Objective:To explore the main factors of renal function injury caused by the combination of elemene emulsion injection in the real world.Methods:Based on the hospital information system medical database constructed by...Objective:To explore the main factors of renal function injury caused by the combination of elemene emulsion injection in the real world.Methods:Based on the hospital information system medical database constructed by the Institute of Clinical Basic Medicine of Chinese Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine,taking the patient information of elemene emulsion injection used in 21 top three hospitals in China as the research object,the nested case control study method was used to compare the combined medication of patients with renal function injury group and control group,The main factors that may lead to renal function injury were screened by MCP variable selection method,and the above main factors were further analyzed by classical logistic regression and propensity score logistic regression method.Results:The analysis found that the combined use of potassium chloride within 7 d before the use of elemene emulsion injection or the combined use of furosemide during the use of elemene emulsion injection may be the main factor leading to renal function injury.Conclusion:The combination of elemene emulsion injection and the above main factors that may lead to renal injury should be avoided.If it must be used,clinical monitoring should be strengthened,and abnormal reactions should be treated immediately.The results of this study have certain clinical significance,and the clinical mechanism can be further studied and explored in the future.展开更多
Objective: To observe and compare the differences in the clinical effect and the incidences of adverse reactions oftranscatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE) combined with elemene injection and cinobufagin injecti...Objective: To observe and compare the differences in the clinical effect and the incidences of adverse reactions oftranscatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE) combined with elemene injection and cinobufagin injection respectively for middleand advanced primary hepatic carcinoma. Methods: A total of 104 cases of patients with middle and advanced primary hepaticcarcinoma who were treated in the oncology department from August 2018 to January 2020 were included as the study objects, andwere randomly divided into two groups according to different treatment regimens, 52 cases in each group. Both groups were treatedwith TACE once;the cinobufagin injection group was given intravenous infusion with 500 mL of 5% glucose injection and 10 mLof cinobufagin injection once a day. The elemene injection group was given intravenous infusion with elemene injection of 0.4 geach time and once a day. Both groups were treated for two courses, 15 days of continuous treatment with a rest of 15 days beingone course. The clinical effect, the changes in the indexes of liver function including alanine amino transferase(ALT), aspartatetransaminase(AST) and total bilirubin(TBil), the scores of alpha-fetoprotein(AFP) and Karnofsky (KPS) and tumor volumes aswell as the difference in the incidences of adverse reactions between the two groups were observed and compared. Results: Thetotal clinical effective rate was 88.46% in the elemene injection group and 71.15% in the cinobufagin injection group, and thedifference was significant(P<0.05). After treatment, the levels of ALT, AST and TBil in serum in the two groups were significantlydecreased when compared with those before treatment, differences being significant(P<0.05). There was no significant differencebeing found in the comparison of the levels of ALT, AST and TBil in serum between the two groups (P>0.05). After treatment, thedecrease of AFP, tumor volume and the increase of KPS scores in the elemene injection group were significantly more than thosein the cinobufagin injection group, differences being significant (P<0.01). During treatment, there was no significant differencebeing found in the comparison of the total incidences of adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05). The adverse reactionsin the cinobufagin injection group were mainly nausea and vomiting, with higher incidence than that in the elemene injection group,the difference being significant (P<0.05). The adverse reactions in the elemene injection group were mainly pain at the injectionsite, with higher incidence than that in the cinobufagin injection group, the difference being significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Thetherapy of elemene injection combined with TACE for middle and advanced primary hepatic carcinoma has better clinical effect thanthat of cinobufagin injection, but the occ.展开更多
Objective： To investigate the impact of beta-elemene injection on the growth and alpha-tubule of human hepatocarcinoma HepG2 cells. Methods： Cell proliferation was assessed by MTT assay. Cell cycle distribution was ...Objective： To investigate the impact of beta-elemene injection on the growth and alpha-tubule of human hepatocarcinoma HepG2 cells. Methods： Cell proliferation was assessed by MTT assay. Cell cycle distribution was detected by flow cytometry （FCM）. The mRNA expression of alpha-tubulin was measured by RT-PCR. Western blot analysis was used to determine protein expression of alpha-tubulin and the polymerization of tubulin. Results： Beta-elemene injection inhibited HepG2 cells proliferation in a dose- and time-dependent manner; FCM analysis indicated beta-elemene injection induced cell cycle arrested at S phase. RT-PCR and western- blot analysis showed that beta-elemene injection down-regulated alpha-tublin at both mRNA and protein levels, presenting a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, beta-elemene injection reduced the polymerization of microtubules in a dose-dependent manner. Conclusions： Beta-elemene injection can inhibit the proliferation of hepatoma HepG2 cells and induce cell apoptosis, the mechanism might be partly related to the down-regulation of alpha-tubulin and inhibition of microtubular polymerization.展开更多
