BACKGROUND The Korea National Cancer Screening Program currently provides screening for colorectal cancer(CRC)for adults older than 50 years with no upper age limit.In general,people are likely to only pay attention t...BACKGROUND The Korea National Cancer Screening Program currently provides screening for colorectal cancer(CRC)for adults older than 50 years with no upper age limit.In general,people are likely to only pay attention to the benefits of cancer screening and to neglect its risks.Most consider the benefits of cancer screening as being far greater than the risks and are unaware that any potential benefits and harms can vary with age.AIM To report acceptance of an upper age limit for CRC screening and factors associated therewith among cancer-free individuals in Korea.METHODS The present study analyzed data from the Korea National Cancer Screening Survey 2017,a nationally representative random sample of 4500 Korean individuals targeted for screening for the five most common types of cancer.A total of 1922 participants were included in the final analysis.The baseline characteristics of the study population are presented as unweighted numbers and weighted proportions.Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were developed to examine factors related with acceptance of an upper age limit for CRC screening;subgroup analysis was also applied.RESULTS About 80%(1554/1922)of the respondents agreed that CRC screening should not be offered for individuals older than 80 years.Specifically,those who had never been screened for CRC had the highest acceptance rate(91%).Overall,screening history for CRC[screened by both fecal occult blood test and colonoscopy,adjusted odds ratio(aOR)=0.33,95%CI:0.22-0.50]and other cancers(aOR=0.55,95%CI:0.34-0.87),as well as a family history of cancer(aOR=0.66,95%CI:0.50-0.87),were negatively associated with acceptance of an upper age limit for CRC screening.In contrast,metropolitan residents(aOR=1.86,95%CI:1.29-2.68)and people who exercised regularly(aOR=1.42,95%CI:1.07-1.89)were more likely to accept an upper age limit.After subgrouping,we found gender,marital status,and lifetime smoking history among never-screened individuals and residential region,family history of cancer,and physical activity among never-screened individuals to be associated with acceptance of an upper age limit.CONCLUSION This study describes acceptance of an upper age limit for CRC screening and factors associated with it,and provides perspectives that should be considered,in addition to scientific evidence,when developing population-based cancer screening policies and programs.展开更多
BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome(LS)is a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome associated with increased risk of multiple cancers.While colorectal cancer surveillance decreases mortality in LS and is recommended by guide...BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome(LS)is a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome associated with increased risk of multiple cancers.While colorectal cancer surveillance decreases mortality in LS and is recommended by guidelines,there is lack of evidence for the efficacy of surveillance for extra-colonic cancers associated with LS,including small intestinal cancer(SIC)and urinary tract cancer(UTC).Given the limited evidence,guidelines do not consistently recommend surveillance for SIC and UTC,and it remains unclear how often individuals will choose to undergo and follow through with extra-colonic surveillance recommendations.AIM To study factors associated with SIC and UTC surveillance uptake and outcomes in LS.METHODS This is an IRB-approved retrospective analysis of individuals with LS seen at a tertiary care referral center.Included individuals had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in MLH1,MSH2,MSH6,PMS2,or EPCAM,or were a confirmed obligate carrier,and had at least one documented visit to our center.Information regarding SIC and UTC surveillance was captured for each individual,and detailed personal and family history was obtained for individuals who had an initial LS management visit in our center’s dedicated high-risk LS clinic between January 1,2017 and October 29,2020.During these initial management visits,all patients had in-depth discussions of SIC and UTC surveillance with 1 of 3 providers experienced in LS management to promote informed decision-making about whether to pursue SIC and/or UTC surveillance.Statistical analysis using Pearson’s chi-squared test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test was completed to understand the factors associated with pursuit and completion of SIC and UTC surveillance,and a P value below 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.RESULTS Of 317 individuals with LS,86(27%)underwent a total of 105 SIC surveillance examinations,with 5 leading to additional work-up and no SICs diagnosed.Additionally,99(31%)patients underwent a total of 303 UTC surveillance examinations,with 19 requiring further evaluation and 1 UTC identified.Of 155 individuals who had an initial LS management visit between January 1,2017 and October 29,2020,63(41%)chose to undergo SIC surveillance and 58(37%)chose to undergo UTC surveillance.However,only 26(41%)and 32(55%)of those who initially chose to undergo SIC or UTC surveillance,respectively,successfully completed their surveillance examinations.Individuals with a pathogenic variant in MSH2 or EPCAM were more likely to initially choose to undergo SIC surveillance(P=0.034),and older individuals were more likely to complete SIC surveillance(P=0.007).Choosing to pursue UTC surveillance was more frequent among older individuals(P=0.018),and females more frequently completed UTC surveillance(P=0.002).Personal history of cancer and family history of SIC or UTC were not significantly associated with electing nor completing surveillance.Lastly,the provider discussing SIC/UTC surveillance was significantly associated with subsequent surveillance choices.CONCLUSION Pursuing and completing SIC/UTC surveillance in LS is influenced by several factors,however broad incorporation in LS management is likely unhelpful due to low yield and frequent false positive results.展开更多
目的:探讨早期老年直肠癌淋巴结中GCC mRNA表达与预后的关系及能否作为判定淋巴隐匿性转移的有效指标。方法:应用RT-PCR技术检测48例早期老年直肠癌淋巴结中GCC m RNA表达水平(GCC m RNA阳性组12例,GCC m RNA阴性组36例),并分析患者的...目的:探讨早期老年直肠癌淋巴结中GCC mRNA表达与预后的关系及能否作为判定淋巴隐匿性转移的有效指标。方法:应用RT-PCR技术检测48例早期老年直肠癌淋巴结中GCC m RNA表达水平(GCC m RNA阳性组12例,GCC m RNA阴性组36例),并分析患者的局部复发率、远处转移率、3年无瘤生存率(DFS)、3年总生存率(OS)与不同GCC m RNA表达水平的关系。结果:GCC m RNA阴性组患者的局部复发率、远处转移率更低,3年无瘤生存率更高(P<0.05)。两组3年总生存率无明显差异。结论:早期老年直肠癌淋巴结中GCC m RNA不同表达状态患者的预后有差异,GCC m RNA可以作为直肠癌淋巴结微转移的有效检测指标,可以作为甄别早期老年直肠癌高危患者的可靠分子学指标,有利于高危患者后续辅助治疗的选择。展开更多
基金Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research and Control from the National Cancer Center of Korea,No.#1910231-2.
文摘BACKGROUND The Korea National Cancer Screening Program currently provides screening for colorectal cancer(CRC)for adults older than 50 years with no upper age limit.In general,people are likely to only pay attention to the benefits of cancer screening and to neglect its risks.Most consider the benefits of cancer screening as being far greater than the risks and are unaware that any potential benefits and harms can vary with age.AIM To report acceptance of an upper age limit for CRC screening and factors associated therewith among cancer-free individuals in Korea.METHODS The present study analyzed data from the Korea National Cancer Screening Survey 2017,a nationally representative random sample of 4500 Korean individuals targeted for screening for the five most common types of cancer.A total of 1922 participants were included in the final analysis.The baseline characteristics of the study population are presented as unweighted numbers and weighted proportions.Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were developed to examine factors related with acceptance of an upper age limit for CRC screening;subgroup analysis was also applied.RESULTS About 80%(1554/1922)of the respondents agreed that CRC screening should not be offered for individuals older than 80 years.Specifically,those who had never been screened for CRC had the highest acceptance rate(91%).Overall,screening history for CRC[screened by both fecal occult blood test and colonoscopy,adjusted odds ratio(aOR)=0.33,95%CI:0.22-0.50]and other cancers(aOR=0.55,95%CI:0.34-0.87),as well as a family history of cancer(aOR=0.66,95%CI:0.50-0.87),were negatively associated with acceptance of an upper age limit for CRC screening.In contrast,metropolitan residents(aOR=1.86,95%CI:1.29-2.68)and people who exercised regularly(aOR=1.42,95%CI:1.07-1.89)were more likely to accept an upper age limit.After subgrouping,we found gender,marital status,and lifetime smoking history among never-screened individuals and residential region,family history of cancer,and physical activity among never-screened individuals to be associated with acceptance of an upper age limit.CONCLUSION This study describes acceptance of an upper age limit for CRC screening and factors associated with it,and provides perspectives that should be considered,in addition to scientific evidence,when developing population-based cancer screening policies and programs.
