Librealism's Boundaries in Addressing the Climate Crisis:Insights from Domenico Losurdo and Posthumanism

This study critically examines the limitations of liberalism in effectively addressing the climate crisis,informed by Domenico Losurdo's critique and the lens of posthumanism.It illuminates the core liberal focus on individual rights and autonomy,which stands in stark contrast with the collective,interconnected nature of global environmental challenges.Through a detailed engagement with Losurdo's analytical framework and posthumanist philosophy,the paper argues for a fundamental shift within liberal thought.This involves the incorporation of a robust environmental ethic and a commitment to global justice to reconcile the intrinsic values of liberalism with the urgent demands of environmental sustainability and collective action.The proposed reconfigured liberal philosophy seeks to combine its traditional strengths with a renewed focus on collective well-being,offering a more comprehensive and effective strategy for confronting the existential threat of the climate crisis.This study argues that such a reimagined liberal approach not only enhances its relevance in the face of global environmental challenges but also serves as a viable pathway toward promoting a more just and sustainable future.

走出殖民主义:洛苏尔多的马克思主义自由观

殖民主义在当代并没有消亡,它与资本主义的自由主义生产方式伴生而行。多米尼克·洛苏尔多从哲学批判转向历史批判,以马克思主义的语言阐明了其针对殖民主义的自由观,在殖民主义尚存且现代人普遍不自由的社会背景下,他依托黑格尔的法哲学思想进入了马克思的历史唯物主义叙事之中。洛苏尔多指明自由的人应当是被全面承认的,这种自由建立在个体被压迫时所具备的反抗权之上,因而在资本主义历史中被压迫者争取承认的斗争实质上是合法追求自由的途径。将这一观点与马克思主义的阶级斗争理论相结合,洛苏尔多重塑了这一理论,以被承认为目的,一切关于自由解放的运动都可以被“复数形式”的阶级斗争所涵盖,阶级的概念事实上被拓展了。但他却走向了偏离马克思本人观点的消极自由,也没有实现对殖民主义经济逻辑的彻底批判。因此,马克思主义自由观的发展必须坚持马克思主义基本理论,在世界历史与现实之间的张力之中,既要以人为本,又须胸怀天下。