AIM:To evaluate the role and outcome of pericardiocentesis with intrapericardial cisplatin instillation for malignant pericardial effusion resulting from esophageal cancer. METHODS:We retrospectively studied 7 patient...AIM:To evaluate the role and outcome of pericardiocentesis with intrapericardial cisplatin instillation for malignant pericardial effusion resulting from esophageal cancer. METHODS:We retrospectively studied 7 patients who underwent pericardiocentesis with intrapericardial cisplatin instillation for malignant pericardial effusion resulting from esophageal cancer.After pericardiocentesis,we performed catheterization of the pericardial space under ultrasonogram guidance.Malignant etiology of the pericardial fluid was confirmed by cytological examination.Subsequently,cisplatin(10 mg in 20 mL normal saline) was instilled into the pericardial space. RESULTS:The mean total volume of the aspirated effusion fluid was 782±264 mL(range,400-1200 mL) . The drainage catheter was successfully removed in all patients,and the mean duration of pericardial drainagewas 7.7±2.7 d(range,5-13 d) .No fluid reaccumulation was observed.Mean survival time was 120±71 d(range,68-268 d) . CONCLUSION:Pericardiocentesis along with catheter drainage appears to be a safe and effective for pericardial malignant effusion and tamponade,and cisplatin instillation prevents recurrence.展开更多
BACKGROUND Primary malignant pericardial mesothelioma(PMPM)is an extremely rare malignant tumor,and it is difficult to diagnose definitively before death.We present a case in which PMPM was diagnosed at autopsy.We con...BACKGROUND Primary malignant pericardial mesothelioma(PMPM)is an extremely rare malignant tumor,and it is difficult to diagnose definitively before death.We present a case in which PMPM was diagnosed at autopsy.We consider this case to be highly suggestive and report it here.CASE SUMMARY A 78-year-old male presented with transient loss of consciousness and falls.The transient loss of consciousness was considered to result from complications of diastolic dysfunction due to pericardial disease,fever with dehydration,and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.Ultrasound cardiography(UCG)and computed tomography showed cardiac enlargement and high-density pericardial effusion.We considered pericardial disease to be the main pathogenesis of this case.Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images showed thick staining inside and outside the pericardium.Pericardial biopsy was considered to establish a definitive diagnosis,but the patient and his family refused further treatment and examinations,and the patient was followed conservatively.We noticed a thickening of the pericardium and massive changes in the pericardium on UCG over time.We performed an autopsy 60 h after the patient died of pneumonia.Giemsa staining of the autopsy tissue showed an epithelial-like arrangement in the pericardial tumor,and immunostaining showed positive and negative factors for the diagnosis of PMPM.Based on these findings,the final diagnosis of PMPM was made.CONCLUSION PMPM has a poor prognosis,and early diagnosis and treatment are important.The temporal echocardiographic findings may provide a clue for the diagnosis of PMPM.展开更多
The diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension(PH) should be made by combining clinical manifestations and echocardiographic probability.[1] Following the confirmation of PH, the classification should begin with the more com...The diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension(PH) should be made by combining clinical manifestations and echocardiographic probability.[1] Following the confirmation of PH, the classification should begin with the more common groups [group 2(PH due to left heart disease) and group 3(PH due to lung diseases and/or hypoxia)], then group 4(chronic thromboembolic PH and other pulmonary artery obstructions) and finally group 1(pulmonary arterial hypertension) and group 5(PH with unclear and/or multifactorial mechanisms).[1] In this case, we demonstrate a rare scenario of obstruction-caused group 4 PH.展开更多
