BACKGROUND The key question in living kidney donor assessment is how best to determine the contribution of each kidney to overall renal function and guide selection of which kidney to donate,ensuring safety of procedu...BACKGROUND The key question in living kidney donor assessment is how best to determine the contribution of each kidney to overall renal function and guide selection of which kidney to donate,ensuring safety of procedure and good outcome for both recipient and donor.It is thought that a length difference>2 cm may indicate significant difference in function and therefore need for measurement of differential function.AIM To determine the effect of using kidney length to decide which kidney to donate in a retrospective cohort of potential donors.METHODS All 333 potential living kidney donors between January 2009 and August 2018 who completed assessment were retrospectively evaluated.Donor assessment was performed as per United Kingdom guidelines.Data included age,sex,kidney length(cranio-caudal)obtained by computed tomography/ultrasonography,51-chromium ethylenediamine tetraacetatic acid measured glomerular filtration rate,mercapto acetyl tri glycine split function and vascular anatomy.There were 48 exclusions due to inadequate data or incomplete investigations.Statistical analysis was performed using Excel pivot tables and GraphPad Prism.Correlation between kidney length and differential function was determined with Pearson’s correlation coefficient.RESULTS Of 285 potential donors included in the study,there were 144 males(mean age 49.9±14.75)and 141 females(mean age 51.2±11.23).Overall,the Pearson’s correlation between differences in length and divided function of kidney pairs was 0.1630,P=0.0058.Of 73 with significant difference(>10%)in divided function,18(24.7%)had no difference in kidney length;54(74%)had a difference of<2 cm and only one of>2 cm.Using a length difference of>1 cm would only predict significant difference in divided function in 8/34(23.5%)of cases.Using a difference of>2 cm as cut off for performing split function would lead to false reassurance in 72 patients(6 had>20%difference in divided function whereas 66 had 10%-20%difference).CONCLUSION Length difference between kidney pairs alone is not sufficient to replace measurement of divided function.This issue requires a randomised controlled trial to resolve it.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND The key question in living kidney donor assessment is how best to determine the contribution of each kidney to overall renal function and guide selection of which kidney to donate,ensuring safety of procedure and good outcome for both recipient and donor.It is thought that a length difference>2 cm may indicate significant difference in function and therefore need for measurement of differential function.AIM To determine the effect of using kidney length to decide which kidney to donate in a retrospective cohort of potential donors.METHODS All 333 potential living kidney donors between January 2009 and August 2018 who completed assessment were retrospectively evaluated.Donor assessment was performed as per United Kingdom guidelines.Data included age,sex,kidney length(cranio-caudal)obtained by computed tomography/ultrasonography,51-chromium ethylenediamine tetraacetatic acid measured glomerular filtration rate,mercapto acetyl tri glycine split function and vascular anatomy.There were 48 exclusions due to inadequate data or incomplete investigations.Statistical analysis was performed using Excel pivot tables and GraphPad Prism.Correlation between kidney length and differential function was determined with Pearson’s correlation coefficient.RESULTS Of 285 potential donors included in the study,there were 144 males(mean age 49.9±14.75)and 141 females(mean age 51.2±11.23).Overall,the Pearson’s correlation between differences in length and divided function of kidney pairs was 0.1630,P=0.0058.Of 73 with significant difference(>10%)in divided function,18(24.7%)had no difference in kidney length;54(74%)had a difference of<2 cm and only one of>2 cm.Using a length difference of>1 cm would only predict significant difference in divided function in 8/34(23.5%)of cases.Using a difference of>2 cm as cut off for performing split function would lead to false reassurance in 72 patients(6 had>20%difference in divided function whereas 66 had 10%-20%difference).CONCLUSION Length difference between kidney pairs alone is not sufficient to replace measurement of divided function.This issue requires a randomised controlled trial to resolve it.
