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2021A1515010107)。
文摘Heart failure has gained increasing notice due to its high prevalence and mortality rate. The management for heart failure has been emphasized on the role of device therapy. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator(ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT) were given strong recommendation for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction(HFrEF), considering their effectiveness on preventing sudden cardiac death(SCD), improving cardiac function and benefiting survival. In this review, we explained the underlying mechanisms of disease initiation and progression in HFrEF, in order to build the connection between the pathological basis of HFrEF and the rationality of ICD and CRT on terminating ventricular arrhythmia, improving cardiac function, decreasing the rate of adverse clinical outcomes and benefiting survival. In addition, we discussed the high-quality researches with significant values on the discovery of device therapy clinical benefits, and compared the class I recommendations for device therapy in HFr EF, suggested by American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology.