Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of artificial femoral head replacement and Proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. Methods...Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of artificial femoral head replacement and Proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 60 elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA and artificial femoral head replacement from 2015.06 to 2018.06, of which 34 were in the PFNA group (Group A) and 26 in the artificial femoral head replacement group (Group B). Statistical analysis of relevant surgical indicators such as surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood transfusion, postoperative time to landing, postoperative infection rate, hospital stay, number of secondary operations, postoperative VAS score, and postoperative Hip function score comparison. Results: All 60 patients were followed up for 1 - 24 months. Compared with the artificial femoral head replacement group, the operation time of PFNA group was shorter, the blood loss during operation was less, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). Conclusion: The hip joint function and pain scores of the artificial femoral head replacement group in the early and follow-up periods are better than those of the PFNA group. The artificial femoral head replacement is more suitable for the treatment of elderly unstable intertrochanteric fractures.展开更多
BACKGROUND Proximal femoral nails(PFNs)are the most common method for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures(IFFs),but postoperative bed rest is required.There is a large amount of blood loss du...BACKGROUND Proximal femoral nails(PFNs)are the most common method for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures(IFFs),but postoperative bed rest is required.There is a large amount of blood loss during the operation.Osteoporosis in elderly patients may cause nonunion of fractures and other complications.Arthroplasty can give patients early weight bearing and reduce financial burden,but whether it can replace PFNs remains controversial.AIM To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroplasty and PFNs in the treatment of unstable IFFs in elderly patients.METHODS A search was conducted in the PubMed,Embase,and Cochrane Library databases and included relevant articles comparing arthroplasty and PFN.The search time was limited from January 1,2005 to November 1,2020.Two investigators independently screened studies,extracted data and evaluated the quality according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.According to the research results,the fixed effect model or random effect model were selected for analysis.The following outcomes were analyzed:Harris Hip score,mortality,complications,operation time,blood loos,hospital stay,weight-bearing time,fracture classification and type of anesthesia.RESULTS We analyzed four randomized controlled trials that met the requirements.A total of 298 patients were included in these studies.According to the AO/OTA classification,there are 20 A1 types,136 A2 types,42 A3 types and 100 unrecorded types.Primary outcome:The Harris Hip Score at the final follow-up of the PFN group was higher[mean difference(MD):9.01,95%confidence interval(CI):16.57 to 1.45),P=0.02].There was no significant difference between the two groups in the rate of overall mortality[risk ratio(RR):1.44,P=0.44]or the number of complications(RR:0.77,P=0.05).Secondary outcomes:blood loss of the arthroplasty group was higher(MD:241.01,95%CI:43.06–438.96,P=0.02);the operation time of the PFN group was shorter(MD:23.12,95%CI:10.46–35.77,P=0.0003);and the length of hospital stay of the arthroplasty group was shorter[MD:0.97,95%CI:1.29 to 0.66),P<0.00001].There was no difference between the two groups in the type of anesthesia(RR:0.99).There were only two studies recording the weight-bearing time,and the time of full weight bearing in the arthroplasty group was significantly earlier.CONCLUSION Compared with PFN,arthroplasty can achieve weight bearing earlier and shorten hospital stay,but it cannot achieve a better clinical outcome.Arthroplasty cannot replace PFNs in the treatment of unstable IFFs in elderly individuals.展开更多
Objective To compare the efficacy of 3 internal fixations,locking proximal femoral plate (LPFP),ASI-AN IMHS and InterTAN,for intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients.Methods A retrospective study was do...Objective To compare the efficacy of 3 internal fixations,locking proximal femoral plate (LPFP),ASI-AN IMHS and InterTAN,for intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients.Methods A retrospective study was done to analyse展开更多
Objective To discuss the postoperative curative effects of two surgical techniques of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (THA) using metal-on-metal largediameter and conventional diameter femoral head for the e...Objective To discuss the postoperative curative effects of two surgical techniques of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (THA) using metal-on-metal largediameter and conventional diameter femoral head for the elderly patients展开更多
For the treatment of an intertrochanteric fracture combined with femoral head necrosis in middle-age patients,it has been controversial whether to perform fracture reduction and fixation first then total hip replaceme...For the treatment of an intertrochanteric fracture combined with femoral head necrosis in middle-age patients,it has been controversial whether to perform fracture reduction and fixation first then total hip replacement,or direct total hip replacement.We present a rare case of 53-year-old male patient suffered from bilateral intertrochanteric fracture caused by a road traffic injury.The patient had a history of femoral head necrosis for eight years,and the Harris score was 30.We performed total hip replacement with prolonged biologic shank prostheses for primary repair.One year after the surgery,nearly full range of motion was achieved without instability(active flexion angle of 110°,extension angle of 20°,adduction angle of 40°,abduction angle of 40°,internal rotation angle of 25°,and external rotation angle of 40°).The Harris score was 85.For the middle-aged patient with unstable intertrochanteric fractures and osteonecrosis of the femoral head,we can choose primary repair for concurrent bilateral intertrochanteric fracture and femoral head necrosis with prolonged shank biologic total hip replacement.展开更多
Background： Few studies have investigated the differences in proximal femoral geometry and risk factors between patients with different types of hip fracture, especially in elderly Chinese. This study aimed to assess...Background： Few studies have investigated the differences in proximal femoral geometry and risk factors between patients with different types of hip fracture, especially in elderly Chinese. This study aimed to assess the differences in proximal femoral geometry parameters between patients with femoral neck fractures and patients with intertrochanteric fractures to provide guidance for individualized customized prosthesis and accurate reconstruction of proximal femurs in elderly Chinese patients. Methods： We retrospectively studied the electronic medical records of 198 elderly patients over 65 years of age who were admitted to the orthopedic department with hip fractures between January 2017 and December 2017 in The Third Hospital, Hebei Medical University. Age, fracture site, gender, and proximal femoral geometry parameters （.neck shaft angle [NSA], center edge angle [CEA], femoral head diameter [FHD], femoral neck diameter [FND], femoral neck axial length [FNAL], hip axial length [HAL], and femoral shaft diameter [FSD]） were recorded. Student＇s t-test was used to compare the continuous variables, Chi-square test was used to analyze categorical variables, and multiple logistic stepwise regression analysis was used to evaluate the influencing factors of hip fracture type. Results： Statistically significant differences in NSA （137.63 ± 4.56° vs. 132.07 ± 4.17°, t = 1.598, P 〈 0.001）, CEA （37.62 ± 6.77° vs. 43.11 ±7.09°, t = 5.597, P 〈 0.001 ）, FND （35.21 ± 3.25 mm vs. 34.09 ±3.82 mm, t = 2.233, P = 0.027）, and FNAL （99.30 ± 7.91 mm vs. 103.58± 8.39 ram, t = 3.715, P 〈 0.001 ） were found between the femoral neck fracture group and femoral intertrochanteric fracture group. FHD, FND, FSD, HAL, and FNAL were different between sexes （all P 〈 0.001 ）. The greater NSA was the risk factor for femoral neck fractures （,odds ratio [OR]： 0.70, P 〈 0.001 ）, greater CEA and longer FNAL were risk factors for femoral intertrochanteric fractures （OR： 1.15, 1.17, all P 〈 0.001）, and greater FND was a protective factor for femoral intertrochanteric fractures （OR： 0.74, P 〈 0.001）. Conclusions： We demonstrate differences in geometric morphological parameters of the proximal femur in different hip fracture types, as well as an effect of sex. These differences should he considered in the selection of prostheses for fracture internal fixation and hip replacements. These data could help guide the design of individualized customized prostheses and improve the accurate reconstruction of the proximal femur for elderly Chinese hip fracture patients.展开更多
目的观察“糖果钢丝”环扎术对股骨距环扎固定联合阿仑膦酸钠对骨质疏松性股骨颈基底部骨折骨转换生化标志物(bone turnover markers,BTMs)及预后的影响。方法筛选2019年5月至2022年5月符合纳入标准的64例骨质疏松性股骨颈基底部骨折患...目的观察“糖果钢丝”环扎术对股骨距环扎固定联合阿仑膦酸钠对骨质疏松性股骨颈基底部骨折骨转换生化标志物(bone turnover markers,BTMs)及预后的影响。方法筛选2019年5月至2022年5月符合纳入标准的64例骨质疏松性股骨颈基底部骨折患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组32例。对照组予以股骨头置换术,术后连续服用碳酸钙D3片3个月;观察组在对照组的基础上予以股骨距“糖果钢丝”环扎固定术,术后连续服用阿仑膦酸钠片3个月。比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、手术切口长度、开始下地时间、住院时间,并分别比较治疗前和治疗3个月后2组患者假体周围骨密度(bone mineral density,BMD)、血清Ⅰ型原胶原N-端前肽(serum N-terminal peptide of type Ⅰ collagen,S-PINP)、血清Ⅰ型胶原C-末端肽交联(serum C-terminal telopeptide of type Ⅰ collagen,S-CTX);并随访12个月分析患者术后Harris髋关节功能评分、疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、改良Barthel指数(modified Barthel index,MBI)评分改善情况及术后并发症发生情况。结果2组患者手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度比较无显著差异(P>0.05),2组患者术后开始下地时间和住院时间比较观察组显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。2组骨转换生化标志物S-PINP和S-CTX均较术前升高,但观察组骨形成生化标志物S-PINP显著高于对照组,骨吸收生化标志物S-CTX显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组假体周围BMD均较治疗前升高,且观察组显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。随访12个月时Harris评分、BMI评分均较术前提高,且观察组显著高于对照组,VAS评分均较术前降低,且观察组显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后随访期间观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论“糖果钢丝”环扎技术联合阿仑膦酸钠可以有效改善骨质疏松性股骨颈骨折术后骨转换状态,促进骨重塑,提供更加稳定的股骨柄骨长入环境,对患者预后恢复疗效显著。展开更多
目的探讨老年不稳定股骨转子间骨折(unstable intertrochanteric fracture of the femur,UITFF)患者实施人工股骨头置换术与防旋型股骨近端髓内钉(proximal femoral antirotation intramedullary nail,PFNA)内固定术的疗效。方法回顾性...目的探讨老年不稳定股骨转子间骨折(unstable intertrochanteric fracture of the femur,UITFF)患者实施人工股骨头置换术与防旋型股骨近端髓内钉(proximal femoral antirotation intramedullary nail,PFNA)内固定术的疗效。方法回顾性分析2016年2月—2023年4月贵州医科大学附属乌当医院收治的52例老年UITFF患者,按手术方法的不同分为2组,各26例。对照组实施PFNA内固定术,观察组实施人工股骨头置换术,持续随访3个月。对比2组围手术期指标、Harris髋关节功能评分(Harris hip score,HHS)及并发症。结果观察组术后出血量为(175.74±19.62)mL,多于对照组的(110.06±20.68)mL;手术时间为(63.69±7.11)min,长于对照组的(58.56±5.60)min;术后卧床及住院时间分别为(8.33±1.22)d、(7.65±1.04)d,均短于对照组的(10.44±1.75)d、(10.78±1.46)d(P<0.05)。观察组治疗后HHS量表评分为(72.75±5.66)分,高于对照组的(61.45±4.78)分(P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率(7.69%)低于对照组(30.77%)(P<0.05)。结论人工股骨头置换术在老年UITFF的治疗中具有更好的应用效果,能够加快患者术后恢复速度,改善髋关节功能,且术后并发症发生风险较低。展开更多
文摘Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of artificial femoral head replacement and Proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 60 elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA and artificial femoral head replacement from 2015.06 to 2018.06, of which 34 were in the PFNA group (Group A) and 26 in the artificial femoral head replacement group (Group B). Statistical analysis of relevant surgical indicators such as surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood transfusion, postoperative time to landing, postoperative infection rate, hospital stay, number of secondary operations, postoperative VAS score, and postoperative Hip function score comparison. Results: All 60 patients were followed up for 1 - 24 months. Compared with the artificial femoral head replacement group, the operation time of PFNA group was shorter, the blood loss during operation was less, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). Conclusion: The hip joint function and pain scores of the artificial femoral head replacement group in the early and follow-up periods are better than those of the PFNA group. The artificial femoral head replacement is more suitable for the treatment of elderly unstable intertrochanteric fractures.
