Objective:To determine the level of agreement among experienced operators of candidacy for upper airway stimulation (UAS) based on evaluation of drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).Methods:The trial was designed as a ...Objective:To determine the level of agreement among experienced operators of candidacy for upper airway stimulation (UAS) based on evaluation of drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).Methods:The trial was designed as a single-blinded cross-sectional study.Four otolaryngologists with extensive DISE experience were given 63 video clips from the STAR trial video library.These videos were graded using the VOTE classification.Percentage agreement and Cohen's k (for inter-rater reliability) were calculated between pairs of reviewers,assessing palatal complete concentric collapse (CCC) and determining UAS eligibility.Subjects were also grouped based on collapse severity for each reviewer.Results:The reviewers had excellent (approximately 90％) agreement on findings at the level of the soft palate and tongue base.The inter-rater reliability for palatal CCC ranged from mod erate to substantial The agreement on determining the criteria for UAS implantation ranged from poor to moderate.All 4 upper airway structures as classified by the criteria of the VOTE were graded by all the reviewers as contributing to obstruction in a majority of subjects who were performed via application of DISE.Conclusion:Application of DISE remains a subjective examination,even among those experienced operators,therefore more studies need to be performed for evaluation of improvement in inter-rater reliability after implantation of training videos.展开更多
文摘Objective:To determine the level of agreement among experienced operators of candidacy for upper airway stimulation (UAS) based on evaluation of drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).Methods:The trial was designed as a single-blinded cross-sectional study.Four otolaryngologists with extensive DISE experience were given 63 video clips from the STAR trial video library.These videos were graded using the VOTE classification.Percentage agreement and Cohen's k (for inter-rater reliability) were calculated between pairs of reviewers,assessing palatal complete concentric collapse (CCC) and determining UAS eligibility.Subjects were also grouped based on collapse severity for each reviewer.Results:The reviewers had excellent (approximately 90％) agreement on findings at the level of the soft palate and tongue base.The inter-rater reliability for palatal CCC ranged from mod erate to substantial The agreement on determining the criteria for UAS implantation ranged from poor to moderate.All 4 upper airway structures as classified by the criteria of the VOTE were graded by all the reviewers as contributing to obstruction in a majority of subjects who were performed via application of DISE.Conclusion:Application of DISE remains a subjective examination,even among those experienced operators,therefore more studies need to be performed for evaluation of improvement in inter-rater reliability after implantation of training videos.
