期刊文献+
共找到7篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
胸部放疗剂量对诱导化疗后未进展ES-SCLC患者临床预后的影响 被引量:3
1
作者 王永存 陈华林 +4 位作者 赖振南 罗怡平 李姝君 胡文铧 杨志雄 《临床肺科杂志》 2021年第1期114-118,共5页
目的探讨胸部放疗剂量对诱导化疗后未进展ES-SCLC患者临床预后的影响。方法回顾性分析我院2010年1月-2015年12月收治诱导化疗后未进展ES-SCLC患者共108例临床资料,其中18例单纯接受化疗,90例则加用胸部放疗;同时根据放疗剂量进行分组,... 目的探讨胸部放疗剂量对诱导化疗后未进展ES-SCLC患者临床预后的影响。方法回顾性分析我院2010年1月-2015年12月收治诱导化疗后未进展ES-SCLC患者共108例临床资料,其中18例单纯接受化疗,90例则加用胸部放疗;同时根据放疗剂量进行分组,比较不同组,中位总生存时间和无进展生存时间,采用Cox回归模型分析临床预后影响因素。结果:①放疗组患者中位总生存时间和无进展生存时间显著长于化疗组(P<0.05);②放疗B组,中位总生存时间显著长于化疗组(P<0.05);放疗C组和放疗D组总生存时间和无进展生存时间均显著长于放疗A组、放疗B组、化疗组(P<0.05);③单因素分析结果显示,同步放化疗、肝或骨转移、病灶转移数量及放疗剂量,是患者总生存时间预后影响因素(P<0.05);同时病灶转移数目和放疗剂量是患者无进展生存时间预后影响因素(P<0.05)。Cox回归模型分析结果显示,同步放化疗、病灶转移数量及放疗剂量是患者总生存时间预后独立影响因素(P<0.05);病灶转移数量和放疗剂量是患者无进展时间独立影响因素(P<0.05);④倾向性评分匹配因素包括年龄、吸烟、KPS评分、体重减轻,转移灶个数、转移器官个数、脑转移、肝骨转移、同步放化疗、放疗时机、分割方式及脑预防;倾向性评分匹配分析结果显示,高剂量放疗患者中位总生存时间和无进展生存时间均显著长于低剂量放疗患者(P<0.05)。结论诱导化疗后未进展ES-SCLC患者加用胸部放疗有助于改善临床预后,同时给予49.5~53.7Gy放疗剂量在延长生存时间方面更具优势,在此基础上增加或减少放疗剂量均未明显增加生存获益。 展开更多
关键词 胸部放疗 剂量 化疗 es-sclc 临床预后
下载PDF
Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study
2
作者 Hanan Ahmed Wahba Hend Ahmed El-Hadaad +2 位作者 Abeer Hussein Anter Magda Abdel-Salam Ahmad Hayam Fathy Abd-El Hay Ghazy 《Advances in Lung Cancer》 2018年第3期21-31,共11页
Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a high grade neuroendocrine tumor, and has aggressive nature, so the majority of cases are presented with extensive disease. SCLC was staged into 2 categories: limited-stag... Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a high grade neuroendocrine tumor, and has aggressive nature, so the majority of cases are presented with extensive disease. SCLC was staged into 2 categories: limited-stage disease (LS-SCLC) and extensive disease (ES-SCLC). Despite SCLC is sensitive to ra-diotherapy and chemotherapy, SCLC has high tendency for rapid dissemina-tion to regional and distant sites. Median survival time ranged from 2 - 4 months in patients with untreated SCLC. Multiagent chemotherapy was the primary treatment for SCLC. Aim of the work: This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate and analyze clinical features, treatment outcome, sur-vival and prognostic factors affecting survival in patients with SCLC presented to Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine department, Chest department and Medical oncology unit in Mansoura Oncology Centre during the period from 2000-2015. Methods: Data of patients were collected from their files. The information obtained included demographic features, treatment received;its toxicity and outcome, survival and its prognostic factors. Demographic data were: age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS), smoking status, stage of disease. Data also included disease presentation and metastatic sites. Several factors affecting survival were analysed as age, sex, stage, PS, smoking status and LDH. Results: Sixty-three patients were enrolled in this study. Median age was 56.2 ± 6. Strong male predominance (92.1%) was observed;84.1% of them were smoker. Thirty six patients (57.2%) were of ECOG-PS of 0 - 1. ES-SCLC was reported in 65% of cases and LDH was high (>1.5 xN) in 47.6%. The most common symptom was chest pain (38.1%) followed by cough (31.8%), weight loss (30%). Fifteen patients had single metastatic site (23.8%) and bone was the most common site of metastasis (reported in 8 patients) followed by brain, lung and liver. 2-year overall survival rate was 35% with median survival time of 14 months. On multivariate analysis, there were significantly higher survival in patients aged Conclusion: This clinico-epidemiologic study provides multiple prognostic factors that have important impact on survival as age, sex, LDH level, stage, smoking and performance status. Larger number of patients and prospective studies are needed to clarify more prognostic factor. 展开更多
