BACKGROUND Intertrochanteric(IT)fracture is one of the most common fractures seen in an orthopaedic practice.Proximal femoral nailing(PFN)is a common modality of fixing IT femur fracture.We retrospectively studied whe...BACKGROUND Intertrochanteric(IT)fracture is one of the most common fractures seen in an orthopaedic practice.Proximal femoral nailing(PFN)is a common modality of fixing IT femur fracture.We retrospectively studied whether a PFN with two proximal lag screws can be done without distal interlocking screws in the 31-A1 and 31-A2 fracture patterns according to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association(AO/OTA)guidelines for IT femur fractures.AIM To compare the outcomes of IT fractures(AO/OTA 31-A1 and 31-A2)treated by PFN with and without distal interlocking screws.METHODS We carried out a retrospective study of 140 patients in a tertiary care centre who had AO/OTA type 31-A1 and 31-A2 IT fractures.We divided the patients into two groups,in which one of the groups received distal interlocking screws(group 1)and the other group did not(group 2).The subjects were followed up for a mean period of 14 mo and assessed for radiological union time,fracture site collapse,mechanical stability of implant,and complications associated with the PFN with distal interlocking and without distal interlocking.Then,the results were compared.RESULTS PFN without distal interlocking screws has several advantages and gives better results over PFN with distal interlocking screws in the AO/OTA 31-A2 fracture pattern.However,similar results were observed in both groups with the fracture pattern AO/OTA 31-A1.In patients with fracture pattern AO/OTA 31-A2 treated by PFN without distal interlocking screws,there were minimal proximal lockrelated complications and no risk of distal interlock-related complications.The operative time,IITV radiation time and time to radiological union were reduced.These patients also had better rotational alignment of the proximal femur,and the anatomy of the proximal femur was well maintained.It was also noted that in the cases where distal interlocking was performed,there was a gradual decrease in neck shaft angle,which led to varus collapse and failure of bone-implant construct in 21.40%.CONCLUSION In fracture pattern AO/OTA 31-A2,PFN without distal interlocking had better results and less complications than PFN with distal interlocking.展开更多
Background: Newer generation intramedullary (IM) tibial nails provide several distal interlocking screw options. The objectives were to determine: 1) if the new oblique interlocking option provides superior stability,...Background: Newer generation intramedullary (IM) tibial nails provide several distal interlocking screw options. The objectives were to determine: 1) if the new oblique interlocking option provides superior stability, 2) which screw orientation/ configuration is the most biomechanically stable, and 3) if three distal interlocking screws provide better stability. Methods: A preliminary experiment was performed in torsion, compression, and bending tests with four different screw configurations: (I) one medial-to-lateral and one oblique, (II) two me-dial-to-lateral, (III) one medial-to-lateral and one anterior-to-posterior, and (IV) one medial-to-lateral, one anterior-to-posterior and one oblique in simu-lated distal metaphyseal fracture tibiae. Twenty- four Synthes EXPERT tibial IM nails were used for six specimens of each screw configuration. Parts I and II, tibial IM nails were locked with 5.0 mm in-terlocking screws into simulated distal tibiae (PVC and composite analogue tibia). Part III, the two most stable configurations were tested using five pairs of simulated cadaveric distal tibiae metaphy-seal fractures. Results: Significant differences were attributable to distal screw orientation for intrame- dullary nailing of distal tibia fractures. Configura-tions II and IV were found to be more stable than the other two configurations. No significant differ-ence was detected in construct stability in all modes of testing between Configurations II and IV. Dis-cussion: Configuration I did not provide superior stability for the distal tibia fracture fixation. Con-figurations II and IV provided equivalent stability. When choosing IM fixation for treatment of distal tibia metaphyseal fractures two medial-to-lateral screws provide the necessary stability for satisfac-tory fixation. Clinical Relevance: This study indi-cated an option for operative treatment of distal metaphyseal tibia fracture fixation where preserva-tion of soft tissue and rigid stabilization are needed.展开更多
