Considering the issues that can accompany prosthetic breast implants,augmentation mammoplasty(AM)with autologous fat grafting(AFG)has attracted growing interest globally,especially in the last two decades,as breast im...Considering the issues that can accompany prosthetic breast implants,augmentation mammoplasty(AM)with autologous fat grafting(AFG)has attracted growing interest globally,especially in the last two decades,as breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma has been increasing in incidence over time.Here,we review the detailed processes of AFG to the breast and the pertinent complications associated with this procedure.This study aims to elucidate the critical points and technique improvements in AM with AFG in recent years,as well as discuss how to decrease complications related to this procedure.Attention was focused on the specific AFG steps,clinical outcomes,and complications to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the available protocols.展开更多
Aim:Simultaneous augmentation mastopexy is a challenging operation for esthetic plastic surgeons.Complication and revision rates following augmentation mammoplasty or mastopexy are less commonly seen when these two pr...Aim:Simultaneous augmentation mastopexy is a challenging operation for esthetic plastic surgeons.Complication and revision rates following augmentation mammoplasty or mastopexy are less commonly seen when these two procedures are performed separately.However,when the two procedures are combined,the complication rate is reported exponentially higher when compared with its individual component carried out separately.The current retrospective chart review is a comparative analysis of the two procedures performed by a single surgeon.Methods:Retrospective data were collected using patient’s charts.All patients who had augmentation mammoplasty(Group A)or simultaneous augmentation with mastopexy(Group B)in muscle splitting biplane using round cohesive gel textured silicone implants by a single surgeon were included.Results:A total of 1,406 patients had consecutive augmentation mammoplasty or simultaneous augmentation mastopexy.Augmentation mammoplasty(Group A)included 1,298 and simultaneous augmentation with mastopexy(Group B)had 108 patients,respectively.The mean age of the patients in Group A and B was 29.6 years and 32.2 years,respectively(P=0.006).The mean size of the implants in Group A and B was 340 mL and 308 mL(P=0.001),respectively.Wound infection in Group A and B was seen in 0.6%and 3.7%,respectively.Wound breakdown was seen in 1.1%in Group A as compared to 6.5%in Group B(P=0.001).Revision surgeries were performed in 1.4%and 11.1%of Group A and B,respectively(P=0.001).Conclusion:There was a statistically and clinically significant higher rate of complications and revision rate noted in simultaneous augmentation with mastopexy(Group B)as compared to augmentation mammoplasty alone(Group A).However,the rise in complications rate is sum of the complications of the two individual components performed and not exponential.展开更多
Aim: The single-stage procedure is a challenging procedure for Plastic Surgeons. The single-stage layered mastopexy with augmentation is a new technique that is aiming to add safety, preserving breast function and to ...Aim: The single-stage procedure is a challenging procedure for Plastic Surgeons. The single-stage layered mastopexy with augmentation is a new technique that is aiming to add safety, preserving breast function and to restore normal parameters of breast. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 50 consecutive cases of layered mastopexy with augmentation mammoplasties was performed. All patients had their implants placed in muscle splitting pocket. Incisions for mastopexy were selected on the basis of nipple areolar complex to inframammary crease. Mastopexy is performed using a medially based pedicle, leaving a sufficient tissue covering the implant. Patients were divided into three groups. Group 'A' who had periareolar mastopexy, Group 'B' had vertical scar mastopexy and Group 'C' patients had mastopexy with Wise pattern markings. Results: Group A comprised 11 patients. The mean age was 28.82± 7.01 years, mean preoperative and postoperative nipple areolar complex (NAC) to IMC measurement was recorded in 10 patients with the mean of 7.15± 1.98 cm and 8.35± 1.18 cm respectively. Mean size of the implant used was 379.55± 77.18 cm3. Group B comprised 29 patients. Mean age was 35.17± 12.37 years and the mean preoperative and postoperative NAC to IMC crease was 8.53± 1.48 cm and 9.72± 1.51 cm respectively. The mean implant size used was 289.48± 109 cm3. Group C had 10 patients. Mean age was 39.60± 12.15 years and the mean preoperative and postoperative NAC to IMC crease of 10.11± 1.24 cm and 8.75± 0.98 cm respectively. The mean implant size used was 287.00± 55.08 cm3. Conclusion: The procedure allows better arterial supply, wider area for venous and lymphatic drainage, better sensory innervation to NAC and maximises lactation potential of the breast.展开更多
