Different roles of capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy in obscure small intestinal diseases

AIM: To compare the roles of capsule endoscopy(CE)and double-balloon enteroscopy(DBE) in the diagnosis of obscure small bowel diseases.METHODS: From June 2009 to December 2014, 88 patients were included in this study; the patients had undergone gastroscopy, colonoscopy, radiological small intestinal barium meal, abdominal computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan and mesenteric angiography, but their diagnoses were still unclear. The patients with gastrointestinal obstructions,fistulas, strictures, or cardiac pacemakers, as well as pregnant women, and individuals who could not accept the capsule-retention or capsule-removal surgery were excluded. Patients with heart, lung and other vital organ failure diseases were also excluded. Everyone involved in this study had undergone CE and DBE. The results were divided into:(1) the definite diagnosis(the diagnosis was confirmed at least by one of the biopsy,surgery, pathology or the drug treatment effects with follow-up for at least 3 mo);(2) the possible diagnosis(a possible diagnosis was suggested by CE or DBE,but not confirmed by the biopsy, surgery or follow-up drug treatment effects); and(3) the unclear diagnosis(no exact causes were provided by CE and DBE for the disease). The detection rate and the diagnostic yield of the two methods were compared. The differencein the etiologies between CE and DBE was estimated,and the different possible etiologies caused by the age groups were also investigated.RESULTS: CE exhibited a better trend than DBE for diagnosing scattered small ulcers(P = 0.242, Fisher's test), and small vascular malformations(χ 2 = 1.810,P = 0.179, Pearson χ 2 test), but with no significant differences, possible due to few cases. However,DBE was better than CE for larger tumors(P =0.018, Fisher's test) and for diverticular lesions with bleeding ulcers(P = 0.005, Fisher's test). All three hemangioma cases diagnosed by DBE in this study(including sponge hemangioma, venous hemangioma,and hemangioma with hamartoma lesions) were all confirmed by biopsy. Two parasite cases were found by CE, but were negative by DBE. This study revealed no obvious differences in the detection rates(DR) of CE(60.0%, 53/88) and DBE(59.1%, 52/88). However,the etiological diagnostic yield(DY) difference was apparent. The CE diagnostic yield was 42.0%(37/88),and the DBE diagnostic yield was 51.1%(45/88).Furthermore, there were differences among the age groups(χ 2 = 22.146, P = 0.008, Kruskal Wallis Test). Small intestinal cancer(5/6 cases), vascular malformations(22/29 cases), and active bleeding(3/4cases) appeared more commonly in the patients over50 years old, but diverticula with bleeding ulcers were usually found in the 15-25-year group(4/7cases). The over-25-year group accounted for the stromal tumors(10/12 cases).CONCLUSION: CE and DBE each have their own advantages and disadvantages. The appropriate choice depends on the patient's age, tolerance, and clinical manifestations. Sometimes CE followed by DBE is necessary.

Non-small-bowel lesions encountered during double-balloon enteroscopy performed for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

AIM:To report the incidence of non-small-bowel bleeding pathologies encountered during double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) procedures and to analyse their significance.METHODS: A retrospective study of a prospective DBE database conducted in a tertiary-referral center was conducted. A total of 179 patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) referred for DBE from June 2004 to November 2008 were analysed looking for the incidence of non-small-bowel lesions (NSBLs; all and newly diagnosed) encountered during DBE.RESULTS: There were 228 (150 antegrade and 78 retrograde) DBE procedures performed in 179 patients. The mean number of DBE procedures was 1.27 per patient. The mean age (SD) of the patients was 62 ± 16 years old. There were 94 females (52.5%). The positive yield for a bleeding lesion was 65.9%. Of the 179 patients, 44 (24.6%) had NSBLs (19 of them had dual pathology with small-bowel lesions and NSBLs); 27 (15.1%) had lesions not detected by previous endoscopies. The most common type of missed lesions were vascular lesions.CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients (24.6%) had lesions within reach of conventional endoscopy. Careful repeat examination with gastroscopy and colonoscopy might be required.

