Background: Some researchers have suggested that when Naegle’s rule (NR) and Dubowitz score (DS) are combined, it could out-perform obstetric ultrasound scan (USS). Others still believe that obstetric USS alone is st...Background: Some researchers have suggested that when Naegle’s rule (NR) and Dubowitz score (DS) are combined, it could out-perform obstetric ultrasound scan (USS). Others still believe that obstetric USS alone is still effective relative to the combination of NR rule and DS in assessing the gestational age (GA) of babies. Objectives: To determine and compare the GA of babies using obstetric USS, NR and DS;and to provide relevant public health information on obstetric USS in the 21st century. Methods: Subjects were selected using systematic random sampling and the GA of babies was determined using obstetric USS, NR, and DS. Statistical package for social science (SPSS) statistical software version 16, Illinois, Chicago USA was used for all data analysis. Results: Eightyfive mother-baby pairs were studied. Forty-four babies (52%) were males and 41 (48%) females. Sixty four (75%) were term with a mean (SD) BW of 3.02 (0.59) at 95%CI (2.89 -?3.14) kg. The overall mean GA of the babies was 38.49 (2.89) at 95%CI (38.14 -?38.85) weeks. The mean GA using obstetric USS, NR and DS were 38.52 (1.98) at 95%CI (38.14 -?38.99), 38.09 (4.13) at 95%CI (37.20-?38.99) and 38.82 (2.02) at 95%CI (38.39 -?39.26), but comparison of these means was not significant (p = 0.256). Combined mean GA by NR and DS was 38.46 (3.26) at 95%CI (37.96 -?38.95). Comparing this mean with mean GA obtained by obstetric USS was also not significant (p = 0.885). Conclusion: The GA assessments by Obstetric USS, NR and DS were all reliable, and Obstetric USS performed effectively relative to combined NR and DS.展开更多
目的初步评价Dubowitz神经学评估法-第2版(The Neurological Assessment of the Preterm and Fullterm Newborn Infant-Second Edition)对晚期早产儿发育行为结局的预测效果,为完善晚期早产儿随访体系提供线索。方法选取2016年10月-2017...目的初步评价Dubowitz神经学评估法-第2版(The Neurological Assessment of the Preterm and Fullterm Newborn Infant-Second Edition)对晚期早产儿发育行为结局的预测效果,为完善晚期早产儿随访体系提供线索。方法选取2016年10月-2017年3月间在上海市第一妇婴保健院出生的低风险晚期早产儿(34+0~36+6孕周)116例组成随访队列,于超早期(生后6h内)和矫正"足月"(矫正胎龄40孕周)时分别进行Dubowitz神经学评估,矫正6月龄时进行贝利-Ⅲ诊断测试(Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development-3rd Edition),采用Pearson相关系数分析Dubowitz神经学评估分数与认知、运动发育商之间的相关性。结果矫正6月龄时,认知发育商与超早期和矫正"足月"异常体征分数相关(r=0.184和-0.187,P均<0.05),与矫正"足月"姿势和肌张力、反射两个维度分数相关(r=0.187和0.182,P均<0.05);运动发育商与超早期姿势和肌张力、异常体征两个维度相关(r=0.201和0.219,P均<0.05)。结论 Dubowitz神经学评估对晚期早产儿的发育行为结局具有一定的预测价值,值得在更大的人群中进一步研究和应用。展开更多
文摘Background: Some researchers have suggested that when Naegle’s rule (NR) and Dubowitz score (DS) are combined, it could out-perform obstetric ultrasound scan (USS). Others still believe that obstetric USS alone is still effective relative to the combination of NR rule and DS in assessing the gestational age (GA) of babies. Objectives: To determine and compare the GA of babies using obstetric USS, NR and DS;and to provide relevant public health information on obstetric USS in the 21st century. Methods: Subjects were selected using systematic random sampling and the GA of babies was determined using obstetric USS, NR, and DS. Statistical package for social science (SPSS) statistical software version 16, Illinois, Chicago USA was used for all data analysis. Results: Eightyfive mother-baby pairs were studied. Forty-four babies (52%) were males and 41 (48%) females. Sixty four (75%) were term with a mean (SD) BW of 3.02 (0.59) at 95%CI (2.89 -?3.14) kg. The overall mean GA of the babies was 38.49 (2.89) at 95%CI (38.14 -?38.85) weeks. The mean GA using obstetric USS, NR and DS were 38.52 (1.98) at 95%CI (38.14 -?38.99), 38.09 (4.13) at 95%CI (37.20-?38.99) and 38.82 (2.02) at 95%CI (38.39 -?39.26), but comparison of these means was not significant (p = 0.256). Combined mean GA by NR and DS was 38.46 (3.26) at 95%CI (37.96 -?38.95). Comparing this mean with mean GA obtained by obstetric USS was also not significant (p = 0.885). Conclusion: The GA assessments by Obstetric USS, NR and DS were all reliable, and Obstetric USS performed effectively relative to combined NR and DS.
文摘目的初步评价Dubowitz神经学评估法-第2版(The Neurological Assessment of the Preterm and Fullterm Newborn Infant-Second Edition)对晚期早产儿发育行为结局的预测效果,为完善晚期早产儿随访体系提供线索。方法选取2016年10月-2017年3月间在上海市第一妇婴保健院出生的低风险晚期早产儿(34+0~36+6孕周)116例组成随访队列,于超早期(生后6h内)和矫正"足月"(矫正胎龄40孕周)时分别进行Dubowitz神经学评估,矫正6月龄时进行贝利-Ⅲ诊断测试(Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development-3rd Edition),采用Pearson相关系数分析Dubowitz神经学评估分数与认知、运动发育商之间的相关性。结果矫正6月龄时,认知发育商与超早期和矫正"足月"异常体征分数相关(r=0.184和-0.187,P均<0.05),与矫正"足月"姿势和肌张力、反射两个维度分数相关(r=0.187和0.182,P均<0.05);运动发育商与超早期姿势和肌张力、异常体征两个维度相关(r=0.201和0.219,P均<0.05)。结论 Dubowitz神经学评估对晚期早产儿的发育行为结局具有一定的预测价值,值得在更大的人群中进一步研究和应用。