BACKGROUND Sedation during endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS)poses many challenges and moderate-to-deep sedation are often required.The conventional method to preform moderate-to-deep sedation is generally intravenous be...BACKGROUND Sedation during endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS)poses many challenges and moderate-to-deep sedation are often required.The conventional method to preform moderate-to-deep sedation is generally intravenous benzodiazepine alone or in combination with opioids.However,this combination has some limitations.Intranasal medication delivery may be an alternative to this sedation regimen.AIM To determine,by continual reassessment method(CRM),the minimal effective dose of intranasal sufentanil(SUF)when combined with intranasal dexmedetomidine(DEX)for moderate sedation of EUS in at least 95%of patients(ED95).METHODS Thirty patients aged 18-65 and scheduled for EUS were recruited in this study.Subjects received intranasal DEX and SUF for sedation.The dose of DEX(1μg/kg)was fixed,while the dose of SUF was assigned sequentially to the subjects using CRM to determine ED95.The sedation status was assessed by modified observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation(MOAA/S)score.The adverse events and the satisfaction scores of patients and endoscopists were recorded.RESULTS The ED95 was intranasal 0.3μg/kg SUF when combined with intranasal 1μg/kg DEX,with an estimated probability of successful moderate sedation for EUS of 94.9%(95%confidence interval:88.1%-98.9%).When combined with intranasal 1μg/kg DEX,probabilities of successful moderate sedation at each dose level of intranasal SUF were as follows:0μg/kg SUF,52.8%;0.1μg/kg SUF,75.4%;0.2μg/kg SUF,89.9%;0.3μg/kg SUF,94.9%;0.4μg/kg SUF,98.0%;0.5μg/kg SUF,99.0%.CONCLUSION The ED95 needed for moderate sedation for EUS is intranasal 0.3μg/kg SUF when combined with intranasal 1μg/kg DEX,based on CRM.展开更多
目的:系统评价鼻内给予右美托咪定对比口服水合氯醛用于儿童程序化镇静的有效性和安全性。方法:计算机检索Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、Embase、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网数据库和万方数据库,收集鼻内给予右美托咪定(试验组)对比...目的:系统评价鼻内给予右美托咪定对比口服水合氯醛用于儿童程序化镇静的有效性和安全性。方法:计算机检索Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、Embase、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网数据库和万方数据库,收集鼻内给予右美托咪定(试验组)对比口服水合氯醛(对照组)用于儿童程序化镇静的随机对照试验(RCT)。筛选文献、提取资料后采用Cochrane 5.1.0偏倚风险评估工具对纳入文献质量进行评价,采用Rev Man 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入8项RCT,共计1413例患儿。Meta分析结果显示,试验组患儿镇静成功率[RR=1.13,95%CI(1.02,1.25),P=0.02]、镇静起效时间[MD=-1.07,95%CI(-1.82,-0.31),P=0.006]、镇静持续时间[MD=-8.25,95%CI(-14.02,-2.47),P=0.005]、苏醒时间[MD=-9.63,95%CI(-15.40,-3.86),P=0.001]、恶心呕吐发生率[RR=0.05,95%CI(0.02,0.14),P<0.00001]均显著优于对照组;两组患儿血氧饱和度<95%发生率[RR=0.60,95%CI(0.24,1.54),P=0.29]、低血压发生率[RR=1.18,95%CI(0.51,2.74),P=0.71]、心动过缓发生率[RR=1.33,95%CI(0.18,9.88),P=0.78]比较,差异均无统计学意义。结论:鼻内给予右美托咪定相较于口服水合氯醛用于儿童程序化镇静的效果更优,且安全性较好。展开更多
基金Supported by the Research Foundation of Beijing Friendship Hospital,Capital Medical University,No. yyqdkt2018-16the Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals’ Youth Program,No. QML20190101the Scientific Research Common Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education,No. KM202010025021
文摘BACKGROUND Sedation during endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS)poses many challenges and moderate-to-deep sedation are often required.The conventional method to preform moderate-to-deep sedation is generally intravenous benzodiazepine alone or in combination with opioids.However,this combination has some limitations.Intranasal medication delivery may be an alternative to this sedation regimen.AIM To determine,by continual reassessment method(CRM),the minimal effective dose of intranasal sufentanil(SUF)when combined with intranasal dexmedetomidine(DEX)for moderate sedation of EUS in at least 95%of patients(ED95).METHODS Thirty patients aged 18-65 and scheduled for EUS were recruited in this study.Subjects received intranasal DEX and SUF for sedation.The dose of DEX(1μg/kg)was fixed,while the dose of SUF was assigned sequentially to the subjects using CRM to determine ED95.The sedation status was assessed by modified observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation(MOAA/S)score.The adverse events and the satisfaction scores of patients and endoscopists were recorded.RESULTS The ED95 was intranasal 0.3μg/kg SUF when combined with intranasal 1μg/kg DEX,with an estimated probability of successful moderate sedation for EUS of 94.9%(95%confidence interval:88.1%-98.9%).When combined with intranasal 1μg/kg DEX,probabilities of successful moderate sedation at each dose level of intranasal SUF were as follows:0μg/kg SUF,52.8%;0.1μg/kg SUF,75.4%;0.2μg/kg SUF,89.9%;0.3μg/kg SUF,94.9%;0.4μg/kg SUF,98.0%;0.5μg/kg SUF,99.0%.CONCLUSION The ED95 needed for moderate sedation for EUS is intranasal 0.3μg/kg SUF when combined with intranasal 1μg/kg DEX,based on CRM.
文摘目的:系统评价鼻内给予右美托咪定对比口服水合氯醛用于儿童程序化镇静的有效性和安全性。方法:计算机检索Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、Embase、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网数据库和万方数据库,收集鼻内给予右美托咪定(试验组)对比口服水合氯醛(对照组)用于儿童程序化镇静的随机对照试验(RCT)。筛选文献、提取资料后采用Cochrane 5.1.0偏倚风险评估工具对纳入文献质量进行评价,采用Rev Man 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入8项RCT,共计1413例患儿。Meta分析结果显示,试验组患儿镇静成功率[RR=1.13,95%CI(1.02,1.25),P=0.02]、镇静起效时间[MD=-1.07,95%CI(-1.82,-0.31),P=0.006]、镇静持续时间[MD=-8.25,95%CI(-14.02,-2.47),P=0.005]、苏醒时间[MD=-9.63,95%CI(-15.40,-3.86),P=0.001]、恶心呕吐发生率[RR=0.05,95%CI(0.02,0.14),P<0.00001]均显著优于对照组;两组患儿血氧饱和度<95%发生率[RR=0.60,95%CI(0.24,1.54),P=0.29]、低血压发生率[RR=1.18,95%CI(0.51,2.74),P=0.71]、心动过缓发生率[RR=1.33,95%CI(0.18,9.88),P=0.78]比较,差异均无统计学意义。结论:鼻内给予右美托咪定相较于口服水合氯醛用于儿童程序化镇静的效果更优,且安全性较好。
