It is demonstrated that the use of Kolmogorov’s probability theory to describe results of quantum probability for EPRB (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm) experiments requires extreme care when different subsets of measur...It is demonstrated that the use of Kolmogorov’s probability theory to describe results of quantum probability for EPRB (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm) experiments requires extreme care when different subsets of measurement outcomes are considered. J. S. Bell and his followers have committed critical inaccuracies related to spin-gauge and probability measures of such subsets, because they use exclusively a single probability space for all data sets and sub-sets of data. It is also shown that Bell and followers use far too stringent epistemological requirements for the consequences of space-like separation. Their requirements reach way beyond Einstein’s separation principle and cannot be met by the major existing physical theories including relativity and even classical mechanics. For example, the independent free will does not empower the experimenters to choose multiple independent spin-gauges in the two EPRB wings. It is demonstrated that the suggestion of instantaneous influences at a distance (supposedly “derived” from experiments with entangled quantum entities) is a consequence of said inaccuracies and takes back rank as soon as the Kolmogorov probability measures are related to a consistent global spin-gauge and permitted to be different for different data subsets: Using statistical interpretations and different probability spaces for certain subsets of outcomes instead of probability amplitudes related to single quantum entities, permits physical explanations without a violation of Einstein’s separation principle.展开更多
Work on quantum entanglement is currently emphasizing the nonlocal nature of theories that attempt to explain spatially separated Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) correlation experiments. It is frequently claimed that no...Work on quantum entanglement is currently emphasizing the nonlocal nature of theories that attempt to explain spatially separated Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) correlation experiments. It is frequently claimed that nonlocal instantaneous influences, or equivalently a breakdown of Einstein’s separation principle, are a signature property of (quantum) entanglement. This paper presents a categorization of the various forms of nonlocality in physical theories. It is shown that, even for Einstein’s theory of relativity, correlations of spatially separated measurements cannot be explained without the involvement of some nonlocal or global knowledge and facts. Instantaneous Influences at a distance are, however, in a special category of nonlocality and, as is well known, Einstein called them spooky. Following a separation of nonlocalities into four distinctly different categories 0, 1, 2, 3, with number 3 corresponding to theories containing instantaneous influences at a distance, I show that any theory of EPR experiments must be at least in category 1 or 2 and does not need to be in category 3. In particular, the Bell theorem, valid for category 0 theories, may be violated for categories 1 and 2 and does not require category 3 theories. Category 0 enforces Bell’s theorem. However, it does not apply to relativistic theories of space like separated measurements.展开更多
By using function S-rough sets(function singular rough sets), this paper gives rough law generation and the theorem of rough law generation.Based on these results above, the paper proposes rough law separation, the ...By using function S-rough sets(function singular rough sets), this paper gives rough law generation and the theorem of rough law generation.Based on these results above, the paper proposes rough law separation, the theorem of rough law separation, the compound generation theorem of rough law bands, and the principle of rough law bands.In the end, an application of rough law separation in recognizing the risk law of profit is presented.展开更多
给出函数单向S-粗集(function one direction singular rough sets)、函数单向S-粗集对偶(dual of function one direction singular rough sets)、函数双向S-粗集(function two direction singular rough sets)与函数粗集(function rou...给出函数单向S-粗集(function one direction singular rough sets)、函数单向S-粗集对偶(dual of function one direction singular rough sets)、函数双向S-粗集(function two direction singular rough sets)与函数粗集(function roughsets)。它们都是把函数概念引入到S-粗集中,改进S-粗集得到的。函数粗集是把函数概念引入到Z.Pawlak粗集中,改进Z.Pawlak粗集得到的。函数单向S-粗集、函数单向S-粗集对偶、函数双向S-粗集是函数S-粗集的三类形式。给出函数S-粗集与S-粗集的关系;给出函数粗集与Z.Pawlak粗集的关系;给出函数S-粗集与函数粗集的关系。利用这些结果,给出函数的区间离散与有限元素集的生成、函数离散-元素集合生成原理;给出函数S-粗集生成的信息规律、函数等价类动态特性-属性补充与删除原理;给出数据拆分-合成原理、信息规律动态拆分-合成的属性特征;给出信息规律动态拆分-合成不变性原理;利用这些概念与结果,给出信息规律拆分-合成与信息图像嵌入-分离的应用,给出嵌入信息图像的分离-辨识。函数S-粗集、函数粗集是粗集理论与应用研究中的一个新的研究方向。展开更多