Introduction: Pericardial effusion is one of the common cardiac problems in our?part of the world and adds burden to the health and economy of the country, as it is associated with high risk of morbidity and mortality...Introduction: Pericardial effusion is one of the common cardiac problems in our?part of the world and adds burden to the health and economy of the country, as it is associated with high risk of morbidity and mortality. Our objective of the study was to determine the etiological spectrum of pericardial effusion, their clinical presentations and complications and assessing the usefulness of echocardiographic features of effusion in helping to determine the etiology. Methods: A cross-sectional observational prospective study of 63 patients with diagnosis of pericardial effusion was enrolled in the study. Pericardial effusion was diagnosed by echocardiography and pericardiocentesis was done in the cardiac catheterization room. Patients were followed up 3 monthly for 1 year and reassessed clinically and by echocardiography. Results: Patients presenting with pericardial effusion belonged to the age group of 8 to 88 years. The most common etiology was tuberculosis (36.5%) followed by malignancy (19%) and idiopathic/Viral (12.6%). Among malignancies, carcinoma lung was the most common cause followed by lymphoma. Pericardiocentesis was done in 46 patients (73%) and the approach was subxiphoid. The procedure-related complications were in 4 patients (6.3%) and there was no death as a consequence of the procedure. The total mortality was 12 (19%) with in-hospital death of 6 patients (9.5%). Conclusions: The study showed tuberculosis as the most common cause of pericardial effusion in developing countries like Nepal and as a cause of cardiac tamponade in contrast to the studies from the developed world where malignancy remains the leading cause.展开更多
Objective To evaluate the evolution of etiology, clinical characteristics, and in-hospital outcomes of pericardial effusions in the recent decade. Methods All patients with a diagnosis of pericardial effusion during h...Objective To evaluate the evolution of etiology, clinical characteristics, and in-hospital outcomes of pericardial effusions in the recent decade. Methods All patients with a diagnosis of pericardial effusion during hospitalization were recruited from the Hospital Inpatient System between January 1996 and December 2005. Demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory measurements, echocardiographic and treatment features, and in-hospital outcomes were retrospectively reviewed by using a standardized data collection form. Results One hundred and fifry-three consecutive patients were recruited. Mild, moderate and large pericardial effusion occurred in 61 （40%）, 52 （34%） and 40 （26%） patients, respectively. The most frequent etiologic diagnoses were tuberculous pericarditis （ n = 50, 33% ） , malignancy （ n = 36, 24% ） and idiopathic pericarditis （n = 35, 23% ）. Large effusions were more likely＇ associated with malignancy （P 〈 0. 01 ）. Compared to the initial 5 years （from 1996 to 2000） , the incidence of tuberculous effusion was decreased but neoplastic effusion increased significantly in the recent 5 ）,ears （from 2001 to 2005 ）. Forty-four patients underwent percardiocentesis （tuberculous in 23, neoplastic in 16, and others in 5） and 28 patients required pericardectomy （tuberculous in 11 and neoplastic in 17）. One patient with tuberculous and 3 patients with neoplastic pericardial effusion died during hospitalization. Conclusion Tuberculosis remains the major cause of pericardial effusion, but neoplastic pericardial effusions are on the rise. Pericardial drainage or pericardectomy are often required for symptomatic relief in those with malignancy-caused pericardial effusion.展开更多
文摘AIM:To evaluate the role and outcome of pericardiocentesis with intrapericardial cisplatin instillation for malignant pericardial effusion resulting from esophageal cancer. METHODS:We retrospectively studied 7 patients who underwent pericardiocentesis with intrapericardial cisplatin instillation for malignant pericardial effusion resulting from esophageal cancer.After pericardiocentesis,we performed catheterization of the pericardial space under ultrasonogram guidance.Malignant etiology of the pericardial fluid was confirmed by cytological examination.Subsequently,cisplatin(10 mg in 20 mL normal saline) was instilled into the pericardial space. RESULTS:The mean total volume of the aspirated effusion fluid was 782±264 mL(range,400-1200 mL) . The drainage catheter was successfully removed in all patients,and the mean duration of pericardial drainagewas 7.7±2.7 d(range,5-13 d) .No fluid reaccumulation was observed.Mean survival time was 120±71 d(range,68-268 d) . CONCLUSION:Pericardiocentesis along with catheter drainage appears to be a safe and effective for pericardial malignant effusion and tamponade,and cisplatin instillation prevents recurrence.
