BACKGROUND It is of vital importance to find radiologic biomarkers that can accurately predict treatment response. Usually, the initiation of antiangiogenic therapy causes a rapid decrease in the contrast enhancing tu...BACKGROUND It is of vital importance to find radiologic biomarkers that can accurately predict treatment response. Usually, the initiation of antiangiogenic therapy causes a rapid decrease in the contrast enhancing tumor. However, the treatment response is observed only in a fraction of patients due to the partial radiological response secondary to stabilization of abnormal vessels which does not essentially indicate a true antitumor effect. Perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging(PWMRI) techniques have shown implicitness as a strong imaging biomarker for gliomas since they give hemodynamic information of blood vessels. Hence, there is a rapid expansion of PW-MRI related studies and clinical applications.AIM To determine the diagnostic performance of PW-MRI techniques including:(A)dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging(DCE-MRI); and(B)dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging(DSC-MRI) for evaluating response to antiangiogenic therapy in patients with recurrent gliomas.METHODS Databases such as PubMed(MEDLINE included), EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant original articles. The included studies were assessed for methodological quality with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Medical imaging follow-up or histopathological analysis was used as the reference standard. The data were extracted by two reviewers independently, and then the sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the curve(AUC), and heterogeneity were calculated using Meta-Disc 1.4 software.RESULTS This study analyzed a total of six articles. The overall sensitivity for DCE-MRI and DSC-MRI was 0.69 [95% confidence interval(CI): 0.53-0.82], and the specificity was 0.99(95%CI: 0.93-1) by a random effects model(DerSimonianeeLaird model). The likelihood ratio(LR) +, LR-, and diagnostic odds ratio(DOR)were 12.84(4.54-36.28), 0.35(0.22-0.53), and 24.44(7.19-83.06), respectively. The AUC(± SE) was 0.9921(± 0.0120), and the Q* index(± SE) was 0.9640(± 0.0323).For DSC-MRI, the sensitivity was 0.73, the specificity was 0.98, the LR+ was 7.82,the LR-was 0.32, the DOR was 31.65, the AUC(± SE) was 0.9925(± 0.0132), and the Q* index was 0.9649(± 0.0363). For DCE-MRI, the sensitivity was 0.41, the specificity was 0.97, the LR+ was 5.34, the LR-was 0.71, the DOR was 8.76, the AUC(± SE) was 0.9922(± 0.2218), and the Q* index was 0.8935(± 0.3037).CONCLUSION This meta-analysis demonstrated a beneficial value of PW-MRI(DSC-MRI and DCE-MRI) in monitoring the response of recurrent gliomas to antiangiogenic therapy, with reasonable sensitivity, specificity, +LR, and-LR.展开更多
Salivary gland tumors(SGTs)make up a small portion(approximately 5%)of all head and neck tumors.Most of them are located in the parotid glands,while they are less frequently located in the submandibular glands,minor s...Salivary gland tumors(SGTs)make up a small portion(approximately 5%)of all head and neck tumors.Most of them are located in the parotid glands,while they are less frequently located in the submandibular glands,minor salivary glands or sublingual gland.The incidence of malignant or benign tumors(BTs)in the salivary glands varies according to the salivary gland from which they originate.While most of those detected in the parotid gland tend to be benign,the incidence of malignancy increases in other glands.The use of magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)in the diagnosis of SGTs is increasing every day.While conventional sequences provide sufficient data on the presence,localization,extent and number of the tumor,they are insufficient for tumor specification.With the widespread use of advanced techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging,semiquantitative and quantitative perfusion MRI,studies and data have been published on the differentiation of malignant or BTs and the specificity of their subtypes.With diffusion MRI,differentiation can be made by utilizing the cellularity and microstructural properties of tumors.For example,SGTs such as high cellular Warthin’s tumor(WT)or lymphoma on diffusion MRI have been reported to have significantly lower apparent diffusion values than other tumors.Contrast agent uptake and wash-out levels of tumors can be detected with semiquantitative perfusion MRI.For example,it is reported that almost all of the pleomorphic adenomas show an increasing enhancement time intensity curve and do not wash-out.On quantitative perfusion MRI studies using perfusion parameters such as Ktrans,Kep,and Ve,it is reported that WTs can show higher Kep and lower Ve values than other tumors.In this study,the contribution of advanced MRI to the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of SGTs will be reviewed.