The Eotvos experiment on the verification of equivalence between inertial mass and gravitational mass of a body is famous for its accuracy. A question is, however, can these experimental results be applied to the case...The Eotvos experiment on the verification of equivalence between inertial mass and gravitational mass of a body is famous for its accuracy. A question is, however, can these experimental results be applied to the case of a physical space in general relativity, where the space coordinates could be arbitrary? It is pointed out that it can be validly applied because it has been proven that Einstein's equivalence principle for a physical space must have a frame of reference with the Euclidean-like structure. Will claimed further that such an overall accuracy can be translated into an accuracy of the equivalence between inertial mass and each type of energy. It is shown that, according to general relativity, such a claim is incorrect. The root of this problem is due to an inadequate understanding of special relativity that produced the famous equation E=mc^2, which must be understood in terms of energy conservation. Concurrently, it is pointed out that this error is a problem in Will's book, ‘Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics'.展开更多
Transnational corporations(TNCs)act as unitary firms in an increasingly globalised economy,but taxes on their profits are levied by national states.Hence,international tax rules have from the start been riven by contr...Transnational corporations(TNCs)act as unitary firms in an increasingly globalised economy,but taxes on their profits are levied by national states.Hence,international tax rules have from the start been riven by contradictory approaches:ei-ther to determine the taxable profits attributable to each separate constituent entity of the TNC in their jurisdiction by comparing them with independent firms conducting a similar business,or to tax an appropriate share of the TNC’s global profits appor-tioned by factors reflecting its activities within the jurisdiction.The separate entity principle became dominant,especially with the adoption of the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines in 1995,but it gave a perverse incentive to TNCs to devise tax avoidance strategies,based on attributing high levels of profit to entities in countries where they would be taxed at low rates.The project on base erosion and profit shifting(BEPS)was mandated by the G20 to reform these rules so that TNCs could be taxed where their activities occur,signaling a return to the unitary principle.The latest proposals now adopt the principle of unitary taxation of TNCs,together with technical standards for formulary apportionment,but only as an overlay on top of existing rules based on the incompatible independent entity principle.A stable foundation for international tax depends on resolving this dilemma and agreeing a fair and balanced allocation of rights to tax TNCs’profits based on their real activities in each jurisdiction.展开更多
文摘It is demonstrated that the use of Kolmogorov’s probability theory to describe results of quantum probability for EPRB (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm) experiments requires extreme care when different subsets of measurement outcomes are considered. J. S. Bell and his followers have committed critical inaccuracies related to spin-gauge and probability measures of such subsets, because they use exclusively a single probability space for all data sets and sub-sets of data. It is also shown that Bell and followers use far too stringent epistemological requirements for the consequences of space-like separation. Their requirements reach way beyond Einstein’s separation principle and cannot be met by the major existing physical theories including relativity and even classical mechanics. For example, the independent free will does not empower the experimenters to choose multiple independent spin-gauges in the two EPRB wings. It is demonstrated that the suggestion of instantaneous influences at a distance (supposedly “derived” from experiments with entangled quantum entities) is a consequence of said inaccuracies and takes back rank as soon as the Kolmogorov probability measures are related to a consistent global spin-gauge and permitted to be different for different data subsets: Using statistical interpretations and different probability spaces for certain subsets of outcomes instead of probability amplitudes related to single quantum entities, permits physical explanations without a violation of Einstein’s separation principle.