[目的]探讨榄香烯注射液静脉点滴联合热疗治疗中度恶性胸腔积液的临床疗效。[方法]选取中度恶性胸腔积液患者80例,其中肺癌64例,乳腺癌8例,肝癌5例、卵巢癌2例、前列腺癌1例。随机分为观察组(40例),对照组(40例)。两组均予胸部高频热疗...[目的]探讨榄香烯注射液静脉点滴联合热疗治疗中度恶性胸腔积液的临床疗效。[方法]选取中度恶性胸腔积液患者80例,其中肺癌64例,乳腺癌8例,肝癌5例、卵巢癌2例、前列腺癌1例。随机分为观察组(40例),对照组(40例)。两组均予胸部高频热疗,隔日1次。观察组同期予静脉点滴榄香烯——0.4G榄香烯注射液加入0.9%氯化钠注射液250 m L中静脉点滴,每日1次,14 d为1个疗程。治疗1个疗程结束后1个月观察两组疗效、临床症状积分改善及功能状态改善情况。[结果]在客观疗效方面,观察组客观有效率(37.5%)优于对照组(17.5%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者在临床症状积分、生活质量方面,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在不良反应方面,观察组表现为发热1例、皮肤灼伤2例,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论]榄香烯注射液静脉点滴联合胸部高频热疗治疗中度恶性胸腔积液疗效较好,患者胸腔积液得到控制,临床症状积分降低,生活质量得到改善,无明显毒副作用,是保守治疗中度恶性胸腔积液较为理想的治疗方案。展开更多
基金Key project of Science and Technology Innovation Project of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences(NO.CI2021A00702)the National Key Research and Development Program(NO.2018YFC1707410)。
文摘Objective:To explore the main factors of renal function injury caused by the combination of elemene emulsion injection in the real world.Methods:Based on the hospital information system medical database constructed by the Institute of Clinical Basic Medicine of Chinese Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine,taking the patient information of elemene emulsion injection used in 21 top three hospitals in China as the research object,the nested case control study method was used to compare the combined medication of patients with renal function injury group and control group,The main factors that may lead to renal function injury were screened by MCP variable selection method,and the above main factors were further analyzed by classical logistic regression and propensity score logistic regression method.Results:The analysis found that the combined use of potassium chloride within 7 d before the use of elemene emulsion injection or the combined use of furosemide during the use of elemene emulsion injection may be the main factor leading to renal function injury.Conclusion:The combination of elemene emulsion injection and the above main factors that may lead to renal injury should be avoided.If it must be used,clinical monitoring should be strengthened,and abnormal reactions should be treated immediately.The results of this study have certain clinical significance,and the clinical mechanism can be further studied and explored in the future.
文摘Objective: To observe and compare the differences in the clinical effect and the incidences of adverse reactions oftranscatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE) combined with elemene injection and cinobufagin injection respectively for middleand advanced primary hepatic carcinoma. Methods: A total of 104 cases of patients with middle and advanced primary hepaticcarcinoma who were treated in the oncology department from August 2018 to January 2020 were included as the study objects, andwere randomly divided into two groups according to different treatment regimens, 52 cases in each group. Both groups were treatedwith TACE once;the cinobufagin injection group was given intravenous infusion with 500 mL of 5% glucose injection and 10 mLof cinobufagin injection once a day. The elemene injection group was given intravenous infusion with elemene injection of 0.4 geach time and once a day. Both groups were treated for two courses, 15 days of continuous treatment with a rest of 15 days beingone course. The clinical effect, the changes in the indexes of liver function including alanine amino transferase(ALT), aspartatetransaminase(AST) and total bilirubin(TBil), the scores of alpha-fetoprotein(AFP) and Karnofsky (KPS) and tumor volumes aswell as the difference in the incidences of adverse reactions between the two groups were observed and compared. Results: Thetotal clinical effective rate was 88.46% in the elemene injection group and 71.15% in the cinobufagin injection group, and thedifference was significant(P<0.05). After treatment, the levels of ALT, AST and TBil in serum in the two groups were significantlydecreased when compared with those before treatment, differences being significant(P<0.05). There was no significant differencebeing found in the comparison of the levels of ALT, AST and TBil in serum between the two groups (P>0.05). After treatment, thedecrease of AFP, tumor volume and the increase of KPS scores in the elemene injection group were significantly more than thosein the cinobufagin injection group, differences being significant (P<0.01). During treatment, there was no significant differencebeing found in the comparison of the total incidences of adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05). The adverse reactionsin the cinobufagin injection group were mainly nausea and vomiting, with higher incidence than that in the elemene injection group,the difference being significant (P<0.05). The adverse reactions in the elemene injection group were mainly pain at the injectionsite, with higher incidence than that in the cinobufagin injection group, the difference being significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Thetherapy of elemene injection combined with TACE for middle and advanced primary hepatic carcinoma has better clinical effect thanthat of cinobufagin injection, but the occ.