Double-balloon enteroscopy in small bowel tumors: A Chinese single-center study

AIM: To analyze the clinical characteristics of small bowel tumors detected by double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and to evaluate the diagnostic value of DBE in tumors. METHODS: Four hundred and forty consecutive DBE examinations were performed in 400 patients (250 males and 150 females, mean age 46.9 ± 16.3 years, range 14-86 years) between January 2007 and April 2012. Of these, 252 patients underwent the antegrade approach, and 188 patients underwent the retrograde approach. All the patients enrolled in our study were suspected of having small bowel diseases with a negative etiological diagnosis following other routine examinations, such as upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy and radiography tests. Data on tumors, such as clinical information, endoscopic findings and opera-tion results, were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: Small bowel tumors were diagnosed in 78 patients, of whom 67 were diagnosed using DBE, resulting in a diagnostic yield of 16.8% (67/400); the other 11 patients had negative DBE findings and were diagnosed through surgery or capsule endoscopy. Adenocarcinoma (29.5%, 23/78), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (24.4%, 19/78) and lymphoma (15.4%, 12/78) were the most common tumors. Among the 78 tumors, 60.3% (47/78) were located in the jejunum, and the overall number of malignant tumors was 74.4% (58/78). DBE examinations were frequently performed in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (47.4%) and abdominal pain (24.4%). The positive detection rate for DBE in the 78 patients with small bowel tumors was 85.9% (67/78), which was higher than that of a computed tomography scan (72.9%, 51/70). Based on the operation results, the accuracy rates of DBE for locating small bowel neoplasms, such as adenocarcinoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor and lymphoma, were 94.4%, 100% and 100%, respectively. The positive biopsy rates for adenocarcinoma and lymphoma were 71.4% and 60%, respectively. CONCLUSION: DBE is a useful diagnostic tool with high clinical practice value and should be considered the gold standard for the investigation of small bowel tumors.

Double-balloon enteroscopy for mesenchymal tumors of small bowel:Nine years' experience

AIM:To assess the value of double-balloon enteroscopy(DBE) for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors(GIMTs) in the small bowel and clarify their clinical and endoscopic characteristics.METHODS:A retrospective review in a total of 783 patients who underwent a DBE procedure from January 2003 to December 2011 was conducted.Data from patients with pathologically confirmed GIMTs were analyzed at a single tertiary center with nine years' experience.The primary outcomes assessed included characteristics of patients with GIMTs,indications for DBE,overall diagnostic yield of GIMTs,endoscopic morphology,positive biopsy,comparison of diagnosis with capsule endoscopy,and subsequent interventional management.RESULTS:GIMTs were identified and analyzed in 77 patients.The mean age was 47.74 ± 14.14 years(range:20-77 years),with 63.6% being males.The majority of individuals presented with gastrointestinal bleeding,accounting for 81.8%,followed by abdominal pain,accounting for 10.4%.Small bowel pathologies were found in 71 patients,the detection rate was 92.2%.The diagnostic yield of DBE for GIMTs was 88.3%.DBE was superior to capsule endoscopy in the diagnosis of GIMTs(P = 0.006;McNemar's χ2 test).Gastrointestinal stromal tumor was the most frequent and leiomyoma was the second frequent GIMT.Single and focal lesions were typical of GIMTs,and masses with smooth or unsmooth surface were the most common in the small bowel.GIMTs were removed from all the patients surgically except one patient treated with endoscopic resection.CONCLUSION:DBE is a safe and valuable procedure for patients with suspected GIMTs,and it provides an accurate position for subsequent surgical intervention.