关键词 SCLC LUNG CANCER LS-SCLC es-sclc
下载PDF
Influence of tumor response on the survival of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with the etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy regimen
3
作者 Guojing Zhang Yongye Liu +8 位作者 Chao Lin Jianfei Guo Long Xu Junling Liu Ying Piao Guanzhong Zhang Yuhui Liu Yaling Han Xiaodong Xie 《The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology》 CAS 2015年第2期65-68,共4页
Objective In this study, we evaluated the difference of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients who acquired partial response ... Objective In this study, we evaluated the difference of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients who acquired partial response (PR) or complete remission (CR) after two cycles of first-line chemotherapy with the etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) regimen and those who acquired PR or CR after four or six cycles. Methods A total of 106 eligible patients treated with the EP chemotherapy regimen for two to six cycles, at The General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region (China) between November 2004 and Way 2011, were enrolled in this study. RECIST version 1.1 was used for the evaluation of chemotherapy efficiency. We followed up all eligible patients every 4 weeks. All statistical data were analyzed by using SPSS 21.0 statistical package for Windows. Results After a median follow-up of 293 days (range, 62-1531 days), all patients had died by the cutoff date. Fifty-one patients acquired PR or CR after two cycles of chemotherapy; the median PFS reached 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.1-6.9), and the median OS was 10.5 months (95% CI, 8.6-12.4). Twenty-eight patients acquired PR or CR after four or six cycles; the median PFS was 4.8 months (95% CI, 4.4-5.2), and the median OS was 7.5 months (95% CI, 6.8-8.2). Both PFS and OS showed a statistical difference between the two groups. Conclusion ES-SCLC patients who acquired PR or CR after two cycles of the EP regimen as first-line therapy had longer PFS and OS than those who acquired PR or CR after four or six cycles. 展开更多
关键词 extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer es-sclc tumor response progression-free sur- vival (PFS) overall survival (OS)
下载PDF
Prognostic factors for the survival of 66 cases with extensive stage-small cell lung cancer
4
作者 Heng Cao Yonggui Hong +3 位作者 Shouran Zhao Nengchao Wang Fuyou Zhou Xiaodong Xie 《Oncology and Translational Medicine》 2016年第1期12-15,共4页
Objective The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the prognostic factors associated with survival among patients with extensive stage-smal cel lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Methods Clinical data from 6... Objective The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the prognostic factors associated with survival among patients with extensive stage-smal cel lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Methods Clinical data from 66 patients with ES-SCLC diagnosed via histopathology or cytology between July 2005 and July 2009 at Anyang Tumor Hospital (China) were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were conducted. Results The 12-, 24-, and 36-month survival rates among patients with ES-SCLC were 40.9%, 13.6%, and 6.1%, respectively. The median survival time (MST) was 10 months. Univariate analyses indicated that weight loss, eficacy of first-line chemotherapy, total number of chemotherapy cycles, treatment meth-od, and serum sodium levels significantly influenced survival among patients with ES-SCLC. Multivariate analyses suggested that the eficacy of first-line chemotherapy, total number of chemotherapy cycles, and serum sodium levels were independent prognostic factors associated with survival. Conclusion The eficacy of first-line chemotherapy, total number of chemotherapy cycles, and serum sodium levels are important prognostic factors for patients with ES-SCLC. 展开更多