A study was performed in adults to determine the efficacy of closed reduction and intramedullary nailing in dynamic mode on union, implant failure and incidence of malalignment in patients who sustained an extra-artic...A study was performed in adults to determine the efficacy of closed reduction and intramedullary nailing in dynamic mode on union, implant failure and incidence of malalignment in patients who sustained an extra-articular fracture of the distal tibia. Methods: Between January 2007 and December 2013, one hundred and twelve patients of distal tibia that involved the distal 6 cm of the tibia were treated at our hospital with reamed intramedullary nailing with use of two distal interlocking screws and one proximal screw in dynamic mode. The augmentation was done with poller screws whenever it was necessary. The nailing of fibular fractures was done in 27 cases. There were 85 males and 27 females with a mean age of 30.9 (range: 20 to 72). Eighty fractures were closed whereas 32 were grade 1 open fractures. Results: The average time to union of the closed fracture was 15.4 weeks (range: 12 – 28 weeks). The healing times for the primarily nailed compound Grade I averaged 17.8 (range: 15 - 34 weeks). After minimum follow-up of one year, rate of primary union was in 97.32%. One case of broken nail required revision surgery. There were three cases of delayed union and two cases of non union. In one case there was deep infection which required exchange nailing with antibiotic impregnated nail. There was breakage of interlocking screws in three cases but fracture had united. In twenty two cases acceptable malalignment of the tibia was observed after union. The outcome was determined at a minimum of one year in our study based on the criteria of Johner and Wruhs. Out of 112 patients, 79 patients had excellent results, 29 had good results and 4 had fair results. Conclusions: The dynamic osteosynthesis of distal tibia by interlocking nail and judicious use of poller screws is an effective alternative for the treatment of distal metaphyseal tibial fractures.展开更多
目的比较股骨远端90°锁定钢板与弹性髓内钉治疗学龄期儿童股骨下段不稳定型骨折的疗效。方法采用随机数字表法将75例学龄期股骨下段不稳定型骨折患儿分成观察组(采用股骨远端90°锁定钢板治疗,38例)与对照组(采用闭合或切开复...目的比较股骨远端90°锁定钢板与弹性髓内钉治疗学龄期儿童股骨下段不稳定型骨折的疗效。方法采用随机数字表法将75例学龄期股骨下段不稳定型骨折患儿分成观察组(采用股骨远端90°锁定钢板治疗,38例)与对照组(采用闭合或切开复位弹性髓内钉治疗,37例)。记录手术情况、骨折复位及愈合情况、术后再移位发生率。采用HSS评分评价膝关节功能。结果患儿均获得随访,时间6~24个月。术中出血量、术中透视次数观察组均少于对照组(P<0.05)。术后3 d X线片显示两组骨折均复位良好。两组骨折愈合时间2.5~5个月。末次随访时,HSS评分优良率观察组高于对照组(P<0.05)。术后再移位发生率观察组低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论与弹性髓内钉相比,股骨远端90°锁定钢板治疗学龄期儿童股骨下段不稳定型骨折,术中出血量、透视次数更少,术后骨折再移位率更低,疗效更好。展开更多
Purpose:Long proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA-II) is a preferred implant in recent years for fixation of pertrochanteric fractures,especially in osteoporotic patients.The purpose of this study is to prospecti...Purpose:Long proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA-II) is a preferred implant in recent years for fixation of pertrochanteric fractures,especially in osteoporotic patients.The purpose of this study is to prospectively investigate the effect of distal locking in long PFNA-II fixation of stable intertrochanteric fractures.Methods:A total of 58 patients with isolated stable intertrochanteric fractures and treated in our hospital during the study period of 2017–2019 by distal locked or unlocked long PFNA-II fixation were included in this study.Patients who had multiple injuries or open fractures were excluded.There were 40 female and 18 male patients,with 33 affecting the left side and 25 the right side.Of them,31 belonged to the distal locked group (group A) and 27 to the unlocked group (group B).Surgical procedures and implants used in both groups were similar except for the distal locking of the nails.General data (age,gender,fracture