基金The General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China:Research Fund for the mechanism of Arenobufagin space isomer inhibits lymphatic metastasis of mouse hepatocarcinomaThe Project Sponsored by the Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars,State Education MinistrySpecialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education(NO.20102105120002)
文摘Objective： To investigate the impact of beta-elemene injection on the growth and alpha-tubule of human hepatocarcinoma HepG2 cells. Methods： Cell proliferation was assessed by MTT assay. Cell cycle distribution was detected by flow cytometry （FCM）. The mRNA expression of alpha-tubulin was measured by RT-PCR. Western blot analysis was used to determine protein expression of alpha-tubulin and the polymerization of tubulin. Results： Beta-elemene injection inhibited HepG2 cells proliferation in a dose- and time-dependent manner; FCM analysis indicated beta-elemene injection induced cell cycle arrested at S phase. RT-PCR and western- blot analysis showed that beta-elemene injection down-regulated alpha-tublin at both mRNA and protein levels, presenting a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, beta-elemene injection reduced the polymerization of microtubules in a dose-dependent manner. Conclusions： Beta-elemene injection can inhibit the proliferation of hepatoma HepG2 cells and induce cell apoptosis, the mechanism might be partly related to the down-regulation of alpha-tubulin and inhibition of microtubular polymerization.
文摘目的:采用Meta分析方法对榄香烯注射液联合经导管肝动脉化学栓塞术(TACE)治疗原发性肝癌的疗效与安全性进行系统评价。方法:检索Pubmed、EMbase、Cochrane Library、中国知网CNKI全文数据库、维普数据库、万方数据库和中国生物医学文献数据库,查找自建库至2016年1月公开发表的研究榄香烯注射液联合TACE治疗原发性肝癌的临床随机对照试验。按照纳入与排除标准选择文献,质量评估,资料提取,采用Rev Man 5.2软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入6篇中文RCT文献,均为高质量研究。Meta分析结果显示,榄香烯注射液联合TACE组治疗原发性肝癌的近期有效率[OR=2.68,95%CI(1.63,4.40),P<0.000 1]、近期缓解率[OR=2.52,95%CI(1.25,5.08),P=0.010]高于单纯TACE组;而胃肠道反应[OR=1.16,95%CI(0.55,2.46),P=0.69]、骨髓抑制[OR=0.66,95%CI(0.32,1.36),P=0.26]在两组中无明显统计学差异。结论:榄香烯注射液可以提高TACE对原发性肝癌的疗效,且安全性较好。
文摘[目的]探讨榄香烯注射液静脉点滴联合热疗治疗中度恶性胸腔积液的临床疗效。[方法]选取中度恶性胸腔积液患者80例,其中肺癌64例,乳腺癌8例,肝癌5例、卵巢癌2例、前列腺癌1例。随机分为观察组(40例),对照组(40例)。两组均予胸部高频热疗,隔日1次。观察组同期予静脉点滴榄香烯——0.4G榄香烯注射液加入0.9%氯化钠注射液250 m L中静脉点滴,每日1次,14 d为1个疗程。治疗1个疗程结束后1个月观察两组疗效、临床症状积分改善及功能状态改善情况。[结果]在客观疗效方面,观察组客观有效率(37.5%)优于对照组(17.5%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者在临床症状积分、生活质量方面,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在不良反应方面,观察组表现为发热1例、皮肤灼伤2例,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论]榄香烯注射液静脉点滴联合胸部高频热疗治疗中度恶性胸腔积液疗效较好,患者胸腔积液得到控制,临床症状积分降低,生活质量得到改善,无明显毒副作用,是保守治疗中度恶性胸腔积液较为理想的治疗方案。