文摘BACKGROUND Proximal femoral nails(PFNs)are the most common method for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures(IFFs),but postoperative bed rest is required.There is a large amount of blood loss during the operation.Osteoporosis in elderly patients may cause nonunion of fractures and other complications.Arthroplasty can give patients early weight bearing and reduce financial burden,but whether it can replace PFNs remains controversial.AIM To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroplasty and PFNs in the treatment of unstable IFFs in elderly patients.METHODS A search was conducted in the PubMed,Embase,and Cochrane Library databases and included relevant articles comparing arthroplasty and PFN.The search time was limited from January 1,2005 to November 1,2020.Two investigators independently screened studies,extracted data and evaluated the quality according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.According to the research results,the fixed effect model or random effect model were selected for analysis.The following outcomes were analyzed:Harris Hip score,mortality,complications,operation time,blood loos,hospital stay,weight-bearing time,fracture classification and type of anesthesia.RESULTS We analyzed four randomized controlled trials that met the requirements.A total of 298 patients were included in these studies.According to the AO/OTA classification,there are 20 A1 types,136 A2 types,42 A3 types and 100 unrecorded types.Primary outcome:The Harris Hip Score at the final follow-up of the PFN group was higher[mean difference(MD):9.01,95%confidence interval(CI):16.57 to 1.45),P=0.02].There was no significant difference between the two groups in the rate of overall mortality[risk ratio(RR):1.44,P=0.44]or the number of complications(RR:0.77,P=0.05).Secondary outcomes:blood loss of the arthroplasty group was higher(MD:241.01,95%CI:43.06–438.96,P=0.02);the operation time of the PFN group was shorter(MD:23.12,95%CI:10.46–35.77,P=0.0003);and the length of hospital stay of the arthroplasty group was shorter[MD:0.97,95%CI:1.29 to 0.66),P<0.00001].There was no difference between the two groups in the type of anesthesia(RR:0.99).There were only two studies recording the weight-bearing time,and the time of full weight bearing in the arthroplasty group was significantly earlier.CONCLUSION Compared with PFN,arthroplasty can achieve weight bearing earlier and shorten hospital stay,but it cannot achieve a better clinical outcome.Arthroplasty cannot replace PFNs in the treatment of unstable IFFs in elderly individuals.
文摘Objective To compare the efficacy of 3 internal fixations,locking proximal femoral plate (LPFP),ASI-AN IMHS and InterTAN,for intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients.Methods A retrospective study was done to analyse
文摘Objective To discuss the postoperative curative effects of two surgical techniques of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (THA) using metal-on-metal largediameter and conventional diameter femoral head for the elderly patients
文摘For the treatment of an intertrochanteric fracture combined with femoral head necrosis in middle-age patients,it has been controversial whether to perform fracture reduction and fixation first then total hip replacement,or direct total hip replacement.We present a rare case of 53-year-old male patient suffered from bilateral intertrochanteric fracture caused by a road traffic injury.The patient had a history of femoral head necrosis for eight years,and the Harris score was 30.We performed total hip replacement with prolonged biologic shank prostheses for primary repair.One year after the surgery,nearly full range of motion was achieved without instability(active flexion angle of 110°,extension angle of 20°,adduction angle of 40°,abduction angle of 40°,internal rotation angle of 25°,and external rotation angle of 40°).The Harris score was 85.For the middle-aged patient with unstable intertrochanteric fractures and osteonecrosis of the femoral head,we can choose primary repair for concurrent bilateral intertrochanteric fracture and femoral head necrosis with prolonged shank biologic total hip replacement.
文摘Background： Few studies have investigated the differences in proximal femoral geometry and risk factors between patients with different types of hip fracture, especially in elderly Chinese. This study aimed to assess the differences in proximal femoral geometry parameters between patients with femoral neck fractures and patients with intertrochanteric fractures to provide guidance for individualized customized prosthesis and accurate reconstruction of proximal femurs in elderly Chinese patients. Methods： We retrospectively studied the electronic medical records of 198 elderly patients over 65 years of age who were admitted to the orthopedic department with hip fractures between January 2017 and December 2017 in The Third Hospital, Hebei Medical University. Age, fracture site, gender, and proximal femoral geometry parameters （.neck shaft angle [NSA], center edge angle [CEA], femoral head diameter [FHD], femoral neck diameter [FND], femoral neck axial length [FNAL], hip axial length [HAL], and femoral shaft diameter [FSD]） were recorded. Student＇s t-test was used to compare the continuous variables, Chi-square test was used to analyze categorical variables, and multiple logistic stepwise regression analysis was used to evaluate the influencing factors of hip fracture type. Results： Statistically significant differences in NSA （137.63 ± 4.56° vs. 132.07 ± 4.17°, t = 1.598, P 〈 0.001）, CEA （37.62 ± 6.77° vs. 43.11 ±7.09°, t = 5.597, P 〈 0.001 ）, FND （35.21 ± 3.25 mm vs. 34.09 ±3.82 mm, t = 2.233, P = 0.027）, and FNAL （99.30 ± 7.91 mm vs. 103.58± 8.39 ram, t = 3.715, P 〈 0.001 ） were found between the femoral neck fracture group and femoral intertrochanteric fracture group. FHD, FND, FSD, HAL, and FNAL were different between sexes （all P 〈 0.001 ）. The greater NSA was the risk factor for femoral neck fractures （,odds ratio [OR]： 0.70, P 〈 0.001 ）, greater CEA and longer FNAL were risk factors for femoral intertrochanteric fractures （OR： 1.15, 1.17, all P 〈 0.001）, and greater FND was a protective factor for femoral intertrochanteric fractures （OR： 0.74, P 〈 0.001）. Conclusions： We demonstrate differences in geometric morphological parameters of the proximal femur in different hip fracture types, as well as an effect of sex. These differences should he considered in the selection of prostheses for fracture internal fixation and hip replacements. These data could help guide the design of individualized customized prostheses and improve the accurate reconstruction of the proximal femur for elderly Chinese hip fracture patients.
