AIM: To identify standards, how entities of dental status are assessed and reported from full-arch radiographs of adults. METHODS: A Pub Med(Medline) search was performed in November 2011. Literature had to report at ...AIM: To identify standards, how entities of dental status are assessed and reported from full-arch radiographs of adults. METHODS: A Pub Med(Medline) search was performed in November 2011. Literature had to report at least one out of four defined entities using radiographs:number of teeth or implants; caries, fillings or restorations; root-canal fillings and apical health; alveolar bone level. Cohorts included to the study had to be of adult age. Methods of radiographic assessment were noted and checked for the later mode of report in text, tables or diagrams. For comparability, the encountered modeof report was operationalized to a logical expression.RESULTS: Thirty-seven out of 199 articles were evaluated via full-text review. Only one article reported all four entities. Eight articles reported at the maximum 3 comparable entities. However, comparability is impeded because of the usage of absolute or relative frequency, mean or median values as well as grouping. Furthermore the methods of assessment were different or not described sufficiently. Consequently, established sum scores turned out to be highly questionable, too. The amount of missing data within all studies remained unclear. It is even so remissed to mention supernumerary and aplased teeth as well as the count of third molars.CONCLUSION: Data about dental findings from radiographs is, if at all possible, only comparable with serious limitations. A standardization of both, assessing and reporting entities of dental status from radiographs is missing and has to be established within a report guideline.展开更多
Patients with uncontrolled diabetes are at greater risk for several oral health complications, particularly periodontal disease. Moreover, there is evidence to support a bidirectional relationship between diabetes and...Patients with uncontrolled diabetes are at greater risk for several oral health complications, particularly periodontal disease. Moreover, there is evidence to support a bidirectional relationship between diabetes and periodontal disease. As the prevalence of diabetes continues to rise, it is expected that dental practitioners will be seeing and treating greater numbers of diabetic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and practice of dental students towards diabetic patients. A cross-sectional study was conducted by means of a questionnaire among dental students in a private dental university in Morocco. Qualitative variables were described in terms of numbers and percentages and were compared using a Chi-square test. A p-value of less than 0.005 was considered significant. A total of 268 students participated in the assessment, corresponding to a response rate of 83.7%. The results showed that 80.6% of the students believed that knowing the type of diabetes was important. 14.2% knew the risks that the diabetic patient incurred in dental treatments. For analytical results, 3 groups corresponding to the final 3 years of their 6-year dental curriculum were compared. When asking about the knowledge of the risks incurred by the diabetic patient, there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) between the 3 groups. On the other hand, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed between students in 4th, 5th and 6th year concerning the prescription of antibiotics for endodontic procedures if HbA1c < 7. There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) between the 3 groups concerning the knowledge of antibiotics and analgesics prescribed in odontology for diabetic patients. To overcome the lack of knowledge relevant to dental students, it is essential that clinical internship of students must consider the management of patients with diabetes. Finally, continuing educational programs should be followed by dentists to improve their knowledge of the management of diabetic patients.展开更多
BACKGROUND Oral candidiasis(OC)is an oral health disease that could influence patients’oral health quality of life.AIM To estimate prevalence of OC among disabled and non-disabled individuals and its potential risk f...BACKGROUND Oral candidiasis(OC)is an oral health disease that could influence patients’oral health quality of life.AIM To estimate prevalence of OC among disabled and non-disabled individuals and its potential risk factors in the Al-Baha region,Saudi Arabia.METHODS An observational cross-sectional study was carried out among 148 disabled and non-disabled participants.The technique of concentrated oral rinse employing the Sabouraud Dextrose Agar medium accompanied with 0.05%chloramphenicol was conducted to assess and isolate candida.Oral examination using the World Health Organization guidelines was conducted to examine participants’oral hea-lth status.A pre-designed questionnaire was also used to evaluate sociodemo-graphic,medical history,and oral hygiene habits of the studied population.RESULTS Out of 148 participants(n=57,38%)had colonized candida.None of the studied population had visible Candida lesions.However,Candida was found in the oral rinses without the subject presenting any lesions or issues caused by Candida(asymptomatic colonization).The most common prevalent OC among participants were Candida albicans,Candida glabrata,Candida dubliniensis,Candida krusei,Candida tropicalis,and Candida parapsilosis(n=35,61%;n=8,14%;n=6,10%;n=5,9%;n=2,4%;and n=1,2%)respectively.Diabetes,smoking,poor plaque,and gingival status were key potential risk factors that significantly associated with candida’s density and presence(P=0.001,P=0.001,P=0.01,and P=0.01)respectively.Disability status had no statistically significant effect on presence and density of Candida.CONCLUSION The prevalence of OC is almost third of the studied population;thus,may provoke a need to develop preventive strategies to reduce the OC rate and establish solid treatment plans.展开更多