文摘BACKGROUND Primary malignant pericardial mesothelioma(PMPM)is an extremely rare malignant tumor,and it is difficult to diagnose definitively before death.We present a case in which PMPM was diagnosed at autopsy.We consider this case to be highly suggestive and report it here.CASE SUMMARY A 78-year-old male presented with transient loss of consciousness and falls.The transient loss of consciousness was considered to result from complications of diastolic dysfunction due to pericardial disease,fever with dehydration,and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.Ultrasound cardiography(UCG)and computed tomography showed cardiac enlargement and high-density pericardial effusion.We considered pericardial disease to be the main pathogenesis of this case.Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images showed thick staining inside and outside the pericardium.Pericardial biopsy was considered to establish a definitive diagnosis,but the patient and his family refused further treatment and examinations,and the patient was followed conservatively.We noticed a thickening of the pericardium and massive changes in the pericardium on UCG over time.We performed an autopsy 60 h after the patient died of pneumonia.Giemsa staining of the autopsy tissue showed an epithelial-like arrangement in the pericardial tumor,and immunostaining showed positive and negative factors for the diagnosis of PMPM.Based on these findings,the final diagnosis of PMPM was made.CONCLUSION PMPM has a poor prognosis,and early diagnosis and treatment are important.The temporal echocardiographic findings may provide a clue for the diagnosis of PMPM.
文摘The diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension(PH) should be made by combining clinical manifestations and echocardiographic probability.[1] Following the confirmation of PH, the classification should begin with the more common groups [group 2(PH due to left heart disease) and group 3(PH due to lung diseases and/or hypoxia)], then group 4(chronic thromboembolic PH and other pulmonary artery obstructions) and finally group 1(pulmonary arterial hypertension) and group 5(PH with unclear and/or multifactorial mechanisms).[1] In this case, we demonstrate a rare scenario of obstruction-caused group 4 PH.
文摘Introduction: Pericardial effusion is one of the common cardiac problems in our?part of the world and adds burden to the health and economy of the country, as it is associated with high risk of morbidity and mortality. Our objective of the study was to determine the etiological spectrum of pericardial effusion, their clinical presentations and complications and assessing the usefulness of echocardiographic features of effusion in helping to determine the etiology. Methods: A cross-sectional observational prospective study of 63 patients with diagnosis of pericardial effusion was enrolled in the study. Pericardial effusion was diagnosed by echocardiography and pericardiocentesis was done in the cardiac catheterization room. Patients were followed up 3 monthly for 1 year and reassessed clinically and by echocardiography. Results: Patients presenting with pericardial effusion belonged to the age group of 8 to 88 years. The most common etiology was tuberculosis (36.5%) followed by malignancy (19%) and idiopathic/Viral (12.6%). Among malignancies, carcinoma lung was the most common cause followed by lymphoma. Pericardiocentesis was done in 46 patients (73%) and the approach was subxiphoid. The procedure-related complications were in 4 patients (6.3%) and there was no death as a consequence of the procedure. The total mortality was 12 (19%) with in-hospital death of 6 patients (9.5%). Conclusions: The study showed tuberculosis as the most common cause of pericardial effusion in developing countries like Nepal and as a cause of cardiac tamponade in contrast to the studies from the developed world where malignancy remains the leading cause.
文摘Objective To evaluate the evolution of etiology, clinical characteristics, and in-hospital outcomes of pericardial effusions in the recent decade. Methods All patients with a diagnosis of pericardial effusion during hospitalization were recruited from the Hospital Inpatient System between January 1996 and December 2005. Demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory measurements, echocardiographic and treatment features, and in-hospital outcomes were retrospectively reviewed by using a standardized data collection form. Results One hundred and fifry-three consecutive patients were recruited. Mild, moderate and large pericardial effusion occurred in 61 （40%）, 52 （34%） and 40 （26%） patients, respectively. The most frequent etiologic diagnoses were tuberculous pericarditis （ n = 50, 33% ） , malignancy （ n = 36, 24% ） and idiopathic pericarditis （n = 35, 23% ）. Large effusions were more likely＇ associated with malignancy （P 〈 0. 01 ）. Compared to the initial 5 years （from 1996 to 2000） , the incidence of tuberculous effusion was decreased but neoplastic effusion increased significantly in the recent 5 ）,ears （from 2001 to 2005 ）. Forty-four patients underwent percardiocentesis （tuberculous in 23, neoplastic in 16, and others in 5） and 28 patients required pericardectomy （tuberculous in 11 and neoplastic in 17）. One patient with tuberculous and 3 patients with neoplastic pericardial effusion died during hospitalization. Conclusion Tuberculosis remains the major cause of pericardial effusion, but neoplastic pericardial effusions are on the rise. Pericardial drainage or pericardectomy are often required for symptomatic relief in those with malignancy-caused pericardial effusion.