Double-balloon enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: A single center experience in China

AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic value of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). METHODS: The data about 75 OGIB patients who underwent DBE in January 2007-June 2009 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: DBE was successfully performed in all 75 patients without complication. Of the 75 patients, 44 (58.7%) had positive DBE findings, 22 had negative DBE findings but had potential bleeding at surgery and capsule endoscopy, etc . These 66 patients were finally diagnosed as OGIB which was most commonly caused by small bowel tumor (28.0%), angiodysplasia (18.7%) and Crohn’s disease (10.7%). Lesions occurred more frequently in proximal small bowel than in distal small bowel (49.3% vs 33.3%, P = 0.047). CONCLUSION: DBE is a safe, effective and accurate procedure for the diagnosis of OGIB.

Comparison between double-balloon and single-balloon enteroscopy in therapeutic ERC after Roux-en-Y entero-enteric anastomosis

AIM:To compare the efficacy of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) in therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) in patients with Roux-en-Y entero-enteric anastomosis.METHODS:Retrospective analysis of our patient cohort revealed 4 patients with enterobiliary anastomosis and Roux-en-Y entero-enteric anastomosis who underwent repeated ERC with DBE and SBE because of recurrent cholangitis.RESULTS:A total of 38 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures were performed in 25 patients with Roux-en-Y entero-enteric anastomosis.DBE was used in 29 procedures and SBE in 9.The 4 patients who underwent repeated ERC with DBE and SBE suffered from recurrent cholangitis due to stenosis of the enterobiliary anastomosis.ERC was performed repeatedly to achieve balloon dilation with/without biliary stone extraction and multiple stent placement at the level of the enterobiliary anastomosis.In all 4 patients DBE and SBE were equally successful.Compared to DBE,SBE was equally effective in passing the Roux-en-Y entero-enteric anastomosis,reaching the enterobiliary anastomosis and performing therapeutic ERC.CONCLUSION:This retrospective comparison shows that DBE and SBE are equally successful in the performance of therapeutic ERC at the level of the enterobiliary anastomosis after Roux-en-Y entero-enteric anastomosis.

Effectiveness and Safety of Double-balloon Catheter versus Intra-amniotic Injection of Ethacridine Lactate for Termination of Second Trimester Pregnancy in Patients with Liver Dysfunction

Severe liver dysfunction in pregnancy（SLDP） is rare but serious complications with high mortality rate. This study compared the effectiveness and safety of double-balloon catheter versus intra-amniotic injection of ethacridine lactate for the termination of second trimester pregnancy in patients with SLD. A total of 55 patients with indications of labor induction were enrolled and analyzed by retrospective control analysis method. Twenty-three cases adopted Cook double balloon dilation as Cook group, and 32 cases received intra-amniotic injection of ethacridine lactate as EL group. The primary outcome was evaluated by successful abortion rate and the difference in the induction-to-abortion interval. Secondary outcomes included liver function recovery and the frequency of adverse events. Both Cook and EL regimens were effective, with successful abortion rate of 87.0% and 93.8%, respectively（P=0.639）. The induction-to-delivery interval was similar between Cook group and EL group（38.1±21.5 vs. 41.3±17.4, P=0.543）. The liver disease status was more severe in Cook group than in EL group, but it did not show any significant difference after pregnancy termination between the two groups and the improvement rate also did not show any significant difference. Both treatments were safe and there was no significant difference in bleeding and cervical laceration adverse events between the two groups. Our study firstly compared double-balloon catheter and ethacridine lactate for the induction of labor in women with SLD during second trimester pregnancy.

Hyperamylasemia is associated with increased intestinal permeability in patients undergoing diagnostic oral double-balloon enteroscopy