Aim:Augmentation mammoplasty is a commonly performed procedure with a high satisfaction rate.Multiplane pocket was described for simultaneous internal mastopexy and augmentation using inframammary crease incision for ...Aim:Augmentation mammoplasty is a commonly performed procedure with a high satisfaction rate.Multiplane pocket was described for simultaneous internal mastopexy and augmentation using inframammary crease incision for selected primary and secondary mammoplasties.The use of the technique is presented with a larger experience for correction of ptosis in a patient presenting for revision surgery following subglandular augmentation mammoplasty.Methods:A retrospectively collected data were analyzed using the Excel Spread Sheet.A total of 25 patients had multiplane augmentation with the internal mastopexy following augmentation mammoplasty in subglandular pocket.Data of 25 patients who had their revision surgery in multiplane were analyzed.Results:The group included 25 patients with a mean age of 36.6 years(range:25-54 years)with mean implant duration of 6.4 years(range:1.5-13 years).Twenty-three of the patients were nonsmokers,1 smoker and 1 patient’s smoking status was not mentioned.Eighteen patients presented with grade I capsular contracture,3 patients with grade II contracture and 4 patients had a combination of grade I and II capsular contracture.Pseudoptosis was present in 6,class B ptosis in 6,A/B ptosis in 3,water-down deformity in 5 and rippling in 5 patients.Average preoperative size of implant used initially was 334.4 mL(range:250-340 mL)and the mean implant size selected for revision surgery was 416 mL(range:260-525 mL).Mean follow-up time was 18 months(range:6-48 months).Of 25 patients,21 had a bilateral procedure whereas the technique was used unilaterally in 4 patients for the correction of asymmetry.All patients had a single dose of intravenous antibiotics and followed by an oral course for 5 days,there was no infection noted in the series.In the current series,no patient required revision surgery following the multiplane internal mastopexy.Conclusion:Multiplane internal mastopexy can be useful in selected cases of revisionary augmentation mammoplasty.展开更多
基金supported by the Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty Project(grant no.Shslczdzk00901).
文摘Considering the issues that can accompany prosthetic breast implants,augmentation mammoplasty(AM)with autologous fat grafting(AFG)has attracted growing interest globally,especially in the last two decades,as breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma has been increasing in incidence over time.Here,we review the detailed processes of AFG to the breast and the pertinent complications associated with this procedure.This study aims to elucidate the critical points and technique improvements in AM with AFG in recent years,as well as discuss how to decrease complications related to this procedure.Attention was focused on the specific AFG steps,clinical outcomes,and complications to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the available protocols.
文摘Aim:Simultaneous augmentation mastopexy is a challenging operation for esthetic plastic surgeons.Complication and revision rates following augmentation mammoplasty or mastopexy are less commonly seen when these two procedures are performed separately.However,when the two procedures are combined,the complication rate is reported exponentially higher when compared with its individual component carried out separately.The current retrospective chart review is a comparative analysis of the two procedures performed by a single surgeon.Methods:Retrospective data were collected using patient’s charts.All patients who had augmentation mammoplasty(Group A)or simultaneous augmentation with mastopexy(Group B)in muscle splitting biplane using round cohesive gel textured silicone implants by a single surgeon were included.Results:A total of 1,406 patients had consecutive augmentation mammoplasty or simultaneous augmentation mastopexy.Augmentation mammoplasty(Group A)included 1,298 and simultaneous augmentation with mastopexy(Group B)had 108 patients,respectively.The mean age of the patients in Group A and B was 29.6 years and 32.2 years,respectively(P=0.006).The mean size of the implants in Group A and B was 340 mL and 308 mL(P=0.001),respectively.Wound infection in Group A and B was seen in 0.6%and 3.7%,respectively.Wound breakdown was seen in 1.1%in Group A as compared to 6.5%in Group B(P=0.001).Revision surgeries were performed in 1.4%and 11.1%of Group A and B,respectively(P=0.001).Conclusion:There was a statistically and clinically significant higher rate of complications and revision rate noted in simultaneous augmentation with mastopexy(Group B)as compared to augmentation mammoplasty alone(Group A).However,the rise in complications rate is sum of the complications of the two individual components performed and not exponential.