关键词 extensive stage-small cell lung cancer es-sclc survival rate PROGNOSIS
下载PDF
广泛期小细胞肺癌放射治疗进展 被引量:5
5
作者 陈思颖 孙基峰 +2 位作者 赵路军 王平 刘宁波 《中国肿瘤临床》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第12期636-639,共4页
广泛期小细胞肺癌(extensive-stage small cell lung cancer,ES-SCLC)约占小细胞肺癌((small cell lung cancer,SCLC)的2/3,治疗以化疗为主,辅以放疗等综合治疗。虽然SCLC对放化疗反应敏感、初治缓解率高,但几乎所有ES-SCLC都会发生复... 广泛期小细胞肺癌(extensive-stage small cell lung cancer,ES-SCLC)约占小细胞肺癌((small cell lung cancer,SCLC)的2/3,治疗以化疗为主,辅以放疗等综合治疗。虽然SCLC对放化疗反应敏感、初治缓解率高,但几乎所有ES-SCLC都会发生复发及进展,迫切需要新的治疗策略以提高疗效。近年来,放疗在ES-SCLC中进展主要包括脑预防照射(prophylactic cranial irradiation,PCI)和胸部放疗(thoracic radiotherapy,TRT)。此外,免疫检查点抑制剂展现了良好的抗肿瘤活性,有望成为该领域治疗的重要突破口。本文将对ES-SCLC在放疗和免疫治疗以及其他治疗的临床研究进展方面进行综述。 展开更多
关键词 广泛期小细胞肺癌 放疗 脑预防照射 免疫治疗
下载PDF
阿替利珠单抗联合EP方案治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌患者的效果观察
6
作者 金静 《华夏医学》 CAS 2021年第4期23-26,共4页
目的:探讨阿替利珠单抗联合依托泊苷+顺铂(EP)方案治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)的效果。方法:选取ES-SCLC患者98例,按照随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组各49例。对照组采用EP方案治疗,观察组采用阿替利珠单抗联合EP方案治疗。对... 目的:探讨阿替利珠单抗联合依托泊苷+顺铂(EP)方案治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)的效果。方法:选取ES-SCLC患者98例,按照随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组各49例。对照组采用EP方案治疗,观察组采用阿替利珠单抗联合EP方案治疗。对比两组疗效、治疗前、治疗4个周期后卡氏评分(KPS)、血清肿瘤标志物水平[糖类抗原125(CA125)、糖类癌抗原199(CA199)、癌胚抗原(CEA)]、不良反应及药物经济学分析[成本和效果之比(C/E)]。结果:观察组总有效率、疾病控制率高于对照组(P<0.05);治疗4个周期后观察组KPS评分高于对照组(P<0.05);治疗4个周期后观察组血清CA125、CEA、CA199水平均低于对照组(P<0.05);两组不良反应比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组C/E明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:阿替利珠单抗联合EP方案治疗ES-SCLC效果显著,能改善体力功能状况,降低血清肿瘤标志物,安全性高。 展开更多
关键词 阿替利珠单抗 EP方案 广泛期小细胞肺癌
下载PDF
Real-world Efficacy Analysis of Combined Chinese and Western Medicine in the Treatment of Extensive-stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
7
作者 Kai Tan Changhui Zhang Puhua Zeng 《Proceedings of Anticancer Research》 2024年第6期198-208,共11页
Objective:To explore the efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer(ES-SCLC).Methods:Patients who were hospitalized and outpatients in th... Objective:To explore the efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer(ES-SCLC).Methods:Patients who were hospitalized and outpatients in the Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine from April 1,2018,to April 1,2023,were selected and screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.A total of 161 patients were included,of which the control group was chemotherapy combined with traditional Chinese medicine(TCM),and the experimental group was chemotherapy+immunotherapy combined with TCM.The primary endpoint of this study was overall survival(OS),and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival(PFS),objective remission rate(ORR),and disease control rate(DCR).SPSS 25.0 statistical software and R software(version 4.2.1)were used for processing and data analysis.Results:The prognosis of patients treated with chemotherapy+immunotherapy combined with TCM was significantly better than that of the chemotherapy combined with TCM group,with median OS(15.07 months vs.13.3 months,P=0.02)and median PFS(6.87 months vs.5.97 months,P=0.04).Conclusion:Based on adjuvant therapy with TCM,chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy has more advantages than chemotherapy alone in prolonging the median OS and PFS.It can improve the general condition of patients after treatment,enhance their tolerance,and provide basic guarantees for subsequent treatment. 展开更多
关键词 Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer(es-sclc) Real-world study(RWS) Immunotherapy Chemotherapy Traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部