AIM:To investigate the correlations between serum amylase levels,intestinal permeability(IP),and pancreatic injury and to explore the mechanisms responsible for hyperamylasemia in double-balloon enteroscopy(DBE).METHODS:A prospective study was conducted in 20patients who underwent DBE from August 1,2008 to February 28,2009.Serum amylase was examined 0,2,6 and 24 h post-DBE,C-reactive protein and lipase were examined at 24 h,and urine lactulose,mannitol,and trypsinogen-Ⅱ(TRY-Ⅱ)levels were measured at6 h.Lactulose/mannitol ratio indicated IP,and TRY-Ⅱindicated pancreatic injuries.Procedure duration and enteroscope insertion length were recorded.RESULTS:Twelve patients underwent oral DBE(M:F,5:7;mean age 50.42±11.11 years)and 8 underwent anal DBE(M:F,5:3;mean age 44.75±12.66 years).They all showed significantly increased post-DBE serum amylase.Amylase and lipase levels were higher in the oral DBE group(P<0.05).Hyperamylasemia was diagnosed in 9(75.0%)patients undergoing oral DBE.Only patients receiving oral DBE showed increased postprocedure IP,which correlated with increased serum amylase(r=0.611,P=0.035)and procedure duration(r=0.668,P=0.018).Adverse events included one oral case with pancreatic injury(elevated TRY-Ⅱ)and two cases of abdominal discomfort in each group.Pancreatitis was not reported.CONCLUSION:Hyperamylasemia correlates with increased IP and clinically undetectable pancreatic injuries.DBE could cause intestinal mucosa damage,which may result in IP elevation and increased amylase absorption,necessitating improvements and standardization of DBE methods.

Application of double-balloon enteroscopy in jejunal diverticular bleeding

AIM:To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic diagnosis and therapy for jejunal diverticular bleeding.METHODS:From January 2004 to September 2009,154 patients underwent double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.Ten consecutive patients with jejunal diverticula (5 males and 5 females) at the age of 68.7 ± 2.1 years (range 1995 years) at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital,Academic Tertiary Referral Center,were enrolled in this study.RESULTS:Of the 10 patients,5 had melena,2 had hematochezia,2 had both melena and hematochezia,1 had anemia and dizziness.DBE revealed ulcers with stigmata of recent hemorrhage in 6 patients treated by injection of epinephrine diluted at 1:10 000,Dieulafoylike lesions in 4 patients treated by deploying hemoclips on the vessels,colonic diverticula in 2 patients,and duodenal diverticula in 3 patients,respectively.Of the 2patients who underwent surgical intervention,1 had a large diverticulum and was referred by the surgeon for DBE,1 received endoscopic therapy but failed due to massive bleeding.One patient had a second DBE for recurrent hemorrhage 7 mo later,which was successfully treated with a repeat endoscopy.The mean follow-up time of patients was 14.7 ± 7.8 mo.CONCLUSION:DBE is a safe and effective treatment modality for jejunal diverticular bleeding.

Diagnosis of the jejunoileal lymphoma by double-balloon endoscopy

AIM:To investigate the feasibility of double-balloon endoscopy(DBE) to detect jejunoileal lymphoma,compared with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography(FDG-PET).METHODS:Between March 2004 and January 2011,we histologically confirmed involvement of malignant lymphoma of the jejunoileum in 31 patients by DBE and biopsy.In 20 patients of them,we performed with FDGPET.We retrospectively reviewed the records of these 20 patients.Their median age was 64 years(range 50-81).In the 20 patients,the pathological diagnosis of underlying non-Hodgkin's lymphoma(NHL) comprised follicular lymphoma(FL,n = 12),diffuse large B cell lymphoma(DLBCL,n = 4),mantle cell lymphoma(MCL,n = 2),enteropathy associated T cell lymphoma(ETL,n = 1) and anaplastic large cell lymphoma(ALCL,n = 1).RESULTS:Ten cases showed accumulation by FDGPET(50%).FDG-PET was positive in 3 of 12 FL cases(25%) while in 7 of 8 non-FL cases(88%,P < 0.05).Intestinal FL showed a significantly lower rate of positive FDG-PET,in comparison with other types of lymphoma.Cases with endoscopically elevated lesions(n = 10) showed positive FDG-PET in 2(20%),but those with other type NHL did in 8 of 10(80%,P < 0.05).When the cases having elevated type was compared with those not having elevated type lesion,the number of cases that showed accumulation of FDG was significantly smaller in the former than in the latter.CONCLUSION:In a significant proportion,small intestinal involvement cannot be pointed out by FDG-PET.Especially,FL is difficult to evaluate by FDG-PET but essentially requires DBE.