side,etc.) showed no significant difference between two groups (allp > 0.05).The intraoperative parameters like operative time,radiation exposure and follow-up parameters like functional and radiological outcomes were recorded and compared.Statistical tests like the independent samplest-test Fischer’’s exact and Chi-square test were used to analyze association.Results:The distribution of the fractures according to AO/OTA classification and 31A1.2 type of intertrochanteric fractures were most common in our study.All the included fractures united and the average functional outcome in both groups were good and comparable at the end of one year.The operative time (mL,107.1 ± 12.6vs.77.0 ± 12.0,p < 0.001) and radiation exposure (s,78.6 ± 11.0vs.40.3 ± 9.3,p < 0.001) were significantly less among the patients in group B.Fracture consolidation,three months after the operative procedures,was seen in a significantly greater proportion of patients in group B (92.6%vs.67.7%,p = 0.025).Hardware irritation because of distal locking bolt was exclusively seen in group A,however this was not statistically significant (p = 0.241).Conclusion:We conclude that,in fixation of stable intertrochanteric fractures by long PFNA-II nail,distal locking not only increases the operative time and radiation exposure but also delays the fracture consolidation and increases the chances of hardware irritation,and hence is not required.展开更多
目的:探讨远端锁钉应用对稳定股骨粗隆间骨折患者的治疗效果及并发症影响,为临床提供参考。方法:选取2019年1月—2021年1月泉州市中医院收治的85例稳定股骨粗隆间骨折患者作为研究对象,所有患者均使用Gamma髓内钉内固定治疗,根据患者是...目的:探讨远端锁钉应用对稳定股骨粗隆间骨折患者的治疗效果及并发症影响,为临床提供参考。方法:选取2019年1月—2021年1月泉州市中医院收治的85例稳定股骨粗隆间骨折患者作为研究对象,所有患者均使用Gamma髓内钉内固定治疗,根据患者是否应用远端锁定螺钉内固定治疗分为远端锁定组(n=45)和未远端锁定组(n=40)。对比两组患者的手术失败率与并发症发生率,不同时间Harris评分与VAS评分。结果:未远端锁定组患者并发症发生率低于远端锁定组,差异有统计学意义(X^(2)=4.722,P<0.05);两组患者在手术后2个月Harris评分均升高,远端锁定组患者低于未远端锁定组,差异有统计学意义(t=17.779,P<0.05);两组患者术后3 d VAS评分均降低,且未远端锁定组患者低于远端锁定组,差异有统计学意义(t=26.998,P<0.05)。结论:稳定股骨粗隆间骨折患者在Gamma髓内钉内固定治疗基础上,不应用远端锁定螺钉内固定手术成功率较高,且能够降低患者并发症发生率,减轻疼痛水平,提升患者髋关节功能。展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Intertrochanteric(IT)fracture is one of the most common fractures seen in an orthopaedic practice.Proximal femoral nailing(PFN)is a common modality of fixing IT femur fracture.We retrospectively studied whether a PFN with two proximal lag screws can be done without distal interlocking screws in the 31-A1 and 31-A2 fracture patterns according to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association(AO/OTA)guidelines for IT femur fractures.AIM To compare the outcomes of IT fractures(AO/OTA 31-A1 and 31-A2)treated by PFN with and without distal interlocking screws.METHODS We carried out a retrospective study of 140 patients in a tertiary care centre who had AO/OTA type 31-A1 and 31-A2 IT fractures.We divided the patients into two groups,in which one of the groups received distal interlocking screws(group 1)and the other group did not(group 2).The subjects were followed up for a mean period of 14 mo and assessed for radiological union time,fracture site collapse,mechanical stability of implant,and complications associated with the PFN with distal interlocking and without distal interlocking.Then,the results were compared.RESULTS PFN without distal interlocking screws has several advantages and gives better results over PFN with distal interlocking screws in the AO/OTA 31-A2 fracture pattern.However,similar results were observed in both groups with the fracture pattern AO/OTA 31-A1.In patients with fracture pattern AO/OTA 31-A2 treated by PFN without distal interlocking screws,there were minimal proximal lockrelated complications and no risk of distal interlock-related complications.The operative time,IITV radiation time and time to radiological union were reduced.These patients also had better rotational alignment of the proximal femur,and the anatomy of the proximal femur was well maintained.It was also noted that in the cases where distal interlocking was performed,there was a gradual decrease in neck shaft angle,which led to varus collapse and failure of bone-implant construct in 21.40%.CONCLUSION In fracture pattern AO/OTA 31-A2,PFN without distal interlocking had better results and less complications than PFN with distal interlocking.