文摘BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome(LS)is a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome associated with increased risk of multiple cancers.While colorectal cancer surveillance decreases mortality in LS and is recommended by guidelines,there is lack of evidence for the efficacy of surveillance for extra-colonic cancers associated with LS,including small intestinal cancer(SIC)and urinary tract cancer(UTC).Given the limited evidence,guidelines do not consistently recommend surveillance for SIC and UTC,and it remains unclear how often individuals will choose to undergo and follow through with extra-colonic surveillance recommendations.AIM To study factors associated with SIC and UTC surveillance uptake and outcomes in LS.METHODS This is an IRB-approved retrospective analysis of individuals with LS seen at a tertiary care referral center.Included individuals had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in MLH1,MSH2,MSH6,PMS2,or EPCAM,or were a confirmed obligate carrier,and had at least one documented visit to our center.Information regarding SIC and UTC surveillance was captured for each individual,and detailed personal and family history was obtained for individuals who had an initial LS management visit in our center’s dedicated high-risk LS clinic between January 1,2017 and October 29,2020.During these initial management visits,all patients had in-depth discussions of SIC and UTC surveillance with 1 of 3 providers experienced in LS management to promote informed decision-making about whether to pursue SIC and/or UTC surveillance.Statistical analysis using Pearson’s chi-squared test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test was completed to understand the factors associated with pursuit and completion of SIC and UTC surveillance,and a P value below 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.RESULTS Of 317 individuals with LS,86(27%)underwent a total of 105 SIC surveillance examinations,with 5 leading to additional work-up and no SICs diagnosed.Additionally,99(31%)patients underwent a total of 303 UTC surveillance examinations,with 19 requiring further evaluation and 1 UTC identified.Of 155 individuals who had an initial LS management visit between January 1,2017 and October 29,2020,63(41%)chose to undergo SIC surveillance and 58(37%)chose to undergo UTC surveillance.However,only 26(41%)and 32(55%)of those who initially chose to undergo SIC or UTC surveillance,respectively,successfully completed their surveillance examinations.Individuals with a pathogenic variant in MSH2 or EPCAM were more likely to initially choose to undergo SIC surveillance(P=0.034),and older individuals were more likely to complete SIC surveillance(P=0.007).Choosing to pursue UTC surveillance was more frequent among older individuals(P=0.018),and females more frequently completed UTC surveillance(P=0.002).Personal history of cancer and family history of SIC or UTC were not significantly associated with electing nor completing surveillance.Lastly,the provider discussing SIC/UTC surveillance was significantly associated with subsequent surveillance choices.CONCLUSION Pursuing and completing SIC/UTC surveillance in LS is influenced by several factors,however broad incorporation in LS management is likely unhelpful due to low yield and frequent false positive results.
文摘目的:探讨早期老年直肠癌淋巴结中GCC mRNA表达与预后的关系及能否作为判定淋巴隐匿性转移的有效指标。方法:应用RT-PCR技术检测48例早期老年直肠癌淋巴结中GCC m RNA表达水平(GCC m RNA阳性组12例,GCC m RNA阴性组36例),并分析患者的局部复发率、远处转移率、3年无瘤生存率(DFS)、3年总生存率(OS)与不同GCC m RNA表达水平的关系。结果:GCC m RNA阴性组患者的局部复发率、远处转移率更低,3年无瘤生存率更高(P<0.05)。两组3年总生存率无明显差异。结论:早期老年直肠癌淋巴结中GCC m RNA不同表达状态患者的预后有差异,GCC m RNA可以作为直肠癌淋巴结微转移的有效检测指标,可以作为甄别早期老年直肠癌高危患者的可靠分子学指标,有利于高危患者后续辅助治疗的选择。