Double-balloon endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for patients who underwent liver operation: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND Double-balloon endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (DB-ERC) is widely performed for biliary diseases after reconstruction in gastrointestinal surgery,but there are few reports on DB-ERC after hepatectomy or living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).AIM To examine the success rates and safety of DB-ERC after hepatectomy or LDLT METHODS The study was performed retrospectively in 26 patients (45 procedures) who underwent hepatectomy or LDLT (liver operation:LO group) and 40 control patients (59 procedures) who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (control group).The technical success (endoscope reaching the choledochojejunostomy site),diagnostic success (performance of cholangiography),therapeutic success(completed interventions) and overall success rates,insertion and procedure(completion of DB-ERC) time,and adverse events were compared between these groups.RESULTS There were no significant differences between LO and control groups in the technical [93.3%(42/45) vs 96.6%(57/59),P=0.439],diagnostic [83.3%(35/42) vs83.6%(46/55),P=0.968],therapeutic [97.0%(32/33) vs 97.7%(43/44),P=0.836],and overall [75.6%(34/45) vs 79.7%(47/59),P=0.617] success rates.The median insertion time (22 vs 14 min,P <0.001) and procedure time (43.5 vs 30 min,P=0.033) were significantly longer in the LO group.The incidence of adverse events showed no significant difference [11.1%(5/45) vs 6.8%(4/59),P=0.670].CONCLUSION DB-ERC after liver operation is safe and useful but longer time is required,so should be performed with particular care.

Accuracy of carbon dioxide insufflation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using double-balloon endoscopy

BACKGROUND Retrograde cholangiopancreatography using double-balloon endoscopic retrograde cholangiography(DBERC)is a valuable technique to treat biliary stone and jejunobiliary anastomotic stenosis in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy.The accurate selection of the route at the anastomosis branch is one of the most important factors in reaching the target in a timely manner.AIM To determine the accuracy of carbon dioxide insufflation enterography(CDE)at the branch for selecting the correct route during DBERC.METHODS We enrolled 52 consecutive patients scheduled for DBERC at our institution from June 2015 to November 2017.Route selection via two methods(visual observation and CDE)was performed in each patient.We determined the correct rate of route selection using CDE.RESULTS Thirty-three patients had a jejunojejunal anastomosis and 19 patients had a gastrojejunal anastomosis.The therapeutic target region was reached in 50 patients.The mean procedure times from the teeth to the target(total insertion time),from the teeth to the branch,and from the branch to the target,and the mean total examination time were 15.2,5.0,8.2,and 60.3 min,respectively.The rate of correct route selection using visual observation and CDE were 36/52(69.2%)and 48/52(92.3%),respectively(P=0.002).The rate of correct route selection using CDE in patients with a jejunojejunal anastomosis was 29/33(87.8%),and the rate in patients with a gastrojejunal anastomosis was 19/19(100%).CONCLUSION CDE is helpful in selecting the route at the branch in the anastomosis for more timely access to the target in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy undergoing DBERC.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma diagnosed via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with a short double-balloon enteroscope

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using a double-balloon enteroscope (DBE) in patients with bowel reconstruction due to a previous abdominal surgery is now widely accepted. In particular, a short DBE, which has a 2.8-mm working channel and 152-cm working length, is useful for ERCP because of its good rotational and straightening ability and the availability of various conventional ERCP accessories through the working channel. Herein we report a case of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma via ERCP with a short DBE. This is the first report in which the pre-cutting and the brush cytological examination were performed successfully under a DBE to diagnose intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma pathologically. The short DBE allowed us to perform all diagnostic and therapeutic procedures accepted in conventional ERCP in patients with surgically altered anatomies.

