Semaglutide for the management of diabesity:The real-world experience

BACKGROUND Diabesity(diabetes as a consequence of obesity)has emerged as a huge healthcare challenge across the globe due to the obesity pandemic.Judicious use of antidiabetic medications including semaglutide is important for optimal management of diabesity as proven by multiple randomized controlled trials.However,more real-world data is needed to further improve the clinical practice.AIM To study the real-world benefits and side effects of using semaglutide to manage patients with diabesity.METHODS We evaluated the efficacy and safety of semaglutide use in managing patients with diabesity in a large academic hospital in the United States.Several parameters were analyzed including demographic information,the data on improvement of glycated hemoglobin(HbA1c),body weight reduction and insulin dose adjustments at 6 and 12 months,as well as at the latest follow up period.The data was obtained from the electronic patient records between January 2019 to May 2023.RESULTS 106 patients(56 males)with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM),mean age 60.8±11.2 years,mean durations of T2DM 12.4±7.2 years and mean semaglutide treatment for 2.6±1.1 years were included.Semaglutide treatment was associated with significant improvement in diabesity outcomes such as mean weight reductions from baseline 110.4±24.6 kg to 99.9±24.9 kg at 12 months and 96.8±22.9 kg at latest follow up and HbA1c improvement from baseline of 82±21 mmol/mol to 67±20 at 12 months and 71±23 mmol/mol at the latest follow up.An insulin dose reduction from mean baseline of 95±74 units to 76.5±56.2 units was also observed at the latest follow up.Side effects were mild and mainly gastrointestinal like bloating and nausea improving with prolonged use of semaglutide.CONCLUSION Semaglutide treatment is associated with significant improvement in diabesity outcomes such as reduction in body weight,HbA1c and insulin doses without major adverse effects.Reviews of largescale real-world data are expected to inform better clinical practice decision making to improve the care of patients with diabesity.

Management of diabesity:Current concepts

The global prevalence of obesity is increasing rapidly with an exponential rise in incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in recent years.‘Diabesity’,the term coined to show the strong interlink between obesity and diabetes,is the direct cons-equence of the obesity pandemic,and poses significant challenges in the management of the disease.Without addressing the clinical and mechanistic complications of obesity such as metabolic-associated fatty liver disease and obstructive sleep apnoea,a rational management algorithm for diabesity cannot be developed.Several classes of anti-diabetic medications including insulins,sulphonylureas,thiazolidinediones and meglitinides are associated with the risk of weight gain and may potentially worsen diabesity.Therefore,appropriate selection of antidiabetic drug regimen is crucial in the medical management of diabesity.The role of non-pharmacological measures such as dietary adjustments,exercise interventions and bariatric procedures should also be emphasised.Unfortunately,the importance of appropriate and optimal management of diabesity is often overlooked by medical professionals when achieving adequate glycemic control which results in inappropriate management of the disease and its complications.This review provides a narrative clinical update on the evidence behind the management of diabesity.

Comparative efficacy of sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus:A real-world experience

BACKGROUND Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors(SGLT-2i)are a class of drugs with modest antidiabetic efficacy,weight loss effect,and cardiovascular benefits as proven by multiple randomised controlled trials(RCTs).However,real-world data on the comparative efficacy and safety of individual SGLT-2i medications is sparse.AIM To study the comparative efficacy and safety of SGLT-2i using real-world clinical data.METHODS We evaluated the comparative efficacy data of 3 SGLT-2i drugs(dapagliflozin,canagliflozin,and empagliflozin)used for treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Data on the reduction of glycated hemoglobin(HbA1c),body weight,blood pressure(BP),urine albumin creatinine ratio(ACR),and adverse effects were recorded retrospectively.RESULTS Data from 467 patients with a median age of 64(14.8)years,294(62.96%)males and 375(80.5%)Caucasians were analysed.Median diabetes duration was 16.0(9.0)years,and the duration of SGLT-2i use was 3.6(2.1)years.SGLT-2i molecules used were dapagliflozin 10 mg(n=227;48.6%),canagliflozin 300 mg(n=160;34.3%),and empagliflozin 25 mg(n=80;17.1).Baseline median(interquartile range)HbA1c in mmol/mol were:dapagliflozin-78.0(25.3),canagliflozin-80.0(25.5),and empagliflozin-75.0(23.5)respectively.The respective median HbA1c reduction at 12 months and the latest review(just prior to the study)were:66.5(22.8)&69.0(24.0),67.0(16.3)&66.0(28.0),and 67.0(22.5)&66.5(25.8)respectively(P<0.001 for all comparisons from baseline).Significant improvements in body weight(in kilograms)from baseline to study end were noticed with dapagliflozin-101(29.5)to 92.2(25.6),and canagliflozin 100(28.3)to 95.3(27.5)only.Significant reductions in median systolic and diastolic BP,from 144(21)mmHg to 139(23)mmHg;(P=0.015),and from 82(16)mmHg to 78(19)mmHg;(P<0.001)respectively were also observed.A significant reduction of microalbuminuria was observed with canagliflozin only[ACR 14.6(42.6)at baseline to 8.9(23.7)at the study end;P=0.043].Adverse effects of SGLT-2i were as follows:genital thrush and urinary infection-20(8.8%)&17(7.5%)with dapagliflozin;9(5.6%)&5(3.13%)with canagliflozin;and 4(5%)&4(5%)with empagliflozin.Diabetic ketoacidosis was observed in 4(1.8%)with dapagliflozin and 1(0.63%)with canagliflozin.CONCLUSION Treatment of patients with SGLT-2i is associated with statistically significant reductions in HbA1c,body weight,and better than those reported in RCTs,with low side effect profiles.A review of large-scale real-world data is needed to inform better clinical practice decision making.

Rising tide: The global surge of type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents demands action now

Childhood-onset obesity has emerged as a major public healthcare challenge across the globe,fueled by an obesogenic environment and influenced by both genetic and epigenetic predispositions.This has led to an exponential rise in the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents.The looming wave of diabetes-related complications in early adulthood is anticipated to strain the healthcare budgets in most countries.Unless there is a collective global effort to curb the devastation caused by the situation,the impact is poised to be pro-found.A multifaceted research effort,governmental legislation,and effective social action are crucial in attaining this goal.This article delves into the current epidemiological landscape,explores evidence concerning potential risks and consequences,delves into the pathobiology of childhood obesity,and discusses the latest evidence-based management strategies for diabesity.

Individualized diabetes care:Lessons from the real-world experience

Diabetes care is often difficult without a proper collaboration between the patient and the care provider as the disease is mostly self-managed by patients through adjustments in their lifestyles,and medication doses to optimise glycaemic control.Most clinical guidelines on the management of diabetes mellitus(DM)provide only broad principles on diabetes care,and the blind follow-up of such principles without a proper review and consideration of patient characteristics often results in inadequate glycaemic control and diabetes complications consequently.Therefore,a proper understanding of the pathobiology,clinical situation,and comorbidities of the individual case is of paramount importance to tailoring the most appropriate management strategy in real-world diabetes care.With the aid of five unique cases of DM[(1)Medically managed type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM)with severe obesity;(2)Management of T2DM with unreliable glycated haemoglobin(HbA1c);(3)Obesity in a patient with type 1 diabetes mellitus(T1DM);and(4)Late diagnosis and subsequent management of monogenic diabetes and 5.Sudden worsening of well-controlled T2DM)]we elaborate on the importance of individualised diabetes care and the practicalities in these situations.The review also provides an evidence update on the management of different forms of DM to guide physicians in optimising the care of their patients in day-to-day clinical practice.