文摘Background: Newer generation intramedullary (IM) tibial nails provide several distal interlocking screw options. The objectives were to determine: 1) if the new oblique interlocking option provides superior stability, 2) which screw orientation/ configuration is the most biomechanically stable, and 3) if three distal interlocking screws provide better stability. Methods: A preliminary experiment was performed in torsion, compression, and bending tests with four different screw configurations: (I) one medial-to-lateral and one oblique, (II) two me-dial-to-lateral, (III) one medial-to-lateral and one anterior-to-posterior, and (IV) one medial-to-lateral, one anterior-to-posterior and one oblique in simu-lated distal metaphyseal fracture tibiae. Twenty- four Synthes EXPERT tibial IM nails were used for six specimens of each screw configuration. Parts I and II, tibial IM nails were locked with 5.0 mm in-terlocking screws into simulated distal tibiae (PVC and composite analogue tibia). Part III, the two most stable configurations were tested using five pairs of simulated cadaveric distal tibiae metaphy-seal fractures. Results: Significant differences were attributable to distal screw orientation for intrame- dullary nailing of distal tibia fractures. Configura-tions II and IV were found to be more stable than the other two configurations. No significant differ-ence was detected in construct stability in all modes of testing between Configurations II and IV. Dis-cussion: Configuration I did not provide superior stability for the distal tibia fracture fixation. Con-figurations II and IV provided equivalent stability. When choosing IM fixation for treatment of distal tibia metaphyseal fractures two medial-to-lateral screws provide the necessary stability for satisfac-tory fixation. Clinical Relevance: This study indi-cated an option for operative treatment of distal metaphyseal tibia fracture fixation where preserva-tion of soft tissue and rigid stabilization are needed.
文摘A study was performed in adults to determine the efficacy of closed reduction and intramedullary nailing in dynamic mode on union, implant failure and incidence of malalignment in patients who sustained an extra-articular fracture of the distal tibia. Methods: Between January 2007 and December 2013, one hundred and twelve patients of distal tibia that involved the distal 6 cm of the tibia were treated at our hospital with reamed intramedullary nailing with use of two distal interlocking screws and one proximal screw in dynamic mode. The augmentation was done with poller screws whenever it was necessary. The nailing of fibular fractures was done in 27 cases. There were 85 males and 27 females with a mean age of 30.9 (range: 20 to 72). Eighty fractures were closed whereas 32 were grade 1 open fractures. Results: The average time to union of the closed fracture was 15.4 weeks (range: 12 – 28 weeks). The healing times for the primarily nailed compound Grade I averaged 17.8 (range: 15 - 34 weeks). After minimum follow-up of one year, rate of primary union was in 97.32%. One case of broken nail required revision surgery. There were three cases of delayed union and two cases of non union. In one case there was deep infection which required exchange nailing with antibiotic impregnated nail. There was breakage of interlocking screws in three cases but fracture had united. In twenty two cases acceptable malalignment of the tibia was observed after union. The outcome was determined at a minimum of one year in our study based on the criteria of Johner and Wruhs. Out of 112 patients, 79 patients had excellent results, 29 had good results and 4 had fair results. Conclusions: The dynamic osteosynthesis of distal tibia by interlocking nail and judicious use of poller screws is an effective alternative for the treatment of distal metaphyseal tibial fractures.