基金Supported by The"Walter and Anna Koerner-Scholarship"as part of the Land of Baden-Wurttemberg’s Dentists Chamber(Stuttgart,Germany)within the cooperation of Tuebingen University and Peking University Dental Schoolsby Mrs.Barbara Welder of Dental Clinics Library at Eberhard-Karls-University(Tuebingen,Germany)by Lucas M Leister for English proofreading
文摘AIM: To identify standards, how entities of dental status are assessed and reported from full-arch radiographs of adults. METHODS: A Pub Med(Medline) search was performed in November 2011. Literature had to report at least one out of four defined entities using radiographs:number of teeth or implants; caries, fillings or restorations; root-canal fillings and apical health; alveolar bone level. Cohorts included to the study had to be of adult age. Methods of radiographic assessment were noted and checked for the later mode of report in text, tables or diagrams. For comparability, the encountered modeof report was operationalized to a logical expression.RESULTS: Thirty-seven out of 199 articles were evaluated via full-text review. Only one article reported all four entities. Eight articles reported at the maximum 3 comparable entities. However, comparability is impeded because of the usage of absolute or relative frequency, mean or median values as well as grouping. Furthermore the methods of assessment were different or not described sufficiently. Consequently, established sum scores turned out to be highly questionable, too. The amount of missing data within all studies remained unclear. It is even so remissed to mention supernumerary and aplased teeth as well as the count of third molars.CONCLUSION: Data about dental findings from radiographs is, if at all possible, only comparable with serious limitations. A standardization of both, assessing and reporting entities of dental status from radiographs is missing and has to be established within a report guideline.
文摘Patients with uncontrolled diabetes are at greater risk for several oral health complications, particularly periodontal disease. Moreover, there is evidence to support a bidirectional relationship between diabetes and periodontal disease. As the prevalence of diabetes continues to rise, it is expected that dental practitioners will be seeing and treating greater numbers of diabetic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and practice of dental students towards diabetic patients. A cross-sectional study was conducted by means of a questionnaire among dental students in a private dental university in Morocco. Qualitative variables were described in terms of numbers and percentages and were compared using a Chi-square test. A p-value of less than 0.005 was considered significant. A total of 268 students participated in the assessment, corresponding to a response rate of 83.7%. The results showed that 80.6% of the students believed that knowing the type of diabetes was important. 14.2% knew the risks that the diabetic patient incurred in dental treatments. For analytical results, 3 groups corresponding to the final 3 years of their 6-year dental curriculum were compared. When asking about the knowledge of the risks incurred by the diabetic patient, there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) between the 3 groups. On the other hand, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed between students in 4th, 5th and 6th year concerning the prescription of antibiotics for endodontic procedures if HbA1c < 7. There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) between the 3 groups concerning the knowledge of antibiotics and analgesics prescribed in odontology for diabetic patients. To overcome the lack of knowledge relevant to dental students, it is essential that clinical internship of students must consider the management of patients with diabetes. Finally, continuing educational programs should be followed by dentists to improve their knowledge of the management of diabetic patients.
基金the King Salman Center for Disability Research,No.KSRG-2023-169.
文摘BACKGROUND Oral candidiasis(OC)is an oral health disease that could influence patients’oral health quality of life.AIM To estimate prevalence of OC among disabled and non-disabled individuals and its potential risk factors in the Al-Baha region,Saudi Arabia.METHODS An observational cross-sectional study was carried out among 148 disabled and non-disabled participants.The technique of concentrated oral rinse employing the Sabouraud Dextrose Agar medium accompanied with 0.05%chloramphenicol was conducted to assess and isolate candida.Oral examination using the World Health Organization guidelines was conducted to examine participants’oral hea-lth status.A pre-designed questionnaire was also used to evaluate sociodemo-graphic,medical history,and oral hygiene habits of the studied population.RESULTS Out of 148 participants(n=57,38%)had colonized candida.None of the studied population had visible Candida lesions.However,Candida was found in the oral rinses without the subject presenting any lesions or issues caused by Candida(asymptomatic colonization).The most common prevalent OC among participants were Candida albicans,Candida glabrata,Candida dubliniensis,Candida krusei,Candida tropicalis,and Candida parapsilosis(n=35,61%;n=8,14%;n=6,10%;n=5,9%;n=2,4%;and n=1,2%)respectively.Diabetes,smoking,poor plaque,and gingival status were key potential risk factors that significantly associated with candida’s density and presence(P=0.001,P=0.001,P=0.01,and P=0.01)respectively.Disability status had no statistically significant effect on presence and density of Candida.CONCLUSION The prevalence of OC is almost third of the studied population;thus,may provoke a need to develop preventive strategies to reduce the OC rate and establish solid treatment plans.