文摘目的观察“糖果钢丝”环扎术对股骨距环扎固定联合阿仑膦酸钠对骨质疏松性股骨颈基底部骨折骨转换生化标志物(bone turnover markers,BTMs)及预后的影响。方法筛选2019年5月至2022年5月符合纳入标准的64例骨质疏松性股骨颈基底部骨折患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组32例。对照组予以股骨头置换术,术后连续服用碳酸钙D3片3个月;观察组在对照组的基础上予以股骨距“糖果钢丝”环扎固定术,术后连续服用阿仑膦酸钠片3个月。比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、手术切口长度、开始下地时间、住院时间,并分别比较治疗前和治疗3个月后2组患者假体周围骨密度(bone mineral density,BMD)、血清Ⅰ型原胶原N-端前肽(serum N-terminal peptide of type Ⅰ collagen,S-PINP)、血清Ⅰ型胶原C-末端肽交联(serum C-terminal telopeptide of type Ⅰ collagen,S-CTX);并随访12个月分析患者术后Harris髋关节功能评分、疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、改良Barthel指数(modified Barthel index,MBI)评分改善情况及术后并发症发生情况。结果2组患者手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度比较无显著差异(P>0.05),2组患者术后开始下地时间和住院时间比较观察组显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。2组骨转换生化标志物S-PINP和S-CTX均较术前升高,但观察组骨形成生化标志物S-PINP显著高于对照组,骨吸收生化标志物S-CTX显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组假体周围BMD均较治疗前升高,且观察组显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。随访12个月时Harris评分、BMI评分均较术前提高,且观察组显著高于对照组,VAS评分均较术前降低,且观察组显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后随访期间观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论“糖果钢丝”环扎技术联合阿仑膦酸钠可以有效改善骨质疏松性股骨颈骨折术后骨转换状态,促进骨重塑,提供更加稳定的股骨柄骨长入环境,对患者预后恢复疗效显著。
文摘目的探讨老年不稳定股骨转子间骨折(unstable intertrochanteric fracture of the femur,UITFF)患者实施人工股骨头置换术与防旋型股骨近端髓内钉(proximal femoral antirotation intramedullary nail,PFNA)内固定术的疗效。方法回顾性分析2016年2月—2023年4月贵州医科大学附属乌当医院收治的52例老年UITFF患者,按手术方法的不同分为2组,各26例。对照组实施PFNA内固定术,观察组实施人工股骨头置换术,持续随访3个月。对比2组围手术期指标、Harris髋关节功能评分(Harris hip score,HHS)及并发症。结果观察组术后出血量为(175.74±19.62)mL,多于对照组的(110.06±20.68)mL;手术时间为(63.69±7.11)min,长于对照组的(58.56±5.60)min;术后卧床及住院时间分别为(8.33±1.22)d、(7.65±1.04)d,均短于对照组的(10.44±1.75)d、(10.78±1.46)d(P<0.05)。观察组治疗后HHS量表评分为(72.75±5.66)分,高于对照组的(61.45±4.78)分(P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率(7.69%)低于对照组(30.77%)(P<0.05)。结论人工股骨头置换术在老年UITFF的治疗中具有更好的应用效果,能够加快患者术后恢复速度,改善髋关节功能,且术后并发症发生风险较低。