Double-balloon endoscopy-diagnosed multiple small intestinal ulcers in a Churg-Strauss syndrome patient

Churg-Strauss syndrome(CSS) is a systemic vascular disorder characterized by severe bronchial asthma hypereosinophilia,and allergic rhinitis.Small intestina ulcers associated with CSS are a relatively rare manifestation that causes gastrointestinal bleeding.Multiple deep ulcers with an irregular shape are characteristic of small intestinal involvement of CSS.Video-capsuleendoscopy(VCE),double-balloon endoscopy(DBE) and Spirus assisted enteroscopy have been developed recently and enabled observation of the small intestine In this case report,we have described a patient with CSS who had multiple deep ulcers in the jejunum detected by oral DBE.Since severe gastrointestinal(GI) involvement has been identified as an independent factor associated with poor outcome,the careful investigation of GI tract must be needed for CSS patients with GI symptoms.We describe the usefulness of DBE for diagnosis of small intestinal ulcers in patient with CSS.

Single-balloon and spiral enteroscopy may have similar diagnostic and therapeutic yields to double-balloon enteroscopy:Results from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective studies

BACKGROUND Double-balloon,single-balloon,and spiral enteroscopy(DBE,SBE,and SE)have revolutionized the management of intestinal diseases.However,evidence about efficacies of these methods is lacking.We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis comparing the clinical outcomes among DBE,SBE,and SE.METHODS We searched randomized controlled trials and prospective studies in MEDLINE,PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane Library,and Chinese CQVIP database.Studies referencing the comparison of at least two of these three methods were included.Primary outcome was diagnostic yield.Other outcomes were therapeutic yield,total enteroscopy,examination time,time to maximum insertion,and depth of maximal insertion(DMI).RESULTS Eleven studies including 727 patients were identified:DBE vs SE(n=6),DBE vs SBE(n=4),and SBE vs SE(n=1).The diagnostic and therapeutic yields did not differ significantly when comparing DBE with SE[odds ratio(OR)=1.19,95%confidence interval(CI):0.68-2.08;OR=1.17,95%CI:0.61-2.23]and DBE with SBE(OR=0.85,95%CI:0.55-1.33;OR=1.71,95%CI:0.64-4.60).Total enteroscopy,examination time,time to maximum insertion,and DMI were similar between SBE and DBE.DBE was superior to SE with regard to DMI[mean difference(MD)=36.76,95%CI:5.09-68.43],with longer time to maximum insertion(MD=15.14,95%CI:12-18.27)and examination time(MD=12.98,95%CI:9.57-16.38).CONCLUSION DBE and SBE have similar clinical outcomes.Compared with DBE,SE seems to have similar diagnostic and therapeutic yields,but shorter procedural time in cost of less depth of insertion.SE needs further evaluation vs SBE.DBE is recommended for complete enteroscopy.

Single-center retrospective study of the diagnostic value of doubleballoon enteroscopy in Meckel’s diverticulum with bleeding