文摘Work on quantum entanglement is currently emphasizing the nonlocal nature of theories that attempt to explain spatially separated Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) correlation experiments. It is frequently claimed that nonlocal instantaneous influences, or equivalently a breakdown of Einstein’s separation principle, are a signature property of (quantum) entanglement. This paper presents a categorization of the various forms of nonlocality in physical theories. It is shown that, even for Einstein’s theory of relativity, correlations of spatially separated measurements cannot be explained without the involvement of some nonlocal or global knowledge and facts. Instantaneous Influences at a distance are, however, in a special category of nonlocality and, as is well known, Einstein called them spooky. Following a separation of nonlocalities into four distinctly different categories 0, 1, 2, 3, with number 3 corresponding to theories containing instantaneous influences at a distance, I show that any theory of EPR experiments must be at least in category 1 or 2 and does not need to be in category 3. In particular, the Bell theorem, valid for category 0 theories, may be violated for categories 1 and 2 and does not require category 3 theories. Category 0 enforces Bell’s theorem. However, it does not apply to relativistic theories of space like separated measurements.
基金supported partly by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China (Y2007Ho2)the Elementary and Advanced Technology Foundation of Henan Province of China (082300410040)
文摘By using function S-rough sets(function singular rough sets), this paper gives rough law generation and the theorem of rough law generation.Based on these results above, the paper proposes rough law separation, the theorem of rough law separation, the compound generation theorem of rough law bands, and the principle of rough law bands.In the end, an application of rough law separation in recognizing the risk law of profit is presented.
文摘给出函数单向S-粗集(function one direction singular rough sets)、函数单向S-粗集对偶(dual of function one direction singular rough sets)、函数双向S-粗集(function two direction singular rough sets)与函数粗集(function roughsets)。它们都是把函数概念引入到S-粗集中,改进S-粗集得到的。函数粗集是把函数概念引入到Z.Pawlak粗集中,改进Z.Pawlak粗集得到的。函数单向S-粗集、函数单向S-粗集对偶、函数双向S-粗集是函数S-粗集的三类形式。给出函数S-粗集与S-粗集的关系;给出函数粗集与Z.Pawlak粗集的关系;给出函数S-粗集与函数粗集的关系。利用这些结果,给出函数的区间离散与有限元素集的生成、函数离散-元素集合生成原理;给出函数S-粗集生成的信息规律、函数等价类动态特性-属性补充与删除原理;给出数据拆分-合成原理、信息规律动态拆分-合成的属性特征;给出信息规律动态拆分-合成不变性原理;利用这些概念与结果,给出信息规律拆分-合成与信息图像嵌入-分离的应用,给出嵌入信息图像的分离-辨识。函数S-粗集、函数粗集是粗集理论与应用研究中的一个新的研究方向。
文摘The Eotvos experiment on the verification of equivalence between inertial mass and gravitational mass of a body is famous for its accuracy. A question is, however, can these experimental results be applied to the case of a physical space in general relativity, where the space coordinates could be arbitrary? It is pointed out that it can be validly applied because it has been proven that Einstein's equivalence principle for a physical space must have a frame of reference with the Euclidean-like structure. Will claimed further that such an overall accuracy can be translated into an accuracy of the equivalence between inertial mass and each type of energy. It is shown that, according to general relativity, such a claim is incorrect. The root of this problem is due to an inadequate understanding of special relativity that produced the famous equation E=mc^2, which must be understood in terms of energy conservation. Concurrently, it is pointed out that this error is a problem in Will's book, ‘Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics'.
文摘Transnational corporations(TNCs)act as unitary firms in an increasingly globalised economy,but taxes on their profits are levied by national states.Hence,international tax rules have from the start been riven by contradictory approaches:ei-ther to determine the taxable profits attributable to each separate constituent entity of the TNC in their jurisdiction by comparing them with independent firms conducting a similar business,or to tax an appropriate share of the TNC’s global profits appor-tioned by factors reflecting its activities within the jurisdiction.The separate entity principle became dominant,especially with the adoption of the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines in 1995,but it gave a perverse incentive to TNCs to devise tax avoidance strategies,based on attributing high levels of profit to entities in countries where they would be taxed at low rates.The project on base erosion and profit shifting(BEPS)was mandated by the G20 to reform these rules so that TNCs could be taxed where their activities occur,signaling a return to the unitary principle.The latest proposals now adopt the principle of unitary taxation of TNCs,together with technical standards for formulary apportionment,but only as an overlay on top of existing rules based on the incompatible independent entity principle.A stable foundation for international tax depends on resolving this dilemma and agreeing a fair and balanced allocation of rights to tax TNCs’profits based on their real activities in each jurisdiction.