I am Dr. David P Pifiero from the Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy of the University of Alicante and from the Department of Ophthalmology of Vithas Medimar (Oftalmar) and Vithas Virgen del Carmen (Qv...I am Dr. David P Pifiero from the Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy of the University of Alicante and from the Department of Ophthalmology of Vithas Medimar (Oftalmar) and Vithas Virgen del Carmen (Qvision) hospitals in Spain.展开更多
AIM:To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes with a diffractive bifocal and trifocal intraocular lens(IOL)during a 12-month follow-up.METHODS:Prospective comparative study including75 eyes of 38 patients(44-...AIM:To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes with a diffractive bifocal and trifocal intraocular lens(IOL)during a 12-month follow-up.METHODS:Prospective comparative study including75 eyes of 38 patients(44-70y)undergoing uneventful cataract surgery.Each patient was randomly assigned to one type of IOL,bifocal(35 eyes)or trifocal(40 eyes).Visual,refractive,and contrast sensitivity changes were evaluated in a 12-month follow-up.The binocular defocus curve was also measured at 12mo postoperatively.RESULTS:No statistically significant differences between groups were found in postoperative uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities(P≥0.276).Postoperative corrected near visual acuity(33 cm)was significantly better in the trifocal group during all follow-up(P≤0.004)as well as 6-month uncorrected near(P=0.008)and distancecorrected near visual acuities(P=0.016)(33/40 cm).Significantly better uncorrected intermediate and distance corrected-intermediate visual acuity were found during all follow-up in the trifocal group(P〈0.001),which was consistent with differences among groups in binocular defocus curve.Differences among groups in contrast sensitivity were minimal,being only significant at 6 months for some low to medium spatial frequencies(P≤0.006).CONCLUSION:Bifocal and trifocal diffractive IOLs are able to provide an effective visual restoration which is maintained during a 12-month follow-up,with a clear benefit of the trifocal IOL for the intermediate vision.展开更多
Purpose: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes, patient satisfaction and spectacle independence between three novel designs of diffractive IOLs. Method: Prospective study including 150 patients with implantati...Purpose: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes, patient satisfaction and spectacle independence between three novel designs of diffractive IOLs. Method: Prospective study including 150 patients with implantation of three IOLs: trifocal diffractive IOL AT LISA tri 839 MP (ATLISA, n = 50), trifocal diffractive IOL PhysIOL FineVision (FineVision, n = 50) and the extended range of vision IOL Tecnis Symfony ZRX00 (Symfony, n = 50). Patients were followed up for 6 months after surgery. Major parameters were monocular and binocular uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance, uncorrected (UIVA) and distance corrected (DCIVA) intermediate (80 cm), and uncorrected (UNVA) and distance corrected (DCNVA) near (40 cm) visual acuities (UNVA), contrast sensitivity (CS), defocus curve as well as patient satisfaction and spectacle use. Results: Mean postoperative decimal UDVA was 1.01 for Symfony, 0.96 for ATLISA and 0.95 for the FineVision IOL. Postoperative UIVA was 0.95 with Symfony, 0.72 with ATLISA and 0.85 with the FineVision IOL. Postoperative UNVA was 0.96 with the FineVision, 0.72 with the ATLISA and 0.63 with the Symfony IOL. The Symfony defocus curve showed the smoothest profile. Mean mesopic CS was 0.84 log units with the Symfony, 0.83 with the ATLISA (0.83) and 0.65 with the FineVision IOL. Mean photopic CS with the Symfony, ATLISA and FineVision was 1.05, 0.85 and 0.69 log units, respectively. Twenty percent of the patients with the ATLISA and FineVision IOLs and 5.6% of the Symfony patients reported halos and glare as troublesome or disabling. Reading glasses were frequently used by 5.6% of the Symfony patients. All patients with the trifocal IOLs reported to be spectacle-free for any distance. Conclusion: All 3 IOLs produce excellent results with high levels of spectacle independence. The Symfony produces better levels of distance and intermediate visual acuity, whereas the trifocal IOLs produced better near vision. Higher frequency of dysphotopsia was seen with the trifocal IOLs.展开更多
文摘I am Dr. David P Pifiero from the Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy of the University of Alicante and from the Department of Ophthalmology of Vithas Medimar (Oftalmar) and Vithas Virgen del Carmen (Qvision) hospitals in Spain.
文摘AIM:To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes with a diffractive bifocal and trifocal intraocular lens(IOL)during a 12-month follow-up.METHODS:Prospective comparative study including75 eyes of 38 patients(44-70y)undergoing uneventful cataract surgery.Each patient was randomly assigned to one type of IOL,bifocal(35 eyes)or trifocal(40 eyes).Visual,refractive,and contrast sensitivity changes were evaluated in a 12-month follow-up.The binocular defocus curve was also measured at 12mo postoperatively.RESULTS:No statistically significant differences between groups were found in postoperative uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities(P≥0.276).Postoperative corrected near visual acuity(33 cm)was significantly better in the trifocal group during all follow-up(P≤0.004)as well as 6-month uncorrected near(P=0.008)and distancecorrected near visual acuities(P=0.016)(33/40 cm).Significantly better uncorrected intermediate and distance corrected-intermediate visual acuity were found during all follow-up in the trifocal group(P〈0.001),which was consistent with differences among groups in binocular defocus curve.Differences among groups in contrast sensitivity were minimal,being only significant at 6 months for some low to medium spatial frequencies(P≤0.006).CONCLUSION:Bifocal and trifocal diffractive IOLs are able to provide an effective visual restoration which is maintained during a 12-month follow-up,with a clear benefit of the trifocal IOL for the intermediate vision.
文摘Purpose: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes, patient satisfaction and spectacle independence between three novel designs of diffractive IOLs. Method: Prospective study including 150 patients with implantation of three IOLs: trifocal diffractive IOL AT LISA tri 839 MP (ATLISA, n = 50), trifocal diffractive IOL PhysIOL FineVision (FineVision, n = 50) and the extended range of vision IOL Tecnis Symfony ZRX00 (Symfony, n = 50). Patients were followed up for 6 months after surgery. Major parameters were monocular and binocular uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance, uncorrected (UIVA) and distance corrected (DCIVA) intermediate (80 cm), and uncorrected (UNVA) and distance corrected (DCNVA) near (40 cm) visual acuities (UNVA), contrast sensitivity (CS), defocus curve as well as patient satisfaction and spectacle use. Results: Mean postoperative decimal UDVA was 1.01 for Symfony, 0.96 for ATLISA and 0.95 for the FineVision IOL. Postoperative UIVA was 0.95 with Symfony, 0.72 with ATLISA and 0.85 with the FineVision IOL. Postoperative UNVA was 0.96 with the FineVision, 0.72 with the ATLISA and 0.63 with the Symfony IOL. The Symfony defocus curve showed the smoothest profile. Mean mesopic CS was 0.84 log units with the Symfony, 0.83 with the ATLISA (0.83) and 0.65 with the FineVision IOL. Mean photopic CS with the Symfony, ATLISA and FineVision was 1.05, 0.85 and 0.69 log units, respectively. Twenty percent of the patients with the ATLISA and FineVision IOLs and 5.6% of the Symfony patients reported halos and glare as troublesome or disabling. Reading glasses were frequently used by 5.6% of the Symfony patients. All patients with the trifocal IOLs reported to be spectacle-free for any distance. Conclusion: All 3 IOLs produce excellent results with high levels of spectacle independence. The Symfony produces better levels of distance and intermediate visual acuity, whereas the trifocal IOLs produced better near vision. Higher frequency of dysphotopsia was seen with the trifocal IOLs.