BACKGROUND The study aimed to analyze the characteristic clinical manifestations of patients with intestinal disease Meckel’s diverticulum(MD)complicated by digestive tract hemorrhage.Moreover,we aimed to evaluate the value of double-balloon enteroscopy(DBE)in MD diagnosis and the prognosis after laparoscopic diverticula resection.AIM To evaluate the value of DBE in the diagnosis and the prognosis after laparoscopic diverticula resection for MD with bleeding.METHODS The study retrospectively analyzed relevant data from 84 MD patients treated between January 2015 and March 2022 and recorded their clinical manifestations,auxiliary examination,and follow-up after laparoscopic resection of diverticula.RESULTS(1)Among 84 MD patients complicated with hemorrhage,77 were male,and 7 were female with an average age of 31.31±10.75 years.The incidence was higher in men than in women of different ages;(2)Among the 84 MD patients,65(78.40%)had defecated dark red stools,and 50(58.80%)had no accompanying symptoms during bleeding,indicating that most MD bleeding appeared a dark red stool without accompanying symptoms;(3)The shock index of 71 patients(85.20%)was<1,suggesting that the blood loss of most MD patients was less than 20%–30%,and only a few patients had a blood loss of>30%;(4)The DBE-positive rate was 100%(54/54),99mTcpertechnetate-positive scanning rate was 78%(35/45)compared with capsule endoscopy(36%)and small intestine computed tomography(19%).These results suggest that DBE and 99mTc-pertechnetate scans had significant advantages in diagnosing MD and bleeding,especially DBE was a highly precise examination method in MD diagnosis;(5)A total of 54 MD patients with hemorrhage underwent DBE examination before surgery.DBE endoscopy revealed many mucosal manifestations including normal appearance,inflammatory changes,ulcerative changes,diverticulum inversion,and nodular hyperplasia,with ulcerative changes being the most common(53.70%).This suggests that diverticular mucosal ulcer was the main cause of MD and bleeding;and(6)Laparoscopic dissection of diverticulae was performed in 76 patients,The patients who underwent postoperative follow-up did not experience any further bleeding.Additionally,follow-up examination of the 8 cases who had declined surgery revealed that 3 of them experienced a recurrence of digestive tract bleeding.These findings indicate that laparoscopic diverticula resection in MD patients complicated by bleeding had a favorable prognosis.CONCLUSION Bleeding associated with MD was predominantly observed in male adolescents,particularly at a young age.DBE was a highly precise examination method in MD diagnosis.Laparoscopic diverticula resection effectively prevented MD bleeding and had a good prognosis.

The role of capsule endoscopy combined with double-balloon enteroscopy in diagnosis of small bowel diseases

Background The diagnosis of small bowel diseases remains relatively inefficient using traditional imaging techniques. Capsule endoscopy （CE） and double-balloon enteroscopy （DBE） are two novel methods of enteroscopy for examining the entire small bowel. The aim of this study was to evaluate the detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of CE and DBE in patients with suspected small bowel diseases and to investigate the clinical significance of combined use of these two novel modalities. Methods Two hundred and eighteen patients were evaluated for suspected small bowel disease, including 116 with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and 102 with obscure abdominal pain or chronic diarrhea. One hundred and sixty-five out of these patients underwent CE first and 53 patients underwent DBE （under anesthesia with propofol） first. DBE was recommended after negative or equivocal evaluation on CE and vise versa. Introduction of the endoscope during DBE was either orally or anally and the patients were referred for a second procedure using the opposite route several days later when no abnormalities were found on the first procedure. The detection rates, diagnostic accuracy, tolerance and frequency of adverse events of these two modalities were then analyzed. Results Failure of the procedure was seen in one patient with CE and in two patients with DBE. Sixty-four DBE procedures were carded out in 51 patients; by the oral route in 34 cases, the anal route in 4 and both routes in 13 cases. The overall detection rate of small bowel diseases using CE （72.0%, 118/164） was superior to that with DBE （41.2%, 21/51）; X2=16.1218, P〈0.0001. The diagnostic rate （51.8%, 85/164） was also higher than that with the latter procedure （39.2%, 20/51）, but was not significantly different （X^2=2.4771, P〉0.05）. Furthermore, the detection rate of small bowel diseases in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding using CE （88.0%, 88/100） was superior to that of DBE （60.0%, 9/15）; X2=7.7457, P=0.0054. Lesions were detected by DBE in 1 out of 4 patients in whom CE had a negative result. Suspected findings by CE were confirmed by DBE combined with biopsy in 12 out of 15 patients. On the other hand, small bowel lesions were identified by CE in all 3 patients after negative evaluations by DBE. There were no severe complications during or after either of the two procedures. Conclusions The detection rate of small bowel diseases by CE is very high. CE should be selected for the initial diagnosis in patients with suspected small bowel diseases, especially in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. DBE appears to be inferior to CE in the diagnosis of small bowel diseases. However, it was shown that abnormalities could still be identified by DBE in patients with normal images or used to confirm suspected findings from CE. DBE can also serve as a good complementary approach after an initial diagnostic imaging using CE.