文摘目的比较股骨远端90°锁定钢板与弹性髓内钉治疗学龄期儿童股骨下段不稳定型骨折的疗效。方法采用随机数字表法将75例学龄期股骨下段不稳定型骨折患儿分成观察组(采用股骨远端90°锁定钢板治疗,38例)与对照组(采用闭合或切开复位弹性髓内钉治疗,37例)。记录手术情况、骨折复位及愈合情况、术后再移位发生率。采用HSS评分评价膝关节功能。结果患儿均获得随访,时间6~24个月。术中出血量、术中透视次数观察组均少于对照组(P<0.05)。术后3 d X线片显示两组骨折均复位良好。两组骨折愈合时间2.5~5个月。末次随访时,HSS评分优良率观察组高于对照组(P<0.05)。术后再移位发生率观察组低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论与弹性髓内钉相比,股骨远端90°锁定钢板治疗学龄期儿童股骨下段不稳定型骨折,术中出血量、透视次数更少,术后骨折再移位率更低,疗效更好。
文摘Purpose:Long proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA-II) is a preferred implant in recent years for fixation of pertrochanteric fractures,especially in osteoporotic patients.The purpose of this study is to prospectively investigate the effect of distal locking in long PFNA-II fixation of stable intertrochanteric fractures.Methods:A total of 58 patients with isolated stable intertrochanteric fractures and treated in our hospital during the study period of 2017–2019 by distal locked or unlocked long PFNA-II fixation were included in this study.Patients who had multiple injuries or open fractures were excluded.There were 40 female and 18 male patients,with 33 affecting the left side and 25 the right side.Of them,31 belonged to the distal locked group (group A) and 27 to the unlocked group (group B).Surgical procedures and implants used in both groups were similar except for the distal locking of the nails.General data (age,gender,fracture side,etc.) showed no significant difference between two groups (allp > 0.05).The intraoperative parameters like operative time,radiation exposure and follow-up parameters like functional and radiological outcomes were recorded and compared.Statistical tests like the independent samplest-test Fischer’’s exact and Chi-square test were used to analyze association.Results:The distribution of the fractures according to AO/OTA classification and 31A1.2 type of intertrochanteric fractures were most common in our study.All the included fractures united and the average functional outcome in both groups were good and comparable at the end of one year.The operative time (mL,107.1 ± 12.6vs.77.0 ± 12.0,p < 0.001) and radiation exposure (s,78.6 ± 11.0vs.40.3 ± 9.3,p < 0.001) were significantly less among the patients in group B.Fracture consolidation,three months after the operative procedures,was seen in a significantly greater proportion of patients in group B (92.6%vs.67.7%,p = 0.025).Hardware irritation because of distal locking bolt was exclusively seen in group A,however this was not statistically significant (p = 0.241).Conclusion:We conclude that,in fixation of stable intertrochanteric fractures by long PFNA-II nail,distal locking not only increases the operative time and radiation exposure but also delays the fracture consolidation and increases the chances of hardware irritation,and hence is not required.
文摘目的:探讨远端锁钉应用对稳定股骨粗隆间骨折患者的治疗效果及并发症影响,为临床提供参考。方法:选取2019年1月—2021年1月泉州市中医院收治的85例稳定股骨粗隆间骨折患者作为研究对象,所有患者均使用Gamma髓内钉内固定治疗,根据患者是否应用远端锁定螺钉内固定治疗分为远端锁定组(n=45)和未远端锁定组(n=40)。对比两组患者的手术失败率与并发症发生率,不同时间Harris评分与VAS评分。结果:未远端锁定组患者并发症发生率低于远端锁定组,差异有统计学意义(X^(2)=4.722,P<0.05);两组患者在手术后2个月Harris评分均升高,远端锁定组患者低于未远端锁定组,差异有统计学意义(t=17.779,P<0.05);两组患者术后3 d VAS评分均降低,且未远端锁定组患者低于远端锁定组,差异有统计学意义(t=26.998,P<0.05)。结论:稳定股骨粗隆间骨折患者在Gamma髓内钉内固定治疗基础上,不应用远端锁定螺钉内固定手术成功率较高,且能够降低患者并发症发生率,减轻疼痛水平,提升患者髋关节功能。