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND It is of vital importance to find radiologic biomarkers that can accurately predict treatment response. Usually, the initiation of antiangiogenic therapy causes a rapid decrease in the contrast enhancing tumor. However, the treatment response is observed only in a fraction of patients due to the partial radiological response secondary to stabilization of abnormal vessels which does not essentially indicate a true antitumor effect. Perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging(PWMRI) techniques have shown implicitness as a strong imaging biomarker for gliomas since they give hemodynamic information of blood vessels. Hence, there is a rapid expansion of PW-MRI related studies and clinical applications.AIM To determine the diagnostic performance of PW-MRI techniques including:(A)dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging(DCE-MRI); and(B)dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging(DSC-MRI) for evaluating response to antiangiogenic therapy in patients with recurrent gliomas.METHODS Databases such as PubMed(MEDLINE included), EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant original articles. The included studies were assessed for methodological quality with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Medical imaging follow-up or histopathological analysis was used as the reference standard. The data were extracted by two reviewers independently, and then the sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the curve(AUC), and heterogeneity were calculated using Meta-Disc 1.4 software.RESULTS This study analyzed a total of six articles. The overall sensitivity for DCE-MRI and DSC-MRI was 0.69 [95% confidence interval(CI): 0.53-0.82], and the specificity was 0.99(95%CI: 0.93-1) by a random effects model(DerSimonianeeLaird model). The likelihood ratio(LR) +, LR-, and diagnostic odds ratio(DOR)were 12.84(4.54-36.28), 0.35(0.22-0.53), and 24.44(7.19-83.06), respectively. The AUC(± SE) was 0.9921(± 0.0120), and the Q* index(± SE) was 0.9640(± 0.0323).For DSC-MRI, the sensitivity was 0.73, the specificity was 0.98, the LR+ was 7.82,the LR-was 0.32, the DOR was 31.65, the AUC(± SE) was 0.9925(± 0.0132), and the Q* index was 0.9649(± 0.0363). For DCE-MRI, the sensitivity was 0.41, the specificity was 0.97, the LR+ was 5.34, the LR-was 0.71, the DOR was 8.76, the AUC(± SE) was 0.9922(± 0.2218), and the Q* index was 0.8935(± 0.3037).CONCLUSION This meta-analysis demonstrated a beneficial value of PW-MRI(DSC-MRI and DCE-MRI) in monitoring the response of recurrent gliomas to antiangiogenic therapy, with reasonable sensitivity, specificity, +LR, and-LR.
文摘Salivary gland tumors(SGTs)make up a small portion(approximately 5%)of all head and neck tumors.Most of them are located in the parotid glands,while they are less frequently located in the submandibular glands,minor salivary glands or sublingual gland.The incidence of malignant or benign tumors(BTs)in the salivary glands varies according to the salivary gland from which they originate.While most of those detected in the parotid gland tend to be benign,the incidence of malignancy increases in other glands.The use of magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)in the diagnosis of SGTs is increasing every day.While conventional sequences provide sufficient data on the presence,localization,extent and number of the tumor,they are insufficient for tumor specification.With the widespread use of advanced techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging,semiquantitative and quantitative perfusion MRI,studies and data have been published on the differentiation of malignant or BTs and the specificity of their subtypes.With diffusion MRI,differentiation can be made by utilizing the cellularity and microstructural properties of tumors.For example,SGTs such as high cellular Warthin’s tumor(WT)or lymphoma on diffusion MRI have been reported to have significantly lower apparent diffusion values than other tumors.Contrast agent uptake and wash-out levels of tumors can be detected with semiquantitative perfusion MRI.For example,it is reported that almost all of the pleomorphic adenomas show an increasing enhancement time intensity curve and do not wash-out.On quantitative perfusion MRI studies using perfusion parameters such as Ktrans,Kep,and Ve,it is reported that WTs can show higher Kep and lower Ve values than other tumors.In this study,the contribution of advanced MRI to the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of SGTs will be reviewed.