Effect of Double-Balloon Enteroscopy on Diagnosis and Treatment of Small-Bowel Diseases

Background： The diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel diseases is clinically difficult. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic value of double-balloon enteroscopy in small-bowel diseases. Methods： The history and outcomes of 2806 patients who underwent double-balloon enteroscopy from July 2004 to April 2017 were reviewed, which included 562 patients with obscure digestive tract bleeding, 457 patients with obscure diarrhea, 930 patients with obscure abdominal pain, 795 patients with obscure weight loss, and 62 patients with obscure intestinal obstruction. Examinations were performed through the mouth and/or anus according to the clinical symptoms and abdominal images, lfa lesion was not detected through one direction, examination through the other direction was performed as necessary. Eighty-four patients with small-bowel polyps, 26 with intestinal obstruction caused by enterolith, and 18 with bleeding from Dieulafoy＇s lesions in the small intestine were treated endoscopically. Results： A total of 2806 patients underwent double-balloon enteroscopy, and no serious complications occurred. An endoscopic approach through both the mouth and anus was used in 212 patients. Lesions were detected in 1696 patients, with a detection rate of 60.4%： the rates for obscure digestive tract bleeding, diarrhea, abdominal pain, weight loss, and intestinal obstrtlction were 85.9% （483/562）, 73.5% （336/457）, 48.2% （448/930）, 49.1% （390/795）, and 62.9% （39/62）, respectively. For patients with small-bowel polyps who underwent endoscopic therapy, no complications such as digestive tract bleeding and perforation occurred. Intestinal obstruction with enteroliths was relieved with endoscopic lithotripsy. Among the 18 patients with bleeding from small-bowel Dieulafoy＇s lesions, 14 patients were controlled with endoscopic hemostasis. Conclusion： Double-balloon enteroscopy is useful for diagnosing and treating some small-bowel disease.

Double-balloon enteroscopy in detecting small intestinal bleeding

Digestive tract hemorrhage is a common disease of the digestive system, but about 0. 4% -5% intestinal bleeding can not be detected with gastroscope or colonscope. 1 Since the intestine is long, tortuous, far away from both ends of the digestive tract and unfixed in position, clinical diagnosis of the bleeding is relatively difficult. Yamamoto and Sugano2 reported the clinical application of double-balloon enteroscope at American DDW in 2003. Since this new instrument can help to observe the entire intestine, obtain biopsy sample, mark lesions and carry out treatments, it has drawn the attention of researchers all over the world. In 2003, we successfully used Japanese Fujinon double-balloon enteroscope in detecting suspected intestinal hemorrhage in 57 patients.

Application of double-balloon enteroscopy in the diagnosis and therapy of small intestinal diseases

Background X-ray of the digestive tract and radionuclide examination could not accurately detect diseases of the small intestine. Double-balloon enteroscopy has been used to increase the detection rate of these diseases in addition to endoscopic biopsy and therapy. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of double-balloon enteroscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the small intestine. Methods A total of 258 double-balloon enteroscopies via the mouth and/or anus were performed in 208 patients. If no lesion was detected on one side （mouth or anus）, examination on the other side （anus or mouth） was made. If active small intestinal bleeding was detected, endoscopic hemostasis was done to treat the bleeding. Results In the 208 patients, 50 were subjected to double-balloon enteroscopy via both mouth and anus. Lesions were detected in 151 patients, giving a rate of 72.6% （151/208）. The detection rates for obscure digestive tract bleeding, diarrhea, abdominal pain and weight loss were 90.2% （92/102）, 64.9% （24/37）, 48.5% （16/33） and 43.3% （13/30）, respectively. Lesions of the 151 patients were confirmed by endoscopic biopsy, surgery, clinical studies, and follow-up. In the 102 patients with bleeding of the digestive tract, active bleeding was detected in 27 patients. Endoscopic hemostasis was successful in 25 of them （92.6%, 25/27）. No serious complications occurred in all the patients, the average time for the procedure was 100 minutes. Conclusions Double-balloon enteroscopy is safe, effective in the diagnosis of diseases of the small intestine in addition to endoscopic therapy.