文摘Aim: The single-stage procedure is a challenging procedure for Plastic Surgeons. The single-stage layered mastopexy with augmentation is a new technique that is aiming to add safety, preserving breast function and to restore normal parameters of breast. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 50 consecutive cases of layered mastopexy with augmentation mammoplasties was performed. All patients had their implants placed in muscle splitting pocket. Incisions for mastopexy were selected on the basis of nipple areolar complex to inframammary crease. Mastopexy is performed using a medially based pedicle, leaving a sufficient tissue covering the implant. Patients were divided into three groups. Group 'A' who had periareolar mastopexy, Group 'B' had vertical scar mastopexy and Group 'C' patients had mastopexy with Wise pattern markings. Results: Group A comprised 11 patients. The mean age was 28.82± 7.01 years, mean preoperative and postoperative nipple areolar complex (NAC) to IMC measurement was recorded in 10 patients with the mean of 7.15± 1.98 cm and 8.35± 1.18 cm respectively. Mean size of the implant used was 379.55± 77.18 cm3. Group B comprised 29 patients. Mean age was 35.17± 12.37 years and the mean preoperative and postoperative NAC to IMC crease was 8.53± 1.48 cm and 9.72± 1.51 cm respectively. The mean implant size used was 289.48± 109 cm3. Group C had 10 patients. Mean age was 39.60± 12.15 years and the mean preoperative and postoperative NAC to IMC crease of 10.11± 1.24 cm and 8.75± 0.98 cm respectively. The mean implant size used was 287.00± 55.08 cm3. Conclusion: The procedure allows better arterial supply, wider area for venous and lymphatic drainage, better sensory innervation to NAC and maximises lactation potential of the breast.
文摘Aim:Augmentation mammoplasty is a commonly performed procedure with a high satisfaction rate.Multiplane pocket was described for simultaneous internal mastopexy and augmentation using inframammary crease incision for selected primary and secondary mammoplasties.The use of the technique is presented with a larger experience for correction of ptosis in a patient presenting for revision surgery following subglandular augmentation mammoplasty.Methods:A retrospectively collected data were analyzed using the Excel Spread Sheet.A total of 25 patients had multiplane augmentation with the internal mastopexy following augmentation mammoplasty in subglandular pocket.Data of 25 patients who had their revision surgery in multiplane were analyzed.Results:The group included 25 patients with a mean age of 36.6 years(range:25-54 years)with mean implant duration of 6.4 years(range:1.5-13 years).Twenty-three of the patients were nonsmokers,1 smoker and 1 patient’s smoking status was not mentioned.Eighteen patients presented with grade I capsular contracture,3 patients with grade II contracture and 4 patients had a combination of grade I and II capsular contracture.Pseudoptosis was present in 6,class B ptosis in 6,A/B ptosis in 3,water-down deformity in 5 and rippling in 5 patients.Average preoperative size of implant used initially was 334.4 mL(range:250-340 mL)and the mean implant size selected for revision surgery was 416 mL(range:260-525 mL).Mean follow-up time was 18 months(range:6-48 months).Of 25 patients,21 had a bilateral procedure whereas the technique was used unilaterally in 4 patients for the correction of asymmetry.All patients had a single dose of intravenous antibiotics and followed by an oral course for 5 days,there was no infection noted in the series.In the current series,no patient required revision surgery following the multiplane internal mastopexy.Conclusion:Multiplane internal mastopexy can be useful in selected cases of revisionary augmentation mammoplasty.
