Objective To study therapeutic efficacy of Aredia in treating malignant metastatic bone tumors. Method 60～90 mg Aredia was administrated iv in 31 cases with malignant metastatic tumors,once each week. Results Pain in...Objective To study therapeutic efficacy of Aredia in treating malignant metastatic bone tumors. Method 60～90 mg Aredia was administrated iv in 31 cases with malignant metastatic tumors,once each week. Results Pain in 12 cases was significantly relieved.14 cases acquired relif.Total effective rate was 83.9%.Activity ability was improved by 80.6%.No apparent toxicological and adverse effects as well as fever and cold symptoms were observed.Conclusion Aredia is a kind of ideal drugs for treatment of pain caused by malignant metastatic bone tumors.It is convenient in use and could be endured by patients.展开更多
Objective To investigate therapeutic effect of rapidly divided radiotherapy in the management of pain due to bone metastases in mammary cancer. Method 20 patients among 33 received rapidly divided radiotherapy in 25 l...Objective To investigate therapeutic effect of rapidly divided radiotherapy in the management of pain due to bone metastases in mammary cancer. Method 20 patients among 33 received rapidly divided radiotherapy in 25 lesions, DTU 5CTY a time, 2～3 times a week, total dose was 15～30 Gy. 13 patients (22 lesions ) received routine dividing radiotherapy, DT 4～5 Gy each time, 5 times a week, total dose was 40～60 Gy. Result In rapidly divided group, total analgesic rate was 95.0% (19/20). In routine dividing group, total analgesic rate was 69.3%. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P >0.05). Pain was controlled in 84% of lesions in rapidly divided group 2 week after radiotherapy. Analgesic rate of DT 20～30 Gy went up to 45.5%. Differences between 2 groups were significant statistically (P< 0.01).Conclusion Rapidly divided radiotherapy is rapid and reliable in managing pain. Patients can endure its toxicological and adverse reactions . It’s therapeutic effect is comparable with that of routine divided radiotherapy.展开更多
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid for the pain caused by metastatic tumor of bone.Methods:52 patients with metastatic tumor of bone were randomly divided into two groups.The zoledronic a...Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid for the pain caused by metastatic tumor of bone.Methods:52 patients with metastatic tumor of bone were randomly divided into two groups.The zoledronic acid group received 4 mg zoledronic acid infusion for 30 minutes and the control group received 90 mg pamidronate infusion for 6 hours. Results:The effective rates in zoledronic acid group and control group were 73.08%and 69.23%respectively.No significant difference was observed between the two groups.The median pain relief onset at days 5 and 7,respectively,and no significant difference was observed.The ECOG scores on the 7th day after medication:the differences in the zoledronic acid group before and after medication and between the two groups were both significant(P<0.001 and P=0.0448).The adverse reac- tion was no significant difference between the two groups.Conclusion:Zoledronic acid is efficient and safe in the treatment of pain caused by metastatic tumor of bone and it has low adverse reaction rate and convenient shorter using time.展开更多
目的观察唑来膦酸联合放疗与单纯药物治疗恶性肿瘤骨转移癌性疼痛的疗效及不良反应。方法40例骨转移瘤患者随机分为A、B两组(各20例)。A组静滴唑来膦酸4 m g;B组静滴唑来膦酸4 m g后局部放疗。结果两组止痛效果比较:A组显效2例,有效12例...目的观察唑来膦酸联合放疗与单纯药物治疗恶性肿瘤骨转移癌性疼痛的疗效及不良反应。方法40例骨转移瘤患者随机分为A、B两组(各20例)。A组静滴唑来膦酸4 m g;B组静滴唑来膦酸4 m g后局部放疗。结果两组止痛效果比较:A组显效2例,有效12例,无效6例;B组分别为12、7、1例;两组比较,P<0.05。止痛起效时间:A组为(7.2±2.0)d;B组为(3.0±1.2)d;两组比较,P<0.05。两组均无严重不良反应。结论唑来膦酸联合放疗对恶性肿瘤骨转移所致的癌性疼痛具有良好的止痛效果。展开更多
文摘Objective To study therapeutic efficacy of Aredia in treating malignant metastatic bone tumors. Method 60～90 mg Aredia was administrated iv in 31 cases with malignant metastatic tumors,once each week. Results Pain in 12 cases was significantly relieved.14 cases acquired relif.Total effective rate was 83.9%.Activity ability was improved by 80.6%.No apparent toxicological and adverse effects as well as fever and cold symptoms were observed.Conclusion Aredia is a kind of ideal drugs for treatment of pain caused by malignant metastatic bone tumors.It is convenient in use and could be endured by patients.
文摘Objective To investigate therapeutic effect of rapidly divided radiotherapy in the management of pain due to bone metastases in mammary cancer. Method 20 patients among 33 received rapidly divided radiotherapy in 25 lesions, DTU 5CTY a time, 2～3 times a week, total dose was 15～30 Gy. 13 patients (22 lesions ) received routine dividing radiotherapy, DT 4～5 Gy each time, 5 times a week, total dose was 40～60 Gy. Result In rapidly divided group, total analgesic rate was 95.0% (19/20). In routine dividing group, total analgesic rate was 69.3%. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P >0.05). Pain was controlled in 84% of lesions in rapidly divided group 2 week after radiotherapy. Analgesic rate of DT 20～30 Gy went up to 45.5%. Differences between 2 groups were significant statistically (P< 0.01).Conclusion Rapidly divided radiotherapy is rapid and reliable in managing pain. Patients can endure its toxicological and adverse reactions . It’s therapeutic effect is comparable with that of routine divided radiotherapy.
文摘Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid for the pain caused by metastatic tumor of bone.Methods:52 patients with metastatic tumor of bone were randomly divided into two groups.The zoledronic acid group received 4 mg zoledronic acid infusion for 30 minutes and the control group received 90 mg pamidronate infusion for 6 hours. Results:The effective rates in zoledronic acid group and control group were 73.08%and 69.23%respectively.No significant difference was observed between the two groups.The median pain relief onset at days 5 and 7,respectively,and no significant difference was observed.The ECOG scores on the 7th day after medication:the differences in the zoledronic acid group before and after medication and between the two groups were both significant(P<0.001 and P=0.0448).The adverse reac- tion was no significant difference between the two groups.Conclusion:Zoledronic acid is efficient and safe in the treatment of pain caused by metastatic tumor of bone and it has low adverse reaction rate and convenient shorter using time.
文摘目的观察唑来膦酸联合放疗与单纯药物治疗恶性肿瘤骨转移癌性疼痛的疗效及不良反应。方法40例骨转移瘤患者随机分为A、B两组(各20例)。A组静滴唑来膦酸4 m g;B组静滴唑来膦酸4 m g后局部放疗。结果两组止痛效果比较:A组显效2例,有效12例,无效6例;B组分别为12、7、1例;两组比较,P<0.05。止痛起效时间:A组为(7.2±2.0)d;B组为(3.0±1.2)d;两组比较,P<0.05。两组均无严重不良反应。结论唑来膦酸联合放疗对恶性肿瘤骨转移所致的癌性疼痛具有良好的止痛效果。
